Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for barcelona clinic liver cancer stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the milan criteria: a propensity score matching analysis

Effect of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization followed by resection versus upfront liver resection on the survival of single large hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Backgrounds/Aims

The efficacy of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (N-TACE) in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains open to debate. While N-TACE may reduce tumor size, its impact on long-term outcomes is inconclusive.

Methods

This meta-analysis reviewed studies on N-TACE before surgical resection vs. liver resection (LR) single large hepatocellular carcinoma (SLHCC) up to March 2023 from four online databases.

Results

Five studies with 1,556 patients were analyzed. No significant differences between N-TACE and LR groups were observed in 1-, 3-, or 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). No significant differences were noted in intraoperative blood loss between groups. Subgroup analysis showed favorable 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS with combination chemotherapy N-TACE (combination group), and better 1-year OS in the LR group with single-agent chemotherapy N-TACE (single-agent group). Five-year DFS favored LR in the single-agent group, and N-TACE in the combination group.

Conclusions

Managing SLHCC requires intricate considerations, and the treatment strategies for this challenging subgroup of HCC need to be improved. The influence of N-TACE on long-term survival depends on the specific chemotherapy regimen employed, and its impact on intraoperative blood loss in SLHCC appears limited.

Neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

High rate of recurrence impaired the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

METHODS

41 HCC patients received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were respectively enrolled. The safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant therapy were assessed. The prognosis was evaluated and compared with that of 41 matched HCC patients who received surgery alone.

RESULTS

36 (87.8%) patients had adverse events (AEs) and only one patient had a grade 3/4 of ALT elevated. All patients performed surgery successfully and no severe postoperative complications occurred. The objective response rate (ORR) was 56.1% and 87.8% based on RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively. 15 (36.6%) patients had radiological complete tumor necrosis and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) was 13 (31.7%) and 18 (43.9%), respectively. The incidence of microvascular invasion (MVI) was 4.9% in neoadjuvant therapy patients, compared with 64.9% before propensity score matching (PSM) and 60.9% after PSM for surgery alone patients. Neoadjuvant therapy patients had a significant better prognosis than surgery alone patients (recurrence-free survival p = 0.041, overall survival p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results suggest the neoadjuvant D-TACE and tislelizumab therapy is safe and benefit to the pathological results and prognosis for patients with resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

Alpha-Fetoprotein Response after First Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Complete Pathologic Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Cancer

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is used as a bridging treatment in liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the main tumor marker used for HCC surveillance. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of using the AFP change after the first TACE in the prediction of complete tumor necrosis. The study comprised 101 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation (LT) after TACE in the period between January 2011 and December 2020. The ΔAFP was defined as the difference between the AFP value before the first TACE and AFP either before the second TACE or the LT. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were used to identify an optimal cut-off value. Complete tumor necrosis was found in 26.1% (18 of 69) and 6.3% (2 of 32) of patients with an initial AFP level under and over 100 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.020). The optimal cut-off value of ΔAFP for the prediction of complete necrosis was a decline of ≥10.2 ng/mL and ≥340.5 ng/mL in the corresponding subgroups. Complete tumor necrosis rates were: 62.5% (5 of 8) in patients with an initial AFP < 100 ng/mL and decline of ≥10.2 ng/mL; 21.3% (13 of 61) in patients with an initial AFP < 100 ng/mL and decline of <10.2 ng/mL; 16.7% (2 of 12) in patients with an initial AFP > 100 ng/mL and decline of ≥340.5 ng/mL; and null in 20 patients with an initial AFP > 100 ng/mL and decline of <340.5 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.003). The simple scoring system, based on the initial AFP and AFP decline after the first treatment, distinguished between a high, intermediate and low probability of complete necrosis, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.699 (95% confidence intervals 0.577 to 0.821, p = 0.001). Combining the initial AFP with its change after the first treatment enables early identification of the efficacy of TACE.

Hepatectomy versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable BCLC stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria: A randomized clinical trial

Background

Hepatectomy is the recommended option for radical treatment of BCLC stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has progressed beyond the Milan criteria. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of preoperative neoadjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for these patients.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, open-label clinical study, BCLC stage A/B HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either neoadjuvant TACE prior to hepatectomy (NT group) or hepatectomy alone (OP group). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Of 249 patients screened, 164 meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either the NT group (n = 82) or OP group (n = 82) and completed follow-up requirements. Overall survival was significantly greater in the NT group compared to the OP group at 1 year (97.2% vs. 82.4%), two years (88.4% vs. 60.4%), and three years (71.6% vs. 45.7%) (p = 0.0011) post-treatment. Similarly, PFS was significantly longer in the NT group than the OP group at 1 year (60.1% vs. 39.9%), 2 years (53.4% vs. 24.5%), and 3 years (42.2% vs. 24.5%) (p = 0.0003). No patients reported adverse events of grade 3 or above in either group.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant TACE prolongs the survival of BCLC stage A/B HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria without increasing severe adverse events frequency.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200055618.

Efficacy and safety of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare preoperative transcatheter arterial chemotherapy (TACE) plus liver resection (LR) with liver resection (LR) alone for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, web of science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched from their initiation until 24 August 2021. Eligible languages were English and Chinese. This study includes only RCT and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the prognostic factors including overall survival rate (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and we also research the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complication.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine trials (2 RCTs and 27 cohorts) were included, containing a total of 22023 patients, compared with hepatic resection, preoperative TACE plus LR shows the benefit of RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.80, 95%CI = [0.73-0.88], p < .001), and the combined therapy was associated with a higher OS for patients with HCC in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B stage (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = [0.60-0.96], p = .024). In terms of safety, combination therapy is related to less intraoperative blood loss (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD)=-11.17, 95%CI = [-21.79 to -0.54], p = .039); and there's no statistical significance in postoperative complication (Risk Ratio (RR)=0.99, 95%CI= [0.90-1.08], p = 0.771) and operative time (WMD = 7.57, 95%CI = [-5.07 to 20.20], p = .240).

CONCLUSION

TACE prior to surgery should be recommended as a routine treatment for HCC patients, especially BCLC B stage HCC, in view of its benefits for RFS and OS. Large, multicenter, and blinded randomized trials should be performed to confirm these findings.

Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Its Definition, Clinical Significance, and Comprehensive Management

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of malignancies in the world, and most HCC patients undergoing liver resection relapse within five years. Microvascular invasion (MVI) is an independent factor for both the disease-free survival and overall survival of HCC patients. At present, the definition of MVI is still controversial, and a global consensus on how to evaluate MVI precisely is needed. Moreover, this review summarizes the current knowledge and clinical significance of MVI for HCC patients. In terms of management, antiviral therapy, wide surgical margins, and postoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) could effectively reduce the incidence of MVI or improve the disease-free survival and overall survival of HCC patients with MVI. However, other perioperative management practices, such as anatomical resection, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immune therapy, should be clarified in future investigations.