Characterization of the infarct substrate and ventricular tachycardia circuits with noncontact unipolar mapping in a porcine model of myocardial infarction

Non-contact whole-chamber charge density mapping of the left ventricle: preclinical evaluation in a sheep model

BACKGROUND

Conventional contact-based electroanatomic mapping is poorly suited for rapid or dynamic ventricular arrhythmias. Whole-chamber charge density (CD) mapping could efficiently characterize complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias and yield insights into their underlying mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of non-contact whole-chamber left ventricular (LV) CD mapping, and to characterize CD activation patterns during sinus rhythm, ventricular pacing, and ventricular fibrillation (VF).

METHODS

Ischemic scar as defined by CD amplitude thresholds was compared to late gadolinium enhancement criteria on magnetic resonance imaging using an iterative closest point algorithm. Electrograms recorded at sites of tissue contact were compared to the nearest non-contact CD-derived electrograms to calculate signal morphology cross-correlations and time differences. Regions of consistently slow conduction were examined relative to areas of scar and to localized irregular activation (LIA) during VF.

RESULTS

Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of CD-defined dense and total LV scar were 0.92 ± 0.03 and 0.87 ± 0.06, with accuracies of 0.86±0.03 and 0.80±0.05, respectively. Morphology cross-correlation between 8,677 contact and corresponding non-contact electrograms was 0.93±0.10, with a mean time difference of 2.5±5.6 msec. Areas of consistently slow conduction tended to occur at scar borders and exhibited spatial agreement with LIA during VF (AUC 0.90±0.02).

CONCLUSION

Non-contact LV CD mapping can accurately delineate ischemic scar. CD-derived ventricular electrograms correlate strongly with conventional contact-based electrograms. Regions with consistently slow conduction are often at scar borders and tend to harbor LIA during VF.

The Ideal Cardiac Mapping System

Cardiac mapping has witnessed significant and unprecedented progress over more than a century. At present, several mapping/imaging technologies are commercially available, alone or in combination. This article briefly discusses the advantages and limitations (disadvantages) of each technique.

Spatial characterization of electrogram morphology from transmural recordings in the intact normal heart

PURPOSE

Unipolar (UE) and bipolar electrograms (BE) are utilized to identify arrhythmogenic substrate. We quantified the effect of increasing distance from the source of propagation on local electrogram amplitude; and determined if transmural electrophysiological gradients exist with respect to propagation and stimulation depth.

METHODS

Mapping was performed on 5 sheep. Deployment of >50 quadripolar transmural needles in the LV were located in Cartesian space using Ensite. Contact electrograms from all needles were recorded during multisite bipolar pacing from epicardial then endocardial electrodes. Analysis was performed to determine stimulus distance to local activation time, peak negative amplitude (V-P), and peak-peak amplitude (VP-P) for (1) unfiltered UE, and (2) unfiltered and 30 Hz high-pass filtered BEs. Each sheep was analysed using repeated ANOVA.

RESULTS

Increasing distance from the pacing sites led to significant (p<0.01) attenuation of UEs (V-P = 7.0±0.5%; VP-P = 5.4±0.3% per cm). Attenuation of BE with distance was insignificant (Vp-p unfiltered = 2.2±0.5%; filtered = 1.7±1.4% per cm). Independent of pacing depth, significant (p<0.01) transmural electrophysiological gradients were observed, with highest amplitude occurring at epicardial layers for UE and endocardial layers for BE. Furthermore, during pacing, propagation was earlier at the epicardium than endocardial layer by 1.6±2.0 ms (UE) and 1.4±2.8 ms (BE) (all p>0.01) during endocardial stimulation, and 2.3±2.4 ms (UE) and 1.8±3.7 ms (BE) during epicardal stimulation (all p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Electrogram amplitude is inversely proportional to propagation distance for unipolar modalities only, which affected V-P>VP-P. Conduction propagates preferentially via the epicardium during stimulation and is believed to contribute to a transmural amplitude gradient.

Primary Radiofrequency Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia Early After Myocardial Infarction

Background—

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a significant complication of myocardial infarction. Radiofrequency ablation for postinfarct VT is reserved for drug refractory VT or VT storms. Our hypothesis is that radiofrequency ablation in the early postinfarct period could abolish or diminish late recurrences of VT.

Methods and Results—

Myocardial infarct was induced by balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery in 35 sheep. The 25 survivors underwent programmed ventricular stimulation and electroanatomical mapping 8 days postinfarct. Animals with inducible VT (12 out of 25 animals) underwent immediate radiofrequency ablation. Further VT inductions were performed 100 and 200 days postinfarct. At day 8, 3.0±0.9 VT morphologies per animal were inducible. All were successfully ablated with 24±6 applications of radiofrequency energy. All had ablations on the left ventricular endocardium, and 67% had ablations on the right ventricular aspect of the interventricular septum. All targeted arrhythmias were successfully ablated acutely. One animal was euthanized because of hypotension from a serious pericardial effusion. The other 11 survived and remained arrhythmia free on subsequent inductions on the 100th and 200th days ( P <0.001). The 13 animals without inducible VT remained noninducible at the subsequent studies. A historical control arm of 9 animals with inducible VT at day 8 remained inducible at day 100.

Conclusions—

Radiofrequency ablation on the eighth day after infarction abolished inducibility of VT at late induction studies ≤200 days in an ovine model. Early identification and ablation of VT after infarction may prevent or reduce late ventricular arrhythmias but needs to be validated in clinical studies.

Revised non-contact mapping of ventricular scar in a post-infarct ovine model with validation using contact mapping and histology

AIMS

Identification of arrhythmogenic scar using non-contact (NC) sinus rhythm (SR) mapping is limited. Dynamic substrate mapping (DSM) overcomes these limitations but is less accurate than plunge needle electrode mapping. We developed a revised method for calculating DSM which was validated using detailed histological analysis and compared with conventional mapping modalities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mapping was performed in eight sheep, >9 weeks post-myocardial infarction. Twenty multielectrode needles were deployed at thoracotomy in the left ventricle within and surrounding scar, and located using Ensite. Simultaneous catheter, needle, and NC electrograms were recorded during SR and multisite pacing. Dynamic substrate mapping maps were calculated as the maximum local peak negative voltage (PNV). Absolute mean DSM (AMDSM) maps, based on peak-peak voltage (P-PV), were calculated to minimize local pacing effects and take into account anisotropic influence. Dynamic substrate mapping and AMDSM maps were normalized based on global maximum voltages attained. Histologically quantified scar and mapping criteria were compared using Spearman's correlation and receiver operator curves (area under the curve, AUC) using 50% scar cut-off. For unipolar mapping, needles had greatest sensitivity at identifying scar which was better for P-PV (AUC; needle = 0.90, catheter = 0.70, NC = 0.66) than for PNV (AUC; needle = 0.79, NC = 0.38). AMDSM (AUC = 0.75) had superior scar discrimination than either catheter (AUC; unipolar = 0.70, bipolar = 0.71) or DSM (AUC = 0.67). Absolute mean DSM accuracy was improved when valvular geometries were excluded (AUC = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Absolute mean DSM was comparably accurate in identifying scarred myocardium as PNV needle mapping but was superior to conventional catheter and NC mapping.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia guided by noncontact mapping

Catheter ablation of untolerated and unstable ventricular tachycardia may not be performed using a conventional activation mapping tecnique. The noncontact mapping system enables reconstruction of the spreading of activation wave through a virtually generated ventricular chamber, even from a single tachycardia beat, and was introduced as a tool to guide mapping and ablation of untolerated or unsustained ventricular arrhythmias. The reduced accuracy in the setting of enlarged ventricles is recognized as the main limitation of this tecnique. While noncontract mapping appears to be especially suitable in guiding the ablation of unsustained idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, it can also be successfully used as a guide to perform ablation of untolerated re-entry-related ventricular tachycardias during sinus rhythm.

Comparison of Electroanatomic Contact and Noncontact Mapping of Ventricular Scar in a Postinfarct Ovine Model With Intramural Needle Electrode Recording and Histological Validation

Background— Substrate-based ablation is useful for nonhemodynamically tolerated postinfarct ventricular tachycardia. We assessed the accuracy of the CARTO contact and EnSite noncontact systems at identifying scar in a chronic ovine model with intramural plunge needle electrode recording and histological validation.

Methods and Results— Scar mapping was performed on 8 male sheep with previous percutaneous-induced myocardial infarction. Up to 20 plunge needles were inserted into the left ventricle of each animal in areas of dense scar, scar border, and normal myocardium. A simultaneous CARTO map and EnSite geometry were acquired using a single catheter, and needle electrode locations were registered. A dynamic substrate map was constructed using ratiometric 50% peak negative voltage. The scar percentage around each needle location was quantified histologically. Analysis was performed on 152 plunge needles and corresponding histological blocks. Spearman correlation with histology was 0.690 ( P <0.001) for needle electrode peak-to-peak voltage (PPV), 0.362 ( P <0.001) and 0.492 ( P <0.001) for CARTO bipolar and unipolar PPV, and 0.381 ( P <0.001) for EnSite dynamic substrate map (≤40 mm from array). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (<50% and ≥50% scar) was 0.896 for needle electrode PPV, 0.726 and 0.697 for CARTO bipolar and unipolar PPV, and 0.703 for EnSite dynamic substrate map (≤40 mm from array).

Conclusions— Both the CARTO contact and EnSite noncontact systems were moderately accurate in identifying postinfarct scar when compared with intramural electrodes and confirmed with histology. The EnSite dynamic substrate map was comparable to the CARTO contact bipolar PPV when points >40 mm from the array were excluded.

Integrated multimodal-catheter imaging unveils principal relationships among ventricular electrical activity, anatomy, and function

Multiple imaging modalities are employed independent of one another while managing complex cardiac arrhythmias. To combine electrical, anatomical, and functional imaging in a single catheter system, we developed a balloon catheter that carried 64 electrodes on its surface and an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter through a central lumen. The catheter system was inserted, and the balloon was inflated inside the left ventricle (LV) of eight dogs with 6-wk-old infarction, created by occlusion in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Anatomy was constructed by ICE imaging (9 MHz) through the balloon. Single-beat noncontact mapping (NCM) was performed via the multielectrode array to reconstruct unipolar endocardial electrograms during sinus rhythm. Standard contact mapping (CM) of the endocardium was also carried out for reference. Myocardial infarction in anterior LV extending from the middle to apical regions was localized both by ICE and NCM and validated by CM and pathology. The overall difference in the activation times between NCM and CM was 3 +/- 1 ms. Unipolar voltage in infarcted middle anterior LV was smaller than the voltage in normal middle inferior LV both by NCM (11 +/- 4 vs. 16 +/- 3 mV; P = 0.002) and CM (11 +/- 3 vs. 20 +/- 4 mV; P < 0.001). Unipolar voltage was also inversely related to infarct transmurality, both by NCM (r = -0.87; P = 0.005) and CM (r = -0.94; P < 0.001). The infarct area by ICE (7.7 +/- 2.9 cm(2)) was in agreement with CM (bipolar voltage, <1 mV; and area, 7.6 +/- 3.3 cm(2); r = 0.80; P = 0.016). Meanwhile, the voltage threshold that depicted the infarct area by NCM was directly related to the smallest unipolar voltage reconstructed within the infarct (r = 0.96; P < 0.001). In conclusion, combining NCM and ICE imaging in a single catheter system is feasible. The preclinical development of such an integrated system and its evaluation in experimental myocardial infarction demonstrate capabilities for single-beat mapping at multiple sites as well as the online assessment of anatomy and myocardial function.

Noncontact mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation of fast and hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this work was to assess efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of fast ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) guided by noncontact mapping.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardias after repair of TOF are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Ten patients after surgical repair of TOF underwent electrophysiological study for hemodynamically unstable VT using the noncontact mapping system. Dynamic substrate mapping was performed and activation was recorded during basic rhythm and induced VT (mean cycle length 269 ms) using color-coded isopotential maps and reconstructed unipolar electrograms.

RESULTS

A total of 13 VTs were induced in the 10 patients. In 11 of 13 VTs, a macro-re-entrant mechanism was identified; 2 had a focal origin. For macro-re-entrant VT, RF current lesion lines were created between areas of residual conduction; in 2 patients, no RF current was delivered due to high risk of atrioventricular block. Focal applications were performed for the focal VTs. Ventricular tachycardia was not inducible after RF application in the 8 patients in whom ablation was attempted (100%, 80% of all patients). An internal cardioverter-defibrillator had already been implanted in 2 patients and was recommended to the rest of the group. During follow-up (mean 35.4 months), 6 of 8 patients with a successful procedure were still free of VT, and 2 patients had recurrence of VT with a different cycle length.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with fast and unstable VT after surgical repair of TOF, noncontact mapping helped to identify the tachycardia substrate and allowed for effective and safe treatment by RF ablation.

Comparison of Noncontact and Electroanatomic Mapping to Identify Scar and Arrhythmia Late After the Fontan Procedure

Background— The right atrium late after the Fontan procedure is characterized by multiple complex arrhythmia circuits. We performed simultaneous electroanatomic and noncontact mapping to assess the accuracy of both systems to identify scar and arrhythmia.

Methods and Results— Mapping was performed in 26 patients aged 26.8±8.9 years, 18.7±4.4 years after Fontan surgery. The area and site of abnormal endocardium defined by electroanatomic mapping (bipolar contact electrogram <0.5 mV) were compared with those defined by noncontact mapping during sinus rhythm and by dynamic substrate mapping. Contact and reconstructed unipolar electrograms at a known distance from the multielectrode array, recorded by the noncontact system simultaneously at 452 endocardial sites, were compared for morphological cross correlation, timing difference, and amplitude. Mapping of arrhythmias was performed with both systems when possible. The median patient abnormal endocardium as defined by electroanatomic mapping covered 38.0% (range 16.7% to 97.8%) of the right atrial surface area, as opposed to 60.9% (range 21.3% to 98.5%) defined by noncontact mapping during sinus rhythm and 11.9% (range 0.4% to 67.3%) by dynamic substrate mapping. A significant decrease in electrogram cross correlation ( P =0.003), timing ( P =0.012), and amplitude ( P =0.003) of reconstructed electrograms, but not of contact electrograms ( P =0.742), was seen at endocardial sites >40 mm from the multielectrode array. Successful arrhythmia mapping by electroanatomic versus noncontact mapping was superior in 15 patients (58%), the same in 6 (23%), and inferior in 5 (19%; P =0.044).

Conclusions— Electroanatomic mapping is the superior modality for arrhythmia mapping late after the Fontan procedure. Noncontact mapping is limited by a significant reduction in reconstructed electrogram correlation, timing, and amplitude >40 mm from the multielectrode array and cannot accurately define areas of scar and low-voltage endocardium.