Implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator with truncal plane blocks

Ten years of subcutaneous defibrillator therapy: Consolidated clinical evidence and future perspectives

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed as an alternative to the traditional transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (TV-ICD), aiming to provide easier implantation, simplified detection algorithm of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and prevention from placing components in the cardiovascular system. The S-ICD is implanted subcutaneously or intramuscularly with the generator placed in the left midaxillary line and the lead tunneled subcutaneously in the left para-sternal region. Preimplant electrocardiogram screening is recommended to prevent implantation in patients at high risk of T wave over-sensing. Currently, the S-ICD is unsuitable for patients requiring pacing or cardiac resynchronization. Since the beginning, the S-ICD underwent extensive preclinical investigation until the first prospective multicentre trial demonstrating high efficacy and safety led to market release. While earlier studies focused on younger patients with higher ejection fraction, more recent studies showed favorable outcomes even in patients with comorbidities similar to those typically observed in patients receiving TV-ICD. The development of second and third generation devices has contributed to reduce inappropriate shocks and overcome previous limitations. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence in the literature over the past decade supporting S-ICD as a valid alternative to TV-ICD in terms of safety and efficacy, highlighting the improvements in technology, as well as outcomes.

Utilization of Regional Anesthesia in the Electrophysiology Lab: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The electrophysiology lab is an important source of growth of anesthetic volume as the indications and evidence for catheter ablations and various cardiac implantable electronic devices improve. Paired with this increase in volume is an increasing number of patients with substantial comorbid conditions presenting for their EP procedures. For these patients, the interaction between their comorbidities and traditional anesthesia practices may create the risk of hemodynamic instability, cardiovascular or respiratory complications, and potential need for prolonged post-operative monitoring negatively impacting length of hospital stay.

RECENT FINDINGS

Regional anesthetic techniques, including pectoralis, serratus, and erector spinae plane blocks, offer options for both regional analgesia and surgical anesthesia for a variety of EP procedures. Existing case reports and extrapolations from other areas support these techniques as viable, safe, and effective components of an anesthetic plan. In this article, we will review the development and challenges of various EP procedures and how different regional anesthetic techniques can function as a component of the anesthesia plan.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection

The vascular access port implantation procedure can be performed using the venesection method by inserting a catheter into the cephalic vein in the region of the deltopectoral groove. This method eliminates the need for catheter tunneling. An alternative method to infiltration anaesthesia for port implantation may be a modified pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified PECS II for vascular access port implantation using cephalic vein venesection. This retrospective observational study was conducted at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland. A group of 114 patients underwent the modified PECS II block and additional cutaneous infiltration anesthesia at the incision line. Pain intensity was assessed on the NRS scale measured intraoperatively at four points. The QoR-15 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. The operator’s condition assessment score was used to assess surgical conditions and operator comfort. The analysis showed that the median pain intensity during vascular port implantation was 0. A statistically significant difference in pain intensity was demonstrated between the specialist’s group and the resident’s group at the second and third measurement points (p < 0.008; p < 0.012). The mean value on the QoR-15 scale was 132. There was a significant difference between the pain scores of the groups. The mean score in the pain position in the specialist’s group was 18 points and in the resident’s group, it was 19 points (p < 0.029). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the modified PECS II block is an effective and safe method of anesthesia for Port-A-Cath implantation.

Persistent Opioid Use After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Procedures

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioids are a major contributor to the ongoing epidemic of persistent opioid use (POU). The incidence of POU among opioid-naïve patients after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from a national administrative claims database from 2004 to 2018 of patients undergoing CIED procedures. Adult patients were included if they were opioid-naïve during the 180-day period before the procedure and did not undergo another procedure with anesthesia in the next 180 days. POU was defined by filling an additional opioid prescription >30 days after the CIED procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 143 400 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 15 316 (11%) filled an opioid prescription within 14 days of surgery. Among these patients, POU occurred in 1901 (12.4%) patients 30 to 180 days after surgery. The likelihood of developing POU was increased for patients who had a history of drug abuse (odds ratio, 1.52; P=0.005), preoperative muscle relaxant (odds ratio, 1.52; P<0.001) or benzodiazepine (odds ratio, 1.23; P=0.001) use, or opioid use in the previous 5 years (OR, 1.76; P<0.0001). POU did not differ after subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator or other CIED procedures (11.1 versus 12.4%; P=0.5). In a sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk patients who were discharged to a facility or who had a history of drug abuse or previous opioid, benzodiazepine, or muscle relaxant use, 8.9% of the remaining cohort had POU. Patients prescribed >135 mg of oral morphine equivalents had a significantly increased risk of POU.

CONCLUSIONS

POU is common after CIED procedures, and 12% of patients continued to use opioids >30 days after surgery. Higher initially prescribed oral morphine equivalent doses were associated with developing POU.

Use of Serratus Anterior Plane and Transversus Thoracis Plane Blocks for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (S-ICD) Implantation Decreases Intraoperative Opioid Requirements

OBJECTIVES

The present study investigated whether regional anesthetic techniques, especially truncal blocks, can provide adjunct anesthesia without the additional risk of general anesthesia and neuraxial techniques for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Holding area and operating room at a single-center tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 22 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3 or 4 patients with severe cardiac disease undergoing S-ICD implantation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either a combination of serratus anterior plane block and transversus thoracis plane block or surgical infiltration of local anesthetics.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative analgesic medication in the fascial plane block group versus the surgical wound infiltration group, visual analog pain scale score (0-10), intraoperative vital signs, total procedure time, and length of stay in the intensive care unit were measured. Total intraoperative fentanyl requirements (µg) were significantly less in the truncal block group versus the surgical infiltration group (45 [25-50] v 90 [50-100]; p = 0.026), and no patients had any adverse sequelae related to the study. Median intraoperative propofol use in the surgical infiltration group was 66.48 (47.30-73.73) µg/kg/min, and 65.95 (51.86-104.86) µg/kg/min for the truncal block group. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.293).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of both the serratus anterior plane block and transversus thoracis plane blocks for S-ICD implantation are appropriate and may have the benefit of decreasing intraoperative opioid requirements.

Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Children Receiving Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Case Series

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement may cause significant postoperative pain. Limited research exists on regional anesthesia for pediatric S-ICD placement. This case series examined transversus thoracic plane blocks (TTPBs), pectointercostal fascial plane blocks (PIFBs), pectoralis nerve I and II blocks, paravertebral, serratus anterior plane, and erector spinae plane blocks (ESPBs) in 10 children receiving S-ICDs. Parasternal nerve blocks consisting of TTPB or PIFB and left ESPB appeared to provide adequate pain control. These children had reduced opioid consumption, lower mean pain scores, longer delay in first postoperative analgesic, and no complications. Regional anesthesia may reduce pain after pediatric S-ICD implantation.

Adjunctive hypnotic communication for analgosedation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. A prospective single center pilot study

Background

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is a well-established therapy for sudden death prevention. Considering the painful nature of the procedure anaesthesia may be required for analgo-sedation. Hypnosis is emerging as a promising therapeutic strategy for pain control. Few data are available regarding the use of hypnosis as adjunctive technique for pain control during S-ICD implantation.

Methods

Thirty consecutive patients referred to our centre for S-ICD implantation were prospectively and alternatively allocated with 1:1 ratio in two groups: A) Standard analgo-sedation approach (Hypnosis non responder patients) B) Standard analgo-sedation approach with the addition of hypnotic communication (Hypnosis responder patients). Peri-procedural pain perception and anxiety, perceived procedural length, type and dosage of administered analgesic drugs have been measured using validate scores and compared.

Results

Hypnotic communication was offered to 15 patients of which was successful in 11 patients (73%). There were no statistical differences between the two study groups according to baseline characteristics. Hypnosis communication resulted in significant pain perception reduction (Group A 6,9 ± 1,6 Vs Group B 1,1 ± 0,9, p value < 0,01), peri-procedural anxiety (Group A 3,5 ± 1,6 Vs Group B 1,9 ± 0,5, p value < 0,01) and reduced perceived procedural length (Group A 58,7 ± 13,4 min Vs Group B 44,7 ± 5,5 min, p value < 0,01). Fentanyl dosage was significantly lower in Group B patients.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated a significant reduction of perceived pain, anxiety, procedural time and use of analgesic drugs in hypnosis responder patients. These results reinforce the beneficial effects of the hypnotic technique in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation.

Analgesic Efficacy of Regional Anesthesia of the Hemithorax in Patients Undergoing Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement

OBJECTIVES

Patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement usually experience substantial perioperative pain. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of transversus thoracic muscle plane block combined with serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing S-ICD placement.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized controlled study.

SETTING

First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 18-to-80 years who underwent new S-ICD placement.

INTERVENTIONS

A group of 80 patients randomly were allocated to either the regional group (R group) or local group (L group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was pain during S-ICD placement. The secondary outcome measures included pain intensity at rest and after movement one, three, six, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery; the dose of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during surgery; 24-hour ketorolac administration; postoperative sufentanil dosage; the total duration of hospitalization; intraoperative sedation; and the incidence of hypoxemia. Mean Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool scores were significantly higher during pocket creation, lead tunneling A, and lead tunneling B in the L group compared with the R group. The R group required significantly less intraoperative dexmedetomidine, intraoperative remifentanil, postoperative sufentanil, and ketorolac consumption. Compared with the R group, the L group had higher Numerical Rating Scale pain scores at 24 hours after surgery both at rest and after movement. The intraoperative Ramsay score and the incidence of hypoxemia were significantly higher in the L group compared with the R group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided transversus thoracic muscle plane block and serratus anterior plane block resulted in lower intraoperative Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool scores and the need for less adjunctive pain medication and sedation compared with local anesthesia in patients undergoing S-ICD placement.

Efficacy of Truncal Plane Blocks in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement usually have substantial postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the transversus thoracic muscle plane (TTMP) block combined with serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD placement.

DESIGN

A double-blind, randomized controlled study.

SETTING

First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged nine-to-18 years undergoing S-ICD placement were included.

INTERVENTIONS

A group of 102 patients randomly were allocated to either receive combined nerve blocks (NER group) or no nerve block (CON group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was perioperative fentanyl consumption. The secondary outcome measures included pain at rest and after movement at two, four, six, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extubation; 48-hour acetaminophen administration; time to extubation; length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU); length of hospital stay; codeine tablet consumption; and percentage of patients who had codeine tablets after discharge. The NER group reported significantly less intraoperative (4.1 μg/kg v 3.1 μg/kg, p = 0.04) and postoperative fentanyl consumption (3.8 μg/kg v 1.5 μg/kg, p = 0.006) than the CON group. Compared with the NER group, the CON group had higher Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at 24 hours after surgery both at rest and after movement. The time to extubation (20.5 minutes v 12.6 minutes, p = 0.03) and length of stay in the PACU (30.5 minutes v 15.6 minutes, p = 0.02) were significantly decreased in the NER group compared with the CON group. The CON group had a significantly higher postoperative acetaminophen requirement than did the NER group (32 mg/kg v 16 mg/kg, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

TTMP block combined with SAPB in pediatric S-ICD placement could provide effective analgesia.

Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Children Receiving a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Case Series

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement causes significant postoperative pain. Limited research exists on nerve blocks for treating pediatric S-ICD pain. This case series presents pain outcomes in 10 children receiving nerve blocks for S-ICD placement. Nerve blocks performed include bilateral parasternal with left erector spinae plane (ESP), pectoralis with left ESP, fascial plane, and paravertebral blocks. The predominant combination of bilateral parasternal blocks with a left ESP block seemed to contribute toward adequate pain control. These children appeared to have low pain scores, low opioid consumption, and no block complications. Nerve blocks may benefit pediatric patients after S-ICD implantation.

State-of-the-art consensus on non-transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy

Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems with non-transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the implantation of non-transvenous ICD systems, and provides specific recommendations for implantation, follow-up, and complication management in patients with subcutaneous ICD. Regarding particular issues like the necessity for shock efficacy testing, or the clinical outcome as compared to transvenous ICD, randomized data are expected in the near future.

Recent Developments in Cardiology Procedures for Adult Congenital Heart Disease: The Anesthesiologist's Perspective

Many children born today with congenital heart disease can expect to live long into adulthood. Improvements in surgical technique and anesthetic and perioperative care have significantly increased the number of survivors. Unfortunately, as these patients progress through life they frequently require further interventions. Although surgical intervention may be required frequently, these patients can be managed in the cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology laboratory. Surgical correction of tetralogy of Fallot can leave patients with pulmonary valve dysfunction later in life. A percutaneous approach is now available for these patients, which can obviate the need for resternotomy. During deployment of the valve, anesthesiologists should be aware that compression of coronary arteries can occur. Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients often require pacemaker/implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) insertion or ablation therapy. These patients may have altered cardiac anatomy, which can make endovascular procedures extremely challenging. Recent developments have made these procedures safer and more efficient. A number of congenital cardiac conditions can also be associated with orofacial abnormalities. ACHD patients, as a result, can present with challenging airways. The catheterization laboratory may not be the optimum environment for the anesthesiologist to manage a difficult airway. The requirement of transesophageal echocardiography for some cath eterization procedures needs to be considered when deciding on an airway management plan. Knowledge of the underlying cardiac anatomy and the planned procedure is advised when providing anesthesia for this complex patient group outside the theater setting.

Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block combined with parasternal block in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: Results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The standard approach to subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation often requires general anesthesia or anesthesiologist-delivered deep sedation. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) combined with parasternal block (PSB) has been proposed in order to provide anesthesia/analgesia and to reduce the need for sedation during S-ICD implantation. In this pilot study, we compared the double-block approach (SAPB + PSB) with the single-block approach (SAPB only) and with the standard approach involving local anesthesia and sedation.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 22 patients undergoing S-ICD implantation: in 10, the single-block approach was adopted; in 12, the double-block approach. As a control group, we retrospectively enrolled 14 consecutive patients who had undergone S-ICD implantation under standard local anesthesia and sedation in the previous 6 months. Intra- and postprocedural data, including patient-reported pain intensity, were collected and compared in the three study groups.

RESULTS

The double-block approach was associated with a shorter procedure duration than the single-block and standard approaches (63.3 ± 7.9 vs 70.1 ± 6.8 vs 76.9 ± 7.8 min; P < .05) and with a lower dose of local an aesthetic for infiltration (18.9 ± 1.7 vs 27.5 ± 4.6 vs 44.6 ± 4.0 cc; P < .001). Both the double- and single-block approaches were associated with lower pain intensity at the device pocket and the lateral tunneling site (P < .05). The double-block approach proved superior to the other two approaches in controlling intraoperative pain at the parasternal tunneling site (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, SAPB combined with PSB was superior to SAPB alone and to the standard approach in controlling intraoperative pain during S-ICD implantation. In addition, this approach resulted in shorter procedure durations.

Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique

PURPOSE

Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is most commonly performed under general anaesthesia (GA). There is growing interest in transitioning away from the routine use of GA and towards several alternative anaesthesia modalities for the S-ICD implant procedure without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist. We assessed the feasibility of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (US-SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation with the intermuscular two-incision technique.

METHODS

The study population included 38 consecutive patients (84% male; median, 53 [46-62] years) who received S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. All procedures were performed under US-SAPB and conscious sedation without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist.

RESULTS

The average procedure time was 67 ± 14 min. No patient experienced significant haemodynamic changes or oxygen desaturation during the period of the US-SAPB procedure and sedation; there was no need for pharmacological interventions. The entire procedure was well tolerated without discomfort or complications and with no need for GA, except in one (2.6%) patient who received GA with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients always remained able to respond appropriately to neurological monitoring during the S-ICD implantation procedure. There were no procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

US-SAPB and the intermuscular two-incision technique may be a promising safe and feasible combination for S-ICD implantation, overcoming the potential barrier to wider S-ICD adoption in clinical practice.

An Overview of Clinical Outcomes in Transvenous and Subcutaneous ICD Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clear guidelines on when to select a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) over a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) are lacking. This review will provide an overview of the most recent clinical data on S-ICD and TV-ICD therapy by pooling comparison studies in order to aid clinical decision making.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pooling of observational-matched studies demonstrated an incidence rate ratio (IRR) for device-related complication of 0.90 (95% CI 0.58-1.42) and IRR for lead-related complications of 0.15 (95% CI 0.06-0.39) in favor of S-ICD. The IRR for device infections was 2.00 (95% CI 0.95-4.22) in favor of TV-ICD. Both appropriate shocks (IRR 0.67 (95% CI 0.42-1.06)) and inappropriate shocks (IRR 1.17 (95% CI 0.77-1.79)) did not differ significantly between both groups. With randomized data underway, the observational data demonstrate that the S-ICD is associated with reduced lead complications, but this has not yet resulted in a significant reduction in total number of complications compared to TV-ICDs. New technologies are expected to make the S-ICD a more attractive alternative.