Atrial and ventricular activation sequence after ventricular induction/entrainment pacing during fast–slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: New insight into the use of V-A-A-V for the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia

A Single Atrial Extrastimulation Resetting His Bundle During Supraventricular Tachycardia to Differentiate Atrial Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is the curative treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, atrial tachycardia (AT) diagnosis is often challenging, especially when SVT is terminated by pacing.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop a novel method for AT diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 147 SVTs including 28 ATs, 87 atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias, and 32 orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias were prospectively studied. Single atrial extrastimulation was performed at the proximal coronary sinus from a coupling interval 20 milliseconds shorter than the tachycardia cycle length and gradually decreased until the His bundle (HB) was first reset and further until the SVT was terminated. The response of the SVT during the first HB resetting and the termination pattern were examined.

RESULTS

In 27 of 28 ATs, tachycardia was unaffected when HB resetting whereas, in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias or orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias (non-AT), tachycardia was simultaneously reset when HB resetting or was terminated with an atrio-Hisian block. When the coupling interval was further shortened for cases in which tachycardia persisted, all 33 SVTs with tachycardia termination with atrio-Hisian block were non-ATs, whereas 5 ATs and 7 non-ATs were terminated with Hisian-atrial block. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the pattern of tachycardia that was unaffected when HB resetting for AT diagnosis were 96%, 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Those of the pattern of tachycardia termination with atrio-Hisian block for non-AT diagnosis were 92%, 100%, 100%, and 42%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Single atrial extrastimulation from the proximal coronary sinus during tachycardia was useful and effective for AT diagnosis.

Discrimination of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrial tachycardia by the V-A-A-V response

INTRODUCTION

The electrophysiological discrimination between fast-slow (F/S-) atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (NRT) and atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from the interatrial septum remains challenging. While a V-A-A-V response may occur immediately after ventricular induction or entrainment of either tachycardia, the electrophysiological dissimilarities in that response between the two tachycardias remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify a diagnostic indicator discriminating F/S-AVNRT from AT by examining the difference in the V-A-A-V response between the two tachycardias.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 17 patients with F/S-AVNRT [7 with common-form F/S-AVNRT using a typical slow pathway (SP) and 10 with superior type F/S-AVNRT using a superior SP] and 10 patients with reentrant AT. All 27 patients presented with long RP supraventricular tachycardia and an initial V-A-A-V response upon ventricular induction or entrainment. The V-A-A-V response in patients with F/S-AVNRT was due to dual atrial responses. We measured the interval between the first (A1) and second atrial electrogram (A2) of V-A-A-V and calculated ΔAA by subtracting A1-A2 from the tachycardia cycle length.

RESULTS

V-A-A-V responses were observed most often upon ventricular induction of F/S-AVNRT (6±5 times) as well as AT (6±6 times; P = 0.87). The V-A-A-V response upon ventricular entrainment was observed in a single patient with F/S-AVNRT versus 10 all patients with AT (P<0.001). ΔAA ranged between -80 and 228 ms in F/S-AVNRT and between -184 and 26 ms in AT. A ΔAA >26 ms predicted a diagnosis of F/S-AVNRT with a 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while a ΔAA ←80 ms predicted a diagnosis of AT with a 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

ΔAA is a useful, confirmatory, diagnostic indicator of F/S-AVNRT versus AT associated with the V-A-A-V response. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pacing site- and rate-dependent shortening of retrograde conduction time over the slow pathway after atrial entrainment of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Introduction

We tested our hypothesis that atrial entrainment pacing (EP) of a) the common‐type (com‐) fast‐slow (F/S‐) atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using a typical slow pathway (SP), or b) the superior‐type (sup‐) F/S‐AVNRT using a superior SP, both modify the retrograde conduction time across the SP immediately after termination of EP (retro‐SP‐time).

Methods

We measured the difference in the His‐atrial interval (HA difference) immediately after cessation of EP, performed at 2 ± 2 rates from the high right atrium (HA[1]‐HRA) versus from the proximal coronary sinus (HA[1]‐CS) in 17 patients with com‐F/S‐AVNRT and 11 patients with sup‐F/S‐AVNRT. We also measured the atrial‐His and HA intervals of the first and second cycles immediately after cessation of EP and during stable tachycardia.

Results

Unequal responses, defined as a ≥ 20‐ms HA difference at ≥1 EP rates, were observed in 16 patients (57%), including 7 with com‐ and 9 with sup‐F/S‐AVNRT. Irrespective of the EP rate, all unequal responses of com‐F/S‐AVNRT were due to a shorter HA[1]‐CS than HA[1]‐HRA, with a mean 34 ± 11 ms HA difference, whereas all unequal responses of sup‐F/S‐AVNRT were due to a longer HA[1]‐CS than HA[1]‐HRA, with a mean 49 ± 25 ms HA difference. The unequal responses resolved within two cycles after the cessation of EP.

Conclusions

We have identified a little‐known pacing site‐ and pacing rate‐dependent shortening of the retro‐SP‐time.

Superior-Type Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Phenotype Mimicking the Slow-Fast Type

BACKGROUND

Superior-type fast-slow (sup-F/S-) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a rare AVNRT variant using a superior slow pathway (SP) as the retrograde limb. Its intracardiac appearance, characterized by a short atrio-His (AH) interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in the His-bundle, is an initial indicator for making a diagnosis.

METHODS

Among 22 consecutive patients with sup-F/S-AVNRT, 3 (age, 68-81 years) patients had an apparent slow-fast (S/F-) AVNRT characterized by a long AH interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in or superior to the His-bundle region (tachy-long-AH).

RESULTS

The diagnosis of sup-F/S-AVNRT was based on the standard criteria in 2 patients and on the occurrence of Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block during tachycardia, which was attributable to a block at the lower common pathway (LCP) below the circuit of the AVNRT, detected owing to the lower common pathway potentials, in one patient. As with the typical S/F-AVNRT, tachy-long-AH was induced after a jump in the AH interval. In contrast to typical S/F-AVNRT, fluctuation in the ventriculoatrial interval was observed during the tachy-long-AH. Ventricular overdrive pacing was unable to entrain or terminate the tachy-long-AH. Moreover, the tachy-long-AH reciprocally transited to/from sup-F/S-AVNRT spontaneously or was triggered by ventricular contractions while the atrial cycle length and earliest site of atrial activation remained unchanged. Both tachycardias were cured by ablation at a single site in the right-side para-Hisian region of 2 patients and the noncoronary aortic cusp of one patient. Collectively, the essential circuit of both tachycardias was identical, and the tachy-long-AH was diagnosed as another phenotype of sup-F/S-AVNRT accompanied by sustained antegrade conduction via another bystander slow pathway breaking through the His-bundle owing to the repetitive antegrade block at the lower common pathway, thus representing a long AH interval during the ongoing sup-F/S-AVNRT.

CONCLUSIONS

An unknown sup-F/S-AVNRT phenotype exists that apparently mimics the typical S/F-AVNRT and is also an unknown subtype of apparent S/F-AVNRT.

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Ablation of Atrioventricular Node-dependent Long-R-P Tachycardias

Atrioventricular (AV) node–dependent long-R–P tachycardias are a unique group of supraventricular tachycardias that include atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atypical AVNRT with a concealed bystander nodofascicular (NF)/nodoventricular (NV) accessory pathway inserting into the slow pathway of the AV node, the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia, and orthodromic NF/NV reciprocating tachycardia. Here, we discuss the complex pathophysiology, diagnosis, and ablation of these intriguing arrhythmias.

Atypical Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Using a Slow Pathway Extending to the Superoanterior Right Atrium

We report a case of atypical fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using a slow pathway variant extending to the superoanterior right atrium. The AVNRT diagnosis was confirmed by using standard electrophysiological criteria that exclude a diagnosis of atrial tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was found in the superoanterior right atrium adjacent to the tricuspid annulus, where the first delivery of radiofrequency energy terminated and eliminated the inducibility of the tachycardia.