Scintigraphic liver function and transient elastography in the assessment of patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Navigating Complex Challenges: Preoperative Assessment and Surgical Strategies for Liver Resection in Patients with Fibrosis or Cirrhosis

This review explores the intricacies of evaluating cirrhotic patients for liver resection while exploring how to extend surgical intervention to those typically excluded by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria guidelines by focusing on the need for robust preoperative assessment and innovative surgical strategies. Cirrhosis presents unique challenges and complicates liver resection due to the altered physiology of the liver, portal hypertension, and liver decompensation. The primary objective of this review is to discuss the current approaches in assessing the suitability of cirrhotic patients for liver resection and aims to identify which patients outside of the BCLC criteria can safely undergo liver resection by highlighting emerging strategies that can improve surgical safety and outcomes.

Feasibility of liver stiffness measured using two-dimensional shear wave elastography in assessing preoperative liver function for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of liver stiffness (LS) measured using two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D SWE) in assessing preoperative liver function for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 143 patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC between August 2018 and December 2019 were enrolled prospectively. LS measurement, liver function tests including serum biochemical indicators, and indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test were performed preoperatively. Child-Pugh (CP) score, Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score were calculated. ICG retention rate at 15 min (ICG R15) and ICG elimination rate constant (ICG K) were determined automatically. Fibrosis stage was determined based on pathological findings. The association between LS and serum biochemical indicators, liver function scores, and the ICG results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Weak to moderate correlations were identified between LS and biochemical indicators of liver function (all p < 0.01). Weak correlation was identified between LS and CP score, and between LS and ALBI score (all p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was identified between LS and ICG R15 (Pearson r = 0.62, p < 0.001), and between LS and ICG K value (Pearson r =  - 0.49, p < 0.001). The best cutoff of LS to discriminate a normal ICG R15 was 10.6 kPa, with area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity of 0.874, 0.900 and 0.724, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LS determined using 2D SWE could be a potential tool for the preoperative evaluation of liver function in patients with HCC.

Comparison of nuclear imaging techniques and volumetric imaging for the prediction of postoperative mortality and liver failure in patients undergoing localized liver-directed treatments: a systematic review

Background/aims

Although volumetric imaging by computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for preoperative assessment of the future liver remnant, nuclear imaging studies have shown promising data. This systematic review summarized the results from trials investigating volumetric and nuclear medicine imaging for the prediction of postoperative mortality and liver failure (LF).

Methods

MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for papers investigating nuclear imaging methods for the prediction of postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing local, liver-directed treatments. Only papers investigating both preoperative nuclear imaging and CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MR) for the prediction of postoperative mortality and/or LF were included.

Results

Twenty-five trials were qualified for this review. All trials but two used technetium-based tracers for the nuclear imaging examination. Four papers used MR imaging and the remaining used CT for the volumetric evaluation. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous both in terms of methodology and imaging technique. Of the thirteen studies reporting on postoperative mortality, most were descriptive without detailed diagnostic data. A few with detailed data found that nuclear imaging had better predictive value than volumetric imaging. Nineteen studies investigated the prediction of postoperative LF of which seven papers investigated the predictive value of both modalities in multivariable regression analysis. Two papers found that only nuclear imaging parameters were predictive of LF, one paper found that the CT parameter was predictive, and four papers found that combined nuclear and CT/MR imaging parameters were predictive of LF.

Conclusion

Both methodologies were useful in the preoperative assessment of patients scheduled for liver interventions, especially in combination, but nuclear imaging demonstrated better predictive value for postoperative mortality and LF in a few trials. The overall technical and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies complicates the ability to directly compare the clinical utility of the two imaging techniques.

Nuclear imaging methods for the prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing localized, liver-directed treatments: a systematic review

Background

Several nuclear imaging methods may predict postoperative liver function and outcome, but none has achieved recommendations in clinical guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the existing knowledge on this topic.

Methods

MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating nuclear medicine imaging methods for the prediction of postoperative liver function in patients undergoing localized, liver-directed treatments. The postoperative endpoints were clinical outcome (morbidity and mortality) as well as measures of postoperative liver function, e.g., liver function assessed by biochemical tests or nuclear imaging.

Results

A total of 1352 references were identified, of which 82 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Most studies (n = 63) were retrospective studies. The vast majority of studies assessed [^99mTc]Tc-galactosyl serum albumin (GSA) (n = 57) and [^99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin (n = 19). Liver resection was entirely or partly major (involved at least three segments) in 78 reports. There were notable variations in the research methodology, e.g., image acquisition, imaging variables, and endpoints. Thirty-seven studies reported on postoperative mortality, of which most reported descriptive data at the patient level. Of the four reports that performed multivariate analyses, two showed significant predictive results of isotope-based preoperative tests. Fifty-two papers presented data on postoperative liver failure. Multivariate predictive analyses were performed in eighteen trials, of which fifteen showed the significant value of nuclear medicine tests.

Conclusion

There is sparse evidence supporting the significant value of nuclear medicine imaging methods in predicting postoperative mortality. In contrast, a notable number of trials showed a significant prediction of liver failure in multivariate analyses. The research methodology was heterogeneous and exploratory in most trials. Documentation of nuclear medicine tests in this setting awaits the results of properly designed, prospective trials with the standardization of both the nuclear medicine test and endpoints.