Association of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes from left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from the national inpatient sample of 36,065 procedures

Hospitalizations for opportunistic infections following transplantation and associated risk factors: A national cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

Opportunistic infections (OIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after organ transplantation, though data in the liver transplant (LT) population are limited.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of LT recipients between January 1, 2007 and Deceber 31, 2016 using Medicare claims data linked to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated factors independently associated with hospitalizations for early (≤1 year post transplant) and late (>1 year) OIs, with a particular focus on immunosuppression.

RESULTS

There were 11 320 LT recipients included in the study, of which 13.2% had at least one OI hospitalization during follow-up. Of the 2638 OI hospitalizations, 61.9% were early post-LT. Cytomegalovirus was the most common OI (45.4% overall), although relative frequency decreased after the first year (25.3%). Neither induction or maintenance immunosuppression were associated with early OI hospitalization (all p > .05). The highest risk of early OI was seen with primary sclerosing cholangitis (aHR 1.74; p = .003 overall). Steroid-based and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppression at 1 year post LT were independently associated with increased late OI (p < .001 overall).

CONCLUSION

This study found OI hospitalizations to be relatively common among LT recipients and frequently occur later than previously reported. Immunosuppression regimen may be an important modifiable risk factor for late OIs.

Association of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease with procedural complications and inpatient outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantations across the United States

BACKGROUND

Leadless pacemakers have emerged as a promising alternative to transvenous pacemakers in patients with kidney disease. However, studies investigating leadless pacemaker outcomes and complications based on kidney dysfunction are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with inpatient complications and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantations.

METHODS

National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients with CKD and ESRD who underwent leadless pacemaker implantations in the United States from 2016 to 2020. Study end points assessed included inpatient complications, outcomes, and resource utilization of leadless pacemaker implantations.

RESULTS

A total of 29,005 leadless pacemaker placements were identified. Patients with CKD (n = 5245 [18.1%]) and ESRD (n = 3790 [13.1%]) were younger than patients without CKD and had higher prevalence of important comorbidities. In crude analysis, ESRD was associated with higher prevalence of major complications, peripheral vascular complications, and inpatient mortality. After multivariable adjustment, CKD and ESRD were associated with inpatient mortality (CKD: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.40-1.86]; ESRD: aOR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.18-1.63]) and prolonged length of stay (CKD: aOR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.46-1.66]; ESRD: aOR, 1.81 [95% CI 1.67-1.96]). ESRD was also associated with higher hospitalization costs (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.50-1.77) and major complications (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57) after leadless pacemaker implantation.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation had CKD or ESRD. CKD and ESRD were associated with greater length and cost of stay and inpatient mortality.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective National Inpatient Sample Study

Background The burden of mitral regurgitation is high, and studies show it is the most common valvular pathology. The management of mitral regurgitation varies and depends on the chronicity, severity, etiology, and comorbidities of the patient. Surgical repair is recommended over replacement. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been shown to improve the prognosis of patients with mitral regurgitation and appears relatively safer than surgical repair in patients with high surgical risks. In this study, we examined the outcomes of TEER in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) by retrospectively evaluating data from the 2010 to 2016 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Methodology We retrospectively evaluated data from the 2010 to 2016 NIS. TEER was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10- CM) codes of 35.97 and 02UG3JZ, respectively, from our dataset. The study sample was stratified based on renal function into two groups (CKD and no CKD). Patients with CKD were identified using ICD-9-CM codes 585.3, 585.4, 585.5, and 585.6 and ICD-10-CM codes N18.3, N18.4, N18.5, and N18.6. Results There was no significant difference in major complications and overall complications between patients with and without CKD. However, heart failure, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, and cardiogenic shock were more prevalent in the CKD group. Patients with CKD were also more likely to sustain respiratory failure, post-procedure hemothorax, and require blood product transfusions. For renal complications, analysis showed that superimposed acute kidney injury and the need for hemodialysis were more common in the CKD group. Of note, there was no difference in neurologic complications, gastrointestinal bleeding, and thromboembolic complications between both groups. Patients with CKD who underwent TEER were more likely to have prolonged hospital stays without a significant increase in hospitalization charges. These patients were also more likely to be discharged to rehabilitation facilities. Conclusions CKD confers significant morbidity and mortality to patients undergoing TEER. Providers should be aware of these discrepancies in outcomes for patients with CKD in need of TEER to help better optimize their care.

Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A real-world analysis from the National Inpatient Sample database

Background

Pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous or surgical-based intervention remains an important complication of a leadless pacemaker implantation.

Objective

The study sought to determine real-world prevalence, risk factors, and associated outcomes of pericardial effusion requiring intervention in leadless pacemaker implantations.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantations during the years 2016 to 2020. The outcomes assessed in our study included prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention, other procedural complications, and in-hospital outcomes. Predictors of pericardial effusion were also analyzed.

Results

Pericardial effusion requiring intervention occurred in a total of 325 (1.1%) leadless pacemaker implantations. Patient-level characteristics that predicted development of a serious pericardial effusion included >75 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.75), female sex (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.62-2.55), coagulopathy (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-1.99), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.74), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.94), and connective tissue disorders (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.02-4.39). Pericardial effusion requiring intervention was independently associated with mortality (OR 5.66, 95% CI 4.24-7.56), prolonged length of stay (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.73), and increased cost of hospitalization (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.92-3.21) after leadless pacemaker implantation.

Conclusion

In a large, contemporary, real-world cohort of leadless pacemaker implantations in the United States, the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was 1.1%. Certain important patient-level characteristics predicted development of a significant pericardial effusion, and such effusions were associated with adverse outcomes after leadless pacemaker implantations.

Practical guide on left atrial appendage closure for the non-implanting physician: an international consensus paper

A significant proportion of patients who suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF) and are in need of thromboembolic protection are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue this treatment shortly after its initiation. This undertreatment has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants which are associated with less major bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this, including bleeding events or ischaemic strokes whilst on anticoagulation, a serious risk of bleeding events, poor treatment compliance despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. An alternative interventional therapy, which is not associated with long-term bleeding and is as effective as vitamin K anticoagulation, was introduced over 20 years ago. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure, predominantly achieved using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation. This management strategy is well known to the interventional cardiologist/electrophysiologist but is not more widely appreciated within cardiology or internal medicine. This article introduces the devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. Almost all physicians who care for adult patients will have many with AF. This practical guide, written within guideline/guidance boundaries, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of this new therapy, which is becoming increasingly popular.

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for embolic stroke, and many nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients have concomitant CKD. Anticoagulation therapy can be challenging in CKD due to increased bleeding risk, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be a promising alternative.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to consolidate current evidence on the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter LAAO in patients with CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from inception to September 2, 2022. We conducted a meta-analysis if an outcome was evaluated in at least two similar studies.

RESULTS

We included 15 studies with 77,780 total patients. Of the 15 studies, 11 had a cohort design (five prospective and six retrospective), and four were case series. Patients with CKD were older and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities than non-CKD patients. The two groups did not differ in procedural failure rate, vascular complications, or pericardial tamponade. CKD patients exhibited higher odds of in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) and bleeding, longer-term bleeding, and mortality than those without CKD. The risk of in-hospital and longer-term cardioembolic events was similar between CKD and non-CKD populations (odds ratio = 1.01 [95% CI 0.70-1.15] and 1.05 [95% CI 0.55-2.00], respectively). Patients with ESRD had higher odds of in-hospital mortality and cardioembolic events than non-ESRD patients, with no differences in risk of pericardial tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on observational studies, LAAO may be an effective option to prevent cardioembolic events in CKD. However, CKD patients may have higher odds of AKI and in-hospital and long-term bleeding and mortality. The adverse clinical outcomes observed in CKD patients may be attributed to this population's high burden of comorbidities, especially among those with ERSD, rather than the LAAO procedure itself. To ensure maximum clinical benefit, careful patient selection, management, and surveillance involving multidisciplinary teams are essential for CKD patients undergoing LAAO. Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (laao) Can Prevent Cardioembolic Events In Chronic Kidney Disease (ckd) Patients. However, Ckd Patients, Particularly Those With End-stage Renal Disease/dialysis (esrd), May Face Increased Odds Of Acute Kidney Injury, In-hospital And Long-term Bleeding, And Mortality. Notably, These Adverse Outcomes In Ckd Patients May Be Linked To Their High Comorbidity Burden, Particularly In Those With Esrd, Rather Than The Laao Procedure Itself. Careful Patient Selection, Management, And Surveillance Involving Multidisciplinary Teams Are Essential For Ckd Patients Undergoing Laao To Ensure Maximum Clinical Benefit Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can prevent cardioembolic events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, CKD patients, particularly those with end-stage renal disease/dialysis (ESRD), may face increased odds of acute kidney injury, in-hospital and long-term bleeding, and mortality. Notably, these adverse outcomes in CKD patients may be linked to their high comorbidity burden, particularly in those with ESRD, rather than the LAAO procedure itself. Careful patient selection, management, and surveillance involving multidisciplinary teams are essential for CKD patients undergoing LAAO to ensure maximum clinical benefit.

Long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: a multi-center, prospective, open label, observational study

Background

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing dialysis is high, however, the high risk of bleeding often hampers with a correct anticoagulation in ESKD patients with AF, despite high thromboembolic risk. Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is a anticoagulation (OAT) for thromboembolism prevention in AF populations with high hemorrhagic risk.

Methods and Results

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAA occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients undergoing the procedure (LAA occlusion cohort, n = 106), in comparison with two other ESKD cohorts, one taking warfarin (Warfarin cohort, n = 114) and the other without anticoagulation therapy (No-OAT cohort, n = 148). After a median follow-up of 4 years, a Cox regression model, adjusted for possible confounding factors, showed that the hazard ratios (HRs) of thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were 0.19 (95%CI 0.04-0.96; p = 0.045) and 0.16 (95%CI 0.04-0.66; p = 0.011) as compared with Warfarin and No-OAT cohorts, respectively. The HR of bleeding in the LAA occlusion cohort was 0.37 (95%CI 0.16-0.83; p = 0.017) compared to Warfarin cohort, while there were no significant differences between the LAA occlusion and the No-OAT cohort (HR 0.51; 95%CI 0.23-1.12; p = 0.094). Adjusted Cox regression models showed lower mortality in patients undergoing LAA occlusion as compared with both the Warfarin cohort (HR 0.60; 95%CI 0.38-0.94; p = 0.027) and no-OAT cohort (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.34-0.78; p = 0.002). Thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were lower than expected according to the CHA2DS2VASc score (1.7 [95%CI 0.3-3.0] vs 6.7 events per 100 person/years, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In ESKD patients with AF, LAA occlusion is safe and effective and is associated with reduced mortality compared with OAT or no therapy.

Prognostic value of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) often coexist and share an increased risk of thrombo-embolism (TE). CKD concomitantly predisposes towards a pro-haemorrhagic state. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of CKD in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 2124 consecutive AF patients undergoing LAAO were categorized into CKD stage 1+2 (n = 1089), CKD stage 3 (n = 796), CKD stage 4 (n = 170), and CKD stage 5 (n = 69) based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline. The primary endpoint included cardiovascular (CV) mortality, TE, and major bleeding. The expected annual TE and major bleeding risks were estimated based on the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. A non-significant higher incidence of major peri-procedural adverse events (1.7 vs. 2.3 vs. 4.1 vs. 4.3) was observed with worsening CKD (P = 0.14). The mean follow-up period was 13 ± 7 months (2226 patient-years). In comparison to CKD stage 1+2 as a reference, the incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in CKD stage 3 (log-rank P-value = 0.04), CKD stage 4 (log-rank P-value = 0.01), and CKD stage 5 (log-rank P-value = 0.001). Left atrial appendage occlusion led to a TE risk reduction (RR) of 72, 66, 62, and 41% in each group. The relative RR of major bleeding was 58, 44, 51, and 52%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with moderate-to-severe CKD had a higher incidence of the primary composite endpoint. The relative RR in the incidence of TE and major bleeding was consistent across CKD groups.

Efficacy and safety of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The relative safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have not been well defined. To evaluate the results in this cohort, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 2023 for all relevant studies. Our inclusion criteria were met by twelve observational studies that included 61324 patients altogether.

RESULTS

Compared with no CKD group, in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.84, 95% CI: 2.12-3.81, p<0.01, I2 = 0%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR: 4.39,95% CI:4.00-4.83, P<0.01, I2 = 3%), major bleeding events (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29-1.60, p<0.01 I2 = 0%), and pericardial effusion/tamponade (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.13-1.51, p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) were more common in the CKD group, especially in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of stroke (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.86-1.78, P = 0.25, I2 = 0%), LAAC success rates (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.33-3.16, p = 0.97, I2 = 58%) and vascular access complications (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.91-1.39, p = 0.28, I2 = 0%) between the two groups. During the follow-up, there was no difference in the risk of stroke between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD patients who receive LAAC have a greater risk of in-hospital mortality, AKI, pericardial effusion/tamponade, and major bleeding events than those without CKD, especially in patients with ESRD. No significant difference in the risk of stroke was found in the long-term follow-up after LAAC between the two groups, demonstrating a similar efficacy of LAAC to prevent stroke in CKD patients.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Among Patients With Diabetes (Insights from a National Database)

Atrial fibrillation is a major risk factor for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative to anticoagulation for patients with high risk of bleeding. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with adverse events after cardiac procedures. We sought to compare procedural and hospital outcomes in patients who underwent LAAC with and without DM. The Nationwide Inpatient Database was queried for patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was all adverse events that included in-hospital death, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke, pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, pericardiocentesis, pericardial window, and postprocedural hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Analysis included 62,220 patients who underwent LAAC from 2016 to 2019; 34.9% of patients had DM. There was a slight increase in the percentage of patients who underwent LAAC who had DM during the study period, from 29.92% to 34.93%. In unadjusted and adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in all adverse events between patients with and without DM who underwent LAAC (9.18% vs 8.77%, respectively, adjusted p = 0.63), and no difference in length of stay. Patients with DM have higher risk of acute kidney injury (3.75 vs 1.96%, p <0.001). This nationwide retrospective study demonstrates that DM is not associated with an increase in adverse event rates in patients who underwent LAAC.

Zero-Contrast Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using a Hybrid Echocardiography-Fluoroscopy Technique Without Iodinated Contrast

Contrast exposure during left atrial appendage occlusion may be harmful in those with chronic kidney disease or allergy. This single-center registry (n = 31) demonstrates the feasibility and safety of zero-contrast percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion using echocardiography, fluoroscopy, and fusion imaging, with 100% procedural success and no device complications at 45 days.

Trends and Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Renal and Liver Transplant Recipients: Insights From the United States National Inpatient and Readmission Database

Left atrial appendage occlusion using the Watchman device has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is no data on its safety and clinical outcomes in prior renal or liver transplant recipients. We included a total of 61,995 patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS, in-hospital outcomes) and 55,048 patients from the National Readmission Database (NRD, 30-day outcomes) who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). From this group, 0.65% (n=405) and 0.62% (n=339) were renal and liver transplant recipients in NIS and NRD respectively. Transplant recipients were younger compared with non-transplant recipients (mean age 69 vs 77 years, P=<0.01). There was little difference in terms of in-hospital mortality (0% vs 0.2%, P=0.43), major complications (6.2% vs 5.6%, P=0.61), cardiovascular complications (2.5% vs 2.8%, P=0.73), neurological complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.21) or bleeding complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.99) between transplant vs. non-transplant patients. Based on the NRD database, 30-day readmission rate was not meaningfully different for transplant recipients undergoing LAAO (9.44%) when compared to non-transplant patients (8.12%, [log-rank, P=0.56]). There was no difference between 30-day major or cardiovascular complications, however vascular complication rates were significantly higher for transplant recipients (OR 2.56, 95% CI [(1.66-3.47]). Our study findings suggest that LAAO may be safe for patients with a prior renal or liver transplant in terms of major complications, cardiovascular complications, and all-cause readmission rates. However vascular complications may be higher in transplant recipients. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Association of advanced age with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes from left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the National Inpatient Sample of 36,065 procedures

Background

Age-stratified analyses of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are limited. The purpose of current study was to compare in-hospital outcomes in elderly AF patients (age > 80 years) to a relatively younger cohort (age £ 80 years) after LAAO.

Methods

Data were extracted from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015–2018. LAAO device implantations were identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes of 37.90 and 02L73DK. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, inpatient mortality, and resource utilization with LAAO.

Results

A total of 36,065 LAAO recipients were included in the final analysis, of which 34.6% (n=12,475) were performed on elderly AF patients. Elderly AF patients had a higher prevalence of major complications (6.7% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.01) and mortality (0.4% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.01) after LAAO device implantation in the crude analysis. After multivariate adjustment of potential confounders, age > 80 years was associated with increased risk of inpatient mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.439, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.391–8.239) but not major complications (aOR 1.084, 95% CI 0.971–1.211), prolonged length of stay (aOR 0.943, 95% CI 0.88–1.101), or increased hospitalization costs (aOR 0.909, 95% CI 0.865–0.955).

Conclusion

Over 1 in 3 LAAO device implantations occurred in elderly AF patients. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, advanced age was associated with inpatient mortality, but not with other LAAO procedural–related outcomes including major complications, prolonged length of stay, or increased hospitalization costs.

Association of heart failure with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes from left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the national inpatient sample of 62 980 procedures

AIMS

To determine outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with concomitant heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were extracted from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015-2019. LAAO device implantations were identified on the basis of ICD-10-CM code of 02L73DK. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, in-patient mortality, and resource utilization. A total of 62 980 LAAO device implantations were studied. HFpEF (14.4%, n = 9040) and HFrEF (11.2%, n = 7100) were associated with a higher prevalence of major complications and in-patient mortality in crude analysis. In the multivariate model adjusted for potential confounders, HFpEF and HFrEF were not associated with major complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.16 and aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.21] or in-patient mortality (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 0.85-2.55 and aOR 1.26, 95% CI 0.67-2.38). HFpEF and HFrEF were associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) > 1 day (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31-1.53 and aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.53-1.80) and increased hospitalization costs > median cost 24 752$ (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.19-1.34 and aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HF in AF patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO was approximately 26%. HF was not independently associated with major complications and in-patient mortality but was associated with prolonged LOS and higher hospitalization costs.