Cardiorenal axis and arrhythmias: Will renal sympathetic denervation provide additive value to the therapeutic arsenal?

Autonomic Neuromodulation for Preventing and Treating Ventricular Arrhythmias

The cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) is associated with modulation of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis. In this mini review, we will briefly introduce cardiac autonomic anatomy and autonomic activity in ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and discuss novel approaches of CANS modulation for treating VAs. Studies over the decades have provided a better understanding of cardiac autonomic innervation and revealed overwhelming evidence of the relationship between autonomic tone and VAs. A high sympathetic tone and low parasympathetic (vagal) tone are considered as the major triggers of VAs in patients with myocardial ischemia, which can cause sudden cardiac death. In recent years, novel methods of autonomic neuromodulation have been investigated to prevent VAs, and they have been verified as being beneficial for malignant VAs in animal models and humans. The clinical outcome of autonomic neuromodulation depends on the level of cardiac neuraxis, stimulation parameters, and patient's pathological status. Since autonomic modulation for VA treatment is still in the early stage of clinical application, more basic and clinical studies should be performed to clarify these mechanisms and optimize autonomic neuromodulation therapies for patients with VAs in the future.

Impact of Renal Denervation on Atrial Arrhythmogenic Substrate in Ischemic Model of Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction increases the risk of heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation. Renal denervation (RDN) might suppress the development of atrial remodeling. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of RDN in the suppression of atrial fibrillation in a HF model after myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

HF rabbits were created 4 weeks after coronary ligation. Rabbits were classified into 3 groups: normal control (n=10), HF (n=10), and HF-RDN (n=6). Surgical and chemical RDN were approached through midabdominal incisions in HF-RDN. Left anterior descending coronary artery in HF and HF-RDN was ligated to create myocardial infarction. After electrophysiological study, the rabbits were euthanized and the left atrial appendage was harvested for real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis and Trichrome stain. Left atrial dimension and left ventricular mass were smaller in HF-RDN by echocardiography compared with HF. Attenuated atrial fibrosis and tyrosine hydroxylase levels were observed in HF-RDN compared with HF. The mRNA expressions of Cav1.2, Nav1.5, Kir2.1, KvLQT1, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, AKT, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in HF-RDN were significantly higher compared with HF. The effective refractory period and action potential duration of HF-RDN were significantly shorter compared with HF. Decreased atrial fibrillation inducibility was noted in HF-RDN compared with HF (50% versus 100%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RDN reversed atrial electrical and structural remodeling, and suppressed the atrial fibrillation inducibility in an ischemic HF model. The beneficial effect of RDN may be related to prevention of the downregulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/endothelial nitric oxide synthase signaling pathway.

Beneficial Effect of Renal Denervation on Ventricular Premature Complex Induced Cardiomyopathy

Background

Frequent ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) can lead to the development of dilated cardiomyopathy and sudden cardiac death. Renal artery sympathetic denervation (RDN) may protect the heart from remodeling. This study aimed to investigate the effect of frequent VPCs on structural and electrical properties and whether RDN can protect the heart from remodeling.

Methods and Results

Eighteen rabbits were randomized to control (n=6), VPC (n=6), and VPC‐RDN (n=6) groups. Surgical and chemical RDNs were approached through bilateral retroperitoneal flank incisions in the VPC‐RDN group. Pacemakers were implanted to the left ventricular apex to produce 50% VPC burden for 5 weeks in the VPC and VPC‐RDN groups. In addition, ventricular myocardium was harvested for western blot and trichrome stain. Echocardiographic results showed left ventricular enlargement after 5‐week pacing in the VPC group, but not in the VPC‐RDN group, when compared to baseline. In biventricles, ion channel protein expressions of Nav1.5, Cav1.2, Kir2.1, and SERCA2 were similar among 3 groups. However, the degree of biventricular fibrosis was extensive in the VPC group, compared to the control and VPC‐RDN groups. Importantly, ventricular fibrillation inducibility was higher in the VPC group (41%) when comparing to the control (13%; P<0.05) and VPC‐RDN groups (13%; P<0.05), respectively.

Conclusions

Frequent VPCs are associated with the development of cardiac structural remodeling and high ventricular fibrillation inducibility. RDN prevents cardiac remodeling and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia through antifibrosis.

Treatment of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Through Autonomic Modulation

This paper reviews the contribution of autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation in the treatment of arrhythmias. Both the atria and ventricles are innervated by an extensive network of nerve fibers of parasympathetic and sympathetic origin. Both the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system exert arrhythmogenic electrophysiological effects on atrial and pulmonary vein myocardium, while in the ventricle the sympathetic nervous system plays a more dominant role in arrhythmogenesis. Identification of ANS activity is possible with nuclear imaging. This technique may provide further insight in mechanisms and treatment targets. Additionally, the myocardial effects of the intrinsic ANS can be identified through stimulation of the ganglionic plexuses. These can be ablated for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. New (non-) invasive treatment options targeting the extrinsic cardiac ANS, such as low-level tragus stimulation and renal denervation, provide interesting future treatment possibilities both for atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias. However, the first randomized trials have yet to be performed. Future clinical studies on modifying the ANS may not only improve the outcome of ablation therapy but may also advance our understanding of the manner in which the ANS interacts with the myocardium to modify arrhythmogenic triggers and substrate.