Postoperative nutritional benefits of proximal parenchymal pancreatectomy for low-grade malignant lesions in the pancreatic head

Recent trends in organ-preserving pancreatectomy: Its problems and clinical advantages compared with other standard pancreatectomies

In this review article, we focus on recent papers on organ-preserving pancreatectomy procedures published since 2010. When comparing central pancreatectomy (CP) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), most studies have concluded that the CP group exhibited significantly lower incidence of new-onset diabetes or diabetes exacerbation than the DP group postoperatively. However, because of increased incidence of morbidities such as pancreatic fistula, the surgeon faces a considerable trade-off between increased short-term morbidity and long-term preservation of endocrine function. When the outcomes of two types of spleen-preserving DP (Kimura and Warshaw procedures) are compared, most studies mentioned the low incidence of postoperative gastric varices and splenic infarction with the Kimura procedure. Although there are several reports regarding the effect of spleen preservation on prevention of postoperative infections, no report on the contribution of spleen preservation to the prevention of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection is seen. The advantages of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) concerning endocrine and exocrine functions continue to be subjects of discussion, mainly due to the limited number of institutions that have adopted this approach; however, DPPHR should be presented as an option for patients due to its low incidence of postoperative cholangitis. Organ-preserving pancreatectomy requires meticulous surgical techniques, and postoperative complications may increase with this surgery compared with standard pancreatectomy, which may be influenced by the surgeon's skill and the surgical facility where the procedure is performed. Nonetheless, this technique has significant long-term advantages in terms of endocrine and exocrine functions and its wider adoption in the future is expected.

Significant positive impact of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection on the prevention of postoperative nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and acute cholangitis

Aim

This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), postoperative cholangitis, and fibrosis-4 (FIB)-4 index in patients who underwent duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for low-grade malignant tumors and verify the usefulness of DPPHR in preventing the occurrence of these disorders.

Methods

This retrospective study included 70 patients who underwent PD (n = 39) and DPPHR (n = 31) between 2006 and 2018 for benign or low-grade malignant tumors. The present study compared the preoperative background, cumulative incidence of postoperative NAFLD and cholangitis, and other biochemical markers, including the FIB-4 index. Subanalysis by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to minimize treatment selection bias.

Results

In terms of the cumulative incidence of NAFLD, the 5-y incidence was significantly lower in the DPPHR group than in the PD group both before (10% vs 38%, P = .002) and after (13% vs 38%, P = .008) matching. Multivariate analyses identified DPPHR as the only independent preventive factor for postoperative NAFLD (hazard ratio: 0.160, 95% confidence intervals: 0.034-0.76, P = .021). The 5-y cumulative incidence of postoperative cholangitis was significantly higher in the PD group than in the DPPHR group before (51% vs 3%, P < .001) and after (49% vs 4%, P < .001) matching. The FIB-4 index at 12 mo postoperatively was significantly better in the DPPHR group than in the PD group (1.45 vs 2.35, P = .006) before matching.

Conclusion

Preservation of the duodenum and bile duct may contribute to preventing long-term postoperative NAFLD and cholangitis, and liver fibrosis for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic head tumors.

Clinical Impact of Organ-Preserving Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Organ-preserving surgery (OPS) has been accepted for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, particularly for the management of small tumors. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcome following this treatment at our institute, focusing on the perioperative factors and postoperative locoregional recurrence.

METHODS

We analyzed 71 consecutive patients with no synchronous liver metastasis. These patients were classified into 1 of 2 groups: the standard operation group (SOG, 41 patients) with prophylactic regional lymph node dissection and the organ-preserving surgery group (OPG, 30 patients). We performed OPS based on size criteria (tumor size <1.5 cm in nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and <2 cm in insulinoma with no evident bulky lymph node swelling on preoperative imaging).

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods were 37 months. The OPG included enucleation, partial resection, proximal parenchymal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, and Warshaw operation. The SOG included pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, showing no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of operation time, hospitalization duration, and postoperative complications. Ten patients showed lymph node metastasis (25%) only in the SOG. There were no locoregional recurrent cases in the OPG.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, OPS may be effective based on the appropriate tumor size criteria.

Outcomes of limited resection for patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

/ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to clarify the oncological outcomes of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) who underwent limited resection (LR).

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the data of 110 patients with IPMN. Patients with IPMN without a history of pancreatitis who had neither tumor infiltration nor regional lymph node swelling on imaging findings underwent LR. We assessed the oncological outcomes of LR for patients with IPMN by comparing the surgical outcomes of LR and standard resection.

RESULTS

LR was performed in 50 patients (45.5%), including duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (n = 31), middle-pancreatectomy (n = 12), spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (n = 3), total parenchymal pancreatectomy (n = 3), and partial resection (n = 1). In the LR group, 18 patients had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa. After histopathological examination, the presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and invasive carcinoma (IC) were observed in nine and three patients, respectively, in the LR group, and eight and 22 patients, respectively, in the standard resection group. There was a significant difference in the histopathological diagnosis of IC between the two groups (p < 0.001). Finally, in the LR group, postoperative recurrences occurred in three patients, and the 5-, 10-, and 15-year disease-specific survival rates were all 97.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with IPMN judged to have no infiltrating lesions based on the detailed imaging examination, LR is acceptable and may be considered as an alternative to standard resection.