Surgical shunts for extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in pediatric patients: a systematic review

Medium-to Long-term Outcomes of Rex Shunt in 105 Children With Extrahepatic Portal Vein Obstruction in China

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to analyze the medium-to long-term outcomes of Rex shunts in a large series of children with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO).

METHODS

The clinical data of 105 children aged between 6 months and 16 years with EHPVO who underwent Rex shunt between October 2014 and June 2021 at our center were retrospectively reviewed after more than 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall patency rate of the Rex shunt was 91.43% (96/105) during a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 24-98 months). Eighty-seven (82.86%) of the 105 patients underwent classical Rex shunt with internal jugular vein (IJV) bypass, and the remaining 18 patients (17.14%) underwent modified Rex shunt with intra-abdominal vein bypass. Patients with a patent shunt experienced portal hypertension resolution, which was characterized by a reduction in portal pressure, disappearance of variceal bleeding, relief of gastroesophageal varices, and relief of splenomegaly or hypersplenism. The rate of Rex shunt thrombosis in our center was 8.57% (9/105), and a repeat Rex shunt was effective for the treatment of graft thrombosis. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 14.26% (15/105) of the children, 38.46% (5/13) of whom received successful endovascular intervention therapy and experienced remission of portal hypertension symptoms. The patency rate of the classical Rex shunt was higher than that of the modified Rex shunt (97.70% vs. 61.11%), whereas the rate of vascular complications, including anastomotic stenosis and graft thrombosis, of the classical Rex shunt was lower than that of the modified Rex shunt (11.49% vs. 77.78%). Further comparison revealed that the risk of vascular complications was substantially greater in the modified Rex shunt group than in the classical Rex shunt group in the nonadjusted model, minimally adjusted model, and fully adjusted model (RR ranged from 6.77 to 7.07, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Rex shunt provides medium-to long-term benefits for children with EHPVO. The classical Rex shunt with IJV bypass provides the best patency rate and the fewest vascular complications.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Ⅲ TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

A History of Umbilical Vein Catheterization Does Not Preclude Children from a Successful Meso-Rex Bypass

INTRODUCTION

 Umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) can cause portal venous thrombosis, leading to the development of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and portal hypertension (PHT). The feasibility of the Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) for the treatment of EHPVO in patients with a history of UVC has been questioned. We compared the feasibility of performing an MRB in patients with or without a history of previous UVC.

METHODS

 A retrospective review of patients with EHPVO and known UVC status explored for a possible MRB at our institution was performed (1997-2022). Patients were categorized in two groups: with (UVC(+)) or without (UVC(-)) a history of UVC for comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

 One hundred and eighty-seven patients were included (n = 57 in UVC(+); n = 130 in UVC(-)). Patients in the UVC group were significantly younger at surgery and the incidence of prematurity was higher. Other risk factors for the development of EHPVO were similar between the groups, but only history of UVC could predict the ability to receive MRB (odds ratio [OR]: 7.4 [3.5-15.4]; p < 0.001). The success rate of MRB was significantly higher in patients with no history of UVC (28/57 [49.1%] in UVC(+) vs. 114/130 [87.7%] in UVC(-); p < 0.001). However, MRB patency at discharge (25/28 [89.3%] in UVC(+) vs. 106/114 [94.7%] in UVC(-); p = 0.3) was equally high in both groups.

CONCLUSION

 Our results indicate that a history of UVC is not a contraindication to MRB. Half of the patients were able to successfully receive an MRB. Patients with symptomatic PHT from EHPVO should not be excluded from consideration for MRB based on UVC history.

Outcome of Children with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate outcome after pediatric transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with respect to survival MATERIAL AND METHODS: After searching for studies on TIPS in children in Ovid, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane published between 2000 and 2022, individual patient data were retrieved from five retrospective cohorts. Overall survival (OS) and transplant-free survival (TFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test and compared to the indication (ascites vs. variceal bleeding) as well as to the level of obstruction (pre-hepatic vs. hepatic vs. post-hepatic). Additionally, TIPS patency was analyzed.

RESULTS

n = 135 pediatric patients were included in the final analysis. Indication for pediatric TIPS creation was heterogeneous among the included studies. TIPS patency decreased from 6 to 24 months, subsequent pediatric liver transplantation was performed in 22/135 (16.3%) of cases. The presence of ascites was related with poorer TFS (HR 2.3, p = 0.023), while variceal bleeding was not associated with impaired survival. Analysis of the level of obstruction (pre-hepatic, hepatic and post-hepatic) failed to prove significantly reduced OS for post-hepatic obstruction (HR 3.2, p = 0.092) and TFS (HR 1.3, p = 0.057). There was no difference in OS and TFS according to age at time of TIPS placement.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ascites associates with impaired survival after TIPS in children, with no differences in survival according to the age of the child. Interventional shunt procedures can be considered feasible for all ages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2a.

Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?

Purpose

To review our single-center surgical outcomes of redo operations after failed Rex shunt procedures.

Methods

From September 2017 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; median age: 8.6 years) with Rex shunt occlusions were admitted to our hospital. Two of these patients were previously operated on in our hospital, and the remaining 18 were from other centers. All patients underwent repeat operations after detailed preoperative evaluations.

Results

Preoperative wedged hepatic vein portography (WHVP) was conducted for 18 patients. Thirteen patients exhibited well-developed Rex recessus and intrahepatic portal vein during WHPV examination, consistent with the intraoperative exploration results. Fifteen patients (75%, 15/20) underwent redo-Rex shunt, four underwent Warren shunt and one underwent devascularization surgery. During the redo-Rex shunt operations, the left internal jugular veins (IJV) were used as bypass grafts in 11 patients; the intra-abdominal veins were used in 4 patients. The patients were followed up for 12-59 months (mean, 24.8 months). After redo Rex shunts, the grafts were patent in 14 patients (93.3%, 14/15), but 1 graft had thrombosis (6.7%, 1/15). Three patients suffered from postoperative anastomotic stenosis, and all of the stenosis was relieved with balloon dilatations. After re-Rex shunts, esophageal varices and spleen size were substantially reduced, and the platelet count significantly increased. Postoperative graft thrombosis was found in 1 patient after Warren shunt (1/4, 25%), and there was no graft stenosis. Compared with Warren surgery, patients who underwent re-Rex shunt had a significantly higher rate of platelet increase.

Conclusions

Redo-rex shunts can be finished in most patients with failed Rex shunts. Re-Rex shunt is a preferred surgical choice after a failed Rex shunt when a good bypass graft is available, and the surgical success rate can reach more than 90%. A suitable bypass graft is essential for a successful redo Rex shunt. Preoperative WHVP is recommended for the design of a redo surgical plan preoperatively.

Surgical management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in children: advantages of MesoRex shunt compared with distal splenorenal shunt

PURPOSE

To review surgical management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and compare MesoRex shunt (MRS) with distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS).

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective review documenting pre- and post-operative data in 21 children. Twenty-two shunts were performed, 15 MRS and 7 DSRS, over an 18-year period. Patients were followed up for a mean of 11 years (range 2-18). Data analysis included demographics, albumin, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), International normalised ratio (INR), fibrinogen, total bilirubin, liver enzymes and platelets before the operation and 2 years after shunt surgery.

RESULTS

One MRS thrombosed immediately post-surgery and the child was salvaged with DSRS. Variceal bleeding was controlled in both groups. Significant improvements were seen amongst MRS cohort in serum albumin, PT, PTT, and platelets and there was a mild improvement in serum fibrinogen. The DSRS cohort showed only a significant improvement in the platelet count. Neonatal umbilic vein catheterization (UVC) was a major risk for Rex vein obliteration.

CONCLUSION

In EHPVO, MRS is superior to DSRS and improves liver synthetic function. DSRS does control variceal bleeding but should only be considered when MRS is not technically feasible or as a salvage procedure when MRS fails.

A Rare Case of Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction in a Nine-Year-Old Female and Its Management: A Case Report

Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a kind of liver vascular disease that causes structural abnormalities in the portal veins, including cavernomatous metamorphosis and obstruction. It is the most common cause of esophageal varices-related hematemesis in youngsters. Significant risk factors include congenital abnormalities, dehydration, sepsis, trauma, hypercoagulable conditions, and multiple transfusions. Acute extrahepatic portal vein blockage is often ignored because patients are usually asymptomatic. Subacute and chronic stages can cause symptoms including splenomegaly and hematemesis without hepatic decompensation. Imaging studies aid in the diagnosis; Doppler imaging is added to ultrasonography to visualize portal vein blood flow. MRI and CT scans are used to visualize portal vein blockage. Prevention of acute bleeding is the cornerstone in the management. Studies have shown that transhepatic thrombolysis is the preferred choice to avoid systemic side effects. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treats extrahepatic portal venous thrombosis and is typically followed by conservative variceal hemorrhage treatment. Liver transplantation is performed when other management measures fail. Here, we present a rare case of EHPVO in a nine-year-old female who was lost to follow-up for a long time and later showed signs of portal biliopathy and non-visualization of a surgically created splenorenal shunt. Re-shunting was performed after detailed conservative management, and the patient responded well to the treatment given.

Technical Aspects and Considerations of Meso-Rex Bypass Following Liver Transplantation With Left Lateral Segment Grafts: Case Report and Review of the Literature

In pediatric patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction and complications of portal hypertension, but with normal liver function, a meso-Rex bypass (MRB) connecting the superior mesenteric vein to the intrahepatic left portal is the favored surgical management. Pediatric patients with a history of a partial liver transplant (LT), especially living donors, are at greater risk for portal vein complications. Hence, an adequate knowledge of this technique and its additional challenges in the post-LT patient setting is crucial. We provide an overview of the available literature on technical aspects for an MRB post-LT. Preoperative considerations are highlighted, along with intraoperative considerations and postoperative management. Special attention is given to the even-more-demanding aspect of performing an MRB post-liver transplantation with a left lateral segment. Surgical alternatives are also discussed. In addition, we report here a unique case in which this surgical technique was performed on a complex pediatric patient with a history of a living-donor LT with a left lateral segment graft over a decade ago.