Death from pulmonary artery erosion complicating implantation of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion device

Use of Computed Tomography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedure Planning and Post-Procedure Assessment

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to systemic anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with increased risk for thromboembolic events. Pre- and post-procedural imaging is essential for technical success, allowing practitioners to identify contraindications, select appropriate devices, and recognize procedural complications. Although transesophageal echocardiography has traditionally served as the preeminent imaging modality in LAAO, cardiac computed tomography imaging has emerged as a noninvasive surrogate given its excellent isotropic spatial resolution, multiplanar reconstruction capability, rapid temporal resolution, and large field of view.

The Future of LAAC-In 5, 10, and 20 Years

Early experience with percutaneous LAA closure documented complication rates of ∼10%, with failure to implant devices in ∼10% of patients. These numbers are unrecognizable in contemporary practice due to the iterative changes made largely in the last 10 years. Here we look forward to ask what might change, and when, to bring percutaneous LAA closure out of the niche early adopter centers into routine use. We consider the opportunity to incorporate different technologies into LAAc devices in the context of managing patient with atrial fibrillation. Finally, we consider how to make the procedure safer and more effective.

Changes in left atrial appendage orifice following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using three-dimensional echocardiography

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is increasingly performed in patients with atrial fibrillation and long-term contraindications for anticoagulation. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of LAA occlusion with the Watchman device on the geometry of the LAA orifice and assess its impact on the adjacent left upper pulmonary vein (LUPV) hemodynamics. We included 50 patients who underwent percutaneous LAA occlusion with the Watchman device and had acceptable three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography images of LAA pre- and post-device placement. We measured offline the LAA orifice diameters in the long axis, and the minimum and maximum diameters, circumference, and area in the short axis view. Eccentricity index was calculated as maximum/minimum diameter ratio. The LUPV peak S and D velocities pre- and post-procedure were also measured. Patients were elderly (mean age 76 ± 8 years), 30 (60%) were men. There was a significant increase of all LAA orifice dimensions following LAA occlusion: diameter 1 (pre-device 18.1 ± 3.2 vs. post-device 21.5 ± 3.4 mm, p < 0.001), diameter 2 (20.6 ± 3.9 vs. 22.1 ± 3.6 mm, p < 0.001), minimum diameter (17.6 ± 3.1 vs. 21.3 ± 3.4 mm, p < 0.001), maximum diameter (21.5 ± 3.9 vs. 22.4 ± 3.6 mm, p = 0.022), circumference (63.6 ± 10.7 vs. 69.6 ± 10.5 mm, p < 0.001), and area (3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 3.9 ± 1.2 cm2, p < 0.001). Eccentricity index decreased after procedure (1.23 ± 0.16 vs. 1.06 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). LUPV peak S and D velocities did not show a significant difference (0.29 ± 0.15 vs. 0.30 ± 0.14 cm/s, p = 0.637; and 0.47 ± 0.19 vs. 0.48 ± 0.20 cm/s, p = 0.549; respectively). LAA orifice stretches significantly and it becomes more circular following LAA occlusion without causing a significant impact on the LUPV hemodynamics.

The Future of LAAC-In 5, 10, and 20 Years

Early experience with percutaneous LAA closure documented complication rates of ∼10%, with failure to implant devices in ∼10% of patients. These numbers are unrecognizable in contemporary practice due to the iterative changes made largely in the last 10 years. Here we look forward to ask what might change, and when, to bring percutaneous LAA closure out of the niche early adopter centers into routine use. We consider the opportunity to incorporate different technologies into LAAc devices in the context of managing patient with atrial fibrillation. Finally, we consider how to make the procedure safer and more effective.

Pulmonary artery pressure is associated with mid-term major adverse cardiovascular events and postprocedure pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion

Background

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at high risk of stroke or bleeding. However, risk factors for their adverse cardiovascular events remain largely unknown. Pulmonary hypertension has been shown to be related to poor prognosis in many heart diseases. In this study, we determined whether elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) is associated with postprocedure adverse events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in these patients.

Methods

From June 2017 and December 2019, 530 consecutive patients with NAVF at high risk of stroke or bleeding who undergone LAAO were retrospectively enrolled in our study. The preprocecure PASP was obtained by transthoracic echocardiography using the simplified Bernoulli's equation. Patients were followed-up through clinic visits or over the phone at discharge at 1-3 months, 6 months, and annually thereafter. The median follow-up time was 12 months, and clinical data were analyzed. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction, definite heart failure, stroke, or all-cause death. The outcome of postprocedure pericardial effusion included in-hospital pericardial effusion and pericardial effusion detected after discharge.

Results

Univariate analyses indicated that patients who had MACE tended to have elevated PASP (P=0.005). After dividing the cohort according to the cut-off value of PASP, Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that patients with PASP ≥39.5 mmHg had a higher risk of MACE (P=0.007) and heart failure hospitalization (P=0.005) compared to patients whose PASP <39.5 mmHg. Cox regression analysis showed that PASP was a predominant risk factor of MACE (HR =2.337, 95% CI, 1.207-4.526, P=0.012) and heart failure hospitalization (HR =3.701, 95% CI, 1.118-12.251, P=0.032). Furthermore, the PASP cut-off added incremental discriminatory capacity to the MACE risk model of this cohort. In addition, logistic regression showed that PASP had as a significant association with postprocedure pericardial effusion (OR =1.061, P=0.032).

Conclusions

Elevated PASP was associated with postprocedure pericardial effusion and mid-term MACEs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing LAAO.

What Does the Future Hold?: Ideal Device, Newer Devices, and More

Please verify if "pigtail guided" should be "pigtail catheter-guided": Recent design changes for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices have led to significant improvement by facilitating the procedural workflow (no need for pigtail guided LAA intubation), moving the workspace from distal LAA to the landing zone (closed distal end design), and improving device stability (different anchor design). The availability of different device types (plug vs disc-lobe design) offers an option to tailor a device type to a patient's anatomy; thereby, sealing results have improved substantially. The issue of device-related thrombus has not been resolved and deserves future research, with the goal of eliminating postprocedural antithrombotic medication without increasing risk for stroke.

Pre- and Postprocedural CT of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices

Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to long-term anticoagulation therapy in selected patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who have an increased risk for stroke. LAA closure devices can be implanted by means of either an endocardial or a combined endocardial and epicardial approach. Preprocedural imaging is key to identifying contraindications, accurately sizing the device, and minimizing complications. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been the reference standard imaging modality to assess the anatomy for LAA closure and to provide intraprocedural guidance. However, CT has emerged as a less-invasive alternative to TEE for pre- and postprocedural imaging. CT is comparable to TEE for exclusion of thrombus but is superior to TEE for the delineation of complex LAA anatomy, measurement for device sizing, and evaluation of pulmonary venous and extracardiac structures. CT provides accurate measurements of the LAA ostial diameter, landing zone diameter, and LAA length, which are vital for accurate sizing of the device. CT allows evaluation of the relationship with the pulmonary veins and other adjacent structures that can be injured during the procedure. CT also simulates procedural fluoroscopic angles and provides evaluation of the interatrial septum, which is punctured during LAA closure. CT also provides a more convenient method for the evaluation of postprocedural complications such as incomplete closure, peridevice leaking, device-related thrombus, and device dislodgement. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to find imaging risk features for device related-pulmonary artery (PA) injury (DR-PAI) in patients after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

BACKGROUND

Cardiac tamponade resulting from DR-PAI is a rare but life-threatening complication of LAAC.

METHODS

In vitro analysis of Amplatzer™ Amulet™ (Abbott, MN) device was done. Measurements of the distance between PA and Amplatzer lobe at its middle part, distal part, and along the stabilizing wires' trajectory (wires-to-PA distance) were taken in 100 consecutive patients on post-LAAC computed tomography (CT) studies. Clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

In vitro analysis indicated that both middle and distal lobe had to be in close PA proximity (<1.5 mm) for the stabilizing wires to cause risk for DR-PAI, configuration called ''cuddling lobe orientation''. On CT measurements middle lobe-PA distance was 4.7 mm (IQR = 2.7-9.5), with close proximity in 4 (4%) patients, and distal lobe-PA distance was 3.2 mm (IQR = 1.8-7.2 mm), with close proximity in 17 (17%) patients. Stabilizing wires were pointing toward PA in 47 patients (47%) with median wire-to-PA distance 5.7 mm (IQR = 3.6-8.5 mm). ''Cuddling'' was found in 2 (2%) patients and resulted in shorter wires-to-PA distance vs no ''cuddling'' group (2.3 vs 5.8 mm p <.01). At 2.9 ± 1.0 yrs of follow-up, the two patients with ''cuddling lobe orientation'' on post-LAAC CT scan developed late cardiac tamponades (p <.001). One of those required surgery, which confirmed DR-PAI.

CONCLUSIONS

''Cuddling lobe orientation'' of Amulet device with the PA was associated with short wires-to-PA distance and late pericardial effusions, including DR-PAI. Hence, such device-to-PA configuration should be avoided.

Late presentation of left atrial appendage erosion and perforation by an Amplatzer™ Amulet™ closure device: a case report

Background

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure may reduce the risk of cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Given the prophylactic nature of the procedure, identifying and managing complications are paramount.

Case summary

A 73-year-old man presented 14 months after percutaneous LAA closure with syncope and acute pericardial tamponade which required surgical exploration and haemostasis; the most temporally remote account of this complication albeit amongst very few case reports. Tissue erosion by the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ LAA closure device (Abbott, Plymouth, MN, USA) was noted at two separate anatomical locations, corresponding to the device disc and lobe, which has not been described previously.

Discussion

This case report highlights the anatomical relationship between the LAA and its surrounding structures, and the importance of recognizing the risk of late device erosion.

Late Presentation of Pulmonary Artery-Left Atrial Appendage Fistula Formation After Left Atrial Appendage Device Closure

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with indication for anticoagulation in those patients whose annual risk for thromboembolism is >2%. Left atrial appendage closure is growing as an alternative to anticoagulation. We present a case of pulmonary artery-left atrial appendage fistula seen after left atrial appendage closure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Systematic Review of Contiguous Vessel and Valve Injury Associated with Endocardial Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices

Endocardial LAAO has been increasingly utilized in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are not suitable for long term oral anticoagulation. While overall procedural complications have decreased, rare complications like contiguous vessel and valve injury may be more frequently seen in the future with increase in the procedure volume. We performed a systematic search using predefined terms which reviewed all cases published in literature of contiguous vessel (pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein and left circumflex artery) and mitral valve injury caused by LAAO devices. Our results showed that Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) and Amplatzer Amulet devices were the most commonly used devices. Pulmonary artery perforation was the most commonly seen collateral vessel injury associated with LAAO. Close proximity of left atrial appendage to pulmonary artery was noted in all cases of pulmonary artery injury. Pulmonary artery injury commonly manifests as pericardial tamponade with hemodynamic collapse and is often fatal. Most common denominator of all the reviewed cases was the presence of an oversized LAAO device. In conclusion, collateral vessels and valve injury can be seen after LAAO mostly with double lobe devices such as ACP or Amulet. Increased awareness by the operators along with proper imaging and investigations could potentially mitigate such rare complications associated with LAAO.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Prevention and Management of Periprocedural and Postprocedural Complications

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is noninferior to oral vitamin K antagonist therapy for the reduction of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-related stroke risk. Currently, the procedure is most widely accepted in patients who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulants. This patient population is generally comorbid, making any reduction in procedural complications paramount. LAAC has important complications described in the periprocedural and postprocedural periods. The prevention and management of complications regarding vascular access, transseptal puncture, pericardial effusion, device embolization, stroke, air embolusperidevice leak, device-related thrombus and device erosion/ late pericardial effusion are discussed.

Pulmonary artery perforation caused by a left atrial appendage closure device

We describe a female patient who received hybrid catheter intervention and occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and left atrial appendage (LAA). Four hours after the procedure, pericardial tamponade suddenly occurred. Surgical exploration of the heart found that a fixation hook of the WATCHMAN device, had protruded through the LAA wall and tore the dilated pulmonary artery (PA). This is the first case report to describe PA perforation caused by barbs of the WATCHMAN device, and more attention should be paid to the relationship between the LAA and its adjacent structures before LAA closure.

Left Atrial Occlusion Device Implantation: the Role of the Echocardiographer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is a major risk factor for embolic stroke. For patients with atrial fibrillation who are unable to tolerate systemic anticoagulation, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion has been shown to mitigate stroke risk. In this article, we describe the vital role of the echocardiographer in intraprocedural guidance of percutaneous LAA occlusion procedures as well as in the pre- and post-procedure assessment of these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

A few percutaneously delivered devices for LAA exclusion from the systemic circulation are available in contemporary practice. These devices employ an either exclusive endocardial LAA occlusion approach, such as the Watchman (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) and Amulet (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN), or both an endocardial and pericardial (epicardial) approach such as the Lariat procedure (SentreHEART, Palo Alto, CA). Two- and three-dimension transesophageal echocardiography is critical for patient selection, procedure planning, procedural guidance, and ensuring satisfactory immediate as well as long-term LAA occlusion/exclusion efficacy. This review will provide an overview of the role of the echocardiographer in all aspects of LAA occlusion/exclusion procedures for the most commonly used commercially available devices in current practice.

Delayed presentation of pulmonary artery perforation by an Amulet left atrial appendage closure device

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices offer stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for patients intolerant of anticoagulation. Device placement leading to bleeding and cardiac tamponade have been reported periprocedurally but delayed presentations have not been reported in the literature. We present the case of an Amulet LAAO device causing erosion and bleeding from the main pulmonary artery that presented with cardiac tamponade 6 months after device placement. The pulmonary artery defect was repaired primarily and buttressed with a pericardial patch with good result.

Pulmonary artery perforation and coronary air embolism-two fatal outcomes in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is a routinely performed method to reduce the risk of stroke in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation, when an oral anticoagulation is no longer indicated due to relevant bleeding complications. Currently, the Amplatzer Amulet and the Watchman system are two equally used systems. While there is an acute success rate of more than 95 per cent for this intervention, several minor and major complications such as pericardial effusions, air embolism, vascular lesions in proximity to the heart or even death can occur. Here, we report two cases of very rare fatal outcomes in percutaneous LAA occlusion. Eight hours after deployment of an Amplatzer Amulet a patient died, after the pulmonary trunk was perforated by a hook of the occluder device causing pericardial tamponade. In the second case during final radiological position control of the deployed Watchman occluder air was injected accidentally. The patient immediately died due to coronary air embolism. Forensic autopsies are necessary to solve the cause and manner of death, to evaluate and develop medical devices and to rule out medical malpractice. Thus, a close collaboration of legal medicine and the various cardiologic departments is proposed.

Left atrial appendage and pulmonary artery anatomic relationship by cardiac-gated computed tomography: Implications for late pulmonary artery perforation by left atrial appendage closure devices

BACKGROUND

Delayed pulmonary artery (PA) perforation and tamponade caused by implantable left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices has been reported in patients with close proximity between these structures. The LAA and PA anatomic relationship (LAA-PAar) has not been analyzed systematically.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify LAA-PAar variants potentially susceptible to this complication using cardiac-gated computed tomography angiography.

METHODS

We studied 100 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac-gated computed tomography angiography of the left atrium. The LAA-PAar was classified into 3 types on the basis of the location, length, and thickness of the segment of contact between the PA and/or its branches and the LAA: type 1, no contact; type 2, contact involving the proximal LAA (defined as the proximal 15 mm extending into the LAA from its ostium, or the LAA proximal to the first major bend arising <15 mm from the ostium); and type 3, contact limited to the distal LAA.

RESULTS

LAA-PAar types 1, 2, and 3 were present in 7 (7%), 28 (28%), and 65 (65%) patients, respectively. For LAA-PAar type 2, the mean contact segment thickness and length were 0.6 ± 0.3 and 18.1 ± 10.6 mm, respectively. For LAA-PAar type 3, the distance between the LAA orifice and the segment of contact was <30 mm in 52 patients (80%).

CONCLUSION

In this series, the LAA came in direct contact with the main PA in the majority of patients. Contact involved the proximal LAA (where the fixation components of most LAA closure devices are positioned) in 28% of patients, posing potential vulnerability to PA perforation.

Preclinical assessment of a modified Occlutech left atrial appendage closure device in a canine model

BACKGROUND

LAA occlusion has a similar stroke prevention efficacy compared to anticoagulation treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a modified Occlutech® left atrial appendage (LAA) closure device in a canine model.

METHODS

The device was implanted in 10 dogs (33±1kg) using fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. The modified Occlutech® LAA occlusion device was compared with the current version, the Watchman device, and the Amplazter cardiac plug (ACP). LAA occlusion and anchoring to the LAA were evaluated. All dogs were assessed using angiography, TEE, and a gross anatomy examination.

RESULTS

The 10 LAA occlusion devices were to be implanted into 10 dogs (5 modified Occlutech devices, 3 current version of Occlutech devices, 1 Watchman, and 1 ACP). LAA implantation was not performed in one dog due to transeptal puncture failure. The three current version of Occlutech devices were embolized immediately after implantation, so three modified devices of the same size were implanted securely without embolization. The mean implant size was 20.1±2.0mm. The devices chosen were a mean of 23.3±10.6% larger than the measured landing zone diameters. Post-implant angiography and TEE revealed well-positioned devices without pericardial effusion or impingement on surrounding structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this acute animal study suggested that a modified Occlutech® LAA occlusion device was feasible and had greater anchoring performance in canines. Additional large clinical studies are needed to evaluate safety and efficacy.

--LAA Occluder View for post-implantation Evaluation (LOVE)--standardized imaging proposal evaluating implanted left atrial appendage occlusion devices by cardiac computed tomography

Background

A standardized imaging proposal evaluating implanted left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion devices by cardiac computed tomography angiography (cCTA) has never been investigated.

Methods

cCTA datasets were acquired on a 3^rd generation dual-source CT system and reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm. An interdisciplinary evaluation was performed by two interventional cardiologists and one radiologist on a 3D multi-planar workstation. A standardized multi-planar reconstruction algorithm was developed in order to assess relevant clinical aspects of implanted LAA occlusion devices being outlined within a pictorial essay.

Results

The following clinical aspects of implanted LAA occlusion devices were evaluated within the most appropriate cCTA multi-planar reconstruction: (1) topography to neighboring structures, (2) peri-device leaks, (3) coverage of LAA lobes, (4) indirect signs of neo-endothelialization. These are illustrated within concise CT imaging examples emphasizing the potential value of the proposed cCTA imaging algorithm: Starting from anatomical cCTA planes and stepwise angulation planes perpendicular to the base of the LAA devices generates an optimal LAA Occluder View for post-implantation Evaluation (LOVE). Aligned true axial, sagittal and coronal LOVE planes offer a standardized and detailed evaluation of LAA occlusion devices after percutaneous implantation.

Conclusions

This pictorial essay presents a standardized imaging proposal by cCTA using multi-planar reconstructions that enables systematical follow-up and comparison of patients after LAA occlusion device implantation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12880-016-0127-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Early safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage suture ligation: results from the U.S. transcatheter LAA ligation consortium

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation may represent an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the early safety and efficacy of transcatheter ligation of the LAA for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing LAA ligation with the Lariat device at 8 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as device success (suture deployment and <5 mm leak by post-procedure transesophageal echocardiography), and no major complication at discharge (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type 3 or greater, or cardiac surgery). Post-discharge management was per operator discretion.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were enrolled. Median CHADS2 score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]) was 3 (interquartile range: 2 to 4). Device success was 94%, and procedural success was 86%. A major complication occurred in 15 patients (9.7%). There were 14 major bleeds (9.1%), driven by the need for transfusion (4.5%). Significant pericardial effusion occurred in 16 patients (10.4%). Follow-up was available in 134 patients at a median of 112 days (interquartile range: 50 to 270 days): Death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 4 patients (2.9%). Among 63 patients with acute closure and transesophageal echocardiography follow-up, there were 3 thrombi (4.8%) and 13 (20%) with residual leak.

CONCLUSIONS

In this initial multicenter experience of LAA ligation with the Lariat device, the rate of acute closure was high, but procedural success was limited by bleeding. A prospective randomized trial is required to adequately define clinical efficacy, optimal post-procedure medical therapy, and the effect of operator experience on procedural safety.

Complications From Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Devices

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and has been identified as an independent risk factor for stroke. Prevention of thromboembolic events has been based on oral anticoagulation (OAC) using Vitamin K antagonists (VKA). However, long-term OAC medication is limited by an increased bleeding risk and a low patient compliance. Relying on the observation that the majority of cardiac thrombi originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA) different devices aiming for LAA closure have been proposed. This review will discuss contemporary LAA closure devices with special emphasis on procedure related complications.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an update

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. One of its most devastating complications is the development of thromboembolism leading to fatal or disabling stroke. Oral anticoagulation (OAC, warfarin) is the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with AF with an increased stroke risk. However, there are several obstacles to long-term OAC therapy, including the risk of serious bleeding, several drug–drug interactions and the need for frequent blood testing. Although newer oral anticoagulants have been developed, these drugs also face issues of major bleeding and non-compliance. Therefore, alternative treatment options for stroke prevention in patients with AF with a high stroke risk are needed. Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an evolving therapy, which should be taken into consideration in those patients with non-valvular AF with a high stroke risk and contraindications for OAC. This article aims to discuss the rationale for LAA closure, the available LAA occlusion devices and their clinical evidence until now. Moreover, we discuss the importance of proper patient selection, the role of various imaging techniques and the need for a more tailored postprocedural antithrombotic therapy.