Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy; change in practice over a 10-year period

Bail Out Procedures in Acute Cholecystitis: Risk Factors and Optimal Approach

BackgroundFor difficult cholecystectomies, bail out procedures (BOP) are performed to mitigate risk of patient harm.ObjectiveThis study sought to identify risk factors for BOP for acute cholecystitis and to compare outcomes by type of BOP performed. Methods: Patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy were included (2020-2022). Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was <30-day complication rate. Groups were defined by surgery performed: BOP vs Laparoscopic Complete Cholecystectomy (LCC). BOPs were defined as any deviation from laparoscopic complete cholecystectomy. Univariate analyses compared outcomes between groups. Multivariable analysis identified independent factors associated with BOP. Subgroup analysis compared outcomes of laparoscopic BOP vs open BOP.ResultsOf 728 patients, 659 (91%) underwent LCC and 69 (9%) underwent BOP: 34 (49%) laparoscopic BOP and 35 (51%) open BOP. Independent predictors of BOP included admission total bilirubin >0.2 mg/dL (OR 5.80, P = .017), >7 days of symptoms at time of cholecystectomy (OR 1.96, P = .019), and arrival heart rate >100 bpm (OR 1.82, P = .032). On subgroup analysis, laparoscopic vs open BOP demonstrated no difference in operative time (P = .536) and overall (P = .733) or gallbladder-related complications (P = .364), including bile leaks (P = .090). Laparoscopic BOP was associated with shorter postoperative lengths of stay (P = .005).ConclusionThe risk factors for BOP identified in this study may help inform patient consent and operative planning. Laparoscopic BOP incurred equivalent complications to open BOP but with shorter hospital stays, challenging conventional dogma that conversion to open is the optimal approach for complicated acute cholecystitis.

Fenestrating Versus Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Bile Leak, Bile Duct Injury, and Outcomes

Symptoms of gallstone disease are the most common reason for cholecystectomy. Fenestration reduces the likelihood of severe inflammation or scarring after normal treatments are used, and it also enhances control over bile outflow. The goal of reconstituted cholecystectomy is to lessen symptoms like pain and jaundice without undergoing the high-risk procedures associated with more invasive procedures. The reconstituted and fenestrated procedures were assessed by a meta-analysis and systematic review. Of the five studies, 189 (34.2%) had a reconstituted subtotal cholecystectomy, and 363 (65.8%) had a fenestrated subtotal cholecystectomy, which had populations from the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Turkey. Two individuals from three trials had bile duct injury, according to three studies. Whereas the fenestrated group reported no bile injury from 236 individuals (0%), the reconstituted group reported two bile duct injuries from 100 patients (2%). The incidence was found to be lower in the fenestrated group (OR 10.81; CI 95% 1.03-113.65; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%) than in the reconstituted group. Four studies revealed 92 cases of bile leaks: 19 out of 155 cases (12.3%) were reconstituted, and 73 out of 351 cases (20.8%) were fenestrated. Between the two groups, there was a significant difference in bile leakage (OR 0.72; CI 95% 0.23-2.32; p = 0.03; I2 = 66%). Two studies reported the establishment of fistulas following surgery in 58 patients in the reconstituted group (5.2%) and 120 patients in the fenestrated group (2.5%) (p = 0.56, I2 = 0%, and OR 0.65; CI 95% 0.12-3.38); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Following a fenestrated partial cholecystectomy, postoperative bile leakage, fistula development, wound infection, and retained stones are more prevalent. Additionally, we saw that the fenestrated method was being used more frequently for post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The subtotal cholecystectomy technique used should be chosen according to the surgeon's comfort level and experience with the various techniques and intraoperative findings, even if the reconstituted procedure could be preferred when feasible. To completely understand the role of each method in the general surgeon's toolkit for treating complex gallbladder (GB) patients, longer-term follow-up studies are still necessary.

Investigating precise control pathway for haemostatic clip usage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on patient clinical variations: an exploratory retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To explore a precise control pathway based on patient clinical variations for haemostatic clip usage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) through on-site research data from a teaching hospital. Specifically, the study aimed to: (1) to calculate the optimal haemostatic clip consumption in LC based on diagnostic grouping and surgical combinations, and (2) to provide evidence for cost containment of high-value medical consumables used in LC.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Hospital in southwest China.

PARTICIPANTS

The inclusion criteria were set as inpatients whose medical records included International Classification of Diseases codes 1-3 with code 51.2300 (corresponding to LC surgery) and who were discharged on medical advice. A dataset containing 1001 patients without any haematological diagnoses was collected.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Two ordered multinomial logit models were established to identify factors affecting haemostatic clip use in LC. Two-step clustering was used to form subgroups. The premodel included preoperative variables (acute cholecystitis and scarring/fibrotic atrophy), while the full model added intraoperative variables (anatomical variation and severe adhesions). Both models met application prerequisites.

RESULTS

Key factors influencing haemostatic clip usage were identified, including acute cholecystitis, scarring/fibrotic atrophy, anatomical variation and severe adhesions. Consumption references for haemostatic clips were established for LC patients with good prognoses on discharge. The ordered multinomial logit model revealed that acute cholecystitis decreased the odds of using four or more clips (p<0.001), while anatomical variation, scarring/fibrotic atrophy and severe adhesions increased the odds (p<0.001 for all). The model suggested using no more than three clips in 17.30% of cases, precisely four clips in 81.72% of cases and five or more clips in 0.98% of cases, depending on the co-occurring factors. Model-predicted clip usage was consistent with actual usage (consistency=0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a framework for evidence-based consumable management in LC, demonstrating the potential for extrapolation to other consumables and surgical combinations. Continuous monitoring and timely adjustment will be imperative as medical products and practices evolve.

Incidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography after Subtotal Fenestrating and Reconstituting Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) is used for the difficult cholecystectomy, but published experience with resource use for SC is limited. We hypothesized that the need for advanced resources are common after SC.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021 at a large center. SC cases were identified using a medical record tool. Baseline characteristics were assessed with Student's t -test and chi-square test. Primary outcome was endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) within 60 days. Secondary outcomes were reconstituted SC on postoperative ERC and length of stay (LOS). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression were used for binary outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used for LOS. Covariates included were age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiology class.

RESULTS

A total of 1,222 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed between 2017 and 2021. Of these, 87 (7%) were SC. Male (p < 0.001) and older (p < 0.001) patients were more likely to undergo SC. Odds of postoperative ERC were higher in the SC group (odds ratio 9.79, 95% CI 5.90 to16.23, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative ERC (17% vs 21%, p = 0.38). Reconstituting SC had lower odds of postoperative ERC (odds ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.023 to 0.58, p = 0.009). LOS was 1.81 times higher in the SC group (p ≤ 0.001). Postoperative ERC was not associated with LOS (p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

We present one of the largest single-center series of SC. Patients who underwent SC are more likely to be male, older, have higher American Society of Anesthesiology class, and have increased LOS. SC should be performed when access to ERC and interventional radiology is available. In the absence of these adjuncts, reconstituting SC decreases the need for early ERC, but long-term outcomes are unknown.

KS, Raghavendra A, Singh PK. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult gallbladder: Our experience in a tertiary care center

Backgrounds/Aims

Open cholecystectomy is becoming obsolete and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the treatment of choice in gallstone diseases. Difficult gallbladders are encountered whenever there is a frozen calot's triangle, obliterated cystic plate, or both. Rather than converting to open procedure, there has been a growing preference for laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) during difficult gallbladders. This study aimed to assess the advantages, indications, and viability of LSC in difficult gallbladders.

Methods

The study included patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in NIMS Hospital, Jaipur, from January 2021 to January 2023. Data of the patients who underwent LSC for difficult gallbladders included demographics, comorbidities, operative time, conversion to open cholecystectomy, length of hospital stay, and complications. LSC was classified into three types depending on the part of the gallbladder remnant.

Results

A total of 728 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Among them, 41 patients (5.6%) were attempted for LSC. However, one patient was converted to an open procedure and the rest 40 underwent LSC. LSC was divided into 3 types, 4 patients underwent LSC type I, 34 patients underwent type II, and 2 patients type III. The average operating time and postoperative length of hospital stay were 86.2 minutes and 2.1 days, respectively. Two patients had surgical site infection. No patient had a bile leak and none required intensive care unit care.

Conclusions

LSC is a safe and feasible option for use in difficult gallbladders.

Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of 30 Studies

This systematic review aims to review articles that evaluate the risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy and to analyze the identified preoperative and intraoperative risk factors. The bibliographic databases CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only English-language retrospective studies and systematic reviews with more than 200 patients were included. The time of publication was limited from 2012 to 2022. Our systematic review identified 30 studies with a total of 108,472 patients. Of those, 92,765 cholecystectomies were commenced laparoscopically and 5,477 were converted to open cholecystectomy (5.90%). The rate of conversion ranges from 2.50% to 50%. Older males with acute cholecystitis, previous abdominal surgery, symptom duration of more than 72 hours, previous history of acute cholecystitis, C-reactive protein (CRP) value of more than 76 mg/L, diabetes, and obesity are significant preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Significant intraoperative risk factors for conversion include gallbladder inflammation, adhesions, anatomic difficulty, Nassar scale of Grades 3 to 4, Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy (CLOC) score of more than 6 and 10-point gallbladder operative scoring system (G10) score more than 3.

State of the art in subtotal cholecystectomy: An overview

Introduction

Subtotal cholecystectomy is a type of surgical bail-out procedure indicated when facing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to not reaching the critical view of safety, inadequate identification of the anatomical structures involved and/or risk of injury.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive search on PubMed were performed using the following Mesh terms: Subtotal cholecystectomy and Partial cholecystectomy. The PubMed databases were used to search for English-language reports related to Subtotal cholecystectomy between January 1, 1987, the date of the first published laparoscopic cholecystectomy, through January 2023. 41 studies were included.

Results

Subtotal cholecystectomy's incidence oscillates between 4.00% and 9.38%. Strasberg et al., divided subtotal cholecystectomies in "fenestrating" and "reconstituting" types based on if the remaining portion of the gallbladder was left open or closed. Subtotal cholecystectomy can sometimes be a challenging procedure and is associated to a high rate of complications such as biliary fistula, retained gallstones, subhepatic or subphrenic collections, among others.

Conslusion

Subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe alternative when facing difficult cholecystectomy in which the critical view of safety is not reached in order to avoid complications. A classification system should be implemented in surgical descriptions to compare the different surgical techniques employed. In order to avoid bile leakage and cholecystitis of the remnant gallbladder, the surgical technique must be performed skillfully. There is still a current lack of information on alternative techniques such as omental plugging or falciform patch in order to judge their utility. There needs to be further research on long-term complications such as malignancy of the remnant gallbladder.

Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

BACKGROUND

The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been increasingly recognised as the standard method for identification of the cystic structures, to prevent vasculobiliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, its adoption has been anything but universal. A significant proportion of surgeons has a poor understanding of the three requirements. To bridge this gap between theory and practice, we aimed to summarise the available evidence on CVS, emphasising on current debates and future perspectives.

METHOD

We systematically reviewed the literature (1995-2021), to identify studies reporting on the CVS. Eligible articles were classified according to methodology and key idea. A quantitative analysis was performed to evaluate effectiveness of the CVS in preventing bile duct injury (BDI).

RESULTS

150 relevant articles were identified, focusing on six main points, (1) safety and effectiveness, (2) intraoperative documentation, (3) complementary imaging techniques, (4) bail-out alternatives, (5) adoption among surgeons, and (6) education and training. The quantitative analysis included 11 studies, with 10,938 cases. Overall, the CVS was achieved in 92.5%. Conversion rate was 4.8%. CVS-related BDI was 0.09% (0.05% technical errors and 0.04% misidentification errors).

CONCLUSION

Routine application of the CVS reduces BDI, but does not eliminate them altogether. Besides operative notes, the CVS should be documented by an imaging modality of sufficient quality. When the CVS cannot be safely established, the threshold for bail-out alternatives or complementary imaging should be low. Adoption by the surgical community worldwide shows great variability and focus should be placed on training through structured educational modules.

Review of the Literature on Partial Resections of the Gallbladder, 1898-2022: The Outline of the Conception of Subtotal Cholecystectomy and a Suggestion to Use the Terms 'Subtotal Open-Tract Cholecystectomy' and 'Subtotal Closed-Tract Cholecystectomy'

Current descriptions of the history of subtotal cholecystectomy require more details and accuracy. This study presented a narrative review of the articles on partial resections of the gallbladder published between 1898 and 2022. The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles items guided the style and content of this paper. The systematic literature search yielded 165 publications. Of them, 27 were published between 1898 and 1984. The evolution of the partial resections of the gallbladder began in the last decade of the 19th century when Kehr and Mayo performed them. The technique of partial resection of the gallbladder leaving the hepatic wall in situ was well known in the 3rd and 4th decades of the 20th century. In 1931, Estes emphasised the term 'partial cholecystectomy'. In 1947, Morse and Barb introduced the term 'subtotal cholecystectomy'. Madding and Farrow popularised it in 1955-1959. Bornman and Terblanche revitalised it in 1985. This term became dominant in 2014. From a subtotal cholecystectomy technical execution perspective, it is either a single-stage (when it includes only the resectional component) or two-stage (when it also entails closure of the remnant of the gallbladder or cystic duct) operation. Recent papers on classifications of partial resections of the gallbladder indicate the extent of gallbladder resection. Subtotal cholecystectomy is an umbrella term for incomplete cholecystectomies. 'Subtotal open-tract cholecystectomy' and 'subtotal closed-tract cholecystectomy' are terms that characterise the type of completion of subtotal cholecystectomy.

[Modern principles of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has many advantages over open surgery. Nevertheless, incidence of intraoperative bile duct injury is consistently higher for laparoscopic technique. This review is devoted to modern principles of identifying the anatomical elements in hepatoduodenal ligament and rules for safe tissue dissection in this area. The last ones mainly consist in formation of «critical view of safety» before clipping and transection of tubular structures. The key for «critical view of safety» is mobilization of fatty and fibrous tissues of hepatocystic triangle starting from the lower third of the gallbladder.