Activation sequences following failed atrial defibrillation

Focal activation patterns: breaking new grounds in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

High-resolution atrial mapping studies have provided novel insights in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the last few years. Increasing attention is being drawn to the so-called focal activation patterns (FAPs); however, there is no consensus on criteria to identify and characterize these patterns. Areas covered: In this expert review, an overview of definitions and criteria used to examine FAPs obtained from atrial mapping studies is provided and studies reporting on the underlying mechanisms are discussed. Expert commentary: High-resolution cardiac mapping has revealed the importance of FAPs in the pathophysiology of AF. There is increasing evidence supporting the concept of endo-epicardial (E-E) asynchrony enabling transmural conduction of electrical waves resulting in FAPs. Uniform reports of FAPs in future studies are needed to provide more knowledge on its clinical importance.

Atrial activation occurring immediately after successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Electrical defibrillation is very effective in interrupting atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its mechanism is not completely understood. We report our observations in patients subjected to external electriocardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation and contrast them with recent theories about defibrillation mechanism.

METHODS

In 13 consecutive patients transthoracic electrical cardioversion for AF was performed during an electrophysiological study (11 monophasic -200-360 J- and 9 biphasic shocks -50-150 J-). About 10-16 electrograms were obtained with multipolar catheters recording right atrium, coronary sinus, and right pulmonary artery. AF was defined by interelectrogram intervals and changing sequences among recordings, indicating complete lack of organization. We evaluated the presence of propagated activations immediately (<300 ms) after successful shocks (>or=1 discrete electrogram in all recordings). In unsuccessful shocks we evaluated changes in electrogram morphology (discrete/fragmented) and interelectrogram intervals before and after defibrillation.

RESULTS

About 16/20 shocks terminated AF. In 6/16 one or two cycles of atrial activation were recorded just after the shock and before AF ended. In 10/16 AF was interrupted immediately after the shock. 4/20 shocks did not interrupt the arrhythmia. After these shocks, transient organization of recorded activity with longer interelectrogram cycle length and disappearance of fragmented activity were transiently observed.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical findings in atrial defibrillation in vivo reproduce experimental data that show myocardial activations early after successful direct current shocks. These observations suggest that successful defibrillation depends not only on the immediate effects of the shock, but also on transient effects on electrophysiological properties of the myocardium, capable of interrupting persistent or reinitiated activations.