Coronary venospasm causing chest pain during implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Left ventricular lead position is one of the main determinants of CRT response. There are several approaches in LV lead positioning that include favoring an optimal anatomical position or targeting either the segment with maximal mechanical dyssynchrony or a region with maximal electrical delay. The conventional LV lead implantation faces several technical difficulties that may prevent the obtaining of a stable position and good performance of the LV lead without phrenic nerve stimulation. In addition, implant of the LV pacing lead in areas with myocardial scar may result in less than optimal cardiac resynchronization. Several strategies have been proposed to overcome all these obstacles including multimodality cardiac imaging to help in preprocedural or intraprocedural identification of the latest activated areas of the LV and the potential anatomical constraints. In selected patients, the surgical implant may be a solution to overcome these constraints. In the future, LV endocardial or epicardial multisite pacing may deliver an enhanced response to CRT.

What can happen during coronary sinus lead implantation: dislocation, perforation and other catastrophes

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using coronary sinus (CS) leads is an established method for the therapy of congestive heart failure (CHF) in the case of asynchronous ventricular contractions. Successful therapy depends on the placement of left ventricular leads usually via the coronary sinus (CS), a technically more challenging procedure than regular pacemaker implantations. Without specific precautions CRT implantation can be the gateway to a time consuming nightmare. Therefore CS lead implantation methods, with a focus on complications, were reviewed according to the literature and own experience with approximately 500 procedures from 1999-2007.