Ligament of Marshall arrhythmogenesis and vein of Marshall ethanol: A problem with a solution

Adjunctive Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with limited efficacy. Due to its autonomic innervation, the vein of Marshall (VOM) is an attractive target during AF ablation. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion of VOM (VOM-EI) in AF ablation.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of VOM-EI in AF ablation compared to AF catheter ablation alone. The primary outcome of interest was late (≥3 months) AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The secondary outcomes included acute mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and procedural complications (pericardial effusion, stroke, or atrio-esophageal fistula). Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of four studies, including 804 AF patients (68.2% with persistent AF, the mean age of 63.5±9.9 years, 401 patients underwent VOM-EI plus CA vs. 403 patients who had CA alone), were included in the final analysis. VOM-EI group was associated with a lower risk of late AF/AT recurrence (RR:0.63; 95% CI:0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), and increased probability to achieve acute MIBB (RR:1.39; 95% CI:1.08-1.79; P = 0.009) without an increase in procedural complications (RR:1.05; 95% CI:0.57-1.94; P = 0.87).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VOM-EI strategy is more effective than conventional catheter ablation with similar safety profiles.

The incidence and location of epicardial connections in the era of contact force guided ablation for pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

The effects of epicardial connections (ECs) involving pulmonary veins (PVs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been revealed recently. However, no systematic approaches to identify and ablate the ECs were established.

METHODS

Patients with AF undergoing radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation were retrospectively analyzed. ECs were identified when (1) PV isolation (PVI) cannot be achieved after first-pass isolation; (2) PVI was still absent although the conduction gap was detected and ablated; (3) the earliest activation area (EAA) was revealed located within the PV antrum distant from the initial ablation line using high-density mapping (HDM) technique; (4) focal ablation at the EAA was effective to achieve PVI. Relevant pacing maneuvers were performed to elucidate ECs' bidirectional conduction.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 ECs were identified and ablated in 35/597 (5.86%) patients. Among the 35 patients with ECs, at least one PV insertion of ECs was located at the carina region. The most common pattern was a single breakthrough in 31 (88.6%) patients, followed by multiple breakthroughs in 3 and wide breakthroughs in 1. The median distance from EAA to the initial ablation line was 10.0 mm. The average number of RF energy delivery was 1.75 ± 1.00, and single RF delivery was adequate in 16/36 (44.4%) patients. Continuous potentials were present at the EAA in 9/34 (26.5%) patients.

CONCLUSION

ECs were confirmed and ablated successfully in 5.86% (35/597) AF patients using HDM. PV insertions of ECs were mainly located at the carina region. Continuous potentials might assist in the prediction of ECs.