1
|
Pilz da Cunha G, Coupé VMH, Zonderhuis BM, Bonjer HJ, Erdmann JI, Kazemier G, Besselink MG, Swijnenburg RJ. Healthcare cost expenditure for robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a bottom-up economic evaluation. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:971-980. [PMID: 38853074 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is increasingly performed via the robot-assisted approach but may be associated with increased costs. This study is a post-hoc comparison of healthcare cost expenditure for robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in a high-volume center. METHODS In-hospital and 30-day postoperative healthcare costs were calculated per patient in a retrospective series (October 2015-December 2022). RESULTS Overall, 298 patients were included (143 RLR and 155 LLR). Benefits of RLR were lower conversion rate (2.8% vs 12.3%, p = 0.002), shorter operating time (167 min vs 198 min, p = 0.044), and less blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, p < 0.001). Total per-procedure costs of RLR (€10260) and LLR (€9931) were not significantly different (mean difference €329 [95% bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI) €-1179-€2120]). Lower costs with RLR due to shorter surgical and operating room time were offset by higher disposable instrumentation costs resulting in comparable intraoperative costs (€5559 vs €5247, mean difference €312 [95% BCI €-25-€648]). Postoperative costs were similar for RLR (€4701) and LLR (€4684), mean difference €17 [95% BCI €-1357-€1727]. When also considering purchase and maintenance costs, RLR resulted in higher total per-procedure costs. DISCUSSION In a high-volume center, RLR can have similar per-procedure cost expenditure as LLR when disregarding capital investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara M Zonderhuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Jaap Bonjer
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pilz da Cunha G, De Meyere C, D'Hondt M, Swijnenburg RJ. Robotic liver parenchymal transection using the SynchroSeal. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11005-4. [PMID: 38977499 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11005-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is much heterogeneity in the instrumentation used for parenchymal transection in minimally invasive liver surgery. Instruments specifically designed for robotic parenchymal transection of the liver are lacking. We aim to gain insight into the safety and effectiveness of the SynchroSeal (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), a novel bipolar electrosurgical device, in the context of liver surgery. METHODS The present study is a post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from patients undergoing robotic liver resection (RLR) using the SynchroSeal in two high-volume centres. The results of the SynchroSeal were compared with that of the previous generation bipolar-sealer; Vessel Sealer Extend (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) using propensity score matching, after excluding the first 25 Vessel Sealer procedures per center. RESULTS During the study period (February 2020-March 2023), 155 RLRs meeting the eligibility criteria were performed with the SynchroSeal (after implementation in June 2021) and 145 RLRs with the Vessel Sealer. Excellent outcomes were achieved when performing parenchymal transection with the SynchroSeal; low conversion rate (n = 1, 0.6%), small amounts of intraoperative blood loss (median 40 mL [IQR 10-100]), short hospital stays (median 3 days [IQR 2-4]), and adequate overall morbidity (19.4%) as well as severe morbidity (11.0%). In a matched comparison (n = 94 vs n = 94), the SynchroSeal was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (48 mL [IQR 10-143] vs 95 mL [IQR 30-200], p = 0.032) compared to the Vessel Sealer. Other perioperative outcomes were similar between the devices. CONCLUSION The SynchroSeal is a safe and effective device for robotic liver parenchymal transection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghamarnejad O, Sahan LA, Kardassis D, Widyaningsih R, Edwin B, Stavrou GA. Technical aspects and learning curve of complex laparoscopic hepatectomy: how we do it. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11002-7. [PMID: 38951242 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11002-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic liver surgery has advanced significantly, offering benefits, such as reduced intraoperative complications and quicker recovery. However, complex laparoscopic hepatectomy (CLH) is technically demanding, requiring skilled surgeons. This study aims to share technical aspects, insightful tips, and outcomes of CLH at our center, focusing on the safety and learning curve. METHODS We reviewed all patients undergoing liver resection at our center from July 2017 to December 2023, focusing on those who underwent CLH. Of 135 laparoscopic liver resections, 63 (46.7%) were CLH. The learning curve of CLH was also assessed through linear and piecewise regression analyses considering the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. RESULTS Postoperative complications occurred only in 4.8% of patients, with a 90-day mortality rate of 3.2%. The mean operation time and blood loss significantly decreased after the first 20 operations, marking the learning curve's optimal cut-off. Significant improvements in R0 resection (p = 0.024) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.035) were noted beyond the learning curve threshold. CONCLUSION CLH is a safe and effective approach, with a relatively short learning curve of 20 operations. Future large-scale studies should further investigate the impact of surgical experience on CLH outcomes to establish guidelines for training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Laura-Ann Sahan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Kardassis
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Rizky Widyaningsih
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Department of HBP Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gregor Alexander Stavrou
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sijberden JP, Hoogteijling TJ, Aghayan D, Ratti F, Tan EK, Morrison-Jones V, Lanari J, Haentjens L, Wei K, Tzedakis S, Martinie J, Osei Bordom D, Zimmitti G, Crespo K, Magistri P, Russolillo N, Conci S, Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, D’Souza D, Zozaya G, Caula C, Geller D, Robles Campos R, Croner R, Rehman S, Jovine E, Efanov M, Alseidi A, Memeo R, Dagher I, Giuliante F, Sparrelid E, Ahmad J, Gallagher T, Schmelzle M, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Cipriani F, Koh YX, White S, Lopez Ben S, Rotellar F, Serrano PE, Vivarelli M, Ruzzenente A, Ferrero A, Di Benedetto F, Besselink MG, Sucandy I, Sutcliffe RP, Vrochides D, Fuks D, Liu R, D’Hondt M, Cillo U, Primrose JN, Goh BK, Aldrighetti LA, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients. Ann Surg 2024; 280:108-117. [PMID: 38482665 PMCID: PMC11161239 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic liver surgery (RLS) and laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) in various settings. BACKGROUND Clear advantages of RLS over LLS have rarely been demonstrated, and the associated costs of robotic surgery are generally higher than those of laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, the exact role of the robotic approach in minimally invasive liver surgery remains to be defined. METHODS In this international retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of patients who underwent RLS and LLS for all indications between 2009 and 2021 in 34 hepatobiliary referral centers were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare both approaches across several types of procedures: (1) minor resections in the anterolateral (2, 3, 4b, 5, and 6) or (2) posterosuperior segments (1, 4a, 7, 8), and (3) major resections (≥3 contiguous segments). Propensity score matching was used to mitigate the influence of selection bias. The primary outcome was textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS), previously defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents ≥grade 2, postoperative bile leak ≥grade B, severe morbidity, readmission, and 90-day or in-hospital mortality with the presence of an R0 resection margin in case of malignancy. The absence of a prolonged length of stay was added to define TOLS+. RESULTS Among the 10.075 included patients, 1.507 underwent RLS and 8.568 LLS. After propensity score matching, both groups constituted 1.505 patients. RLS was associated with higher rates of TOLS (78.3% vs 71.8%, P < 0.001) and TOLS+ (55% vs 50.4%, P = 0.026), less Pringle usage (39.1% vs 47.1%, P < 0.001), blood loss (100 vs 200 milliliters, P < 0.001), transfusions (4.9% vs 7.9%, P = 0.003), conversions (2.7% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001), overall morbidity (19.3% vs 25.7%, P < 0.001), and microscopically irradical resection margins (10.1% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.015), and shorter operative times (190 vs 210 minutes, P = 0.015). In the subgroups, RLS tended to have higher TOLS rates, compared with LLS, for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments (n = 431 per group, 75.9% vs 71.2%, P = 0.184) and major resections (n = 321 per group, 72.9% vs 67.5%, P = 0.086), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS While both produce excellent outcomes, RLS might facilitate slightly higher TOLS rates than LLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper P. Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tijs J. Hoogteijling
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Davit Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery, Ringerike Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ek-Khoon Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Victoria Morrison-Jones
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Louis Haentjens
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kongyuan Wei
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - John Martinie
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniel D’Souza
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabriel Zozaya
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cèlia Caula
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ricardo Robles Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Roland Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Shafiq Rehman
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, CA
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Miulli Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department for Clinical Science, Division of Surgery, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jawad Ahmad
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridges Road, Coventry, UK
| | - Tom Gallagher
- St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Steven White
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Santi Lopez Ben
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo E. Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Brian K.P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Luca A. Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seow-En I, Koh YX, Tan EKW, Tan EK. Simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and liver metastasectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction: A proof-of-concept study. Heliyon 2024; 10:e33065. [PMID: 39022098 PMCID: PMC11252925 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background, Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) via the anus or vagina is an alternative to conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. NOSE has been shown to be safe and effective, resulting in decreased postoperative pain, analgesia use, and improved recovery, without oncological compromise. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of NOSE for combined colectomy with liver metastasectomy. Methods, From July 2022 to April 2024, all cases of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection and synchronous liver metastasectomy with NOSE were included in the study. Selection criteria included a maximum specimen diameter of less than 5 cm and patient body mass index of less than 35 kg/m2. Results, Over the 22-month duration, four consecutive patients (two males, two females) underwent combined resection with NOSE. Mean age and BMI were 74.8 (range 63-81) years and 20.9 (range 19.5-22.3) kg/m2 respectively. Patient A and D underwent anterior resection for sigmoid cancer, Patient B underwent D3 right hemicolectomy for cecal cancer, and Patient C underwent subtotal colectomy for synchronous cecal and descending colon cancer. All patients underwent liver metastasectomy at the same sitting. Patient A and D had transanal NOSE while Patients B and C underwent transvaginal NOSE. Mean operative time and blood loss was 416 (range 330-535) minutes and 338 (range 50-500) ml respectively. All patients recovered gastrointestinal function within the first two postoperative days. Infected seroma of the liver bed occurred in one patient requiring percutaneous drainage. The average maximum colon tumor diameter was 2.9 (range 1.3-4.0) cm. All resection margins were clear. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.5 (range 2-12) months. Conclusions, Simultaneous colectomy and liver metastasectomy with NOSE for colorectal cancer is feasible and safe in highly selected patients, resulting in good postoperative outcomes. This proof-of-concept analysis paves the way for larger studies to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Ek Khoon Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Connell RM, Hoti E. Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2379. [PMID: 39001441 PMCID: PMC11240734 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Michael O'Connell
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liang B, Peng Y, Yang W, Yang Y, Li B, Wei Y, Liu F. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)01769-6. [PMID: 38955633 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive hepatectomy for difficult lesions located in posterosuperior segments (segments I, IVa, VII and VIII) remains challenging. The value of robotic liver resection (RLR) compared with laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for posterosuperior segments is controversial. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to validate the safety and efficacy of RLR in posterosuperior segments. METHODS The Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched to identify available research published up to October 2023. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan software version 5.3. RESULTS Six studies with a total of 2289 patients (RLR: n = 749; LLR: n = 1540) were included in this meta-analysis. The RLR group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -119.54 ml, 95% CI: -178.89 to -60.19, P < 0.0001), fewer blood transfusions (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.80, P = 0.001), a lower conversion rate (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.61, P < 0.0001), and a shorter operative time (WMD = -27.16 min, 95% CI: -35.95 to -18.36, P < 0.00001). DISCUSSION Compared with LLR, RLR for lesions in the posterosuperior segments could be safe and effective, and it has superior surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Liang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yufu Peng
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wugui Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yubo Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang JHE, Xu H, Zhao Y, Wee IJY, Ang JX, Tan EKW, Seow-En I. Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:172. [PMID: 38829526 PMCID: PMC11147895 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03361-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
AIM Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an alternative to conventional transabdominal retrieval. We aimed to compare outcomes following transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) and transabdominal specimen extraction (TASE) in minimally invasive abdominal surgery. METHODS An electronic database search of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL was performed from inception until March 2023. Comparative studies evaluating TVSE versus TASE in adult female patients were included. Studies involving transanal NOSE, endoluminal surgery, or TVSE with concomitant hysterectomy were excluded. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratio were estimated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes respectively. Primary outcomes were postoperative day 1 (POD1) pain and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were operative time, rescue analgesia, morbidity, and cosmesis. A review of sexual, oncological, and technical outcomes was performed. RESULTS Thirteen studies (2 randomised trials, 11 retrospective cohort studies), involving 1094 patients (TASE 583, TVSE 511), were included in the analysis. Seven studies involved colorectal disease and six assessed gynaecological conditions. TVSE resulted in significantly decreased POD1 pain (WMD 1.08, 95% CI: 0.49, 1.68) and shorter LOS (WMD 1.18 days, 95% CI: 0.14, 2.22), compared to TASE. Operative time was similar between both groups, with fewer patients requiring postoperative rescue analgesia with TVSE. Overall morbidity rates, as well as both wound-related and non-wound related complication rates were better with TVSE, while anastomotic morbidity rates were comparable. Cosmetic scores were higher with TVSE. TVSE did not result in worse sexual or oncological outcomes. CONCLUSION TVSE may be feasible and beneficial compared to TASE when performed by proficient laparoscopic operators, using appropriate selection criteria. Continued evaluation with prospective studies is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Hui Er Chang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| | - Hongyun Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| | - Yun Zhao
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Jun Yan Wee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| | - Joella Xiaohong Ang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| | - Emile Kwong-Wei Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| | - Isaac Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoogteijling TJ, Abu Hilal M, Zimmitti G, Aghayan DL, Wu AGR, Cipriani F, Gruttadauria S, Scatton O, Long TCD, Herman P, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Tang CN, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cherqui D, Liang X, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Han HS, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Dokmak S, Chen KH, Liu R, Fuks D, Zhang W, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Goh BKP. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108309. [PMID: 38626588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last three decades, minimally invasive liver resection has been replacing conventional open approach in liver surgery. More recently, developments in neoadjuvant chemotherapy have led to increased multidisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases with both medical and surgical treatment modalities. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections remains poorly understood. METHODS A multicenter, international, database of 4998 minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases was used to compare surgical outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. To correct for baseline imbalance, propensity score matching, coarsened exact matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed. RESULTS 2546 patients met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching there were 759 patients in both groups and 383 patients in both groups after coarsened exact matching. Baseline characteristics were equal after both matching strategies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant worse surgical outcomes of minimally invasive minor hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no statistically significant impact on short-term surgical outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijs J Hoogteijling
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrew G R Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy; Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy; Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, China
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center - IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ho Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Kuo Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center and Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Luo W, Jin D, Huang J, Zhang J, Xu Y, Gu J, Sun C, Yu J, Xu P, Liu L, Zhang Z, Guo C, Liu H, Miao C, Zhong J. Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure Reduces Gas Embolism During Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2024; 279:588-597. [PMID: 38456278 PMCID: PMC10922664 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of low and standard pneumoperitoneal pressure (PP) on the occurrence of gas embolism during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). BACKGROUND LLR has an increased risk of gas embolism. Although animal studies have shown that low PP reduces the occurrence of gas embolism, clinical evidence is lacking. METHODS This parallel, dual-arm, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 141 patients undergoing elective LLR. Patients were randomized into standard ("S," 15 mm Hg; n = 70) or low ("L," 10 mm Hg; n = 71) PP groups. Severe gas embolism (≥ grade 3, based on the Schmandra microbubble method) was detected using transesophageal echocardiography and recorded as the primary outcome. Intraoperative vital signs and postoperative recovery profiles were also evaluated. RESULTS Fewer severe gas embolism cases (n = 29, 40.8% vs n = 47, 67.1%, P = 0.003), fewer abrupt decreases in end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure, shorter severe gas embolism duration, less peripheral oxygen saturation reduction, and fewer increases in heart rate and lactate during gas embolization episodes was found in group L than in group S. Moreover, a higher arterial partial pressure of oxygen and peripheral oxygen saturation were observed, and fewer fluids and vasoactive drugs were administered in group L than in group S. In both groups, the distensibility index of the inferior vena cava negatively correlated with central venous pressure throughout LLR, and a comparable quality of recovery was observed. CONCLUSIONS Low PP reduced the incidence and duration of severe gas embolism and achieved steadier hemodynamics and vital signs during LLR. Therefore, a low PP strategy can be considered a valuable choice for the future LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenchen Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Wusong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Danfeng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinlin Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongfeng Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiahui Gu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Caihong Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiyao Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Luping Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenyue Guo
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongjin Liu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Changhong Miao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Zhong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Wusong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Fudan Zhangjiang Institute, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haney CM, Holze S, Liatsikos E, Dietel A, Kallidonis P, Tatanis V, Katsakiori P, Spinos T, Imkamp F, Stolzenburg JU. IDEAL-D Phase 0 Evaluation of the Avatera System in Robot-Assisted Prostate, Bladder and Renal Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:239-245. [PMID: 38252556 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the utilization of novel Avatera system in urological operations according to the IDEAL-D framework recommendations for high-risk invasive surgical devices. Materials and Methods: Three surgeons attempted to perform 23 upper and lower urinary tract operations on human cadavers and in live porcine models using the Avatera system. Total operative time and the duration of the substeps were evaluated. Surgical performance was assessed with the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) score. Suturing was rated using the technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery. Attending surgeons rated their satisfaction with the Avatera system on a scale of 1-5. Results and Limitation: Seventeen out of 18 operations performed on cadavers were completed, while one pyeloplasty was discontinued. All five operations performed in porcine models were completed. Although 1 pig was euthanized on the fifth postoperative day, its symptoms were unrelated to surgery. Mean GEARS and Suturing scores in the upper urinary tract were 29 ± 0.7 and 29.5 ± 0.95, respectively, and in the lower urinary 28.5 ± 1.2 and 29.5 ± 0.5, respectively. Surgeons' satisfaction was high or very high for all procedures. Conclusions: The Avatera system was associated with good surgical performance and high surgeons' satisfaction rates. All urological procedures performed were shown to be feasible, with comparable risks to other robot-assisted surgery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelan-Max Haney
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sigrun Holze
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Anja Dietel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Florian Imkamp
- Department of Urology, Clinic for Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Yoon YS, Lee JS, Lee B, Lee HW, Cho JY. Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection in the last two decades: lessons from 2000 cases at a referral Korean center. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1200-1210. [PMID: 38087108 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10580-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has evolved to become the standard surgical approach in many referral centers worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze how LLR evolved at a single high-volume referral center since its introduction, more than two decades ago. METHODS Data from all consecutive LLR between January 2003 and September 2022 at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between three time periods, with major technological innovations considered as landmarks: before introduction of laparoscopic-US and CUSA (2003-2006), before (2006-2015) and after (2015-2022) introduction of high-definition scope. RESULTS During the analyzed time periods the number of technically challenging procedures increased from 39.2 to 61.1% (p < 0.001). The most recent period showed shorter median operation time (from 267.5' to 175', p < 0.001), lower median estimated blood loss (EBL) (from 500 to 300 ml, p < 0.001), lower intraoperative transfusions (from 33.8 to 9.3%, p < 0.001), shorter median postoperative hospital stay (from 12 to 6 days, p < 0.001). The time period, a technical major resection and an underlying liver cirrhosis were found to be the associated with longer operation time (p < 0.001) in the multivariable linear regression analysis, while tumor size, technically major surgeries and liver cirrhosis were associated with higher EBL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION During the last two decades, the indications for patients undergoing LLR have expanded significantly, including more and more challenging procedures and frail patients. Despite such challenges, perioperative outcomes improved, although technically major procedures, cirrhotic patients and huge tumors have still to be considered challenging situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 166 Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jun-Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee B, Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Lee HW, Kang M, Park Y, Kim J. Association between Unplanned Conversion and Patient Survival after Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1116. [PMID: 38398431 PMCID: PMC10889730 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Unplanned conversion (UPC) is considered to be a predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. However, the effects of UPC on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and those who underwent UPC for HCC. Among 1029 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2021, 251 were eligible for the study. Of 251 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC in PS segments, 29 (26.0%) required UPC, and 222 underwent LLR. After 1:5 PSM, 25 patients were selected for the UPC group and 125 for the LLR group. Blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and postoperative complication were higher in the UPC group. Regarding oncologic outcomes, although the 5-year overall survival rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.544), the recurrence-free survival rate was lower in the UPC group (p < 0.001). UPC was associated with poor short-term as well as inferior long-term outcomes compared with LLR for HCC in PS segments. Therefore, surgeons must carefully select patients and consider early conversion if unexpected bleeding occurs to maintain safety and oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro, 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea; (B.L.); (H.-S.H.); (Y.-S.Y.); (M.K.); (J.K.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kitano Y, Inoue Y, Sato Y, Oba A, Ono Y, Sato T, Ito H, Matsueda K, Baba H, Takahashi Y. Management of potential portal vein thrombus during laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy following portal vein embolization. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:56. [PMID: 38332380 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03250-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Portal vein embolization (PVE) is often performed prior to right hemihepatectomy (RH) to increase the future liver remnants. However, intraoperative removal of portal vein thrombus (PVT) is occasionally required. An algorithm for treating the right branch of the PV using laparoscopic RH (LRH) after PVE is lacking and requires further investigation. METHODS In our department, after the confirmation of a lack of extension of PVT to the main portal trunk or left branch on preoperative examination (ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography), a final evaluation was performed using intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS). Here we present the cases of eight patients who underwent LRH after PVE and examine the safety of our treatment strategies. RESULTS IOUS revealed PVT extension into the main portal trunk in two cases. For the other six patients without PVT extension, we continued the laparoscopic procedure. In contrast, in the two cases with PVT extension, we converted to laparotomy after hepatic transection and removed the PVT. The median operation time for hepatectomy was 562 min (421-659 min), the median blood loss was 293 mL (85-1010 mL), no liver-related postoperative complications were observed, and the median length of stay was 10 days (6-34 days). CONCLUSIONS PVT evaluation and removal are important in cases of LRH after PVE. Our strategy is safe and IOUS is particularly useful for laparoscopically evaluating PVT extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Kitano
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Yozo Sato
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Matsueda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sijberden JP, Zimmitti G, Cipriani F, Furumaya A, Lanari J, Suhool A, Osei-Bordom D, Aghayan D, Jovine E, Ruzzenente A, Ardito F, D'Hondt M, Ferrero A, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lopez-Ben S, Dagher I, Fuks D, Alseidi A, Rotellar F, di Benedetto F, Ratti F, Swijnenburg RJ, Gringeri E, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Edwin B, Sutcliffe RP, Primrose JN, Cillo U, Besselink MG, Aldrighetti LA, Abu Hilal M. Trends in the characteristics and perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open resections for benign liver lesions: An international multicenter retrospective cohort study of 845 patients. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:188-202. [PMID: 37989610 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid benign liver lesions (BLL) are increasingly discovered, but clear indications for surgical treatment are often lacking. Concomitantly, laparoscopic liver surgery is increasingly performed. The aim of this study was to assess if the availability of laparoscopic surgery has had an impact on the characteristics and perioperative outcomes of patients with BLL. METHODS This is a retrospective international multicenter cohort study, including patients undergoing a laparoscopic or open liver resection for BLL from 19 centers in eight countries. Patients were divided according to the time period in which they underwent surgery (2008-2013, 2014-2016, and 2017-2019). Unadjusted and risk-adjusted (using logistic regression) time-trend analyses were performed. The primary outcome was textbook outcome (TOLS), defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents ≥ grade 2, bile leak ≥ grade B, severe complications, readmission and 90-day or in-hospital mortality, with the absence of a prolonged length of stay added to define TOLS+. RESULTS In the complete dataset comprised of patients that underwent liver surgery for all indications, the proportion of patients undergoing liver surgery for benign disease remained stable (12.6% in the first time period, 11.9% in the second time period and 12.1% in the last time period, p = 0.454). Overall, 845 patients undergoing a liver resection for BLL in the first (n = 374), second (n = 258) or third time period (n = 213) were included. The rates of ASA-scores≥3 (9.9%-16%,p < 0.001), laparoscopic surgery (57.8%-77%,p < 0.001), and Pringle maneuver use (33.2%-47.2%,p = 0.001) increased, whereas the length of stay decreased (5 to 4 days,p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the TOLS rate (86.6%-81.3%,p = 0.151), while the TOLS + rate increased from 41.7% to 58.7% (p < 0.001). The latter result was confirmed in the risk-adjusted analyses (aOR 1.849,p = 0.004). CONCLUSION The surgical treatment of BLL has evolved with an increased implementation of the laparoscopic approach and a decreased length of stay. This evolution was paralleled by stable TOLS rates above 80% and an increase in the TOLS + rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alicia Furumaya
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Amal Suhool
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Davit Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Ardito
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Santi Lopez-Ben
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris 75014, France
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fabrizio di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Enrico Gringeri
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - John N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luca A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Lee E, Lee B, Lee HW, Cho JY, Montalti R, Troisi RI. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for multiple hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the Milan criteria: An Eastern-Western propensity score-matched analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024; 31:2-11. [PMID: 37916427 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still little knowledge about the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long- term outcomes of LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) for patients with multiple HCC within and beyond the Milan criteria, and in both BCLC-A and -B stage. METHODS Data regarding all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for multiple HCC were retrospectively collected from Asian (South Korean) and European (Italian) referral HPB centers. The cases were propensity-score matched for age, BMI, center, extent of the resection, postero-superior location of the lesion, underlying liver condition, BCLB staging and the Milan criteria. RESULTS A total of 203 patients were included in the study: 27% of patients had undergone hemi-hepatectomy, 26.6% atypical resections, 20.6% sectionectomy and 16.2% segmentectomy. After PSM two cohorts of 57 patients were obtained, with no significant differences in all preoperative characteristics. The length of hospital stay was significantly lower after LLR (median 7 vs. 9 days, p < .01), with no statistically significant differences in estimated blood loss, operation time, transfusions, postoperative bile leak, ascites, severe complications and R1 resection rates. After a median follow-up of 61 (±7) months, there were no significant differences between OLR and LLR in both median OS (69 vs. 59 months, p = .74, respectively) and median DFS (12 vs. 10 months, p = .48, respectively). CONCLUSION LLR for multiple HCC can be safe and effective in selected cases and is able to shorten median hospital stay without affecting perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Eunhye Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ou Y, Liu T, Huang T, Xue Z, Yao M, Li J, Huang Y, Cai X, Yan Y. Risk Factors and Long-Term Implications of Unplanned Conversion During Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:1088-1096. [PMID: 37751197 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become a widely used standardized operation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the field of hepatic surgery. However, the risk factors and long-term implications associated with unplanned conversion to an open procedure during the LLR have not been adequately studied. Methods: The study incorporated 96 patients with HCC. Risk factors of conversion and their prognosis were analyzed by comparing patients who successfully underwent LLR with those who required unplanned conversion. Results: In this study, the unplanned conversion rate for laparoscopic hepatectomy was 42.7%. Patients who underwent conversion had longer length of stay (8 versus 7 days, P < .001), longer operation time (297.73 versus 194.03 minutes, P = .000), a higher transfusion rate (29.3% versus 5.5%, P < .001), and more postoperative complications compared with patients who successfully underwent LLR. The two surgical maneuvers did not show substantial disparities in terms of total survival and disease-free survival rates. Risk factors of unplanned conversion contained tumor location (odds ratio [OR], 3.129; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.214-8.066; P = 0.018) and tumor size (OR, 2.652; 95% CI: 1.039-6.767; P = 0.041). Conclusions: The unplanned conversion during LLR for HCC was linked to unfavorable short-term prognosis, yet it did not influence long-term oncologic outcomes. Moreover, preoperative evaluation of tumor size and location may effectively reduce the probability of unplanned conversion during LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Ou
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Taiyun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Zhaosong Xue
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ming Yao
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jianjun Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Yubin Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Xiaoyong Cai
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Yihe Yan
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mithany RH, Gerges F, Shahid MH, Abdallah S, Manasseh M, Abdelmaseeh M, Abdalla M, Elmahi E. Operative and Hepatic Function Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e47274. [PMID: 37859673 PMCID: PMC10584273 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is a pivotal treatment for various liver diseases, and the choice between laparoscopic (LR) and open (OR) methods is debatable. This study aims to compare their respective complications and hepatic outcomes comprehensively, providing critical insights to guide clinical decisions and optimize patient results. We conducted a comprehensive review across PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS, and the Cochrane Library until September 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic (LR) and open (OR) liver resections were included. Data screening, extraction, and quality assessments utilized the Risk of Bias (ROB-2). We conducted our analysis using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software, and the data were presented as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our comprehensive research yielded 3,192 relevant records, and 9 RCTs were finally included. LR exhibited reduced operative bleeding (MD = -82.87 ml, 95% CI: -132.45 to -33.30, P=0.001) and shorter hospital stays (MD = -2.32 days, 95% CI: -3.65 to -0.98, P=0.0007). The risk of complications was significantly lower in the LR group (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.76, P<0.0001), especially in Clavian-Dindo classification degree 1 and 2 complications (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, P=0.005). LR patients also had lower postoperative AST levels at one day (MD = -123.16 U/L, 95% CI: -206.08 to -40.24, P=0.004) and three days (MD = -35.95 U/L, 95% CI: -65.83 to -6.06, P=0.02). These findings underscore LR's superiority, emphasizing its potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes, reduce complications, and improve recovery in liver resection procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reda H Mithany
- Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston, GBR
| | - Farid Gerges
- General and Emergency Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston, GBR
| | | | | | - Mina Manasseh
- General Surgery, Torbay and South Devon National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR
| | - Mark Abdelmaseeh
- General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, EGY
| | - Mazin Abdalla
- General Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston, GBR
| | - Eiad Elmahi
- General Surgery, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Uemoto Y, Fujikawa T, Matsuoka T. Laparoscopic Liver Resection Utilizing a Water Jet Scalpel for Patients With Liver Fibrosis. Cureus 2023; 15:e45212. [PMID: 37854745 PMCID: PMC10581323 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A variety of devices are utilized in order to resect liver parenchyma in laparoscopic liver resection. However, liver fibrosis makes hepatectomy problematic because the liver is rigid and prone to bleeding. The water jet scalpel, which dissociates the liver parenchyma with a jet stream has no thermal damage and is clinically utilized in liver resection, but its safety and efficacy during laparoscopic liver resection for patients with liver fibrosis remain unknown. Methods We analyzed patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection utilizing the water jet scalpel with liver fibrosis at our hospital. A water jet scalpel was used for liver parenchymal transection, and a saline-linked ball-tipped electrocautery was simultaneously used for hemostasis. Results Subsectionectomy was one case, left lateral sectionectomy was two cases, and non-anatomical liver resection was three cases. The median blood loss was 70 mL (24-104 mL). There was no need for the intraoperative Pringle's maneuver. No perioperative blood transfusion was performed, and there were no postoperative complications, including posthepatectomy liver failure. Conclusion It was suggested that laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver fibrosis can be safely performed with the water jet scalpel.
Collapse
|
20
|
Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Lang F, Bintintan V, Fan C, Wehrtmann F, Studier-Fischer A, Felinska EA, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic bowel anastomoses: randomized crossover in vivo experimental study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5894-5901. [PMID: 37072638 PMCID: PMC10338398 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10044-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Initial learning curves are potentially shorter in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) than in conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS). There is little evidence to support this claim. Furthermore, there is limited evidence how skills from LS transfer to RAS. METHODS A randomized controlled, assessor blinded crossover study to compare how RAS naïve surgeons (n = 40) performed linear-stapled side-to-side bowel anastomoses in an in vivo porcine model with LS and RAS. Technique was rated using the validated anastomosis objective structured assessment of skills (A-OSATS) score and the conventional OSATS score. Skill transfer from LS to RAS was measured by comparing the RAS performance of LS novices and LS experienced surgeons. Mental and physical workload was measured with the NASA-task load index (NASA-Tlx) and the Borg-scale. OUTCOMES In the overall cohort, there were no differences between RAS and LS for surgical performance (A-OSATS, time, OSATS). Surgeons that were naïve in both LS and RAS had significantly higher A-OSATS scores in RAS (Mean (Standard deviation (SD)): LS: 48.0 ± 12.1; RAS: 52.0 ± 7.5); p = 0.044) mainly deriving from better bowel positioning (LS: 8.7 ± 1.4; RAS: 9.3 ± 1.0; p = 0.045) and closure of enterotomy (LS: 12.8 ± 5.5; RAS: 15.6 ± 4.7; p = 0.010). There was no statistically significant difference in how LS novices and LS experienced surgeons performed in RAS [Mean (SD): novices: 48.9 ± 9.0; experienced surgeons: 55.9 ± 11.0; p = 0.540]. Mental and physical demand was significantly higher after LS. CONCLUSION The initial performance was improved for RAS versus LS for linear stapled bowel anastomosis, whereas workload was higher for LS. There was limited transfer of skills from LS to RAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelán Max Haney
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mona Wanda Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franziska Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vasile Bintintan
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cluj Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Carolyn Fan
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Wehrtmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Studier-Fischer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Amelia Felinska
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat Peter Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clara Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rozhkova V, Burlaka A, Lukashenko A, Ostapenko Y, Bezverkhnyi V. Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resections for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis in the Ukrainian State Center. Cureus 2023; 15:e38701. [PMID: 37292553 PMCID: PMC10246927 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer have been increasingly performed all over the world with promising results. We planned the current study to review our experience on this matter and compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). Materials and methods This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM who underwent laparoscopic (n=86) and open (n=96) surgical treatment for metastatic liver lesions between March 2016 and November 2022. Tumor characteristics, intra- and postoperative results, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed and compared. Results LLR was associated with significantly shorter surgery duration (180 minutes versus 295 minutes, p=0.03). There was no significant difference in blood loss between the two groups (100 mL versus 350 mL, p=0.061). Additionally, the laparoscopic approach was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays (6 days versus 9 days, p=0.004). The rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3) was lower in the LLR group (5.8% versus 16.6%, p=0.037). There was no mortality in the LLR group, and in the OLR group, one lethal case was induced by mesenteric thrombosis on the fifth postoperative day. We did not find a statistically significant difference in the OS rate between the two groups at one, three, and five years: 97.3%, 74.7%, and 43.4%, respectively, in the OLR group and 95.1%, 70.3%, and 49.5%, respectively, in the LLR group (p=0.53). DFS at one, three, and five years were 88.7%, 52.3%, and 25.5%, respectively, in the LLR group and 71.9%, 53.1%, and 19.3%, respectively, in the OLR group (p=0.66). Conclusions This study showed that laparoscopic liver surgery is a safe and effective method of CRLM treatment in our center. LLR was associated with a decrease in major morbidity, shorter surgery duration, and reduced postoperative hospital stay. Minimally invasive liver resections showed similar oncological outcomes to the open approach in terms of overall and disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Rozhkova
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, UKR
| | - Anton Burlaka
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, UKR
| | - Andrii Lukashenko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, UKR
| | - Yuriy Ostapenko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, UKR
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, de Kleine R, Elfrink AKE, Swijnenburg RJ, M Zonderhuis B, D Mieog JS, Derksen WJM, Hagendoorn J, van den Boezem PB, Rijken AM, Gobardhan PD, Marsman HA, Liem MSL, Leclercq WKG, van Heek TNT, Pantijn GA, Bosscha K, Belt EJT, Vermaas M, Torrenga H, Manusama ER, van den Tol P, Oosterling SJ, den Dulk M, Grünhagen DJ, Kok NFM. Practice variation and outcomes of minimally invasive minor liver resections in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a population-based study. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10010-3. [PMID: 37072639 PMCID: PMC10338622 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10010-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2017, the Southampton guideline stated that minimally invasive liver resections (MILR) should considered standard practice for minor liver resections. This study aimed to assess recent implementation rates of minor MILR, factors associated with performing MILR, hospital variation, and outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS This population-based study included all patients who underwent minor liver resection for CRLM in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2021. Factors associated with MILR and nationwide hospital variation were assessed using multilevel multivariable logistic regression. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between minor MILR and minor open liver resections. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis on patients operated until 2018. RESULTS Of 4,488 patients included, 1,695 (37.8%) underwent MILR. PSM resulted in 1,338 patients in each group. Implementation of MILR increased to 51.2% in 2021. Factors associated with not performing MILR included treatment with preoperative chemotherapy (aOR 0.61 CI:0.50-0.75, p < 0.001), treatment in a tertiary referral hospital (aOR 0.57 CI:0.50-0.67, p < 0.001), and larger diameter and number of CRLM. Significant hospital variation was observed in use of MILR (7.5% to 93.0%). After case-mix correction, six hospitals performed fewer, and six hospitals performed more MILRs than expected. In the PSM cohort, MILR was associated with a decrease in blood loss (aOR 0.99 CI:0.99-0.99, p < 0.01), cardiac complications (aOR 0.29, CI:0.10-0.70, p = 0.009), IC admissions (aOR 0.66, CI:0.50-0.89, p = 0.005), and shorter hospital stay (aOR CI:0.94-0.99, p < 0.01). Five-year OS rates for MILR and OLR were 53.7% versus 48.6%, p = 0.21. CONCLUSION Although uptake of MILR is increasing in the Netherlands, significant hospital variation remains. MILR benefits short-term outcomes, while overall survival is comparable to open liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben de Kleine
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Babs M Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Paul D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle Aan de Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Torrenga
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wong KC, Lee KF, Lo EYJ, Fung AKY, Lok HT, Cheung SYS, Ng KKC, Wong J, Lai PBS, Chong CCN. Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis of 224 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:118. [PMID: 36917309 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02857-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the peri-operative and long-term survival outcomes of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) (robotic or laparoscopic) with open liver resection (OLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Data of patients who underwent liver resection for HCC were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. Outcomes of MILR were compared with those of OLR. A propensity score matching analysis with a ratio of 1:1 was performed to minimise the potential bias in clinical pathological factors. RESULTS From January 2003 to December 2017, a total of 705 patients underwent liver resection for HCC. Amongst them, 112 patients received MILR and 593 patients received OLR. After propensity score matching, there were 112 patients in each of the MILR and OLR groups. Patients were matched by age, sex, hepatitis status, presence of cirrhosis, platelet count, albumin level, bilirubin level, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level, alanine transferase (ALT) level, creatinine level, tumour differentiation, tumour size, tumour number, presence of tumour rupture, presence of vascular invasion, extent of liver resection (minor/major) and difficulty score. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 94.4%, 90.4% and 82.3% in the MILR group vs 95.4%, 80.5% and 71.8% in the open group (p = 0.240). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 81.0%, 63.1% and 55.8% in the MILR group vs 79.1%, 58.1% and 45.7 in the open group (p = 0.449). The MILR group demonstrated significantly less blood loss (p < 0.001), less blood transfusion (p = 0.004), lower post-operative complications (p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) when compared with the OLR group. CONCLUSIONS Our data shows MILR yielded superior post-operative outcomes to OLR, with comparable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kam Cheung Wong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kit Fai Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eugene Y J Lo
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Andrew K Y Fung
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hon Ting Lok
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Sunny Y S Cheung
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kelvin K C Ng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - John Wong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Paul B S Lai
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen W, Zhang X, Jiang J, Ye Y, Zhai Z, Hu W, Li X, Chen Y, Chen Y, Hong Y, Jia L, Bai X, Liang T. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in posterosuperior region: a retrospective study of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5. [PMID: 36890414 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver resection of the posterosuperior region is considered a challenging procedure due to poor exposure and difficult bleeding control. A robotic approach is supposed to be advantageous in posterosuperior segmentectomy. Its benefits over laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) remain undetermined. This study compared robotic liver resection (RLR) and LLR in the posterosuperior region performed by a single surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive RLR and LLR performed by a single surgeon between December 2020 and March 2022. Patient characteristics and perioperative variables were compared. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed between both groups. RESULTS The analysis included 48 RLR and 57 LLR procedures in the posterosuperior region. After PSM analysis, 41 cases of both groups were retained. In pre-PSM cohort, the operative time in the RLR group was significantly shorter than in the LLR group (160 vs. 208 min, P = 0.001), especially in radical resection of malignant tumors (176 vs. 231 min, P = 0.004). The total Pringle maneuver duration was also markedly shorter (40 vs. 51 min, P = 0.047), and the estimated blood loss in the RLR group was lower (92 vs. 150 mL, P = 0.005). The postoperative hospital stay (POHS) in the RLR group was significantly shorter (5.4 vs. 7.5 days, P = 0.048). In PSM cohort, operative time in the RLR group was also significantly shorter (163 vs. 193 min, P = 0.036), and the estimated blood loss was lower (92 vs. 144 mL, P = 0.024). However, the total Pringle maneuver duration and POHS showed no significant difference. The complications were similar between two groups in both pre-PSM and PSM cohorts. CONCLUSION RLR in the posterosuperior region was as safe and feasible as LLR. RLR was associated with reduced operative time and blood loss than LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Jincai Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yufu Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Zhenglong Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Wendi Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yiwen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yifan Hong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Lan Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Hangzhou, China
- The Innovation Center for the Study of Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu T, Ou Y, Huang T, Xue Z, Yao M, Li J, Huang Y, Cai X, Yan Y. Delimiting Low Level of Difficulty Scoring System Based on the Extent of Resection Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023. [PMID: 36862541 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The difficulty scoring system based on the extent of resection (DSS-ER) is a common tool for assessing the difficulty and risk of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), but DSS-ER fails to comprehensively and accurately assess low level for beginners. Methods: The 93 cases of LLRs for primary liver cancer in the general surgery department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The low level of DSS-ER difficulty scoring system was reclassified into three grades. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared among different groups. Results: There were significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion, conversion to laparotomy, and allogeneic blood transfusion among the different groups. Meanwhile, the postoperative complications were mainly pleural effusion and pneumonia, and the incidence of grade III was higher compared with other two grades. No significant difference existed in the postoperative biliary leakage and liver failure among three grades. Conclusions: This reclassified low level of DSS-ER difficulty scoring system has certain clinical value for LLR beginners to complete the corresponding learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yangyang Ou
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Taiyun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Zhaosong Xue
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Ming Yao
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jianjun Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yubin Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xiaoyong Cai
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yihe Yan
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041179. [PMID: 36831521 PMCID: PMC9954110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the two most common malignant tumors that require liver resection. While liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC, organ shortages and high costs limit the availability of this option for many patients and make resection the mainstay of treatment. For patients with CRLM, surgical resection with negative margins is the only potentially curative option. Over the last two decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly adopted for the resection of a variety of tumors and was found to have similar long-term outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR) while offering the benefits of improved short-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the outcomes of LLR vs. OLR for patients with HCC and CRLM. Although the use of LLR for HCC and CRLM is increasing, it is not appropriate for all patients. We describe an approach to selecting patients best-suited for LLR. The four common difficulty-scoring systems for LLR are summarized. Additionally, we review the current evidence behind the emerging robotically assisted liver resection technology.
Collapse
|
27
|
Rocca A, Porfidia C, Russo R, Tamburrino A, Avella P, Vaschetti R, Bianco P, Calise F. Neuraxial anesthesia in hepato-pancreatic-bilio surgery: a first western pilot study of 46 patients. Updates Surg 2023; 75:481-491. [PMID: 36607598 PMCID: PMC9817460 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01437-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The most common anesthetic approach in hepato-pancreatic-biliary (HPB) surgery is general anesthesia (GA), but it may result in increased morbidity and mortality and peri-operative risks especially in frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in HPB in a pilot clinical series. This analysis was conducted on 46 consecutive patients undergoing HPB surgery in an Italian Tertial referral center. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA), combined spino-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and peridural anesthesia (PA) were used in major and minor hepatectomies and bilio-pancreatic surgery instead of GA. NA was evaluated by analyzing the surgical and anesthesiological short-term outcomes. 46 patients were considered eligible for the study between February 2018 and May 2020. The average age was 69.07 (± 9.95) years. 22 were males and 24 were females. According to the ASA score, 19 (41.30%) patients had ASA II, 22 (47.83%) had ASA III and 5 (10.87%) had ASA IV. 22 (47.83%) patients underwent CSA, 20 (43.48%) CSEA and 4 (8.69%) PA. We performed 8 major and 19 minor hepatectomies, 7 bilio-digestive derivations, 5 Whipple procedures, 4 iatrogenic biliary duct injuries, 2 splenopancreatectomies and 1 hepatic cyst fenestration. Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 was observed in 3 patients. The conversion rate to endotracheal intubation occurring in 3 of 46 (6.52%) patients. After surgery, no local or pulmonary complications and delirium were reported in our series. The present study demonstrates that NA is a safe and feasible option in selected patients, if performed in referral centers by well-trained anaesthesiologists and surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- HPB Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy.
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
| | - Carmela Porfidia
- Intensive Care Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | - Raffaele Russo
- Intensive Care Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | | | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| | - Roberto Vaschetti
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| | - Paolo Bianco
- HPB Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- HPB Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Filippo R, Conticchio M, Ratti F, Inchingolo R, Gelli M, Anelli FM, Laurent A, Vitali GC, Magistri P, Assirati G, Felli E, Wakabayashi T, Pessaux P, Piardi T, Di Benedetto F, de'Angelis N, Briceno DFJ, Rampoldi AG, Adam R, Cherqui D, Aldrighetti L, Memeo R. Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in octogenarian patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score multicenter analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3029-3036. [PMID: 36534162 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection (LR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are considered curative options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after LR and RFA in octogenarian patients with HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter retrospective study included 102 elderly patients (> 80 years old) treated between January 2009 and January 2019, who underwent LR or RFA for HCC (65 and 37 with, respectively). RESULTS After Propensity Score Matching, the postoperative course of LR was burdened by a higher rate of complications than RFA group (64% vs 14%, respectively, p: 0.001). The LR group had also significantly longer operative time (207 ± 85 min vs 33 ± 49 min, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stays than the RFA group (7 d vs 2 d, p = 0.019). Overall survival at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 86%, 86%, and 70% for the LR group and 82%, 64%, and 52% for the RFA group (p = 0.380). Disease-free survival at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 89%, 74%, and 56% for the LR group, and 51%, 40%, and 40% for the RFA group (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION Despite a higher rate of Dindo-Clavien I-II post-operative complications, a longer operative time and length of hospital stay, LR in octogenarian patients can provide comparable 90d mortality than RFA and better long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalinda Filippo
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Conticchio
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
| | | | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Giulio Cesare Vitali
- Service of Abdominal Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Institut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de L'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Institut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de L'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Institut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de L'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | | | | | - Renè Adam
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hepatobiliaire, Hopital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hepatobiliaire, Hopital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Riccardo Memeo
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ozair A, Collings A, Adams AM, Dirks R, Kushner BS, Sucandy I, Morrell D, Abou-Setta AM, Vreeland T, Whiteside J, Cloyd JM, Ansari MT, Cleary SP, Ceppa E, Richardson W, Alseidi A, Awad Z, Ayloo S, Buell JF, Orthopoulos G, Sbayi S, Wakabayashi G, Slater BJ, Pryor A, Jeyarajah DR. Minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for the resection of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7915-7937. [PMID: 36138246 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09612-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While surgical resection has a demonstrated utility for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), it is unclear whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or an open approach should be used. This review sought to assess the efficacy and safety of MIS versus open hepatectomy for isolated, resectable CRLM when performed separately from (Key Question (KQ) 1) or simultaneously with (KQ2) the resection of the primary tumor. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies published during January 2000-September 2020. Two independent reviewers screened literature for eligibility, extracted data from included studies, and assessed internal validity using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD). RESULTS From 2304 publications, 35 studies were included for meta-analysis. For staged resections, three RCTs and 20 observational studies were included. Data from RCTs indicated MIS having similar disease-free survival (DFS) at 1-year (RR 1.03, 95%CI 0.70-1.50), overall survival (OS) at 5-years (RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.84-1.28), fewer complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.38-1.00), and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (MD -6.6 days, 95%CI -10.2, -3.0). For simultaneous resections, 12 observational studies were included. There was no evidence of a difference between MIS and the open group for DFS-1-year, OS-5-year, complications, R0 resections, blood transfusions, along with lower blood loss (MD -177.35 mL, 95%CI -273.17, -81.53) and shorter LOS (MD -3.0 days, 95%CI -3.82, -2.17). CONCLUSIONS Current evidence regarding the optimal approach for CRLM resection demonstrates similar oncologic outcomes between MIS and open techniques, however MIS hepatectomy had a shorter LOS, lower blood loss and complication rate, for both staged and simultaneous resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Ozair
- Faculty of Medicine, King George's Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India
| | - Amelia Collings
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alexandra M Adams
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Centre, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca Dirks
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bradley S Kushner
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David Morrell
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Timothy Vreeland
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Centre, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jake Whiteside
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eugene Ceppa
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ziad Awad
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Subhashini Ayloo
- Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Joseph F Buell
- Division of Surgery, Mission Healthcare System, HCA Healthcare, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - Georgios Orthopoulos
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Samer Sbayi
- Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo City, Japan
| | - Bethany J Slater
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aurora Pryor
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - D Rohan Jeyarajah
- Department of Surgery, TCU School of Medicine, and Methodist Richardson Medical Center, 2805 East President George Bush Highway, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
AVELLA P, VASCHETTI R, CAPPUCCIO M, GAMBALE F, DE MEIS L, RAFANELLI F, BRUNESE MC, GUERRA G, SCACCHI A, ROCCA A. The role of liver surgery in simultaneous synchronous colorectal liver metastases and colorectal cancer resections: a literature review of 1730 patients underwent open and minimally invasive surgery. Minerva Surg 2022; 77:582-590. [DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.22.09716-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
31
|
Jianxi W, Xiongfeng Z, Zehao Z, Zhen Z, Tianyi P, Ye L, Haosheng J, Zhixiang J, Huiling W. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center propensity score matching study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:930065. [PMID: 35928871 PMCID: PMC9343849 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.930065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIndocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy (ICG-guided LH) is increasingly used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether ICG-guided LH can improve surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the short-term outcomes and survival outcomes of ICG-guided LH versus common laparoscopic hepatectomy (CLH) for HCC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 104 ICG-guided LH and 158 CLH patients from 2014 to 2020 at our center. To avoid selection bias, 81 ICG-guided LH and 81 CLH cases were analyzed after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The baseline data and results were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable after matching. There was a significant difference in operative time: longer in the ICG-guided LH group than in the CLH group (p=0.004). However, there was no significant difference in operative time in anatomical resection between the two groups (p=0.987). There was a significant difference in operative time in non-anatomical resection: longer in the ICG-guided LH group than in the CLH group (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in positive surgery margin, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, postoperative length of hospital stay, mortality within 30 days, and mortality within 90 days. The ICG-guided LH group appeared to have a trend towards better overall survival (OS), but there was no significant difference in OS (P=0.168) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.322) between the two groups.ConclusionsAlthough ICG fluorescence-guided LH is a timelier procedure to perform, it is a safe and effective technique with the advantages of intraoperative positioning, low postoperative complication rates, and potential to improve OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Jianxi
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zou Xiongfeng
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zheng Zehao
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhao Zhen
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Tianyi
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin Haosheng
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Zhixiang
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wang Huiling
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Wang Huiling,
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Matsuo Y, Hokuto D, Yasuda S, Yoshikawa T, Kamitani N, Doi S, Nakagawa K, Nishiwada S, Nagai M, Terai T, Sho M. Impact of laparoscopic liver resection on liver regeneration. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7419-7430. [PMID: 35277763 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09155-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver regeneration after liver resection plays an important role in preventing posthepatectomy liver failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) on liver regeneration. METHODS Patients who underwent curative anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, and colorectal liver metastases at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. The patients were divided into the OLR and LLR groups. Preoperative liver volume (PLV), future remnant liver volume, resected liver volume (RLV), liver volume at 1 month after the surgery, and liver volume at 6 months after the surgery were calculated. The liver regeneration rate was defined as the increase in the rate of RLV, and the liver recovery rate was defined as the rate of return to the PLV. RESULTS The study included 72 patients. Among them, 43 were included in the OLR group and 29 were included in the LLR group. No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics and surgical procedures between the two groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the liver regeneration rate at 1 month after the surgery (OLR vs. LLR: 68.9% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.875) and at 6 months after the surgery (91.8% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.995). Furthermore, the liver recovery rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 month after the surgery (90.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.893) and at 6 months after the surgery (96.9% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.986). CONCLUSION Liver regeneration after liver resection is not affected by the type of surgical procedure and both laparoscopic and open procedures yield similar regeneration and recovery rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Hokuto
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoshikawa
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Naoki Kamitani
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Doi
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nishiwada
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Taichi Terai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Morawski M, Grąt M, Krasnodębski M, Kobryń K, Hołówko W, Rykowski P, Dec M, Nowosad M, Figiel W, Patkowski W, Zieniewicz K. Early results of the implementation of laparoscopic major liver resection program. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:65. [PMID: 35241093 PMCID: PMC8892810 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02505-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic liver resections offer potential benefits but may require advanced laparoscopic skills and are volume dependent. Methods This retrospective study included 12 patients who underwent major laparoscopic resection and 24 patients after open major liver resection for liver malignancy in the time period between September 2020 and May 2021. The primary outcomes were complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification and duration of hospital stay. Results Median duration of hospital stay in laparoscopic resection group (6 days) was significantly shorter than in open resection group (8 days) (p = 0.046). Complications classified as grade II or higher were significantly less frequent in the laparoscopic resection group (2 patients) versus open resection group (13 patients) (p = 0.031). Conclusions Although laparoscopic major liver resections should be limited to expert hepatobiliary centers and are characterized by long learning curve, this approach may offer favorable short-term outcomes even during launching a new program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Morawski
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Michał Grąt
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Krasnodębski
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Konrad Kobryń
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wacław Hołówko
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rykowski
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marta Dec
- 2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-07, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Nowosad
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Figiel
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Waldemar Patkowski
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nicolás M, Czerwonko M, Ardiles V, Sánchez Claria R, Mazza O, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, de Santibañes M. Laparoscopic vs open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of surgical margin status and survival. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1113-1119. [PMID: 34988643 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02396-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection represents the curative treatment of choice for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Laparoscopic hepatectomy in CRLM is considered a safe approach. However, the information on their oncological results in the different series is deficient. This study aimed to compare the surgical margin, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with oncological resections of CRLM according to the type of surgical approach performed. METHODS Between April 2007 and June 2017, 263 patients with CRLM underwent hepatic resection. Inclusion criteria were initial resectability, tumor size ≤ 50 mm, 3 or less metastases, no bilobar involvement, and absence of extrahepatic disease. A propensity score was performed to adjust the indication bias. RESULTS Eighty-two patients were included (56 open and 26 laparoscopic). Twenty-eight (50%) patients had synchronous presentation in the open approach and 6 (23%) in the laparoscopic approach (p = 0.021), with more frequent simultaneous open resections (p = 0.037). The resection margin was positive (R1) in 5 patients with an open approach and 2 with a laparoscopic approach (8.9% and 7.6% respectively; p = 0.852). Nine patients (16%) with conventional approach and 2 (7.7%) with laparoscopic approach had local complications (p = 0.3). There was one death in the open group and none in the laparoscopic. There were no significant differences in OS and DFS rate between both groups (1-3 years, OS: 92-77% and 96-75% respectively; 1-3 years, DFS: 63-20% and 73-36% respectively). CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in terms of surgical margin, OS rate, and DFS rate between the laparoscopic and open approach in patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Nicolás
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matías Czerwonko
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Claria
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Oscar Mazza
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martín de Santibañes
- Department of General Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rocca A, Scacchi A, Cappuccio M, Avella P, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Costa G, Polistena A, Codacci-Pisanelli M, Amato B, Carbone F, Ceccarelli G. Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases resection: A systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2330. [PMID: 34498805 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has never been investigated in large series. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out on PubMed and Cochrane libraries. RESULTS We selected nine studies between 2008 and 2021. Two hundred sixty-two patients were included. One hundred thirty-one patients underwent simultaneous resections. The mean blood loss was 309.4 ml (range, 200-450 ml), the mean operative time was 250.5 min (range, 198.5-449.0 min). The mean length of hospital stay was 7.98 days (range, 4.5 to 12 days). The overall postoperative mortality was 0.4%. The overall morbidity rate was 37.0%, Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were 8.4%. The mean 3-year overall survival was 55.25% (range, 44.4-66.1%), the mean 3-year disease free survival was 37% (range, 33.3-41.9%) CONCLUSION: We can conclude that robotic-assisted surgery might be considered as a technical upgrade option for minimally invasive approach to CRCLM resections even for simultaneous operations and challenging cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, St Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Carbone
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Università di Napoli - "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|