Impact of body mass index in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alcoholic liver disease

Clinical evidence of outcomes following liver transplantation in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a dramatically growing indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide and the posttransplant outcomes of NASH patients are currently under intensive investigation. This quantitative meta-analysis aimed to update the clinical evidence on outcomes of transplanted patients with NASH.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies (published up to September 15, 2021) that focused on LT outcomes for NASH versus non-NASH patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses based on crucial baseline clinical characteristics and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the pooled results. Meta-regression was used to evaluate study-level demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics to identify potential confounders affecting patient survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-two non-randomized comparative studies with 1,538 NASH and 6,014 non-NASH patients were included. 1- (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.14), 3- (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 1.00-1.22), and 5- (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.84-1.31) year patient survival was equivalent between NASH and non-NASH recipients. NASH patients were associated with similar cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.89-2.09) and retransplantation rates (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53), lower graft failure-related mortality (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.29-0.74), but higher sepsis-related mortality (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.06). Meta-regression revealed that a higher proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were associated with significantly superior overall patient survival at 1 (P = 0.044), 3 (P = 0.035) and 5 (P = 0.049) years after LT in NASH compared with non-NASH.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no difference in posttransplant survival between NASH and non-NASH patients. Carefully selected patients with NASH-related HCC may benefit from LT. NASH recipients should be managed with caution posttransplant, especially regarding the potentially high risk of sepsis-related death.

Similarities and Differences Between Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Other Causes of Cirrhosis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease includes a spectrum of liver disorders that range from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and smoking status increase risk of progression to cirrhosis among patients with NASH. Cirrhosis derived from non-NASH causes may share similar features with patients with NASH but embody distinct pathogenetic mechanisms, genetic associations, prognosis, and outcomes. This article discusses in detail the comparison of clinical, genetic, and outcome characteristics between patients with NASH cirrhosis as opposed to alternative causes of chronic liver disease.