Electrophysiologic delineation of the tachycardia circuit in the slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Re-evaluation of the structure of the atrioventricular node and its connections with the atrium

Aims

The anatomic substrates for atrioventricular nodal re-entry remain enigmatic, but require knowledge of the normal arrangement of the inputs and exist from the atrioventricular node. This knowledge is crucial to understand the phenomenon of atrioventricular nodal re-entry.

Methods and results

We studied 20 human hearts with serial sections covering the entirety of the triangle of Koch and the cavotricuspid isthmus. We determined the location of the atrioventricular conduction axis and the connections between the specialized cardiomyocytes of the conduction axis and the adjacent working atrial myocardium. The atrioventricular node was found at the apex of the triangle of Koch, with entry of the conduction axis to the central fibrous body providing the criterion for distinction of the bundle of His. We found marked variation in the inferior extensions of the node, the shape of the node, the presence or absence of a connecting bridge within the myocardium of the cavotricuspid isthmus, the connections between the compact node and the myocardium of the atrial septum, the presence of transitional cardiomyocytes, and the ‘last’ connection between the working atrial myocardium and the conduction axis before it became the bundle of His.

Conclusion

The observed variations of the inferior extensions, combined with the arrangement of the ‘last’ connections between the atrial myocardium and the conduction axis prior to its insulation as the bundle of His, provide compelling evidence to support the concept for atrioventricular nodal re-entry as advanced by Katritsis and Becker.

Differentiation of Slow-Slow Form of AVNRT from AVRT through a Posteroseptal Accessory Pathway by Retrograde P-Wave Amplitude

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify whether retrograde P-wave amplitude during tachycardia can be used to differentiate slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (S/S-AVNRT) from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia through a posteroseptal accessory pathway (PS-AVRT).

METHODS

Sixteen patients with S/S-AVNRT and 14 patients with PS-AVRT constituted the study group. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological parameters were compared between both the groups. HA(CS-His), which indicates the location of the earliest atrial activation site during tachycardia, was calculated as the difference of the shortest HA interval in the His bundle region and the coronary sinus region.

RESULTS

Negative deflection of the retrograde P wave during tachycardia was significantly greater in S/S-AVNRT than in PS-AVRT in the inferior leads (lead aVF, -0.22 ± 0.04 mV vs -0.10 ± 0.07 mV; P < 0.001). Among the electrocardiographic parameters, retrograde P-wave amplitude in lead aVF had the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve 0.975, sensitivity 93%, and specificity 88% for a cutoff value of -0.16 mV). HA(CS-His) was negatively greater in S/S-AVNRT than in PS-AVRT (-24 ± 13 ms vs -3 ± 18 ms; P = 0.001), and was significantly correlated with the retrograde P-wave amplitude in lead aVF (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Deeper negative deflection of the retrograde P wave in the inferior lead can help differentiate S/S-AVNRT from PS-AVRT.