Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A proportional meta-analysis and systematic review of single-arm studies

Clinical and pathophysiologic determinants of catheter ablation outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrial fibrillation

Background

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is frequently associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared clinical, echocardiographic, and electrophysiological parameters between HCM subtypes and those without HCM at AF catheter ablation (AFCA) and analyzed post-AFCA reverse remodeling and AF recurrence based on HCM presence and subtype.

Methods

Among 5161 consecutive patients who underwent de novo AFCA, we included HCM patients and control patients who were age-, gender-, and AF type-matched. Between AF-HCM patients and controls, we compared baseline values for left atrium (LA) wall thickness (LAWT), reverse remodeling at 1-year follow-up, and procedural outcomes over the course of follow-up between two groups.

Results

A total of 122 AF-HCM patients and 318 control patients were included. AF-HCM patients had more frequent heart failure and higher LA diameter, E/Em, and LA pressure (all, p < .001). However, LAWT did not differ from control group. A year after AFCA, degree of LA reverse remodeling was significantly lower in AF-HCM than in control group (ΔLA dimension, p = .025). Nonapical HCM (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.05-2.80), persistent AF (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.05-2.04), and LA dimension (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) were independent risk factors for AF recurrence. During 78.0 months of follow-up, nonapical HCM patients showed higher AF recurrence rate than both apical HCM (log-rank p = .005) and control patients (log-rank p = .002).

Conclusions

The presence of HCM, particularly nonapical HCM, displayed increased LA hemodynamic loading with diastolic dysfunction and had poorer rhythm outcomes after AFCA compared to both apical HCM and control group.

From Atrial Fibrillation Management to Atrial Myopathy Assessment: The Evolving Concept of Left Atrium Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiovascular disorder in adults and a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Historically, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considered as a critical aspect in HCM patients as it is considered to be a marker of disease progression, escalates the frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, increases the risk of thromboembolic events, and worsens quality of life and outcome. Increasing evidence suggests that AF is the result of a subtle long-standing process that starts early in the history of HCM. The process of left atrial dilation accompanied by morphologic and functional remodelling is the quintessential prerequisite for the onset of AF. This review aims to describe the current understanding of AF pathophysiology in HCM, emphasising the role of left atrial myopathy in its development. In addition, we discuss risk factors and management strategies specific to AF in the context of HCM, providing insights into the complexities and challenges of treating this specific patient population.

Atrioventricular nodal ablation is an effective management strategy for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can be challenging to manage. Atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation may be an effective management strategy for AF in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of AVN ablation in HCM patients who have failed medical therapy and/or catheter ablation for AF.

METHODS

A multicenter study with retrospective analysis of a prospectively collated HCM registry was performed. AVN ablation patients were identified. Baseline characteristics and device and procedural indications were collected. Symptoms defined by New York Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association classification and echocardiographic findings during follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included in the study. Indications for AVN ablation were 6 (10.2%) inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, 35 (59.3%) ineffective rate control, and 18 (30.5%) to regularize rhythm for symptom improvement. During post-AVN ablation follow-up of 79.4 ± 61.1 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remained stable (pre-LVEF 48.9% ± 12.6% vs post-LVEF 50.1% ± 10.1%; P = .29), even in those without a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device (pre-LVEF 54.3% ± 8.0% vs post-LVEF 53.8% ± 8.0%; P = .65). Forty-nine patients (83.1%) reported an improvement in symptoms regardless of AF type (17/21 [81.0%] paroxysmal vs 32/38 [84.2%] persistent; P = 1.00), presence of baseline left ventricular impairment (22/26 [84.6%] LVEF ≤50% vs 27/33 [81.8%] LVEF ≥50%; P = 1.00) or CRT device (27/32 [84.4%] CRT vs 22/27 [81.5%] no CRT; P = 1.00). Symptoms improved in 16 patients (89.0%) who underwent AVN ablation to regularize rhythm.

CONCLUSION

AVN ablation improved symptoms without impacting left ventricular function in the majority of patients. The data suggest that AVN ablation is an effective and safe management approach for AF in HCM and should be further evaluated in larger prospective studies.