Safe and effective delivery of high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions with a flexible-tip ablation catheter

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of High-power, Short-duration Ablation versus Low-power, Long-duration Ablation Strategy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects around 33 million people worldwide, rendering it a common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has evolved as a leading therapeutic intervention for symptomatic AF. This umbrella review systematically evaluates existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the safety, efficacy, and potential of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation as an alternative therapy option for AF. A thorough exploration was undertaken across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify pertinent studies for inclusion in this umbrella review. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method was employed to assess the overall certainty of the evidence comprehensively, and the quality of the incorporated reviews was meticulously evaluated through use of the AMSTAR 2 tool, the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In this study, we initially identified 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrowing them down to a final selection of 11 studies, which collectively integrated data from 6 randomized controlled trials and 26 observational studies. For primary efficacy outcomes, the HPSD approach led to a non-significant decrease in the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.12; I 2 = 90%; P = .31) and a significantly reduced risk of AF recurrence (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.67; I 2 = 0%; P < .00001) compared to the low-power, long-duration (LPLD) approach. In terms of primary safety outcomes, the HPSD approach significantly reduced the risk of esophageal thermal injury (ETI) (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; I 2 = 0%; P < .00001) and facilitated a non-significant decrease in the risk of other major complications (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.03; I 2 = 0%; P = .10). In conclusion, HPSD therapy is safer and more effective than LPLD therapy, facilitating decreased AF recurrence rates along with reductions in ETI, total procedure duration, ablation number, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, and acute pulmonary vein reconnection.

An optimized approach for increasing lesion size in temperature-controled setting using a catheter with a surface thermocouple and efficient irrigation

Background

We explore an optimized approach for increasing lesion size using a novel ablation catheter with a surface thermocouple and efficient irrigation in a temperature-control setting.

Methods

We conducted radiofrequency applications at various power levels (35 W, 40 W, and 45 W), contact forces (CFs, 10 g/20 g), and durations (60 s/120 s/180 s) in perpendicular/parallel catheter orientations, with normal saline irrigation (NS-irrigation) and Half NS-irrigation (HNS-irrigation) in an ex-vivo model (Step 1). In addition, we performed applications (35 W/40 W/45 W for 60 s/120 s/180 s in NS-irrigation and 35 W/40 W for 60 s/120 s/180 s in HNS-irrigation) in four swine (Step 2), evaluating lesion characteristics and the occurrence of steam pops.

Results

In Step 1, out of 288 lesions, we observed 47 (16.3%) steam pops, with 13 in NS-irrigation and 34 in HNS-irrigation (p = .001). Although steam pops were mostly observed with the most aggressive setting (45 W/180 s, 54%) with NS-irrigation, they happened in less aggressive settings with HNS irrigation. Lesion size significantly increased with longer-duration ablation but not with HNS-irrigation. The optimal %impedance-drop cutoff to predict steam pops was 20% with a negative-predictive-value (NPV) = 95.1% including NS- and HNS-irrigation groups, and 22% with an NPV = 96.1% in NS-irrigation group. In Step 2, similar to the ex-vivo model, lesion size significantly increased with longer-duration ablation but not with HNS-irrigation. Steam pops were absent with NS-irrigation (0/35) even with the largest %impedance-drop reaching 31% at 45 W/180 s. All steam pops were observed with HNS-irrigation (6/21, 29%). The optimal %impedance-drop cutoff predicting steam pops was 24% with an NPV = 96.3% including both NS- and HNS-irrigation groups.

Conclusions

Rather than using HNS-irrigation, very long-duration of radiofrequency applications up to 45 W/180 s may be recommended to safely and effectively increase lesion dimensions using this catheter with NS-irrigation.

Technological advances in ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation: the relentless quest for novel solutions to old problems

BACKGROUND

Several novel technologies allowing catheter ablation (CA) with a favorable safety/efficacy profile have been recently developed, but not yet extensively clinically tested in the setting of ventricular tachycardia CA.

METHODS

In this technical report, we overview technical aspects and preclinical/clinical information concerning the application of three novel CA technologies in the ventricular milieu: a pulsed field ablation (PFA) generator (CENTAURI™, Galaxy Medical) to be used with linear, contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation catheters; a contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter equipped with six thermocouples and three microelectrodes (QDOT Micro™, Biosense-Webster), allowing high-resolution mapping and temperature-controlled CA; and a flexible and mesh-shaped irrigation tip, contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter (Tactiflex, Abbott). We also report three challenging VT cases in which CA was performed using these technologies.

RESULTS

The CENTAURI system was used with the Tacticath™ (Abbott) ablation catheter to perform ventricular PFA in a patient with advanced heart failure, electrical storm, and a deep intramural septal substrate. Microelectrode mapping using QDOT Micro™ helped to refine substrate assessment in a VT patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, and allowed the identification of the critical components of the VT circuit, which were successfully ablated. Tactiflex™ was used in two challenging CA cases (one endocardial and one epicardial), allowing acute and mid-term control of VT episodes without adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The ideation and development of novel technologies initially intended to treat atrial arrhythmias and successfully implemented in the ventricular milieu is contributing to the progressive improvement in the clinical benefits derived from VT CA, making this procedure key for successful management of increasingly complex patients.

Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: between Present and Future

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, indeed current guidelines recognize PVI as the gold standard for first-time AF ablation, regardless of if it is paroxysmal or persistent. Since 1998 when Haïssaguerre pioneered AF ablation demonstrating a burden reduction after segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ablation, our approach to PVI was superior in terms of methodology and technology. This review aims to describe how paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation has evolved over the last twenty years. We will focus on available techniques, a mechanistic understanding of paroxysmal AF genesis and the possibility of a tailored approach for the treatment of AF, before concluding with a future perspective.

High-power short-duration catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is it really a new era? Comparison between new and old radiofrequency contact force-sensing catheters

BACKGROUND

The clinical performance of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the novel flexible tip TactiFlex™ (TFSE) catheter, as compared to standard-power, long-duration (SPLD) PVI using the TactiCath™ (TCSE) catheter among patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational, single-centre study including 40 consecutive patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal/persistent AF, using HPSD ablation with the novel TFSE catheter (HPSD/TFSE group). Based on propensity score-matching, forty patients undergoing SPLD PVI with the TCSE catheter were identified (SPLD/TCSE group). In the HPSD/TFSE group, RF lesions were performed by delivering 40-50 W for 10-20 s, while in the SPLD/TCSE group, RF power was 30-35 W, targeting a lesion size index (LSI) of 4.0-5.5. The co-primary study outcomes were time required to complete PVI and first pass isolation (FPI).

RESULTS

PVI was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups, and no major adverse events were observed. Remarkably, PVI time was shorter in the HPSD/TFSE, compared to the SPLD/TCSE group(9 [7-9] min vs. 50 [37-54] min; p < 0.001), while FPI rate was non-significantly higher in the former group(91% [146/160] vs 83% [134/160]; p = 0.063). Shorter procedural (108 [91-120] min vs. 173 [139-187] min, p < 0.001), total RF (9 [7-11] min vs. 43 [32-53] min, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy times(15 [10-19] min vs. 18 [13-26] min, p = 0.014), and lower DAP (1461 [860-2181] vs. 7200 [3400-20,800], p < 0.001) were recorded in the HPSD/TFSE group. A higher average impedance drop was obtained with HPSD/TFSE CA(17[17-18]Ω vs. 16 [15-17] Ω, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our initial clinical experience, HPSD PVI with the TFSE catheter proved faster than SPLD PVI with the TCSE catheter, at least equally effective in terms of FPI, and it was associated with greater impedance drop.

Comparison of pulsed-field ablation versus very high power short duration-ablation for pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

The newly introduced nonthermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology to achieve fast pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with high acute success rates and good safety features. However, previous studies have shown that very high power short duration ablation (VHPSD) is also highly effective and fast to achieve PVI with potentially less arrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Data comparing PFA to VHPSD-PVI is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared procedural and outcome data for PFA-PVI to VHPSD-PVI in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF/persAF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing de novo PVI (PFA or VHPSD) were included in this analysis. For PFA-PVI a pentaspline 20 electrode catheter was used. For VHPSD-PVI an enhanced irrigated catheter with a power setting of 70 W/7 s (70 W/5 s at posterior wall) was employed in conjunction with electro-anatomical mapping. All procedures were performed in deep analgo-sedation.

RESULTS

A total of n = 114 patients (n = 57[50%] PFA, n = 17[30%] PAF; n = 40[70%] persAF) were included in this analysis. PVI was successful in all patients. The PFA group revealed a significantly shorter procedure duration (65 ± 17 min vs. 95 ± 23 min, p < 0.01) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA 15 ± 5 min and VHPSD 12 ± 3 min; p < 0.001). At follow-up after median 125 days (interquartile range: 109-162) n = 46 PFA (80.7%) and n = 44 VHPSD pts (77.2%) were free from atrial arrhythmia after a single procedure (p = 0.819). Two tamponades occurred in the PFA while in VHPSD two pts suffered groin bleedings. One clinically nonsignificant PV stenosis occurred in the VHPSD group.

CONCLUSION

Pulsed-field ablation and VHPSD-PVI seem to be highly effective and safe to achieve PVI in the setting of PAF and persAF with comparable arrhythmia-free survival. However, procedure duration for PFA PVI is significantly shorter and therefore may be of potential benefit. Compared to PFA VHPSD-PVI might ensure information on left atrial substrate allowing to target concomitant secondary tachycardias.

Superiority of the Combination of Input and Output Parameters to the Single Parameter for Lesion Size Estimation

BACKGROUND

For lesion size prediction, each input parameter, including ablation energy (AE), and output parameter, such as impedance, is individually used. We hypothesize that using both parameters simultaneously may be more optimal.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Radiofrequency applications at a range of power (30-50 W), contact force (10 g and 20 g), duration (10-60 s), and catheter orientation with normal saline (NS)- or half-normal saline (HNS)-irrigation were performed in excised porcine hearts. The correlations, with lesion size of AE, absolute impedance drop (∆Imp-drop), relative impedance drop (%Imp-drop), and AE*%Imp-drop were examined. Lesion size was analyzed in 283 of 288 lesions (NS-irrigation, n=142; HNS-irrigation, n=141) without steam pops. AE*%Imp-drop consistently showed the strongest correlations with lesion maximum depth (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.91; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.94), surface area (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.87; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.86), and volume (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.94; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.94) compared with the other parameters. Moreover, compared with AE alone, AE*%Imp-drop significantly improved the strength of correlation with lesion maximum depth (AE vs. AE*%Imp-drop, ρ=0.83 vs. 0.91, P<0.01), surface area (ρ=0.73 vs. 0.87, P<0.01), and volume (ρ=0.84 vs. 0.94, P<0.01) with NS-irrigation. This tendency was also observed with HNS-irrigation. Parallel catheter orientation showed a better correlation with lesion depth and volume using ∆Imp-drop, %Imp-drop, and AE*%Imp-drop than perpendicular orientation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of input and output parameters is more optimal than each single parameter for lesion prediction.