1
|
Rhaiem R, Duramé A, Primavesi F, Dorcaratto D, Syn N, Rodríguez ÁDLH, Dupré A, Piardi T, Fernández GB, Villaverde AP, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, Santiago RF, Fernández-Moreno MC, Ferret G, Ben SL, Suárez Muñoz MÁ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Koh YX, Jones R, Martín-Pérez E, Kianmanesh R, Di Martino M. Critical appraisal of surgical margins according to KRAS status in liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: Should surgical strategy be influenced by tumor biology? Surgery 2024; 176:124-133. [PMID: 38519408 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND KRAS mutation is a negative prognostic factor for colorectal liver metastases. Several studies have investigated the resection margins according to KRAS status, with conflicting results. The aim of the study was to assess the oncologic outcomes of R0 and R1 resections for colorectal liver metastases according to KRAS status. METHODS All patients who underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 with available KRAS status were enrolled in this multicentric international cohort study. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the outcomes of R0 and R1 colorectal liver metastases resections according to KRAS status: wild type versus mutated. The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS The analysis included 593 patients. KRAS mutation was associated with shorter overall survival (40 vs 60 months; P = .0012) and disease-free survival (15 vs 21 months; P = .003). In KRAS-mutated tumors, the resection margin did not influence oncologic outcomes. In multivariable analysis, the only predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival was primary tumor location (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). In KRAS wild-type tumors, R0 resection was associated with prolonged overall survival (74 vs 45 months, P < .001) and disease-free survival (30 vs 17 months, P < .001). The multivariable model confirmed that R0 resection margin was associated with prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.03) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.91). CONCLUSIONS KRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases showed more aggressive tumor biology with inferior overall survival and disease-free survival after liver resection. Although R0 resection was not associated with improved oncologic outcomes in the KRAS-mutated tumors group, it seems to be of paramount importance for achieving prolonged long-term survival in KRAS wild-type tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France.
| | - Adrien Duramé
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Hepatobiliary Surgery Centre, Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Spain
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France; Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Simone Veil Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Gerardo Blanco Fernández
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz, INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura), University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Arancha Prada Villaverde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz, INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura), University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | - María-Carmen Fernández-Moreno
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Spain
| | - Georgina Ferret
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alejandro J Perez-Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugia HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Robert Jones
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
| | - Reza Kianmanesh
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain; Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Surgery, A.O.R.N., Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bernardi L, Roesel R, Aghayan DL, Majno-Hurst PE, De Dosso S, Cristaudi A. Preoperative chemotherapy in upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases: New elements for an old dilemma? Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 124:102696. [PMID: 38335813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
The use of preoperative or "neoadjuvant" chemotherapy (NAC) has long been controversial for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2023 guidelines on metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate a combination of surgical/technical and oncologic/prognostic criteria as the two determinants for allocating patients to NAC or upfront hepatectomy. However, surgical and technical criteria have evolved, and oncologic prognostic criteria date from the pre-modern chemotherapy era and lack prospective validation. The traditional literature is interpreted as not supporting the use of NAC because several studies fail to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared to upfront surgery; however, OS may not be the most appropriate endpoint to consider. Moreover, the commonly quoted studies against NAC contain many limitations that may explain why NAC failed to demonstrate its value. The query of the recent literature focused primarily on other aspects than OS, such as surgical technique, the impact of side effects of chemotherapy, the histological growth pattern of metastases, or the detection of circulating tumor DNA, shows data that support a more widespread use of NAC. These should prompt a critical reappraisal of the use of NAC, leading to a more precise selection of patients who could benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bernardi
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Raffaello Roesel
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- Department of Surgery, Ringerike Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Pietro E Majno-Hurst
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Sara De Dosso
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via A. Gallino 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
| | - Alessandra Cristaudi
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee MY, Kim MJ, Jin JO, Lee PCW. USP14 inhibition regulates tumorigenesis by inducing apoptosis in gastric cancer. BMB Rep 2023; 56:451-456. [PMID: 37401238 PMCID: PMC10471464 DOI: 10.5483/bmbrep.2023-0063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deubiquitinases (DUBs) are an essential component of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). They trim ubiquitin from substrate proteins, thereby preventing them from degradation, and modulate different cellular processes. Ubiquitin-specific protease 14 (USP14) is a DUB that has mainly been studied for its role in tumorigenesis in several cancers. In the present study, we found that the protein levels of USP14 were remarkably higher in gastric cancer tissues than in the adjacent normal tissues. We also demonstrated that the inhibition of USP14 activity using IU1 (an USP14 inhibitor) or the inhibition of USP14 expression using USP14-specific siRNA markedly reduced the viability of gastric cancer cells and suppressed their migratory and invasive abilities. The reduction in gastric cancer cell proliferation due to the inhibition of USP14 activity was a result of the increase in the degree of apoptosis, as evidenced by the increased expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP. Furthermore, an experiment using the USP14 inhibitor IU1 revealed that the inhibition of USP14 activity suppressed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in GC cells. Collectively, these findings indicate that USP14 plays critical roles in gastric cancer progression and suggest its potential to serve as a novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer treatment. [BMB Reports 2023; 56(8): 451-456].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Yea Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Min-Jee Kim
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Jun-O Jin
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Microbiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Peter Chang-Whan Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee MY, Kim MJ, Jin JO, Lee PCW. USP14 inhibition regulates tumorigenesis by inducing apoptosis in gastric cancer. BMB Rep 2023; 56:451-456. [PMID: 37401238 PMCID: PMC10471464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Deubiquitinases (DUBs) are an essential component of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). They trim ubiquitin from substrate proteins, thereby preventing them from degradation, and modulate different cellular processes. Ubiquitin-specific protease 14 (USP14) is a DUB that has mainly been studied for its role in tumorigenesis in several cancers. In the present study, we found that the protein levels of USP14 were remarkably higher in gastric cancer tissues than in the adjacent normal tissues. We also demonstrated that the inhibition of USP14 activity using IU1 (an USP14 inhibitor) or the inhibition of USP14 expression using USP14-specific siRNA markedly reduced the viability of gastric cancer cells and suppressed their migratory and invasive abilities. The reduction in gastric cancer cell proliferation due to the inhibition of USP14 activity was a result of the increase in the degree of apoptosis, as evidenced by the increased expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP. Furthermore, an experiment using the USP14 inhibitor IU1 revealed that the inhibition of USP14 activity suppressed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in GC cells. Collectively, these findings indicate that USP14 plays critical roles in gastric cancer progression and suggest its potential to serve as a novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer treatment. [BMB Reports 2023; 56(8): 451-456].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Yea Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Min-Jee Kim
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Jun-O Jin
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Microbiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Peter Chang-Whan Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Lung Cancer Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Predicting Limited Survival After Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Propensity Score Matched Comparison Between The Primary First And The Simultaneous Strategy. J Gastrointest Surg 2023:10.1007/s11605-023-05633-9. [PMID: 36857012 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05633-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best surgical approach to treat synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with limited survival comparing patients undergoing primary-first resection (PF) and simultaneous resection (SR) approaches. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 217 patients who underwent resection for synchronous CRLMs between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. There were 133 (61.2%) PF resection and 84 (38.8%) SRS. The two groups of patients were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and cox analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). RESULTS After PSM, two groups of 71 patients were compared. Patients undergoing SR had longer operative time (324 ± 104 min vs 250 ± 101 min; p < 0.0001), similar transfusion (33.3% vs 28.1%; p = 0.57), and similar complication rates (35.9% vs 27.2%; p = 0.34) than patients undergoing PF. The median overall survival and 5-year survival rates were comparable (p = 0.94) between patients undergoing PF (48.2 months and 44%) and patients undergoing SR (45.9 months and 30%). Multivariate Cox analysis identified pre-resection elevated CEA levels (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.20-4.70; P = .01), left colonic tumors (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.68; P = .002), and adjuvant treatment (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.83; P = .01) as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS In the presence of synchronous CRLM, right colonic tumors, persistent high CEA levels before surgery, and the absence of adjuvant treatment identified patients characterized by a limited survival rate after resection. The approach used (PF vs SR) does not influence short and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Martino M, Primavesi F, Syn N, Dorcaratto D, de la Hoz Rodríguez Á, Dupré A, Piardi T, Rhaiem R, Blanco Fernández G, de Armas Conde N, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, Fernández Santiago R, Fernández-Moreno MC, Ferret G, López Ben S, Suárez Muñoz MÁ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Koh YX, Jones R, Martín-Pérez E. Long-Term Outcomes of Perioperative Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Multicentre Propensity-Score Matched Analysis with Stratification by Contemporary Risk-Scoring. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6829-6842. [PMID: 35849284 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12027-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still debate regarding the principal role and ideal timing of perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) for patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study assesses long-term oncological outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant CTx only versus those receiving neoadjuvant combined with adjuvant therapy (perioperative CTx). METHODS International multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection between 2010 and 2015. Characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, stratification by the tumour burden score (TBS) was applied. RESULTS Of 967 patients undergoing hepatectomy, 252 were analysed, with a median follow-up of 45 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a bias towards patients with neoadjuvant CTx presenting with more high-risk patients (p = 0.045) and experiencing increased postoperative complications ≥Clavien-Dindo III (20.9% vs. 8%, p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis showed that perioperative CTx was associated with significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.579, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.420-0.800, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.579, 95% CI 0.403-0.834, p = 0.003). After PSM (n = 180 patients), the two groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics. The perioperative CTx group presented with a significantly prolonged RFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.007) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87, p = 0.010) in both low and high TBS patients. CONCLUSIONS When patients after resection of CRLM are able to tolerate additional postoperative CTx, a perioperative strategy demonstrates increased RFS and OS in comparison with neoadjuvant CTx only in both low and high-risk situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.,HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, Simone Veil Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Gerardo Blanco Fernández
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Noelia de Armas Conde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | - María-Carmen Fernández-Moreno
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Georgina Ferret
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alejandro J Perez-Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugia HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Martino M, Primavesi F. ASO Author Reflections: Peri-operative Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6843-6844. [PMID: 35831523 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. .,Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prognostic Models Incorporating RAS Mutation to Predict Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133223. [PMID: 35804994 PMCID: PMC9264993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrence and survival vary widely among patients who undergo curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Prognostic models provide estimated probabilities of these outcomes and allow the effects of multiple potentially interacting variables to be adjusted and assessed simultaneously. Although many prognostic models based on clinicopathologic factors have been developed since the 1990s to predict survival after resection of CRLM, these models vary in their predictive performance when applied to contemporary cohorts. Rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) mutation status is routinely tested in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor therapy. In addition, mutations in RAS predict survival and recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. Several recent prognostic models have incorporated RAS mutation status as a surrogate of tumor biology and combined revised clinicopathologic variables to improve the prediction of recurrence and survival. This narrative review aims to evaluate the differences between contemporary prognostic models incorporating RAS mutation status and their clinical applicability in patients considered for curative-intent resection of CRLM.
Collapse
|
9
|
Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology in Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010088. [PMID: 35008252 PMCID: PMC8750618 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Prognostic models allow clinicians to predict survival outcomes, facilitate patient-physician discussions, and identify subgroups with potentially distinct prognoses [...].
Collapse
|