Mahaim fiber: An atriofascicular or a long atrioventricular pathway?

Arrhythmias Involving Variants of Accessory Pathways

In some cases, atrioventricular reentrant arrhythmias are sustained by accessory pathways with peculiar electrophysiologic properties related to their specific anatomy. Most of these fibers, which may be responsible for variants of ventricular preexcitation, show decremental conduction properties due to a nodelike aspect or a peculiar tortuous anatomic route across the atrioventricular groove. Moreover, some fibers do not actively sustain any reentrant circuit and can be only involved as bystander in other arrhythmias. Although rare, these accessory pathway variants should be properly diagnosed using noninvasive and invasive methods to guide catheter ablation procedures when needed.

Variable Presentations and Ablation Sites for Manifest Nodoventricular/Nodofascicular Fibers

BACKGROUND

Nodofascicular and nodoventricular (NFV) accessory pathways connect the atrioventricular node and the Purkinje system or ventricular myocardium, respectively. Concealed NFV pathways participate as the retrograde limb of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Manifest NFV pathways can comprise the anterograde limb of wide-complex SVT but are quite rare. The purpose of this report is to highlight the electrophysiological properties and sites of ablation for manifest NFV pathways.

METHODS

Eight patients underwent electrophysiology studies for wide-complex tachycardia (3), for narrow-complex tachycardia (1), and preexcitation (4).

RESULTS

NFV was an integral part of the SVT circuit in 3 patients. Cases 1 to 2 were wide-complex tachycardia because of manifest NFV SVT. Case 3 was a bidirectional NFV that conducted retrograde during concealed NFV SVT and anterograde causing preexcitation during atrial pacing. NFV was a bystander during atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and orthodromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia in 4 cases and caused only preexcitation in 1. Successful NFV ablation was achieved empirically in the slow pathway region in 1 case. In 5 cases, the ventricular insertion was mapped to the slow pathway region (2 cases) or septal right ventricle (3 cases). The NFV was not mapped in cases 5 and 7 because of its bystander role. QRS morphology of preexcitation predicted the right ventricle insertion sites in 4 of the 5 cases in which it was mapped. During follow-up, 1 patient noted recurrent palpitations but no documented SVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Manifest NFV may be critical for wide-complex tachycardia/manifest NFV SVT, act as the retrograde limb for narrow-complex tachycardia/concealed NFV SVT, or cause bystander preexcitation. Ablation should initially target the slow pathway region, with mapping of the right ventricle insertion site if slow pathway ablation is not successful. The QRS morphology of maximal preexcitation may be helpful in predicting successful right ventricle ablation site.

Perioperative management of patients with pre-excitation syndromes

Patients with pre-excitation abnormalities are at a high risk for life-threatening perioperative arrhythmias. In Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, the anaesthetics used for invasive diagnostic testing/ablation, should not affect cardiac electrophysiology; propofol, sevoflurane, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil are suitable. In non-ablative surgery, propofol, sevoflurane, isoflurane, fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil have been used safely. Among neuromuscular blockers, cis-atracurium, rocuronium and vecuronium are good choices. Ketamine, pancuronium and pethidine should be avoided because of their sympathomimetic actions. Anticholinergic/ anticholinesterase combinations for neuromuscular block reversal should preferably be omitted, while sugammadex seems more attractive. In regional anaesthesia, addition of epinephrine and high sympathetic blocks should be avoided. Hypotension should be treated with pure alpha-adrenergic agonists. Other pre-excitation abnormalities associated with different accessory pathways are the Mahaim Fiber and Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome. Sympathetic activation should be avoided. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol probably represents the safest option. A careful anaesthetic plan and close cooperation with cardiologists are mandatory for successful management.

Decremental accessory pathway conduction after ablation and antidromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia 8 years after successful radiofrequency ablation

INTRODUCTION

This is a rare case of antidromic reciprocating tachycardia developing 8 years after successful catheter ablation.

RESULT

A 15-year-old girl had recurrence of palpitations 8 years after the ablation of manifest right posteroseptal accessory pathway. Atrial burst pacing revealed Wenckebach atrioventricular conduction with preexcitation. Wide QRS tachycardia with identical morphology to sinus rhythm associated with retrograde His potential recorded immediately after the V-wave was induced by isoproterenol infusion. Atrial premature stimulus applied at the identical timing of His potential advanced the subsequent ventricular beat and His potential.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation may produce decremental accessory pathway conduction and rarely cause antidromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia. This may be explained by a presence of "de novo" accessory pathway with decremental conduction properties that became manifest after the first ablation.

Spontaneous automaticity arising from a successfully ablated Mahaim fiber

The authors describe a 22-year-old woman with regular and irregular arrhythmias exhibiting left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology at various heart rates. An atriofascicular fiber was diagnosed as the underlying mechanism for the antidromic reciprocating tachycardia. In addition, spontaneous automaticity of the Mahaim fiber was present during electrophysiologic study. The accessory pathway was ablated successfully, targeting a Mahaim potential at the supero-anterior tricuspid valve annulus. Relatively slow automatic rhythms with identical LBBB morphology were recorded immediately after ablation, as well as during long-term follow-up in a more sporadic and subclinical form. Abnormal automaticity arising from the distal portions of the remnant pathway was considered to be the origin of the slow ventricular rhythms in this peculiar case.

Effects of Right Bundle Branch Block on the Antidromic Circus Movement Tachycardia in Patients with Presumed Atriofascicular Pathways

BACKGROUND

The typical and most common tachycardia in patients with atriofascicular pathways is a macro reentrant tachycardia, with anterograde conduction over the decrementally conducting bypass tract and retrograde conduction over the right bundle branch-His-AV node axis resulting in a short V-right bundle branch and short V-H interval.

OBJECTIVES

To report on changes in rate and QRS configuration when right bundle branch block (RBBB) develops spontaneously during antidromic tachycardia using an atriofascicular fiber.

METHODS

Three of 25 patients with an antidromic circus movement tachycardia using a right-sided atriofascicular pathway showed episodes of right bundle branch block (RBBB) during ventriculo-atrial conduction. Effect of retrograde RBBB on tachycardia rate and QRS configuration was studied using intracardiac and extracardiac recordings.

RESULTS

All 3 patients showed prolongation of their V-A interval when retrograde RBBB occurred during tachycardia, resulting in a longer tachycardia cycle length. The VA time increase ranged from 85 to 100 msec, with a mean 346 +/- 5 msec. Two of the 3 patients also showed a change in QRS configuration due to a more leftward shift of the frontal plane QRS axis.

CONCLUSION

Rate changes in antidromic tachycardia in patients with atriofascicular fibers can be based on a shift in VA conduction from one bundle branch to the other. This may be accompanied by changes in the frontal plane QRS axis because of a change in ventricular activation sequence.