Isolated pulmonary recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer: the effect of patient factors and treatment modalities on survival

Pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer have different clinico-radiological features compared with those from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary metastasectomy is a commonly-performed procedure, data are lacking on the feasibility and oncological efficacy of removal of pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer. In this study, we retrospectively compared features of pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer versus colorectal cancer (CRC, patients with CRC being common candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy) and outcomes of removing such metastases, with our aim being to identify specific features of the former.

METHODS

Data on removal of 182 pulmonary metastases (29 from pancreatic and 153 from CRC) performed from January 2013 to April 2024 were included in this analysis. Radio-pathological findings were compared between these groups. The study cohort comprised 139 pulmonary metastasectomies in 119 patients (24 with pancreatic cancer and 95 with CRC) in whom R0 resection was achieved and follow-up data were available.

RESULTS

Atypical radiological findings of pulmonary metastases, including polygonal-shape (P < 0.001), spiculae (P < 0.001), air bronchogram (P = 0.012), peripheral ground-glass opacities (P < 0.001), and pleural tags (P < 0.001) were present more frequently in metastases from pancreatic cancer than from CRC. Furthermore, pleural lavage cytology was more frequently positive in pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer than in those from CRC (P < 0.001). Disease-free survival was significantly shorter after the removal of metastases from pancreatic than from CRC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Some pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer have atypical radiological features. Surgical interventions for these may enable diagnosis. The prognosis is significantly poorer after removing metastases from pancreatic cancer than from CRC. The therapeutic significance of our findings requires further investigation.

Quantification of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden in biologically distinct advanced pancreatic cancers responding to pembrolizumab: case reports

Background

The advent of checkpoint therapy is one of the most important recent advancements in cancer therapy. Though checkpoint therapy is a mainstay in some cancers, it has been largely ineffective in treating cancers of the pancreas. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are seldom responsive to checkpoint inhibition.

Case presentations

Here we present two cases of advanced pancreatic cancers that either failed to respond or recurred following conventional treatments. Tissue from each tumor was sequenced and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. Each patient was started on checkpoint blockade after assessing for a predictive biomarker, either the combined positive score or the tumor mutational burden. In each case, checkpoint blockade led to durable radiographic responses.

Conclusions

We therefore propose that it is reasonable to assess combined positive score and tumor mutational burden in refractory or recurrent pancreatic cancers when initiation of ICB is being considered.

Meta-analysis of survival after pulmonary resection for isolated metachronous pancreatic cancer metastasis: a promising, albeit infrequent, approach

BACKGROUND

To evaluate survival outcomes of pulmonary resection for isolated metachronous pancreatic cancer metastasis.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic data sources and reference lists were conducted. Proportion meta-analysis model was constructed to quantify 1- to 5-year survival after pulmonary resection for isolated metachronous pancreatic cancer metastasis. Random-effects modelling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data.

RESULTS

Twenty-four retrospective studies were included reporting a total of 168 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for isolated pancreatic cancer metastasis. The nature of the index pancreatic surgery included 65% pancreaticoduodenectomies, 17.5% distal pancreatectomies, 0.5% total pancreatectomy, and 17% unspecified. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 88% of the patients. The median disease-free interval was 35 (8-96) months. The type of pulmonary resection included 54% wedge resections, 26% lobectomies, 4% segmentectomies, 1% pneumonectomies, and 15% unspecified. Pulmonary resection was associated with 1-year survival of 91.1% (95% CI 86.6%-95.5%), 2-year survival of 77.5% (95% CI 68.9%-86.0%), 3-year survival of 65.0% (95% CI 50.7%-79.3%), 4-year survival of 52.0% (95% CI 37.2%-66.9%), and 5-year survival of 37.0% (95% CI 25.0%-49.1%).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary resection for isolated pancreatic cancer metastasis is associated with acceptable overall patient survival. We recommend selective pulmonary resection for isolated pulmonary metastasis from pancreatic cancer. Our findings may encourage conduction of better-quality studies in this context to help establishment of definitive treatment strategies.

Meta-analysis of pancreatic re-resection for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer following index pancreatectomy

The role of surgical resection in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of pancreatic re-resection for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer following index pancreatectomy. A literature search was carried out in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Proportion meta-analysis model was constructed to quantify 1 to 5-year survival after pancreatic re-resection for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer. Random-effects modelling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Fifteen retrospective studies were included, reporting a total of 250 patients who underwent pancreatic re-resection for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer following their index pancreatectomy. Pancreatic re-resection was associated with 1-year survival 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0-76.2), 2-year survival 38.8% (95% CI, 28.6-49.0), 3-year survival 20.2% (95% CI, 13.8-26.7), and 5-year survival 9.2% (95% CI, 5.5-12.8). The between-study heterogeneity was insignificant in all outcome syntheses. Repeat pancreatectomy for local recurrence of pancreatic cancer in the remnant pancreas following the index pancreatectomy is associated with acceptable overall patient survival. We recommend selective re-resection of such recurrences in younger patients with favorable tumor size and location. Our findings may encourage more robust studies to be conducted in this context to provide stronger evidence.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the primary tumor and oligometastases versus the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Local therapies may benefit patients with oligometastatic cancer. However, there were limited data about pancreatic cancer. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor and all oligometastases with SBRT to the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with synchronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (up to 5 lesions) receiving SBRT to all lesions (including all oligometastases and the primary tumor) were performed. Another comparable group of patients with similar baseline characteristics, including metastatic burden, SBRT doses, and chemotherapy regimens, receiving SBRT to the primary tumor alone were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression frees survival (PFS), polyprogression free survival (PPFS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 59 and 158 patients receiving SBRT to all lesions and to the primary tumor alone. The median OS of patients with SBRT to all lesions and the primary tumor alone was 10.9 months (95% CI 10.2-11.6 months) and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.8-9.8 months) (P < 0.001). The median PFS of two groups was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-7.4 months) and 4.1 months (95% CI 3.8-4.4 months) (P < 0.001). The median PPFS of two groups was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.9-10.7 months) and 7.8 months (95% CI 7.2-8.4 months) (P < 0.001). Additionally, 14 (23.7%) and 32 (20.2%) patients in two groups had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT to all oligometastases and the primary tumor in patients with pancreatic cancer may improve survival, which needs prospective verification.

Organ-specific variations in tumor marker dynamics in postoperative pancreatic cancer recurrence: Trends in lung and liver recurrence highlighting biological heterogeneity

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Although tumor recurrence after surgical resection in pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally considered incurable, it is well-accepted that clinical presentations and outcomes vary according to the recurrent sites (e.g., liver vs. lung recurrence), suggesting a possible biological inhomogeneity of PC recurrence. Understanding the behavior of biological factors, specifically tumor markers (TMs), at different recurrence sites may contribute to individualized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the dynamics of pre-recurrence TMs at liver and lung recurrence sites.

METHODS

Patients with isolated postoperative liver or lung recurrence as their first recurrence were enrolled. Starting from the recurrence date confirmed by imaging examinations, the values of TMs (carbohydrate antigen 19-9: CA19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were retrospectively evaluated 6 and 3 months before recurrence and at the time of recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with liver recurrence displayed a significant increase in CA19-9 and CEA levels from as early as 6 months before recurrence. Contrastingly, patients with lung recurrence demonstrated a significant elevation of CA19-9 levels starting from 3 months before recurrence, with no increase in CEA levels, even at the time of recurrence. The relative change in CA19-9 and CEA levels during each period were significantly lower in patients with lung recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TMs exhibited organ-specific variations in patients with postoperative PC recurrence. This disparity may reflect the biological heterogeneity of PC between recurrence patterns, thereby highlighting the importance of conducting postoperative follow-up with consideration of this fact.

Surgery for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Biologic Resectability

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is most often metastatic at diagnosis. As systemic therapy continues to improve alongside advanced surgical techniques, the focus has shifted toward defining biologic, rather than technical, resectability. Several centers have reported metastasectomy for oligometastatic PDAC, yet the indications and potential benefits remain unclear. In this review, we attempt to define oligometastatic disease in PDAC and to explore the rationale for metastasectomy. We evaluate the existing evidence for metastasectomy in liver, peritoneum, and lung individually, assessing the safety and oncologic outcomes for each. Furthermore, we explore contemporary biomarkers of biological resectability in oligometastatic PDAC, including radiographic findings, biochemical markers (such as CA 19-9 and CEA), inflammatory markers (including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and scoring indices), and liquid biopsy techniques. With careful consideration of existing data, we explore the concept of biologic resectability in guiding patient selection for metastasectomy in PDAC.

Anatomical and Biological Considerations to Determine Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains associated with poor outcomes with a 5-year survival of 12% across all stages of the disease. These poor outcomes are driven by a delay in diagnosis and an early propensity for systemic dissemination of the disease. Recently, aggressive surgical approaches involving complex vascular resections and reconstructions have become more common, thus allowing more locally advanced tumors to be resected. Unfortunately, however, even after the completion of surgery and systemic therapy, approximately 40% of patients experience early recurrence of disease. To determine resectability, many institutions utilize anatomical staging systems based on the presence and extent of vascular involvement of major abdominal vessels around the pancreas. However, these classification systems are based on anatomical considerations only and do not factor in the burden of systemic disease. By integrating the biological criteria, we possibly could avoid futile resections often associated with significant morbidity. Especially patients with anatomically resectable disease who have a heavy burden of radiologically undetected systemic disease most likely do not derive a survival benefit from resection. On the contrary, we could offer complex resections to those who have locally advanced or oligometastatic disease but have favorable systemic biology and are most likely to benefit from resection. This review summarizes the current literature on defining anatomical and biological resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Isolated pulmonary metastases in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of current evidence

Despite recent advances in cancer therapeutics, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal disease with a 5-year overall survival of only 10%. Since either at or within a few months of diagnosis, most patients with PDAC will present with metastatic disease, a more individualized approach to select patients who may benefit from more aggressive therapy has been suggested. Although studies have reported improved survival in PDAC and isolated pulmonary metastasis (ISP) compared to extrapulmonary metastases, such findings remain controversial. Furthermore, the added benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy and other lung-directed therapies remains unclear. In this review, we discuss the metastatic pattern of PDAC, evaluate the available evidence in the literature for improved survival in PDAC and ISP, evaluate the evidence for the added benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy and other lung-directed therapies, identify prognostic factors for survival, discuss the biological basis for the reported improved survival and identify areas for further research.

Outcomes of lung oligometastasis in pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer with lung oligometastasis may have favourable overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of pancreatic cancer with lung oligometastases including both synchronous and metachronous metastases.

METHODS

Consecutive pancreatic cancer patients with lung metastasis treated at our institution between February 2015 and December 2021 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared and analysed according to the extent of lung metastases. Predictors for overall survival were analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A totoal of 171 patients were included (oligometastasis/polymetastasis/multi-organ metastasis: 34/50/87). Patients with oligometastases were more likely to undergo surgical resection (41% vs. 0% vs. 2%) and showed a longer median overall survival (41.3 vs. 17.6 vs. 13.1 months) compared with those with other types of metastases. Oligometastasis (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.76; P = 0.004) was identified as an independent factor predicting favourable overall survival in patients with lung-only metastasis. Disease status (synchronous vs. metachronous) was not associated with survival in patients with oligometastasis (29.4 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.527) and polymetastasis (17.9 vs. 16.7 months, P = 0.545). Selected patients who underwent surgical resection showed a median overall survival of 52.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung oligometastases presented a favourable prognosis. Surgical resection in selected patients was associated with a long median overall survival.

Predicting post-recurrence survival for patients with pancreatic cancer recurrence after primary resection: A Bi-institutional validated risk classification

BACKGROUND

Over 80% of patients will develop disease recurrence after radical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to develop and validate a clinical risk score predicting post-recurrence survival (PRS) at time of recurrence.

METHODS

All patients who had recurrence after undergoing pancreatectomy for PDAC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital or at the Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht during the study period were included. Cox proportional hazard model was used to develop the risk model. Performance of the final model was assessed in a test set after internal validation.

RESULTS

Of 718 resected PDAC patients, 72% had recurrence after a median follow-up of 32 months. The median overall survival was 21 months and the median PRS was 9 months. Prognostic factors associated with shorter PRS were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.00-1.04), multiple-site recurrence (HR 1.57; 95%CI 1.08-2.28), and symptoms at time of recurrence (HR 2.33; 95%CI 1.59-3.41). Recurrence-free survival longer than 12 months (HR 0.55; 95%CI 0.36-0.83), FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.45; 95%CI 0.25-0.81; HR 0.58; 95%CI 0.26-0.93, respectively) were associated with a longer PRS. The resulting risk score had a good predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.73).

CONCLUSION

This study developed a clinical risk score based on an international cohort that predicts PRS in patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC. This risk score will become available on www.evidencio.com and can help clinicians with patient counseling on prognosis.

Pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with survival after lung-only recurrence in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

After surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 14% of patients have lung-only recurrence. We hypothesize that in patients with isolated lung metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pulmonary metastasectomy offers a survival benefit with minimal additional morbidity after resection.

METHODS

This was a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent definitive resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and later developed isolated lung metastases between 2009 and 2021. Patients were included if they carried a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, underwent pancreatic resection with curative intent, and subsequently developed lung metastases. Patients were excluded if they developed multiple sites of recurrence.

RESULTS

We identified 39 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and isolated lung metastases, 14 of whom underwent pulmonary metastasectomy. During the study period, 31 (79%) patients died. Across all patients, there was an overall survival of 45.9 months, a disease-free interval of 22.8 months, and survival after recurrence of 22.5 months. Survival after recurrence was significantly longer in patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy than those who did not (30.8 months vs 18.6 months, P < .01). There was no difference in overall survival between groups. However, patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy were significantly more likely to be alive 3 years after their diagnosis (100.0% vs 64%, P = .02) and 2 years after recurrence (79% vs 32%, P < .01) than those in who did not undergo pulmonary metastasectomy. No mortalities occurred related to pulmonary metastasectomy, and procedure-related morbidity was 7%.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for isolated pulmonary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma metastases had significantly longer survival after recurrence and clinically meaningful survival benefit with minimal additional morbidity after pulmonary resection.

Risk factors and survival prediction of pancreatic cancer with lung metastases: A population-based study

Background

The risk and prognosis of pancreatic cancer with lung metastasis (PCLM) are not well-defined. Thus, this study aimed to identify the risk and prognostic factors for these patients, and establish predictive nomogram models.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PCLM between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Independent risk factors and prognostic factors were identified using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. Nomograms were constructed to predict the risk and survival of PCLM, and the area under the curve (AUC), C-index, and calibration curve were used to determine the predictive accuracy and discriminability of the established nomogram, while the decision curve analysis was used to confirm the clinical effectiveness.

Results

A total of 11287 cases with complete information were included; 601 (5.3%) patients with PC had lung metastases. Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that primary site, histological subtype, and brain, bone, and liver metastases were independent risk factors for lung metastases. We constructed a risk prediction nomogram model for the development of lung metastases among PC patients. The c-index of the established diagnostic nomogram was 0.786 (95%CI 0.726-0.846). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that primary site, liver metastases, surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), while bone metastases were independent prognostic factors for CSS. The C-indices for the OS and CSS prediction nomograms were 0.76 (95% CI 0.74-0.78) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.74-0.78), respectively. Based on the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we concluded that the risk and prognosis model of PCBM exhibits excellent performance.

Conclusions

The present study identified the risk and prognostic factors of PCLM and further established nomograms, which can help clinicians effectively identify high-risk patients and predict their clinical outcomes.

Feasibility of local therapy for recurrent pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in perioperative management, recurrence after curative pancreatectomy is a critical issue in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The significance of local therapy for recurrent PDAC remains unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients with PDAC who underwent curative resection at our institution between January 2009 and December 2019. We examined the patterns of relapse and assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with recurrence who underwent local therapy, including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients with PDAC who underwent R0 or R1 resection were included in this study. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 39.8%, and the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was 51.2% for the entire population. Recurrence was observed in 172/246 (69.9%) patients, including multiple site recurrences in 50, liver metastasis in 41, locoregional recurrence in 34, and peritoneal dissemination in 27. Of the 172 patients, treatment was administered in 137 (79.7%), and 16 received local therapy, including surgical resection (n = 13), radiotherapy (n = 5), and RFA (n = 1). PS-matched analysis revealed that patients with recurrence who were treated with chemotherapy combined with local therapy showed better post-recurrence survival rates than those treated with chemotherapy alone (P = 0.016). Detailed clinical courses of these patients are presented in the main manuscript.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a multimodal approach may improve the clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent PDAC.

Surgical management of pancreatic cancer liver oligometastases

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer, which commonly metastasizes to the liver. The current standard of care for metastatic PDAC is systemic chemotherapy, however there are limited emerging data regarding surgical resection of pancreatic oligometastases in select patients. Here we review the literature addressing resection of PDAC liver oligometastases.

Prediction of Recurrence Pattern of Pancreatic Cancer Post-Pancreatic Surgery Using Histology-Based Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) have poor prognosis and a high incidence of recurrence. Since further treatment is applicable for specific recurrent events, it is important to predict recurrence patterns after surgery. This study aimed to identify and predict early and late recurrence patterns of PC using a histology-based machine learning model.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative surgery for PC between 2001 and 2014 were included. The timing of recurrence and prognosis of each first recurrence site were examined. A histology-based supervised machine learning method, which combined convolutional neural networks and random forest, was used to predict the recurrence and respective sites of metastasis. Accuracy was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In total, 524 patients were included. Recurrence in the liver accounted for 47.8% of all recurrence events in the first year after surgery. Meanwhile, recurrence in the lung occurred later and could become apparent more than 5 years post-surgery, with indications for further surgery. In terms of substantial distant organ metastases, liver and lung metastases were identified as representative early and late recurrence events. The predictive AUCs of the machine learning model for training and test data were 1.000 and 0.861, respectively, and for predicting nonrecurrence were 1.000 for both.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the liver and lung as early and late recurrence sites, which could be distinguished with high probability using a machine learning model. Prediction of recurrence sites using this model may be useful for further treatment of patients with PC.

Proclivity to Explore Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer Is Not Associated with Surgeon Volume

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is limited high-level evidence to guide locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) management. Recent work shows that surgeons' preferences in LAPC management vary broadly. We sought to examine whether surgeon volume was associated with attitudes regarding LAPC management.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed by email to an international cohort of pancreas surgeons to evaluate practice patterns regarding LAPC management. Clinical vignette-based questions evaluated surgeons' attitudes regarding patient eligibility and the proclivity to offer exploration. Surgeons were classified into "low-" or "high-volume" categories according to thresholds of self-reported annual pancreatectomy volume. Surgeon's attitudes regarding LAPC management and inclination to consider exploration were compared across annual volume categories.

RESULTS

A total of 153 eligible responses were received from 4 continents, for an estimated response rate of 10.6%. Median duration of practice was 12 years (IQR 6-20). Most respondents reported >25 cases/year (89, 58.2%), of which 34 (22.2%) reported >50. Compared to surgeons with <25 cases/year, surgeons with >25 cases/year practiced longer (median 15 vs. 7.5 years, P<0.001) and were more likely to "always" recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (83.2% vs. 56.3%, P=0.001). Surgeons performing >50 cases/year were more likely to offer arterial resection (70.6% vs. 43.7%, P=0.006). The willingness to offer (or defer) exploration did not differ across any categories of surgeons' annual case volume.

CONCLUSIONS

In an international survey of pancreas surgeons, the proclivity to consider exploration for LAPC was not associated with multiple categories of surgeon volume. Better evidence is needed to define the optimal management approach to LAPC.

Lorlatinib Induces Durable Disease Stabilization in a Pancreatic Cancer Patient with a ROS1 p.L1950F Mutation: Case Report

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer has improved only modestly in recent years. This is partly due to the lack of development in precision oncology including immune oncology in this entity. Rearrangements of the proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase ROS1 gene represent driver alterations found especially in lung cancer. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with activity against ROS1 including lorlatinib substantially improved the outcome of this patient population. Anecdotal evidence reports treatment of pancreatic cancer harboring ROS1 fusions with ROS1 TKI, but data concerning treatment of patients with ROS1 point mutations are lacking.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case describes a pancreatic cancer patient harboring a ROS1 point mutation that occurred without an underlying ROS1 rearrangement and thus not in the resistance situation. The heavily pretreated patient showed a strong decrease of the tumor biomarkers (CA19-9 and CEA) and radiologically a durable stable disease to the targeted treatment with lorlatinib, thereby achieving a progression-free survival of 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Our data are the first to show a clinical benefit from targeted treatment with ROS1 TKI in a cancer patient with a thus far undescribed ROS1 point mutation without a concomitant ROS1 rearrangement. Furthermore, they indicate that ROS1 could be an oncogenic driver in pancreatic cancer. This subgroup could be eligible for targeted treatments, which may contribute to the urgently needed improvement in patient outcome.

Ovarian Metastasis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a high propensity for systemic dissemination. Ovarian metastases are rare and poorly described.

METHODS

We identified PDAC cases with ovarian metastasis from a prospectively maintained registry. We reported on the association between outcomes and clinicopathologic factors. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with PDAC and synchronous or metachronous ovarian metastases were identified. Nine patients (75%) underwent pancreatectomy for localized PDAC and developed metachronous ovarian recurrence. The median OS for all patients was 25.4 (IQR:15.4-82.9) months. For the nine patients with metachronous ovarian metastasis, the median RFS and OS were 14.2 (IQR:7.2-58.3) and 44.6 (IQR:18.6-82.9) months, respectively. Nodal disease, poor grade, vascular invasion in the pancreatic primary, and bilateral ovarian disease tended to confer worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with resected PDAC and ovarian recurrence tend to have a comparable disease course to more common patterns of recurrence. Primaries with nodal disease, poorer grade, vascular invasion, and bilateral ovarian disease were indicative of more aggressive disease biology. The ideal management remains largely unknown, and future collaborative efforts should optimize therapeutic strategies.

Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a dismal prognosis. In selected patients with limited metastatic disease, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. This systematic review sought to examine current evidence on the value of additional locoregional treatment, including resection, ablation and embolization, in patients with hepatic or pulmonary mPDAC. The results, although liable to substantial bias, demonstrated superior survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment in a subset of patients after radical-intent local primary and metastatic treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). However, as a consequence of the bias, definitive conclusions regarding the seemingly beneficial effect of locoregional treatment cannot be endorsed. Randomized controlled trials with strictly selected oligometastatic PDAC patients are required to deduce final recommendations on this notion.

Abstract

The prognosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remains universally poor, requiring new and innovative treatment approaches. In a subset of oligometastatic PDAC patients, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. The aim of this systematic review was to explore and evaluate the current evidence on locoregional treatments for mPDAC. A systematic literature search was conducted on locoregional techniques, including resection, ablation and embolization, for mPDAC with a focus on hepatic and pulmonary metastases. A total of 59 studies were identified, including 63,453 patients. Although subject to significant bias, radical-intent local therapy for both the primary and metastatic sites was associated with a superior median overall survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to control groups receiving chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). To recruit patients that may benefit from these local treatments, selection appears essential. Most significant is the upfront possibility of local radical pancreatic and metastatic treatment. In addition, a patient’s response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, performance status, metastatic disease load and, to a lesser degree, histological differentiation grade and tumor marker CA19-9 serum levels, are powerful prognostic factors that help identify eligible subjects. Although the exact additive value of locoregional treatments for mPDAC patients cannot be distillated from the results, locoregional primary pancreatic and metastatic treatment seems beneficial for a highly selected group of oligometastatic PDAC patients. For definite recommendations, well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials with strict in- and exclusion criteria are needed to validate these results.

CT features of lung metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Correlation with histopathologic findings

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of an atypical, alveolar presentation of pulmonary metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on computed tomography (CT) and to correlate CT features with those obtained at histopathologic analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 76 patients with lung metastases from PDAC over a 10-year period (2009-2019) in a French university hospital were retrospectively included. There were 34 men and 42 women with a mean age of 67.6±11.3 (SD) years (range: 38-89 years). CT features of PDAC were classified according to their presentations as usual metastatic pattern or atypical alveolar pattern; the atypical alveolar pattern corresponding to either ground glass nodules or opacities, solid nodules with a halo sign, "air-space" nodules with air bronchogram, or parenchymal consolidation. Imaging-histopathologic correlation was performed when tissue samples were available.

RESULTS

Pulmonary metastases were synchronous in 36 patients (36/76; 47%) and metachronous in 40 patients (40/76; 53%). A predominant alveolar presentation on CT was observed in 17 patients (17/76, 22%). Nodules with halo sign were the predominant alveolar pattern in 7 patients (7/17; 41%), air-space nodules were predominant in 4 patients (4/17; 24%) whereas pure ground glass nodules and consolidations were observed as predominant features in 3 patients (3/17; 18%) each. For 5 patients who had histopathological confirmation, alveolar metastases of PDAC were characterized by columnar tumor cells lining the alveolar wall, which was not seen in other radiological presentations, whereas there were no differences regarding mucin secretion between pulmonary metastases with alveolar presentation and those with typical pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung metastases from PDAC may present with a so-called "alveolar" pattern on CT. This misleading CT features is found in 22% of patients with lung metastases from PDAC and is due to lepidic growth of the metastatic cells.

[Surgery for isolated local recurrence and metachronous oligometastasis in pancreatic cancer]

BACKGROUND

Most patients with pancreatic cancer suffer a relapse, which occurs either locally or systemically in the sense of liver and the lung metastases. Surgery for pancreatic cancer has become more radical due to the increased use of multimodal treatment concepts; however, the role of surgery in cases of recurrence remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes the surgical treatment options for isolated local recurrence and metachronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out and the current evidence for surgical treatment is summarized.

RESULTS

There are currently no randomized studies on surgery for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Currently available data, however, show that after surgery long-term survival of up to 32-47 months after metastasectomy can be achieved, especially in patients with local recurrence or isolated pulmonary metastases with low morbidity and mortality. Individualized treatment concepts including surgical resection after initial systemic therapy seem promising even for liver metastases. The greatest survival benefits are consistently shown for all localizations in patients with a long as possible disease-free interval after the first operation.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of isolated local recurrence or metachronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer is an interdisciplinary challenge that should be performed in specialized pancreatic treatment centers only. Surgical resection embedded in a multimodal treatment concept can be meaningful in selected cases.

Surgery for synchronous and metachronous single-organ metastasis of pancreatic cancer: a SEER database analysis and systematic literature review

Surgery for metastatic pancreatic cancer remains controversial as the survival benefit is questionable. The aim of the present study was to analyze the survival of these patients using data extracted from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program database. Further, studies on resection for metastatic disease to the lung were systematically reviewed. A total of 11,541 cases with synchronous distant metastasis were analyzed. The median survival of single-organ metastasis was better than of multi-organ metastasis (single-organ 4.0 ± 0.07 months, two-organs 3.0 ± 0.13 months, three/four-organs 2.0 ± 0.19 months; p < 0.0001). Single organ lung metastasis had longer median survival times compared to the other sites (lung 6.0 ± 0.32 months, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97; p = 0.013). Resection of the primary tumor was associated with longer survival in synchronous single-organ metastasis to the lung compared to no resection (14.0 ± 1.93 months vs 6.0 ± 0.31 months, p < 0.0001). A systematic literature review identified 79 cases of metachronous lung metastasis with a survival of 120.0 ± 6.32 months and 83.0 ± 24.84 months following resection of the primary tumor and metastasis, respectively. Lower TNM staging, longer interval to metastasis, and single metastatic lesion correlated with better survival. Resection in highly selected pancreatic cancer patients with synchronous and metachronous lung only metastasis might confer a survival benefit and should be considered on an individual basis.

Surgery for Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Effective?

Despite improvements to surgical procedures and novel combinations of drugs for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the recurrence rate after radical surgery is still high. Little is known about the role of surgery in the treatment of isolated recurrences of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to review the current literature dealing with surgery for recurrent pancreatic cancer in order to examine its feasibility and effectiveness. An extensive literature review was conducted according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and 14 articles dealing with re-resections for recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed, focusing on the characteristics of the primary neoplasm and its recurrence, the surgical procedures used, and patient outcomes. Data were retrieved on a total of 301 patients. The interval between surgery for primary pancreatic cancer and the detection of a recurrence ranged from 2 to 120 months. The recurrence was local or regional in 230 patients, and distant in 71. The median overall survival was 68.9 months (range 3–152) after resection of the primary tumor, and 26.0 months (range 0–112) after surgery for recurrent disease. The disease-free interval after the resection of recurrences was 14.2 months (range 4–29). Although data analysis was performed on a heterogeneous and limited number of patients, some of these may benefit from surgery for isolated recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to identify these cases.