Treatment strategies for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Application of radioactive iodine-125 microparticles in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein embolus

BACKGROUND

Radioactive iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) microparticle therapy is a new type of internal radiation therapy that has shown unique advantages in the treatment of malignant tumors, especially hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma frequently experience portal vein embolism, which exacerbates the difficulty and complexity of treatment. ¹²⁵I particles, used in local radiotherapy, can directly act on tumor tissue and reduce damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Through retrospective analysis, this study discussed the efficacy and safety of radioactive ¹²⁵I particles in portal vein embolization patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in order to provide more powerful evidence supporting clinical treatment.

AIM

To investigate the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with portal vein ¹²⁵I particle implantation in the treatment of primary liver cancer patients with portal vein tumor thrombus and its influence on liver function.

METHODS

The clinical data of 96 patients with primary liver cancer combined with portal vein tumor thrombus admitted to our hospital between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients received treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and implantation of ¹²⁵I particles in the portal vein (combination group), while 44 patients received treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone (control group). The therapeutic effects on tumor lesions, primary liver cancer, and portal vein tumor embolisms were compared between the two groups. Changes in relevant laboratory indexes before and after treatment were evaluated. The t test was used to compare the measurement data between the two groups, and the χ² test was used to compare the counting data between groups.

RESULTS

The tumor lesion response rate in the combination group (59.62% vs 38.64%) and the response rate of patients with primary liver cancer complicated with portal vein tumor thrombus (80.77% vs 59.09%) were significantly greater than those in the control group (χ² = 4.196, 5.421; P = 0.041, 0.020). At 8 wk after surgery, the serum alpha-fetoprotein, portal vein main diameter, and platelet of the combined group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were significantly greater than those of the control group (t = 3.891, 3.291, 2.330, 3.729, 3.582, 4.126; P < 0.05). The serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels of the two groups were significantly greater than those of the same group 8 wk after surgery (P < 0.05), and the peripheral blood platelet, alpha-fetoprotein, and main portal vein diameter were significantly less than those of the same group before surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with primary liver cancer and a thrombus in the portal vein, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus portal vein ¹²⁵I implantation is more effective than transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone. However, during treatment it is crucial to pay attention to liver function injury caused by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Comparison of tumor response and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after multimodal treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radiotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well-defined. We performed a meta-analysis to characterize tumor response and survival associated with multimodal treatment of HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched (1990-2022). Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of treatment modalities. Odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (4170 patients) met inclusion criteria. Triple therapy regimen (ICI + TKI + TACE) had the highest overall disease control rate (DCR) (87%, 95% CI 83-91), while ICI + radiotherapy had the highest objective response rate (ORR) (72%, 95% CI 54%-89%). Triple therapy had a higher DCR than ICI + TACE (OR 4.49, 95% CI 2.09-9.63), ICI + TKI (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.63-5.82), and TKI + TACE (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.61-5.20). Triple therapy demonstrated improved overall survival versus ICI + TKI (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.37-1.07) and TKI + TACE (SMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.70-1.48) (both p < 0.05). Triple therapy had a greater incidence of adverse events (AEs) compared with ICI + TKI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.29-0.91; p = 0.02), but no difference in AEs versus ICI + TACE or TKI + TACE (both p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ICIs, TKIs and TACE demonstrated superior tumor response and survival and should be considered for select patients with advanced HCC.

Ablation for malignant liver tumor using high-intensity focused ultrasound and radio-frequency: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary liver cancer is a major health issue, so finding the most effective treatment is vital.

OBJECTIVE

The present meta-analysis compares high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to radiofrequency (RF) ablation for primary liver cancer treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang were used to search for English and Chinese papers. After carefully confirming data completeness and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, RevMan 5.3 was used to evaluate the included literature. Data analysis utilized a fixed-effects model for heterogeneity between 0.1 and 0.5.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 304 patients: 119 had HIFU and 185 RF ablation. For primary liver cancer, HIFU and RF ablation were equally efficacious (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval [0.54, 1.92]). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and complications at 1, 2, and 3 years were not significantly different (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence range [0.04, 12.79], P= 0.82).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis shows no significant difference in efficacy, long-term survival rates, or complication rates between HIFU and RF ablation for primary liver cancer, but more large-scale, high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to prove their equivalence. Both therapy strategies seem promising, but additional information is needed to determine their respective merits.

The effectiveness of ablative and non-surgical therapies for early hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Non-surgical therapies are frequently used for patients with early or very early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small HCC.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched (March 2021) along with clinical trial registries. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any ablative or non-surgical therapy versus any comparator in patients with HCC ≤3 cm were eligible. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The effectiveness of therapies was compared using NMA. Threshold analysis was undertaken to identify which NMA results had less robust evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eligible RCTs were included (including over 3700 patients). Most were from China (n = 17) or Japan (n = 7). Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 308 patients. The majority had a high RoB or some RoB concerns. No RCTs were identified for some therapies and no RCTs reported quality of life outcomes. The results of the NMA and treatment effectiveness rankings were very uncertain. However, the evidence demonstrated that percutaneous ethanol injection was worse than radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.45, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.16-1.82), progression-free survival (HR: 1.36, 95% CrI: 1.11-1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk [RR]: 1.19, 95% CrI: 1.02-1.39) and local recurrence (RR: 1.80, 95% CrI: 1.19-2.71). The threshold analysis suggested that robust evidence was lacking for some comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear which treatment is most effective for patients with small HCC because of limitations in the evidence base. It is also not known how these treatments would impact on quality of life. Further high quality RCTs are needed to provide robust evidence but may be difficult to undertake.

Outcomes of Transarterial Embolisation (TAE) vs. Transarterial Chemoembolisation (TACE) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although hepatocellular carcinoma is increasingly common, debate exists surrounding the management of patients with unresectable disease comparing transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving TAE and TACE. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) until August 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Five studies with 609 patients were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the OS (p = 0.36) and PFS (p = 0.81). There was no difference in OS among patients treated with a single TACE/TAE versus repeat treatments. Post-procedural adverse effects were higher in the TACE group but were not statistically significant. TACE has comparable long-term survival and complications profile to TAE for patients with HCC. However, the low-to-moderate quality of current RCTs warrants high-quality RCTs are necessary to provide enough evidence to give a definitive answer and inform treatment plans for the future.

Machine-Learning-Based Radiomic Features on Pre-Ablation MRI as Predictors of Pathologic Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Hepatic Transplant

Background: The aim was to investigate the role of pre-ablation tumor radiomics in predicting pathologic treatment response in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent liver transplant. Methods: Using data collected from 2005–2015, we included adult patients who (1) had a contrast-enhanced MRI within 3 months prior to ablation therapy and (2) underwent liver transplantation. Demographics were obtained for each patient. The treated hepatic tumor volume was manually segmented on the arterial phase T1 MRI images. A vector with 112 radiomic features (shape, first-order, and texture) was extracted from each tumor. Feature selection was employed through minimum redundancy and maximum relevance using a training set. A random forest model was developed based on top radiomic and demographic features. Model performance was evaluated by ROC analysis. SHAP plots were constructed in order to visualize feature importance in model predictions. Results: Ninety-seven patients (117 tumors, 31 (32%) microwave ablation, 66 (68%) radiofrequency ablation) were included. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 10.5 ± 3. The mean follow-up time was 336.2 ± 179 days. Complete response on pathology review was achieved in 62% of patients at the time of transplant. Incomplete pathologic response was associated with four features: two first-order and two GLRM features using univariate logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05). The random forest model included two radiomic features (diagnostics maximum and first-order maximum) and four clinical features (pre-procedure creatinine, pre-procedure albumin, age, and gender) achieving an AUC of 0.83, a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 67%, a PPV of 69%, and an NPV of 80%. Conclusions: Pre-ablation MRI radiomics could act as a valuable imaging biomarker for the prediction of tumor pathologic response in patients with HCC.

Prognostic Signature and Tumor Immune Landscape of N7-Methylguanosine-Related lncRNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Despite great advances in the treatment of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), such as immunotherapy, the prognosis remains extremely poor, and there is an urgent need to develop novel diagnostic and prognostic markers. Recently, RNA methylation-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been demonstrated to be novel potential biomarkers for tumor diagnosis and prognosis as well as immunotherapy response, such as N6-methyladenine (m6A) and 5-methylcytosine (m5C). N7-Methylguanosine (m7G) is a widespread RNA modification in eukaryotes, but the relationship between m7G-related lncRNAs and prognosis of LIHC patients as well as tumor immunotherapy response is still unknown. In this study, based on the LIHC patients’ clinical and transcriptomic data from TCGA database, a total of 992 m7G-related lncRNAs that co-expressed with 22 m7G regulatory genes were identified using Pearson correlation analysis. Univariate regression analysis was used to screen prognostic m7G-related lncRNAs, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression were applied to construct a 9-m7G-related-lncRNA risk model. The m7G-related lncRNA risk model was validated to exhibit good prognostic performance through Kaplan–Meier analysis and ROC analysis. Together with the clinicopathological features, the m7G-related lncRNA risk score was found to be an independent prognostic factor for LIHC. Furthermore, the high-risk group of LIHC patients was unveiled to have a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB), and their tumor microenvironment was more prone to the immunosuppressive state and exhibited a lower response rate to immunotherapy. In addition, 47 anti-cancer drugs were identified to exhibit a difference in drug sensitivity between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Taken together, the m7G-related lncRNA risk model might display potential value in predicting prognosis, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity in LIHC patients.

Dual immune checkpoint blockade in hepatocellular carcinoma: where do we stand?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death. Surgery, local ablative therapies and liver transplantation are the only potentially curative strategies, but the majority of patients present with advanced disease at diagnosis or develop recurrence after surgery. In recent years, immunotherapy for HCC has received growing interest, and one of the most promising strategies is the association of two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which has already demonstrated its potential in other solid tumors such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Herein, we discuss the role and the biologic rationale of dual immune checkpoint blockade in HCC patients, focusing on the two ICI combinations: nivolumab plus ipilimumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab.

Real-World Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background

Lenvatinib is approved for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its non-inferiority to sorafenib of overall survival (OR) in clinical trials. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib and sorafenib in the real world.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 338 patients with unresectable HCC who had undergone lenvatinib or sorafenib treatment between January 2018 and August 2020. Propensity-score matching analysis was performed with a 1:2 ratio to reduce the real-life baseline difference between the two groups.

Results

A total of 210 patients (Male/Female: 150/60, mean age: 65.8 years) were recruited including 70 patients in the Lenvatinib group and 140 patients in the Sorafenib group. Compared with sorafenib, lenvatinib had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (5.2 vs 3.3 months, p=0.019) but similar OR (13.3 vs 11.8 months, p=0.714). Additionally, lenvatinib had better disease control rates (62.3 vs 48.6%, p=0.029) and equivalent incidences of treatment-related adverse events over sorafenib. In multivariate analysis, lenvatinib was associated with better PFS over sorafenib (hazard ratio: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.3–0.79, p=0.004) after adjustments of albumin-bilirubin grade and alpha-fetoprotein level; however, different agents using lenvatinib or sorafenib did not contribute to OS, whether in univariate or multivariate analysis. Patients who failed lenvatinib had a lower proportion of having sequential systemic therapies compared with the Sorafenib group (36.2 vs 47.8%, p=0.02). The most frequently used sequential therapy following lenvatinib and sorafenib was chemotherapy (n=9, 42.8%) and regorafenib (n=33, 50.8%), respectively.

Conclusions

In clinical real-life practice, lenvatinib illustrated promising survival benefits and acceptable safety for patients with unresectable HCC, while reducing the risk of progression disease compared with sorafenib. Additionally, lack of approved post-lenvatinib systemic therapies is a serious issue in the real world.

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) for pancreatic head or periampullary lesions is being utilized with increasing frequency. However, few data are available for the elderly. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of MIPD in elderly population, by making a comparison with conventional open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) and with non-elderly population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search to identify all eligible studies in Cochrane Library, Ovid, and PubMed from their inception up to April 2020.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective studies involving 2727 patients were included. Of these, 3 compared MIPD and OPD in elderly patients, 2 compared MIPD in elderly and non-elderly patients, and 2 included both outcomes. Compared to those with OPD, elderly patients who underwent MIPD were associated with less 90-day mortality (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; P = 0.04) and fewer delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.88; P = 0.01). On the other hand, no significant difference was observed in terms of 30-day mortality, major morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C), postoperative hemorrhage, reoperation, 30-day readmission, and operative time. For patients who have treated with MIPD, elderly did not reveal worse outcomes than non-elderly.

CONCLUSION

MIPD is a safe and feasible procedure for select elderly patients if performed by experienced surgeons from high-volume pancreatic surgery centers. However, further randomized studies are required to confirm this.