Rhythm management in myotonic dystrophy: Progress has been made, but unsettled issues remain

Natural history of cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 1 - Emphasis on the need for lifelong follow-up

BACKGROUND

Cardiac involvement represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a central part of patient care. We investigated the natural history of cardiac involvement in patients with DM1 to provide an evidence-based foundation for adjustment of follow-up protocols.

METHODS

Patients with genetically confirmed DM1 were identified. Data on patient characteristics, performed investigations (12 lead ECG, Holter monitoring and echocardiography), and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected from electronic health records.

RESULTS

We included 195 patients (52% men) with a mean age at baseline evaluation of 41 years (range 14-79). The overall prevalence of cardiac involvement increased from 42% to 66% after a median follow-up of 10.5 years. There was a male predominance for cardiac involvement at end of follow-up (74 vs. 44%, p < 0.001). The most common types of cardiac involvement were conduction abnormalities (48%), arrhythmias (35%), and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (21%). Only 17% of patients reported cardiac symptoms. The standard 12‑lead ECG was the most sensitive diagnostic modality and documented cardiac involvement in 24% at baseline and in 49% at latest follow-up. However, addition of Holter monitoring and echocardiography significantly increased the diagnostic yield with 18 and 13% points at baseline and latest follow-up, respectively. Despite surveillance 35 patients (18%) died during follow-up; seven due to SCD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DM1 cardiac involvement was highly prevalent and developed during follow-up. These findings justify lifelong follow-up with ECG, Holter, and echocardiography.

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

What is new? What are the clinical implications?

Cardiac magnetic resonance findings and prognosis in type 1 myotonic dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac involvement is a major determinant of prognosis in type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1), but limited information is available about myocardial remodeling and tissue changes. The aim of the study was to investigate cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings and their prognostic significance in DM1.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all DM1 patients referred from a neurology unit to our CMR laboratory from 2009 to 2020.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included (aged 45 ± 12, 62% male individuals) and compared with 68 age-matched and gender-matched healthy volunteers (43 male individuals, age 48 ± 15 years). At CMR, biventricular and biatrial volumes were significantly smaller (all P < 0.05), as was left ventricular mass (P < 0.001); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were significantly lower (all P < 0.01). Five (15%) patients had a LVEF less than 50% and four (12%) a RVEF less than 50%. Nine patients (26%) showed mid-wall late gadolinium enhancement (LGE; 5 ± 2% of LVM), and 14 (41%) fatty infiltration. Native T1 in the interventricular septum (1041 ± 53 ms) was higher than for healthy controls (1017 ± 28 ms) and approached the upper reference limit (1089 ms); the extracellular volume was slightly increased (33 ± 2%, reference <30%). Over 3.7 years (2.0-5.0), 6 (18%) patients died of extracardiac causes, 5 (15%) underwent device implantation; 5 of 21 (24%) developed repetitive ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) on Holter monitoring. LGE mass was associated with the occurrence of repetitive VEBs (P = 0.002). Lower LV stroke volume (P = 0.017), lower RVEF (P = 0.016), a higher LVMi/LVEDVI ratio (P = 0.016), fatty infiltration (P = 0.04), and LGE extent (P < 0.001) were associated with death.

CONCLUSION

DM1 patients display structural and functional cardiac abnormalities, with variable degrees of cardiac muscle hypotrophy, fibrosis, and fatty infiltration. Such changes, as evaluated by CMR, seem to be associated with the development of ventricular arrhythmias and a worse outcome.

A Normal Electrocardiogram Does Not Exclude Infra-Hisian Conduction Disease in Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of a prolonged His-ventricular (HV) interval in patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1).

BACKGROUND

Patients with DM1 have an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. The presence of His-Purkinje system disease/prolonged HV interval (≥70 ms) is associated with a higher risk of potentially life-threatening bradyarrhythmic events.

METHODS

Electrophysiology studies (EPSs) were performed in all DM1 patients referred to 2 tertiary centers for routine cardiac assessment. In a subgroup of patients, the EPS was repeated at varying intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients (mean age: 43.7 ± 13.3; 58.1% male) underwent 202 diagnostic EPSs. HV ≥70 ms was found on 58 EPSs (28.7%); 9 of 59 patients (15.2%) with PR <200 ms and QRS interval <110 ms on baseline ECG had an HV ≥70 ms on EPS. Among those with PR ≥200 ms and/or QRS interval ≥100 ms, only 33.9% had an HV ≥70 ms on EPS. There were 38 patients who underwent repeated EPS, in which 28.8% demonstrated a prolongation of the HV interval overall compared with baseline. QRS duration demonstrated the most powerful discriminative capacity for HV ≥70 ms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 0.84; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, QRS interval ≥112 ms had the highest predictive value for HV ≥70 ms (odds ratio: 7.94; 95% CI: 3.85 to 16.37.

CONCLUSIONS

ECG parameters have a poor predictive value for infra-Hisian conduction block in DM1 patients. QRS and PR intervals are normal in up to 15.2% of DM1 patients with prolonged HV, and 66.1% of those with PR ≥200 ms and/or QRS ≥100 ms do not have advanced His-Purkinje conduction system disease on EPS. Electrophysiology testing should be a mandatory part of screening for all patients to guide prophylactic pacemaker implantation.