Treatment of spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: use of laparoscopic microwave ablation and washout

The prophylactic role of mitomycin C-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (MMC-based HIPEC) on peritoneal metastasis of spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (srHCC): A pilot study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was featured as spontaneous rupture hemorrhage under intratumoral overpressure. Spontaneous rupture hepatocellular carcinoma (srHCC) has a high propensity for peritoneal metastasis (PM). Although HIPEC has become standard treatment for malignancies with PM, it has been poorly described in srHCC. We conducted a single-arm, open-label, single-center, prospective study to explore the prophylactic role of MMC-based HIPEC on PM of srHCC. A total of 7 patients were collected from April 1, 2021 to April 30, 2022. HIPEC was conducted 3 times on the first, third and fifth postoperative days. 15 mg/m2 of MMC was used with 60 minutes perfusion at 43°C. The primary end-point was local peritoneum recurrence free survival (RFS), whereas the secondary end-point was systemic RFS and overall survival (OS). The mean hepatectomy operation time was 232 minutes (SD: 124.08 minutes). The median bleeding loss was 200 mL (range 50-400 mL). The mean hospital stay was 13 days (SD: 3.42 days). Only mild abdominal distension was reported in 4 patients (57%). There were no patients who suffered from life-threatening intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal complications (EAC). At the data cut-off (April 30, 2023), one patient (14%) had died due to cachexia. Local peritoneal recurrence occurred in three patients (43%). Median follow-up was 16.1 months (IQR: 12.8-16.6 months). Median local peritoneum RFS was 12.3 months (95% CI: 7.0- 17.5; 4 events) and median overall RFS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.2-10.8; 6 events). MMC-based HIPEC was safe and feasible in selected patients of srHCC. It showed a positive tendency in preventing PM, but large-scale research should be continued.

Immunotherapy improved cancer related pain management in patients with advanced Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Cancers: A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis

Background

Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer is a serious form of cancer. in many HPB cancers, including cholangiocarcinoma (also known as bile duct cancer), pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer and ampullary cancer, although several treatment options are developed during these decades, the prognosis is still poor.

Methods

A total of 356 HPB cancers patients in advanced stage received different kinds of treatments including adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Among these patients with advanced HPB cancers, 135 patients have received standard opioid treatment for pain controlling.

Results

We performed a PSM analysis to minimize differences between groups. Before PSM, 135 patients received standard opioid treatment for pain controlling were enrolled in this study and divided into 4 groups, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Relevant clinical variables that were available at the time of initial diagnosis were used for 1:1 matching between the two groups. After PSM, the cohort consisted of 18 patients in each group. Prior to PSM, patients received targeted therapy and immunotherapy exhibited shorter median OSs than their counterparts for patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy (p<0.001). there were so survival differences among all the four different treatments for these patients with HPB cancers (p>0.05). We found the OMED (mg) q/day and NRS scores decreased significantly when patients received immunotherapy treatment. Fewer adverse events were showed between immunotherapy group and other three treatment groups, which was consistent with our previous reports.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that given the same survival benefit, immunotherapy reduced opioid consumption in HPB cancers patients and improved the pain management. Moreover, immunotherapy results in fewer other adverse effects.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know?

Rupture of HCC (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and rHCC may lead to a high rate of peritoneal dissemination and affect survival negatively. Treatment for rHCC mainly includes emergency surgery, interventional therapies, and palliative treatment. However, the management of rHCC should be carefully evaluated. For patients with severe bleeding, who are not tolerant to open surgery, quick hemostatic methods such as rupture tissue ablation and TAE/TACE can be performed. We described clinical presentation, prognosis, complication, interventional management, and current evidence of rHCC from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Overall, our review summarized that interventional therapies are necessary for most patients with rHCC to achieve hemostasis, even in some patients with Child–Pugh C. Moreover, TAE/TACE followed by staged hepatectomy is a beneficial treatment for rHCC according to current clinical evidence. TAE/TACE is the first choice for most patients with rHCC, and appropriate interventional treatment may provide staged surgery opportunities for those who are not tolerant to emergency surgery to reach an ideal prognosis.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know?

Rupture of HCC (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and rHCC may lead to a high rate of peritoneal dissemination and affect survival negatively. Treatment for rHCC mainly includes emergency surgery, interventional therapies, and palliative treatment. However, the management of rHCC should be carefully evaluated. For patients with severe bleeding, who are not tolerant to open surgery, quick hemostatic methods such as rupture tissue ablation and TAE/TACE can be performed. We described clinical presentation, prognosis, complication, interventional management, and current evidence of rHCC from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Overall, our review summarized that interventional therapies are necessary for most patients with rHCC to achieve hemostasis, even in some patients with Child–Pugh C. Moreover, TAE/TACE followed by staged hepatectomy is a beneficial treatment for rHCC according to current clinical evidence. TAE/TACE is the first choice for most patients with rHCC, and appropriate interventional treatment may provide staged surgery opportunities for those who are not tolerant to emergency surgery to reach an ideal prognosis.

Early-Stage Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Different Tumor Diameters: Small Tumors Have a Better Prognosis

Background and Aim

Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is classified as T4 according to the TNM staging system with a very poor (does not achieve expected) prognosis, which has always been controversial. This study aimed at assessing the specific impact of different tumor diameters on the posttreatment prognosis of BCLC stage 0/A rHCC patients.

Methods

Data from 258 patients with BCLC stage 0/A HCC treated in our center from January 2008 to December 2017 were collected, including 143 rHCC patients and 115 patients with non-ruptured HCC (nrHCC). With the help of X-tile software, we determined the cutoff value of the tumor diameter in patients with rHCC. Using 8 cm as the cutoff, we divided rHCC patients into Small-rHCC (n = 96) and Large-rHCC (n = 47) groups, compared the prognoses of the S-rHCC and L-rHCC groups, as well as the prognoses of the two groups with the nrHCC group using the Kaplan–Meier method, and screened the prognostic factors of rHCC patients using the multivariate Cox risk model.

Results

The OS of the S-rHCC group was significantly higher than that of the L-rHCC group [HR = 2.41 (1.60–3.63)], and the OS of the nrHCC group was comparable to that of the S-rHCC group (P = 0.204). In patients treated with surgery only, OS and RFS were also comparable in the S-rHCC nrHCC group. Meanwhile, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the main method of treatment were also prognostic factors for OS in patients with rHCC.

Conclusions

Ruptured HCC with a relatively small diameter (≤8 cm) can also achieve the same prognosis as nrHCC patients after aggressive treatment. It is also not recommended to include all patients with rHCC in stage T4.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status of Research

Background

Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is considered a rare and life-threatening manifestation; when it happens, it often requires acute and positive intervention. At present, the mechanism of rHCC development is gradually being understood while there are many kinds of rHCC treatment. From our clinical observation, the prognosis of rHCC patients is not as poor as it is currently believed. It may not be appropriate to include all patients with rHCC in T4.

Main Body

The incidence of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma is now rising. Especially in the Asian region, it can even reach 10% – 15%. The most common symptom of HCC rupture is abdominal pain, and there are now a variety of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma rupture. With aggressive treatment, rHCC patients can also achieve a better prognosis. The patient’s condition varies on admission, so the treatment methods will also be different. It is critical to identify prognostic factors simultaneously, and rHCC can be effectively managed by focusing on important prognostic factors.

Conclusion

A review was carried out to analyze diagnosis, mechanism, treatment, and prognostic risk factors on this disease condition during the current situation; it is hoped that it will provide better guidance for clinicians. Moreover, patients with rHCC were managed hierarchically to prolong their prognosis.