A pooled analysis of combined liver and inferior vena cava resection for hepatic malignancy

Full-Circumference Prosthetic Grafts for Replacing a Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Segment During Hepatectomy for Tumor

BACKGROUND

Although hepatectomy including inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is becoming more common, some details remain uncertain such as use of artificial materials to replace a tumor-involved, damaged, or narrowed retrohepatic IVC segment.

METHODS

Surgical outcomes of 12 patients who underwent hepatectomy with IVC resection including reconstruction using synthetic tubular grafts were investigated to clarify safety and feasibility.

RESULTS

Operative time (median, 573 min; range, 268 to 774) and the blood loss (1076 mL; 155 to 2960) were acceptable. In-hospital mortality was 8% (1/12), and morbidity was 42% (5/12). Among the 12 patients, 2 were planned to undergo IVC reconstruction without an artificial graft. In one patient, prosthetic repair was adopted because of massive bleeding from the IVC wall during dissection of tumor from the IVC. In the other, severe stricture became evident during attempted direct closure of the partially resected IVC wall.

DISCUSSION

Ongoing experience has increased our acceptance of combined liver and IVC resection. We believe that segmental IVC resection and reconstruction with a prosthetic tubular graft could be chosen more frequently in managing liver tumors suspected to involve the IVC.

Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases Involving the Inferior Vena Cava: A Systematic Review

Combined hepatic and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving the IVC. Most of the existing data come from case reports or small case series. In this paper, a systematic review based on the PICO strategy was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Papers from January 1980 to December 2022 were searched in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Articles considered for inclusion had to present data on simultaneous liver and IVC resection for CRLM and report surgical and/or oncological outcomes. From a total of 1175 articles retrieved, 29, including a total of 188 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58.3 ± 10.8 years. The most frequent techniques used were right hepatectomy ± caudate lobe for hepatic resections (37.8%), lateral clamping (44.8%) for vascular control, and primary closure (56.8%) for IVC repair. The thirty-day mortality reached 4.6%. Tumour relapse was reported in 65.8% of the cases. The median overall survival (OS) was 34 months (with a confidence interval of 30-40 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 71.4%, 19.8%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the absence of prospective randomized studies, which are difficult to perform, IVC resection seems to be safe and feasible.

Major Hepatectomy En Bloc with Cava Vein Resection for Locally Invasive Caudate Lobe Hepatocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

Locally advanced liver tumours with vascular invasion have been considered for a long period of time as unresectable lesions, so the patient was further deferred to oncology services for palliation. However, improvement of the surgical techniques and the results reported so far came to demonstrate that extended hepatic and vascular resections might be safely performed in such cases and might significantly improve the long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 61-year-old patient was diagnosed with a caudate lobe tumour invading the inferior cava vein and the right hepatic pedicle.

RESULTS

The patient was successfully submitted to surgery, and an extended right hepatectomy en bloc with cava vein resection was performed; the continuity of the cava vein was re-established by the placement of a synthetic graft. The postoperative outcome was uneventful.

CONCLUSIONS

Although initially considered as a formal contraindication for resection, vascular invasion of the greater vessels should not preclude surgery if complete resection is achievable.

Oncological relevance of major hepatectomy with inferior vena cava resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-terms outcomes of patients undergoing major hepatectomy (MH) with inferior vena cava (IVC) resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Data from all patients who underwent MH for ICC with or without IVC resection between 2010 and 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Postoperative outcomes, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in the whole population. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and an inverse probability weighting analysis (IPW) were performed to assess the influence of IVC resection on short- and long-terms outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients who underwent MH, 20 had IVC resection (IVC patients). Overall, the mortality and severe complication rate were 8% and 20%, respectively. IVC patients required more extended hepatectomies (p = 0.001) and had increased rates of transfusions (p = 0.001), however they did not experience increased postoperative morbidity, even after PSM. The 1-, 3- and 5-years OS and DFS were 78%, 45%, and 32% and 48%, 20%, and 16%, respectively. IVC was not associated with decreased OS (p = 0.52) and/or RFS (p = 0.85), even after IPW.

CONCLUSION

MH with IVC resection for ICC seems to provide acceptable short- and long-term results in a selected population of patients.

Vascular Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Considerations

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) accounts for approximately 10% of all primary liver cancers. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, even in cases of macrovascular invasion. Since resection offers the only curative chance, even extended liver resection combined with complex vascular or biliary reconstruction of the surrounding organs seems justified to achieve complete tumour removal. In selected cases, the major vascular resection is the only change to try getting the cure. The best results are achieved by the referral centre with a wide experience in complex liver surgery, such as ALPPS procedure, IVC resection, and ante-situ and ex-situ resections. However, despite aggressive surgery, tumour recurrence occurs frequently and long-term oncological results are very poor. This suggests that significant progress in prognosis cannot be expected by surgery alone. Instead, multimodal treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and subsequent adjuvant treatment for iCCA seem to be necessary to improve results.

Vascular Involvements in Cholangiocarcinoma: Tips and Tricks

Simple Summary

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common liver primary malignancy and its gold-standard treatment is surgery. Unfortunately, CCA is seldom amenable to curative resection due to late-stage diagnosis and frequent major vascular invasion. Major vascular invasion has historically been considered a contraindication to resection, but lately aggressive surgeries for CCA with vascular involvement have been shown to improve outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and up to date summary of the strategies for CCA resection, focusing on the surgical techniques and results of complex procedures with tumour vascular involvements. The current review shows that satisfactory results can be achieved in patients with CCA and tumoral vascular invasion by aggressive surgical resection and challenging vascular reconstruction, ensuring a meticulous evaluation of patients in a multidisciplinary setting by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy of the biliary tract. To date, surgical treatment remains the only hope for definitive cure of CCA patients. Involvement of major vascular structures was traditionally considered a contraindication for resection. Nowadays, selected cases of CCA with vascular involvement can be successfully approached. Intrahepatic CCA often involves the major hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava and might necessitate complete vascular exclusion, in situ hypothermic perfusion, ex situ surgery and reconstruction with autologous, heterologous or synthetic grafts. Hilar CCA more frequently involves the portal vein and hepatic artery. Resection and reconstruction of the portal vein is now considered a relatively safe and beneficial technique, and it is accepted as a standard option either with direct anastomosis or jump grafts. However, hepatic artery resection remains controversial; despite accumulating positive reports, the procedure remains technically challenging with increased rates of morbidity. When arterial reconstruction is not possible, arterio-portal shunting may offer salvage, while sometimes an efficient collateral system could bypass the need for arterial reconstructions. Keys to achieve success are represented by accurate selection of patients in high-volume referral centres, adequate technical skills and eclectic knowledge of the various possibilities for vascular reconstruction.

Current trends in vena cava reconstructive techniques with major liver resection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Historically, invasion of the inferior vena cava (IVC) represented advanced and often unresectable hepatic disease. With surgical and anesthetic innovations, IVC resection and reconstruction have become feasible in selected patients. This review assesses technical variations in reconstructive techniques and post-operative management.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed according to PRISMA. Inclusion criteria were (i) peer-reviewed articles in English; (ii) at least three cases; (iii) hepatic IVC resection and reconstruction (January 2015-March 2020). Primary outcomes were reconstructive technique, anti-thrombotic regimen, post-operative IVC patency, and infection. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications and malignant disease survival.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were included allowing for investigation of 351 individual patients. Analysis demonstrated significant heterogeneity in surgical reconstructive technique, anti-thrombotic management, and post-operative monitoring of patency. There was increased utilization of ex vivo approaches and decreased use of venovenous bypass compared with previously published reviews.

CONCLUSION

This review of literature published between 2015 and 2020 reveals persistent heterogeneity of hepatic IVC reconstructive techniques and peri-operative management. Increased utilization of ex vivo approaches and decreased use of venovenous bypass point towards improved operative techniques, peri-operative management, and anesthesia. In order to gain evidence for consensus on management, a registry would be beneficial.

Outcomes of vascular resection associated with curative intent hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to investigate the impact of vascular resection (VR) on postoperative outcomes and survival of patients undergoing hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional series of 270 patients with resected ICC was carried out. Patients were divided into three groups: portal vein VR (PVR), inferior vena cava VR (CVR) and no VR (NVR). Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to define the impact of VR on postoperative outcomes and survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (11.5%) underwent VR: 15 (5.6%) to PVR and 16 (5.9%) to CVR. R0 resection rates were 73.6% in NVR, 73.3% of PVR and 68.8% in CVR. The postoperative mortality rate was increased in VR groups: 2.5% in NVR, 6.7% in PVR and 12.5% in CVR. The 5-years overall survival (OS) rates progressively decreased from 38.4% in NVR, to 30.1% in CVR and to 22.2% in PVR, p = 0.030. However, multivariable analysis did not confirm an association between VR and prognosis. The following prognostic factors were identified: size ≥50 mm, patterns of distribution of hepatic nodules (single, satellites or multifocal), lymph-node metastases (N1) and R1 resections. In the VR group the 5-years OS rate in patients without lymph-node metastases undergoing R0 resection (VRR0N0) was 44.4%, while in N1 patients undergoing R1 resection was 20% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vascular resection (PVR and CVR) is associated with higher operative risk, but seems to be justified by the good survival results, especially in patients without other negative prognostic factors (R0N0 resections).

Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the short and long-term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies.

METHODS

From a prospective database, a case-matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320-525] vs 360 [270-440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400-800] vs 400 [100-600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6-14] vs 7 [5-9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54-6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35-13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91-29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52-79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease-free survival (P = .28) were observed.

CONCLUSION

MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long-term outcomes.

Case series of extended liver resection associated with inferior vena cava reconstruction using peritoneal patch

INTRODUCTION

Among various reported techniques for inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction, the superiority of one technique over another has not been clearly established. This study aimed at reporting the technical aspects of caval reconstruction using peritoneal patch during extended liver resections.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent extended liver resection associated with anterolateral caval reconstruction using a peritoneal patch from 2016 to 2019 were included in this study. Technical insights, intra-operative details, short and long-term results were reported.

RESULTS

Overall six patients underwent caval reconstruction using peritoneal patch under total vascular exclusion. Half of them required veno-venous bypass. Caval involvement ranged from 30 to 50% of the circumference and from 5 to 7 cm of the length of the IVC. Caval reconstructions was performed using a peritoneal patch harvested from the falciform ligament in four cases and from the right pre-renal peritoneum and right part of the diaphragm in one Case each. Three cases underwent associated reimplantation the remnant hepatic vein. Median intra-operative blood loss and TVE duration were 500 ml and 41 min, respectively. One case experienced a severe complication (liver failure leading to death). R₀ resection was achieved in all patients. All patients had patent IVC and remnant hepatic vein at last follow-up and none was on long-term therapeutic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Caval reconstruction using a peritoneal patch in patients undergoing extended liver resection is feasible and cost-effective and associated with excellent long-term results.

Combined Liver and Inferior Vena Cava Resection for Malignancies Is Safe and Feasible in a Group of High-Risk Patients

Background and Methods: Tumors infiltrating the inferior caval vein (ICV) have been considered irresectable in the past due to high perioperative risks. Consequently, the only treatment option for these patients was best supportive care, which resulted in reduced survival. Advancements in surgical techniques have since evolved, such that combined resections of the ICV and the hepatic malignancy are being performed. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the long-term outcomes (e.g., survival) and short-term risks of this procedure. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study (n = 24), we evaluated surgical and oncological outcome for patients undergoing hepatic surgery for oncological indications in combination with resections of the ICV. In addition, we investigated which factors are associated with survival. Results: First, we showed that perioperative mortality is as low as 4.1%. Second, we showed that perioperative co-morbidities are acceptable for this type of advanced hepatobiliary surgery. Third, the reconstruction of the ICV by means of a patch was superior in terms of survival compared to other types of reconstructions. This finding was independent of the type or the aggressiveness of tumor or the resections status. Discussion: In our cohort, many patients had undergone (multiple) preceding visceral surgical interventions or underwent multi-visceral surgery. Despite the medical complexity, survival was encouraging in this cohort, offering novel treatment modalities with a low risk of severe morbidities.