1
|
Tangsirapat V, Kengsakul M, Udomkarnjananun S, Sookpotarom P, Rattanasakalwong M, Nuchanatanon J, Kongon P, Wongta K. Surgical margin status outcome of intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy in liver malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2024; 24:181. [PMID: 38867212 PMCID: PMC11167816 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02469-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatectomy stands as a curative management for liver cancer. The critical factor for minimizing recurrence rate and enhancing overall survival of liver malignancy is to attain a negative margin hepatic resection. Recently, Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been proven implemental in aiding laparoscopic liver resection, enabling real-time tumor identification and precise liver segmentation. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain whether ICG-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy yields a higher incidence of complete tumor eradication (R0) resections. METHODS The search encompassed databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Ovid in April 2024, in strict adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies involving patients with malignant liver lesions who underwent ICG-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy and reported R0 resection outcomes were eligible for inclusion in this review. RESULTS In a total of seven studies, involving 598 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The ICG demonstrated a significantly elevated R0 resection rate compared to the non-ICG group [98.6% (359/364) vs. 93.1% (339/364), odds ratio (OR) = 3.76, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.45-9.51, P = 0.005]. Notably, no heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 0%, P = 0.5). However, the subtype analysis focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma [98.2% (165/168) vs. 93.6% (161/172), OR = 3.34, 95% CI 0.94-11.91, P = 0.06) and the evaluation of margin distance (4.96 ± 2.41 vs. 2.79 ± 1.92 millimeters, weighted mean difference = 1.26, 95% CI -1.8-4.32, P = 0.42) revealed no apparent differences. Additionally, the incidence of overall postoperative complications was comparable between both groups, 27.6% (66/239) in the ICG group and 25.4% (75/295) in the non-ICG group (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.53-1.76, P = 0.9). No disparities were identified in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion, and length of hospital stay after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of ICG-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy can be undertaken with confidence, as it does not compromise either intraoperative or postoperative events. Furthermore, the ICG-guided approach is beneficial to achieving a complete eradication of the tumor during hepatic resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42023446440.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vorapatu Tangsirapat
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand
| | - Malika Kengsakul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand
| | - Suwasin Udomkarnjananun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Paiboon Sookpotarom
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand
| | - Mati Rattanasakalwong
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand
| | - Jantaluck Nuchanatanon
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand
| | - Panutchaya Kongon
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand
| | - Kitti Wongta
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand.
- Department of Surgery, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, 222 Tiwanon Road, Pak Kret, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dugan MM, Sucandy I, Ross SB, Crespo K, Syblis C, Alogaidi M, Rosemurgy A. Analysis of survival outcomes following robotic hepatectomy for malignant liver diseases. Am J Surg 2024; 228:252-257. [PMID: 37880028 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increased adoption of the robotic platform for complex hepatobiliary resections for malignant disease, little is known about long-term survival outcomes. This is the first study to evaluate the postoperative outcomes, and short- and long-term survival rates after a robotic hepatectomy for five major malignant disease processes. METHODS A prospectively collected database of patients who underwent a robotic hepatectomy for malignant disease was reviewed. Pathologies included colorectal liver metastases (CLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Klatskin tumor, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), and gallbladder cancer (GC). Data are presented as median (mean ± standard deviation) for illustrative purposes. RESULTS Of the 210 consecutive patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy for malignant disease, 75 (35 %) had CLM, 69 (33 %) had HCC, 27 (13 %) had Klatskin tumor, 20 (10 %) had IHCC, and 19 (9 %) had GC. Patients were 66 (65 ± 12.4) years old with a BMI of 29 (29 ± 6.5) kg/m2. R0 resection was achieved in 91 %, and 65 % underwent a major hepatectomy. Postoperative major complication rate was 6 %, length of stay was four (5 ± 4.3) days, and 30-day readmission rate was 17 %. Survival at 1, 3, and 5-years were 93 %/75 %/72 % for CLM, 84 %/71 %/64 % for HCC, 73 %/55 %/55 % for Klatskin tumor, 80 %/69 %/69 % for IHCC, 79 %/65 %/65 % for GC. CONCLUSION This study suggests a favorable 5-year overall survival benefit with use of the robotic platform in hepatic resection for colorectal metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Klatskin tumor, and gallbladder cancer. The robotic platform facilitates fine dissection in complex hepatobiliary operations, with a high rate of R0 resections and excellent perioperative clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Dugan
- Florida Atlantic University Schmidt College of Medicine, United States; Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, United States
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, United States.
| | - Sharona B Ross
- Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, United States
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, United States
| | - Cameron Syblis
- Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Semenkov AV, Subbot VS, Yuriev DY. [Videofluorescence navigation during parenchymal-sparing liver resections using a domestic fluorescence imaging system]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2024:65-74. [PMID: 38785241 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202405165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Parenchyma- sparing liver resections are aimed at maximizing the possible preservation of parenchyma not affected by the tumor - a current trend in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. On the other hand, a prerequisite for operations is to ensure their radicality. To effectively solve this problem, all diagnostic imaging methods available in the arsenal are used, which make it possible to comprehensively solve the issues of perioperative planning of the volume and technical features of the planned operation. Diagnostic imaging methods that allow intraoperative navigation through intraoperative, instrumentally based determination of the tumor border and resection plane have additional value. One of the methods of such mapping is ICG video fluorescence intraoperative navigation. An analysis of the clinical use of the domestic video fluorescent navigation system "MARS" for parenchymal-sparing resections of focal liver lesions is presented. An assessment was made of the dynamics of the distribution of the contrast agent during ICG videofluorescent mapping during parenchymal-sparing resection interventions on the liver, with the analysis of materials from histological examination of tissues taking into account three-zonal videofluorescent marking of the resection edge, performed using the domestic videofluorescence imaging system «MARS».
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Semenkov
- Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute («MONIKI»), Moscow, Russia
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - V S Subbot
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - D Y Yuriev
- Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute («MONIKI»), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nigam A, Hawksworth JS, Winslow ER. Minimally Invasive Robotic Techniques for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection: How I Do It. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:111-132. [PMID: 37945137 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The adoption of minimally invasive techniques for hepatocellular resection has progressively increased in North America. Cumulative evidence has demonstrated improved surgical outcomes in patients who undergo minimally invasive hepatectomy. In this review, the authors' approach and methodology to minimally invasive robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aradhya Nigam
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, 4PHC, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Jason S Hawksworth
- Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH14-105, New York, NY 20032, USA.
| | - Emily R Winslow
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, 2PHC, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kalayarasan R, Chandrasekar M, Sai Krishna P, Shanmugam D. Indocyanine green fluorescence in gastrointestinal surgery: Appraisal of current evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2693-2708. [PMID: 38222003 PMCID: PMC10784830 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Applying indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence in surgery has created a new dimension of navigation surgery to advance in various disciplines. The research in this field is nascent and fragmented, necessitating academic efforts to gain a comprehensive understanding. The present review aims to integrate diverse perspectives and recent advances in its application in gastrointestinal surgery. The relevant articles were selected by using the appropriate keyword search in PubMed. The angiography and cholangiography property of ICG fluorescence is helpful in various hepatobiliary disorders. In gastroesophageal and colorectal surgery, the lymphangiography and angiography property of ICG is applied to evaluate bowel vascularity and guide lymphadenectomy. The lack of objective parameters to assess ICG fluorescence has been the primary limitation when ICG is used to evaluate bowel perfusion. The optimum dose and timing of ICG administration need to be standardized in some new application areas in gastrointestinal surgery. Binding tumor-specific ligands with fluorophores can potentially widen the fluorescence application to detect primary and metastatic gastrointestinal tumors. The narrative review outlines prior contributions, limitations, and research opportunities for future studies across gastrointestinal sub-specialty. The findings of the present review would be helpful for scholars and practitioners to explore and progress in this exciting domain of gastrointestinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja Kalayarasan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Murugesan Chandrasekar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Pothugunta Sai Krishna
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Dasarathan Shanmugam
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605006, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang B, Tang C, Lin E, Jia X, Xie G, Li P, Li D, Yang Q, Guo X, Cao C, Shi X, Zou B, Cai C, Tian J, Hu Z, Li J. NIR-II fluorescence-guided liver cancer surgery by a small molecular HDAC6 targeting probe. EBioMedicine 2023; 98:104880. [PMID: 38035463 PMCID: PMC10698675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy globally and ranks third in terms of both mortality and incidence rates. Surgical resection holds potential as a curative approach for HCC. However, the residual disease contributes to a high 5-year recurrence rate of 70%. Due to their excellent specificity and optical properties, fluorescence-targeted probes are deemed effective auxiliary tools for addressing residual lesions, enabling precise surgical diagnosis and treatment. Research indicates histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) overexpression in HCC cells, making it a potential imaging biomarker. This study designed a targeted small-molecule fluorescent probe, SeCF3-IRDye800cw (SeCF3-IRD800), operating within the Second near-infrared window (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm). The study confirms the biocompatibility of SeCF3-IRD800 and proceeds to demonstrate its applications in imaging in vivo, fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) for liver cancer, liver fibrosis imaging, and clinical samples incubation, thereby preliminarily validating its utility in liver cancer. METHODS SeCF3-IRD800 was synthesized by combining the near-infrared fluorescent dye IRDye800cw-NHS with an improved HDAC6 inhibitor. Initially, a HepG2-Luc subcutaneous tumor model (n = 12) was constructed to investigate the metabolic differences between SeCF3-IRD800 and ICG in vivo. Subsequently, HepG2-Luc (n = 12) and HCCLM3-Luc (n = 6) subcutaneous xenograft mouse models were used to assess in vivo targeting by SeCF3-IRD800. The HepG2-Luc orthotopic liver cancer model (n = 6) was employed to showcase the application of SeCF3-IRD800 in FGS. Liver fibrosis (n = 6) and HepG2-Luc orthotopic (n = 6) model imaging results were used to evaluate the impact of different pathological backgrounds on SeCF3-IRD800 imaging. Three groups of fresh HCC and normal liver samples from patients with liver cancer were utilized for SeCF3-IRD800 incubation ex vivo, while preclinical experiments illustrated its potential for clinical application. FINDINGS The HDAC6 inhibitor 6 (SeCF3) modified with trifluoromethyl was labeled with IRDy800CW-NHS to synthesize the small-molecule targeted probe SeCF3-IRD800, with NIR-II fluorescence signals. SeCF3-IRD800 was rapidly metabolized by the kidneys and exhibited excellent biocompatibility. In vivo validation demonstrated that SeCF3-IRD800 achieved optimal imaging within 8 h, displaying high tumor fluorescence intensity (7658.41 ± 933.34) and high tumor-to-background ratio (5.20 ± 1.04). Imaging experiments with various expression levels revealed its capacity for HDAC6-specific targeting across multiple HCC tumor models, suitable for NIR-II intraoperative imaging. Fluorescence-guided surgery experiments were found feasible and capable of detecting sub-visible 2 mm tumor lesions under white light, aiding surgical decision-making. Further imaging of liver fibrosis mice showed that SeCF3-IRD800's imaging efficacy remained unaffected by liver pathological conditions. Correlations were observed between HDAC6 expression levels and corresponding fluorescence intensity (R2 = 0.8124) among normal liver, liver fibrosis, and HCC tissues. SeCF3-IRD800 identified HDAC6-positive samples from patients with HCC, holding advantages for perspective intraoperative identification in liver cancer. Thus, the rapidly metabolized HDAC6-targeted small-molecule NIR-II fluorescence probe SeCF3-IRD800 holds significant clinical translational value. INTERPRETATION The successful application of NIR-II fluorescence-guided surgery in liver cancer indicates that SeCF3-IRD800 has great potential to improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer, and could be used as an auxiliary tool for surgical treatment of liver cancer without being affected by liver pathology. FUNDING This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (92,059,207, 62,027,901, 81,930,053, 81,227,901, 82,272,105, U21A20386 and 81,971,773), CAS Youth Interdisciplinary Team (JCTD-2021-08), the Zhuhai High-level Health Personnel Team Project (Zhuhai HLHPTP201703), and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation under Grant No. 2022A1515011244.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Chu Tang
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China
| | - En Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Xiaohua Jia
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Ganyuan Xie
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China
| | - Peiping Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China
| | - Decheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China
| | - Qiyue Yang
- Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery, PLA, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100048, China
| | - Xiaoyong Guo
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; Clinical College of Armed Police General Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Department of Gastroenterology of The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Caiguang Cao
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xiaojing Shi
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Baojia Zou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China
| | - Chaonong Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China
| | - Jie Tian
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China; Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China.
| | - Zhenhua Hu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Washington K. HPB further education - Fluorescence Imaging in Liver Tumor Resection. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1300-1301. [PMID: 37482526 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the most common indications for liver resection. Historically, anatomic liver resection (ALR) was the standard of care, causing many patients with small, segmental tumors to undergo larger resections; however, in recent decades, there has been a shift towards parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) which allows sparing of a larger volume of normal liver. With the increase in PSR and the improvement in intra-operative technology, use of fluorescence imaging to guide liver resection has been explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Washington
- Texas Christian University, Ann Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Health Resources, Harris Methodist Hospital, 1325 Pennsylvania Avenue, Ste 560, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel I, Rehman S, McKay S, Bartlett D, Mirza D. Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5536. [PMID: 37685603 PMCID: PMC10488819 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) afflict a significant proportion of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), ranging from 25% to 30% of patients throughout the course of the disease. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in the application of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging as an intraoperative imaging technique for liver surgery. The utilisation of NIRF-guided liver surgery, facilitated by the administration of fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG), has gained traction in numerous medical institutions worldwide. This innovative approach aims to enhance lesion differentiation and provide valuable guidance for surgical margins. The use of ICG, particularly in minimally invasive surgery, has the potential to improve lesion detection rates, increase the likelihood of achieving R0 resection, and enable anatomically guided resections. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of ICG, such as its low specificity. Consequently, there has been a growing demand for the development of tumour-specific fluorescent probes and the advancement of camera systems, which are expected to address these concerns and further refine the accuracy and reliability of intraoperative fluorescence imaging in liver surgery. While NIRF imaging has been extensively studied in patients with CRLM, it is worth noting that a significant proportion of published research has predominantly focused on the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we present a comprehensive literature review of the existing literature pertaining to intraoperative fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive surgery for CRLM. Moreover, our analysis places specific emphasis on the techniques employed in liver resection using ICG, with a focus on tumour detection in minimal invasive surgery (MIS). Additionally, we delve into recent developments in this field and offer insights into future perspectives for further advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishaan Patel
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Saad Rehman
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Siobhan McKay
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - David Bartlett
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hon Professor of HPB and Transplant Surgery, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yasuda J, Furukawa K, Yanagaki M, Igarashi Y, Tanji Y, Haruki K, Onda S, Ikegami T. Double cone-unit laparoscopic hepatic resection for tumors adjacent to the hepatic vein. Surg Oncol 2023; 48:101926. [PMID: 37003191 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In tumor adjacent to the hepatic vein, it is important to treat two tertiary Glissonean pedicles that straddle to the hepatic vein in order to remove the tumor with a negative margin. The anatomical resection of the smallest unit may be considered to be the resection of the double cone-unit (DCU) in small tumor adjacent to the vein. PATIENTS AND METHODS 127 patients who had undergone laparoscopic hepatectomy at the Jikei Medical University Hospital from 2020 through 2021. In 5 cases, Laparoscopic DCU resection was performed. If the CT image shows a hepatic vein near the tumor and the tumor is relatively small, less than 50 mm in size, DCU resection should be considered. After approaching the target Glissonean pedicles, the Bulldog Clamps were used to testing clamp it. After clamping it, the ICG was injected from peripheral veins. A few minutes later, the tumor-bearing portal territory could be identified as negative regions of fluorescence in the near infrared imaging system. The target hepatic vein, which runs between the two territories, was dissected where it transitions from the first to the second territory. RESULTS The median operative time in these 5 patients was 279 min, and the median volume of blood loss was 290 g. The average tumor size was 33 mm and the average surgical margin was 4.5 mm. CONCLUSION In small tumor adjacent to the hepatic vein, the anatomical hepatectomy of the smallest unit may be the Double Cone-Unit resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jungo Yasuda
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
| | - Kenei Furukawa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Yanagaki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yousuke Igarashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Tanji
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Kouichirou Haruki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shinji Onda
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cassinotti E, Al-Taher M, Antoniou SA, Arezzo A, Baldari L, Boni L, Bonino MA, Bouvy ND, Brodie R, Carus T, Chand M, Diana M, Eussen MMM, Francis N, Guida A, Gontero P, Haney CM, Jansen M, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Muller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Oderda M, Parise P, Rosati R, Schijven MP, Silecchia G, Soares AS, Urakawa S, Vettoretto N. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) consensus on Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1629-1648. [PMID: 36781468 PMCID: PMC10017637 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09928-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery during open and laparoscopic procedures has exponentially expanded across various clinical settings. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on this topic with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community. METHODS An expert panel of surgeons has been selected and invited to participate to this project. Systematic reviews of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of ICG fluorescence-guided surgery on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by the panel; they were then submitted to all EAES members through a two-rounds online survey and results presented at the EAES annual congress, Barcelona, November 2021. RESULTS A total of 18,273 abstracts were screened with 117 articles included. 22 statements and 16 recommendations were generated and approved. In some areas, such as the use of ICG fluorescence-guided surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery and the search for the sentinel lymph nodes in gynaecological malignancies, the large number of evidences in literature has allowed us to strongly recommend the use of ICG for a better anatomical definition and a reduction in post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS Overall, from the systematic literature review performed by the experts panel and the survey extended to all EAES members, ICG fluorescence-guided surgery could be considered a safe and effective technology. Future robust clinical research is required to specifically validate multiple organ-specific applications and the potential benefits of this technique on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cassinotti
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Al-Taher
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - S A Antoniou
- Department of Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - L Baldari
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R Brodie
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - T Carus
- Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Elisabeth-Hospital, Thuine, Germany
| | - M Chand
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Diana
- IHU Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery and IRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System, Strasbourg, France
| | - M M M Eussen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - N Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK
| | - A Guida
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - C M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - S Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - B P Muller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - F Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Oderda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Parise
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Policlinico di Abano Terme, Abano Terme, PD, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M P Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - G Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - A S Soares
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Urakawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - N Vettoretto
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Montichiari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Potharazu AV, Gangemi A. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence in robotic hepatobiliary surgery: A systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2023; 19:e2485. [PMID: 36417426 PMCID: PMC10078519 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG-F) stains hepatic tumours and delineates vascular and biliary structures in real-time. We detail the efficacy of ICG-F in robotic hepatobiliary surgery. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched for original articles and meta-analyses detailing the outcomes of ICG-F in robotic hepatobiliary surgery. RESULTS 214 abstracts were reviewed; 16 studies are presented. One single-institution study reported ICG-F in robotic right hepatectomy reduced postoperative bile leakage (0% vs. 12%, p = 0.023), R1 resection (0% vs. 16%, p = 0.019), and readmission (p = 0.023) without prolonging operative time (288 vs. 272 min, p = 0.778). Improved visualisation aided in attainment of R0 resection in partial hepatectomies and radical gallbladder adenocarcinoma resections. Fewer ICG-F-aided robotic cholecystectomies were converted to open procedure compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomies (2.1% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.03; 0.15% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ICG-F improves clinical outcomes in robotic hepatobiliary surgery without prolonging operative time. There is an opportunity to standardise ICG administration protocols, especially for hepatectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archit V Potharazu
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Antonio Gangemi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zagainov EV, Karachun AM, Sapronov PA, Khromova EA, Kazantsev AI. [Modern possibilities of fluorescent imaging in liver surgery]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:98-106. [PMID: 37916563 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202310198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
The article presents a literature review of modern methods of fluorescent navigation in liver surgery. The technique of tumor «staining», mapping of liver segments, fluorescent cholangiography is covered. The own results of the use of indocyanine green in liver surgery are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E V Zagainov
- FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A M Karachun
- FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - P A Sapronov
- FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - E A Khromova
- FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A I Kazantsev
- FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaprin AD, Ivanov SA, Petrov LO, Isaeva AG. [Indocyanine green in liver tumor resection]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:5-10. [PMID: 37682541 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20230925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Primary liver cancer and colorectal cancer liver metastases are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Surgery is one of the main methods of treatment to achieve the best results in overall and recurrence-free survival. The main objectives in this surgery are preoperative planning, assessment of functional viability of liver parenchyma and total resection with low complication rate. Post-resection liver failure is one of the most formidable and often fatal complication following functional failure of liver remnant. Thus, preoperative assessment of liver functional reserves is a necessary step for adequate selection of patients and safe surgery. Passive liver tests, such as biochemical parameters or clinical scales, do not accurately reflect the actual functional component of liver parenchyma. The most accurate method is dynamic quantitative test of liver, such as indocyanine green clearance. The authors discuss the practical aspects of preoperative assessment of liver functional reserves using indocyanine green, as well as the concept and technical foundations of fluorescent imaging in hepatobiliary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Kaprin
- National Medical Research Radiology Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - S A Ivanov
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - L O Petrov
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - A G Isaeva
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ishizawa T, McCulloch P, Stassen L, van den Bos J, Regimbeau JM, Dembinski J, Schneider-Koriath S, Boni L, Aoki T, Nishino H, Hasegawa K, Sekine Y, Chen-Yoshikawa T, Yeung T, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Bouvet M, Diana M, Kokudo N, Dip F, White K, Rosenthal RJ. Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for anatomy visualisation, using the IDEAL framework. BMJ SURGERY, INTERVENTIONS, & HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES 2022; 4:e000156. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesIntraoperative fluorescence imaging is currently used in a variety of surgical fields for four main purposes: visualising anatomy, assessing tissue perfusion, identifying/localising cancer and mapping lymphatic systems. To establish evidence-based guidance for research and practice, understanding the state of research on fluorescence imaging in different surgical fields is needed. We evaluated the evidence on fluorescence imaging used to visualise anatomical structures using the IDEAL framework, a framework designed to describe the stages of innovation in surgery and other interventional procedures.DesignIDEAL staging based on a thorough literature review.SettingAll publications on intraoperative fluorescence imaging for visualising anatomical structures reported in PubMed through 2020 were identified for five surgical procedures: cholangiography, hepatic segmentation, lung segmentation, ureterography and parathyroid identification.Main outcome measuresThe IDEAL stage of research evidence was determined for each of the five procedures using a previously described approach.Results225 articles (8427 cases) were selected for analysis. Current status of research evidence on fluorescence imaging was rated IDEAL stage 2a for ureterography and lung segmentation, IDEAL 2b for hepatic segmentation and IDEAL stage 3 for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Enhanced tissue identification rates using fluorescence imaging relative to conventional white-light imaging have been documented for all five procedures by comparative studies including randomised controlled trials for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Advantages of anatomy visualisation with fluorescence imaging for improving short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes also were demonstrated, especially for hepatobiliary surgery and (para)thyroidectomy. No adverse reactions associated with fluorescent agents were reported.ConclusionsIntraoperative fluorescence imaging can be used safely to enhance the identification of anatomical structures, which may lead to improved postoperative outcomes. Overviewing current research knowledge using the IDEAL framework aids in designing further studies to develop fluorescence imaging techniques into an essential intraoperative navigation tool in each surgical field.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rahimli M, Perrakis A, Andric M, Stockheim J, Franz M, Arend J, Al-Madhi S, Abu Hilal M, Gumbs AA, Croner RS. Does Robotic Liver Surgery Enhance R0 Results in Liver Malignancies during Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery?—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143360. [PMID: 35884421 PMCID: PMC9320889 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Robotic procedures are an integral part of modern liver surgery. However, the advantages of a robotic approach in comparison to the conventional laparoscopic approach are the subject of controversial debate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare robotic and laparoscopic liver resection with particular attention to the resection margin status in malignant cases. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane Library in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Only studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic liver resections were considered for this meta-analysis. Furthermore, the rate of the positive resection margin or R0 rate in malignant cases had to be clearly identifiable. We used fixed or random effects models according to heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen studies with a total number of 1530 cases were included in qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Malignancies were identified in 71.1% (n = 1088) of these cases. These included hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal liver metastases and other malignancies of the liver. Positive resection margins were noted in 24 cases (5.3%) in the robotic group and in 54 cases (8.6%) in the laparoscopic group (OR = 0.71; 95% CI (0.42–1.18); p = 0.18). Tumor size was significantly larger in the robotic group (MD = 6.92; 95% CI (2.93–10.91); p = 0.0007). The operation time was significantly longer in the robotic procedure (MD = 28.12; 95% CI (3.66–52.57); p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between the robotic and laparoscopic approaches regarding the intra-operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, overall and severe complications and conversion rate. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the robotic and laparoscopic procedures regarding the resection margin status. Tumor size was significantly larger in the robotic group. However, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to demonstrate the benefits of robotics in liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirhasan Rahimli
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Aristotelis Perrakis
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Mihailo Andric
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Jessica Stockheim
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Mareike Franz
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Joerg Arend
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Sara Al-Madhi
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Unità Chirurgia Epatobiliopancreatica, Robotica e Mininvasiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Via Bissolati, 57, 25124 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Andrew A. Gumbs
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 10 Rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France;
| | - Roland S. Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (A.P.); (M.A.); (J.S.); (M.F.); (J.A.); (S.A.-M.); (R.S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mehdorn AS, Richter F, Hess K, Beckmann JH, Egberts JH, Linecker M, Becker T, Braun F. The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections. J Clin Med 2022; 11:3527. [PMID: 35743595 PMCID: PMC9225074 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic-assisted liver surgery (RALS) with its known limitations is gaining more importance. The fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), is a way to overcome some of these limitations. It accumulates in or around hepatic masses. The integrated near-infrared cameras help to visualize this accumulation. We aimed to compare the influence of ICG staining on the surgical and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RALS. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent RALS between 2014 and 2021 at the Department of General Surgery at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, were included. In 2019, ICG-supported RALS was introduced. Results: Fifty-four patients were included, with twenty-eight patients (50.9%) receiving preoperative ICG. Hepatocellular carcinoma (32.1%) was the main entity resected, followed by the metastasis of colorectal cancers (17%) and focal nodular hyperplasia (15.1%). ICG staining worked for different tumor entities, but diffuse staining was noted in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, ICG-supported RALS lasted shorter (142.7 ± 61.8 min vs. 246.4 ± 98.6 min, p < 0.001), tumors resected in the ICG cohort were significantly smaller (27.1 ± 25.0 mm vs. 47.6 ± 35.2 mm, p = 0.021) and more R0 resections were achieved by ICG-supported RALS (96.3% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.075). Conclusions: ICG-supported RALS achieve surgically and oncologically safe results, while overcoming the limitations of RALS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Mehdorn
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Florian Richter
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Katharina Hess
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Jan Henrik Beckmann
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Jan-Hendrik Egberts
- Department of Surgery, Israelit Hospital, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Thomas Becker
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Felix Braun
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Piccolo G, Barabino M, Pesce A, Diana M, Lecchi F, Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Bianchi PP, Piozzi GN. Role of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Minimally Invasive Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2022; 32:259-265. [PMID: 35180735 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is an easy and reproducible method to detect hepatic lesions, both primary and metastatic. This review reports the potential benefits of this technique as a tactile mimicking visual tool and a navigator guide in minimally invasive liver resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies reporting the use of intravenous injection of ICG before minimally invasive surgery for CLRM. The search was performed for publications reported from the first study in 2014 to April 2021. The final review included 13 articles: 6 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, 3 case series, 1 case report, 1 case-matched study, and 1 clinical trial registry. The administered dose ranged between 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg, while timing ranged between 1 and 14 days before surgery. CRLM detection rate ranged between 30.3% and 100% with preoperative imaging (abdominal computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), between 93.3 and 100% with laparoscopic ultrasound, between 57.6% and 100% with ICG fluorescence, and was 100% with combined modalities (ICG and laparoscopic ultrasound) with weighted averages of 77.42%, 95.97%, 79.03%, and 100%, respectively. ICG fusion imaging also allowed to detect occult small-sized lesions, not diagnosed preoperatively. In addition, ICG is effective in real-time assessment of surgical margins by evaluating the integrity of the fluorescent rim around the CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Piccolo
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Sciences
| | - Matteo Barabino
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Sciences
| | - Antonio Pesce
- Unit of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Azienda USL di Ferrara, Lagosanto (FE), Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer
- Department of General, Digestive, Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg
- ICube Laboratory, Photonics for Health, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Roberto Santambrogio
- Unit of General Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco: Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
| | - Enrico Opocher
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Sciences
| | - Paolo P Bianchi
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, San Paolo Hospital
| | - Guglielmo N Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review on Dose and Timing of Administration. Ann Surg 2022; 275:1025-1034. [PMID: 35121701 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has proven to be a high potential navigation tool during liver surgery; however, its optimal usage is still far from being standardized. METHODS A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed for English articles that contained the information of dose and timing of ICG administration until February 2021. Successful rates of tumor detection and liver segmentation, as well as tumor/patient background and imaging settings were also reviewed. The quality assessment of the articles was performed in accordance with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). RESULTS Out of initial 311 articles, a total of 72 manuscripts were obtained. The quality assessment of the included studies revealed usually low; only 9 articles got qualified as high quality. Forty articles (55%) focused on open resections, whereas 32 articles (45%) on laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. Thirty-four articles (47%) described tumor detection ability, and 25 articles (35%) did liver segmentation ability, and the others (18%) did both abilities. Negative staining was reported (42%) more than positive staining (32%). For tumor detection, majority used the dose of 0.5 mg/kg within 14 days before the operation day, and an additional administration (0.02-0.5 mg/kg) in case of longer preoperative interval. Tumor detection rate was reported to be 87.4% (range, 43%-100%) with false positive rate reported to be 10.5% (range, 0%-31.3%). For negative staining method, the majority used 2.5 mg/body, ranging from 0.025 to 25 mg/body. For positive staining method, the majority used 0.25 mg/body, ranging from 0.025 to 12.5 mg/body. Successful segmentation rate was 88.0% (range, 53%-100%). CONCLUSION The time point and dose of ICG administration strongly needs to be tailored case by case in daily practice, due to various tumor/patient backgrounds and imaging settings.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rela M, Rajalingam R, Shetty G, Cherukuru R, Rammohan A. Robotic monosegment donor hepatectomy for pediatric liver transplantation: First report. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14110. [PMID: 34383361 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND LT for infants less than 5 kg remains a challenge with high technical complication rates, which is further compounded by large-for-size grafts requiring hyper-reduction. The benefits of MIDH especially for standard left lateral segment (LLS) resection have been unequivocally demonstrated. However, given the fine margins of error, the highly challenging technical aspects of anatomical graft reduction test the limits of safety and may not be routinely feasible with the conventional laparoscopic approach. CASE REPORT A 14-month-old girl weighing 4.4 kg with extrahepatic biliary atresia was referred to our unit for an LT. Her mother volunteered to donate and the calculated volume of the LLS was 342 ml, with an estimated GRWR of 7.6. Given the extremely high GRWR, a segment II monosegment graft was planned. A RMDH was performed, with a final GRWR of 4. The donor and recipient were discharged on the 5th and 12th post-operative days, respectively. CONCLUSION We present the first-ever report of an RMDH. Our report highlights the fact that robotic surgery can safely replicate a highly precise surgical operation, thereby safely pushing the limits of MIDH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Rela
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| | - Rajesh Rajalingam
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| | - Guruprasad Shetty
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| | - Ramkiran Cherukuru
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Saito Y, Shimada M, Morine Y, Yamada S, Sugimoto M. Essential updates 2020/2021: Current topics of simulation and navigation in hepatectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 6:190-196. [PMID: 35261944 PMCID: PMC8889864 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
With the development of three‐dimensional (3D) simulation software, preoperative simulation technology is almost completely established. The remaining issue is how to recognize anatomy three‐dimensionally. Extended reality is a newly developed technology with several merits for surgical application: no requirement for a sterilized display monitor, better spatial awareness, and the ability to share 3D images among all surgeons. Various technology or devices for intraoperative navigation have also been developed to support the safety and certainty of liver surgery. Consensus recommendations regarding indocyanine green fluorescence were determined in 2021. Extended reality has also been applied to intraoperative navigation, and artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the topics of real‐time navigation. AI might overcome the problem of liver deformity with automatic registration. Including the issues described above, this article focuses on recent advances in simulation and navigation in liver surgery from 2020 to 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Saito
- Department of Surgery Tokushima University Tokushima Japan
| | - Mitsuo Shimada
- Department of Surgery Tokushima University Tokushima Japan
| | - Yuji Morine
- Department of Surgery Tokushima University Tokushima Japan
| | | | - Maki Sugimoto
- Department of Surgery Tokushima University Tokushima Japan
- Okinaga Research Institute Teikyo University Chiyoda‐ku Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Giannone F, Felli E, Cherkaoui Z, Mascagni P, Pessaux P. Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246268. [PMID: 34944887 PMCID: PMC8699460 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence makes surgical resection easier and safer, and, at the same time, can improve oncological results. The robotic system fits perfectly with these more or less diffused technologies, and it seems that this benefit is mutual. In liver surgery, robotic systems help surgeons to localize tumors and improve surgical results with well-defined preoperative planning or increased intraoperative detection. Furthermore, they can balance the absence of tactile feedback and help recognize intrahepatic biliary or vascular structures during parenchymal transection. Some of these systems are well known and are already widely diffused in open and laparoscopic hepatectomies, such as indocyanine green fluorescence or ultrasound-guided resections, whereas other tools, such as Augmented Reality, are far from being standardized because of the high complexity and elevated costs. In this paper, we review all the experiences in the literature on the use of artificial intelligence systems in robotic liver resections, describing all their practical applications and their weaknesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Giannone
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Zineb Cherkaoui
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
| | - Pietro Mascagni
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-369-550-552
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Abu Hilal M, Berardi G, Ciria R, Abe Y, Aoki T, Asbun HJ, Chan ACY, Chanwat R, Chen KH, Chen Y, Cheung TT, Fuks D, Gotohda N, Han HS, Hasegawa K, Hatano E, Honda G, Itano O, Iwashita Y, Kaneko H, Kato Y, Kim JH, Liu R, López-Ben S, Morimoto M, Monden K, Rotellar F, Sakamoto Y, Sugioka A, Yoshiizumi T, Akahoshi K, Alconchel F, Ariizumi S, Benedetti Cacciaquerra A, Durán M, Garcia Vazquez A, Golse N, Miyasaka Y, Mori Y, Ogiso S, Shirata C, Tomassini F, Urade T, Wakabayashi T, Nishino H, Hibi T, Kokudo N, Ohtsuka M, Ban D, Nagakawa Y, Ohtsuka T, Tanabe M, Nakamura M, Tsuchida A, Yamamoto M. The Tokyo 2020 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: Updates of the Brisbane 2000 system. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:6-15. [PMID: 34866349 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Brisbane 2000 Terminology for Liver Anatomy and Resections, based on Couinaud's segments, did not address how to identify segmental borders and anatomic territories of less than one segment. Smaller anatomic resections including segmentectomies and subsegmentectomies, have not been well defined. The advent of minimally invasive liver resection has enhanced the possibilities of more precise resection due to a magnified view and reduced bleeding, and minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) is becoming popular gradually. Therefore, there is a need for updating the Brisbane 2000 system, including anatomic segmentectomy or less. An online "Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus)" was hosted on February 23, 2021. METHODS The Steering Committee invited 34 international experts from around the world. The Expert Committee (EC) selected 12 questions and two future research topics in the terminology session. The EC created seven tentative definitions and five recommendations based on the experts' opinions and the literature review performed by the Research Committee. Two Delphi Rounds finalized those definitions and recommendations. RESULTS This paper presents seven definitions and five recommendations regarding anatomic segmentectomy or less. In addition, two future research topics are discussed. CONCLUSIONS The PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus has presented the Tokyo 2020 Terminology for Liver Anatomy and Resections. The terminology has added definitions of liver anatomy and resections that were not defined in the Brisbane 2000 system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris, France
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Service, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Aoki
- Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Albert C Y Chan
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rawisak Chanwat
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yukio Iwashita
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Hironori Kaneko
- Division of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Santiago López-Ben
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Mamoru Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshiizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keiichi Akahoshi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (IMIB-Virgen de la Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - Shunichi Ariizumi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Manuel Durán
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Nicolas Golse
- Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Yoshihiro Miyasaka
- Department of Surgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Mori
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ogiso
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chikara Shirata
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Urade
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hitoe Nishino
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ban
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Ohtsuka
- First Department of Surgery, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Akihiko Tsuchida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gotohda N, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Abu Hilal M, Berardi G, Ciria R, Abe Y, Aoki T, Asbun HJ, Chan ACY, Chanwat R, Chen KH, Chen Y, Cheung TT, Fuks D, Han HS, Hasegawa K, Hatano E, Honda G, Itano O, Iwashita Y, Kaneko H, Kato Y, Kim JH, Liu R, López-Ben S, Morimoto M, Monden K, Rotellar F, Sakamoto Y, Sugioka A, Yoshiizumi T, Akahoshi K, Alconchel F, Ariizumi S, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Durán M, Garcia Vazquez A, Golse N, Miyasaka Y, Mori Y, Ogiso S, Shirata C, Tomassini F, Urade T, Wakabayashi T, Nishino H, Hibi T, Kokudo N, Ohtsuka M, Ban D, Nagakawa Y, Ohtsuka T, Tanabe M, Nakamura M, Yamamoto M, Tsuchida A, Wakabayashi G. Expert Consensus Guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:16-32. [PMID: 34779150 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) is gaining popularity. However, specific technical skills need to be acquired to safely perform MIALR. The "Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus)" was developed as a special program during the 32nd meeting of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS). METHODS Thirty-four international experts gathered online for the consensus. A Research Committee performed a comprehensive literature review, classifying studies according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Based on the literature review and experts' opinions, tentative recommendations were drafted and circulated among experts using online Delphi Rounds. Finally, formulated recommendations were presented online in the Expert Consensus Meeting of the JSHBPS on February 23rd, 2021. The final recommendations were validated and finalized by the 2nd Delphi Round in May 2021. RESULTS Seven clinical questions were selected, and 22 recommendations were formulated. All recommendations reached more than 85% consensus among experts at the final Delphi Round. CONCLUSIONS The Expert Consensus Meeting for safely performing MIALR has presented a set of clinical guidelines based on available literature and experts' opinions. We expect these guidelines to have a favorable effect on the safe implementation and development of MIALR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris, France
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Service, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofia, IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Aoki
- Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Albert C Y Chan
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rawisak Chanwat
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yukio Iwashita
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Hironori Kaneko
- Division of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Santiago López-Ben
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Mamoru Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshiizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keiichi Akahoshi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (IMIB-Virgen de la Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - Shunichi Ariizumi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Manuel Durán
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofia, IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Nicolas Golse
- Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Yoshihiro Miyasaka
- Department of Surgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Mori
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ogiso
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chikara Shirata
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Urade
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hitoe Nishino
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ban
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Ohtsuka
- First Department of Surgery, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiko Tsuchida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee YJ, van den Berg NS, Orosco RK, Rosenthal EL, Sorger JM. A narrative review of fluorescence imaging in robotic-assisted surgery. LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY 2021; 5. [PMID: 34549180 PMCID: PMC8452263 DOI: 10.21037/ls-20-98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective In this review, we provide examples of applications of fluorescence imaging in urologic, gynecologic, general, and endocrine surgeries. Background While robotic-assisted surgery has helped increase the availability of minimally invasive procedures across surgical specialties, there remains an opportunity to reduce adverse events associated with open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted methods. In 2011, fluorescence imaging was introduced as an option to the da Vinci Surgical System, and has been standard equipment since 2014. Without interfering with surgical workflow, this fluorescence technology named Firefly® allows for acquisition and display of near-infrared fluorescent signals that are co-registered with white light endoscopic images. As a result, robotic surgeons of all specialties have been able to explore the clinical utility of fluorescence guided surgery. Methods Literature searches were performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases using the keywords "robotic-assisted fluorescence surgery", "ICG robotic surgery", and "fluorescence guided surgery" covering the years 2011-2020. Conclusions Real-time intraoperative fluorescence guidance has shown great potential in helping guide surgeons in both simple and complex surgical interventions. Indocyanine green is one of the most widely-used imaging agents in fluorescence guided surgery, and other targeted, near-infrared imaging agents are in various stages of development. Fluorescence is becoming a reliable tool that can help surgeons in their decision-making process in some specialties, while explorations continue in others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Jin Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Ryan K Orosco
- Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Eben L Rosenthal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan M Sorger
- Department of Research, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Protic M, Krsmanovic O, Solajic N, Kukic B, Nikolic I, Bogdanovic B, Radovanovic Z, Kresoja M, Mannion C, Man YG, Stojadinovic A. Prospective Non-Randomized Study of Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Resection Margin of Colo-Rectal Liver Metastases. J Cancer 2021; 12:3701-3714. [PMID: 33995645 PMCID: PMC8120181 DOI: 10.7150/jca.58580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: More than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases during the natural course of disease. Surgical resection is currently the most potentially curative method in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The goal of surgery is to achieve a negative resection margin (RM) of at least 1 mm, which provides the best prognosis for patients. The RM can be assessed by the pathologist of the resected liver specimen (RLS) and by the surgeon intraoperatively. The aim of this research paper is to determine the degree of agreement on intraoperative assessment of the RM by the surgeon and histopathological RM assessment by the pathologist. Material and methods: This prospective non-randomized double-blind study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04634526. The study was conducted at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia. An experienced hepatobiliary surgeon assessed RM for every specimen intra-operatively, immediately after CRLM resection. Resected CRLM lesions were analyzed by two experienced pathologists. These data were compared with pathological RM assessment as a “gold standard”. RM of 1 mm or more was rated as negative RM (RM-). Disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence rate was calculated by RM status defined by surgeon and by pathologist. Results: From 01 January 2015 to 31 August 2019, 98 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 219 RLS with 245 CRLM. The surgeon registered positive RM (RM+) of <1mm in 41 (18.7%) RLS. Taking the result of the histopathological assessment (HPA) as the “gold standard”, it was determined that RM was true positive in 32 (14.6%) cases. False positive RM was found in 9 (4.1%) cases. False negative RM was found in 20 (9.1%) cases. True negative RM was found in 158 (72.2%) cases. Sensitivity of surgical assessment (SA) of RM+ was 61.5% (32/52). Specificity of SA of RM+ was 94.6% (158/167). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 78.0% (32/41), while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.8% (158/178). The overall accuracy of the RM+ SA was 86.8% (190/219). There was no statistically significant difference in the assessment of RM+ per RLS by surgeon and pathologists (p=0.061), but it was significant when analyses per patients was performed (p=0.017). Recurrence rate for RM+ patients was 48.1% (13/27, p=0.05) for SA and 35.0% (14/40, p=0.17) for HPA. Three year DFS for RM- and RM+ was 66.5% and 27.9% (p=0.04), respectively, by SA, and 64.8% and 42.1% (p=0.106), respectively, by HPA. Conclusion: Intraoperative assessment of RM- by surgeon of RLS is clinically meaningful. There is not a statistically significant difference in the assessment of RM+ by surgeon and pathologists per RLS, but it was statically significant on a per patient basis. RM determined by surgeon has better prognostic impact on recurrence rate and 1- and 3-year DFS than standard histopathological assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mladjan Protic
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Olivera Krsmanovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Logistics Command, Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Nenad Solajic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Department of Pathoanatomical and Laboratory Diagnostics, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Biljana Kukic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Clinic for Internal Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Ivan Nikolic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Clinic for Internal Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Bogdan Bogdanovic
- Clinic for Internal Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Zoran Radovanovic
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Milana Kresoja
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Ciaran Mannion
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.,Department of Pathology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yan-Gao Man
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mehdorn AS, Beckmann JH, Braun F, Becker T, Egberts JH. Usability of Indocyanine Green in Robot-Assisted Hepatic Surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 10:456. [PMID: 33503996 PMCID: PMC7865567 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent developments in robotic surgery have led to an increasing number of robot-assisted hepatobiliary procedures. However, a limitation of robotic surgery is the missing haptic feedback. The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) may help in this context, which accumulates in hepatocellular cancers and around hepatic metastasis. ICG accumulation may be visualized by a near-infrared camera integrated into some robotic systems, helping to perform surgery more accurately. We aimed to test the feasibility of preoperative ICG application and its intraoperative use in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma and metastasis of colorectal cancer, but also of other origins. In a single-arm, single-center feasibility study, we tested preoperative ICG application and its intraoperative use in patients undergoing robot-assisted hepatic resections. Twenty patients were included in the final analysis. ICG staining helped in most cases by detecting a clear lesion or additional metastases or when performing an R0 resection. However, it has limitations if applied too late before surgery and in patients suffering from severe liver cirrhosis. ICG staining may serve as a beneficial intraoperative aid in patients undergoing robot-assisted hepatic surgery. Dose and time of application and standardized fluorescence intensity need to be further determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jan-Hendrik Egberts
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (J.H.B.); (F.B.); (T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wakabayashi T, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Ciria R, Ariizumi S, Durán M, Golse N, Ogiso S, Abe Y, Aoki T, Hatano E, Itano O, Sakamoto Y, Yoshizumi T, Yamamoto M, Wakabayashi G. Landmarks to identify segmental borders of the liver: A review prepared for PAM-HBP expert consensus meeting 2021. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:82-98. [PMID: 33484112 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In preparation for the upcoming consensus meeting in Tokyo in 2021, this systematic review aimed to analyze the current available evidence regarding surgical anatomy of the liver, focusing on useful landmarks, strategies and technical tools to perform precise anatomic liver resection (ALR). METHODS A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed for English articles and on Ichushi database for Japanese articles until September 2020. The quality assessment of the articles was performed in accordance with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). RESULTS A total of 3169 manuscripts were obtained, 1993 in English and 1176 in Japanese literature. Subsequently, 63 English and 20 Japanese articles were selected and reviewed. The quality assessment of comparative series and case series was revealed to be usually low; only six articles were qualified as high quality. Forty-two articles focused on analyzing intersegmental/sectional planes and their relationship with specific hepatic landmark veins. In 12 articles, the authors aimed to investigate liver surface anatomic structures, while 36 articles aimed to study technological tools and contrast agents for surgical segmentation during ALR. Although Couinaud's classification has remained the cornerstone in daily diagnostic/surgical practices, it does not always portray the realistic liver segmentation and there has been no standardization on which a single strategy should be followed to perform precise ALR. CONCLUSIONS A global consensus should be pursued in order to establish clear guidelines and proper recommendations to perform ALR in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiga Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Unit, Istituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Shunichi Ariizumi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manuel Durán
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Nicolas Golse
- Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Satoshi Ogiso
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Aoki
- Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ohuchida K. Robotic Surgery in Gastrointestinal Surgery. CYBORG AND BIONIC SYSTEMS 2020; 2020:9724807. [PMID: 37063412 PMCID: PMC10097416 DOI: 10.34133/2020/9724807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Robotic surgery is expanding in the minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. In the field of gastrointestinal cancer, robotic surgery is performed using a robot-assisted surgery system. In this system, the robot does not operate automatically but is controlled by the surgeon. The surgery assistant robot currently used in clinical practice worldwide is the leader-follower type, including the da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical). This review describes the current state of robotic surgery in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and discusses the future development of robotic systems in gastrointestinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenoki Ohuchida
- Department of Oncology and Surgery, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Indocyanine green fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a retrospective single-center study of 120 cases. Surg Today 2020; 51:695-702. [PMID: 33128594 PMCID: PMC8055570 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02163-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To explore the role of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic hepatectomy and investigate if the timing of its administration influences the intraoperative observation. Methods The subjects of this retrospective study were 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy; divided into an ICG-FN group (n = 57) and a non-ICG-FN group (n = 63). We analyzed the baseline data and operative data. Results There were no remarkable differences in baseline data such as demographic characteristics, lesion-related characteristics, and liver function parameters between the groups. Operative time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in the ICG-FN group. The rate of R0 resection of malignant tumors was comparable in the ICG-FN and non-ICG-FN groups, but the wide surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the ICG-FN group. The administration of ICG 0–3 or 4–7 days preoperatively did not affect the intraoperative fluorescence imaging. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and a wide surgical margin correlated with ICG fluorescence navigation. ICG fluorescence navigation helped to minimize intraoperative blood loss and achieve a wide surgical margin. Conclusion ICG fluorescence navigation is safe and efficient in laparoscopic hepatectomy. It helps to achieve a wide surgical margin, which could result in a better prognosis. The administration of ICG 0–3 days preoperatively is acceptable. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00595-020-02163-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
30
|
Cañada Trofo Surjan R, do Prado Silveira S. Totally robotic caudate lobe liver resection: Bridge over troubled water. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:1-6. [PMID: 32931627 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive hepatectomy has well-known advantages over the traditional open approach. Inherent limitations of laparoscopy make major hepatectomies and the resection of upper and posterior segments a great technical challenge. The robotic approach overcomes most of these limitations, and this technology is most useful in the resection of the deeply located caudate lobe. METHODS We describe the robotic caudate lobe resection technical aspects, using the first robotic resection of the caudate lobe to treat a biphenotypic hepatocholangiocarcinoma to illustrate the procedure. We also performed a literature review on the current status of the robotic approach to segment (Sg) 1. RESULTS Technical approach to the robotic caudate lobe resection is described in a patient with uneventful post-operative recovery. Literature review demonstrated only four previous authors reporting the use of this technique. CONCLUSION We present a step-by-step approach to the hepatic Sg 1 resection by robotic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Cañada Trofo Surjan
- Department of Surgery, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Surgery, Hospital Nove de Julho, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Di Benedetto F, Petrowsky H, Magistri P, Halazun KJ. Robotic liver resection: Hurdles and beyond. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:155-162. [PMID: 32504813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopy is currently considered the standard of care for certain procedures such as left-lateral sectionectomies and wedge resections of anterior segments. The role of robotic liver surgery is still under debate, especially with regards to oncological outcomes. The purpose of this review is to describe how the field of robotic liver surgery has expanded, and to identify current limitations and future perspectives of the technology. Available evidences suggest that oncologic results after robotic liver resection are comparable to open and laparoscopic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases, with identifiable advantages for cirrhotic patients and patients undergoing repeat resections. Excellent outcomes and optimal patient safety can be only achieved with specific hepato-biliary and general minimally invasive training to overcome the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB & Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Karim J Halazun
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|