The rationale for isolation of the left atrial pulmonary venous component to control atrial fibrillation: A review article

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Hybrid Endo-Epicardial Therapies for Advanced Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health problem that increases morbidity and mortality, and in most patients progresses to more advanced diseases over time. Recent research has examined the underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and progression of AF, leading to updated AF disease classification schemes. Although endocardial catheter ablation is effective for early-stage paroxysmal AF, it consistently achieves suboptimal outcomes in patients with advanced AF. Identification of the factors that lead to the increased risk of treatment failure in advanced AF has spurred the development and adoption of hybrid ablation therapies and collaborative heart care teams that result in higher long-term arrhythmia-free survival. Patients with non-paroxysmal AF, atrial remodeling, comorbidities, or AF otherwise deemed difficult to treat may find hybrid treatment to be the most effective option. Future research of hybrid therapies in advanced AF patient populations, including those with dual diagnoses, may provide further evidence establishing the safety and efficacy of hybrid endo-epicardial ablation as a first line treatment.

Adjunctive posterior wall isolation for the treatment of persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (CORNERSTONE AF) trial: Design and rationale

BACKGROUND

A left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) is one of the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation strategies.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that an additional empirical LAPWI would increase the freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias as compared to standard AF ablation in persistent AF patients.

METHODS

The CORNERSTONE AF study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study investigating patients with AF persisting for >7 days and <3 years undergoing first-time AF ablation. They will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI + LAPWI in a 1:1 manner. Although PVI can be performed with either radiofrequency catheters or cryoballoons, only radiofrequency catheters will be permitted to achieve LAPWIs. Additional focal ablation targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers will be allowed. A total of 516 patients will be enrolled in 17 centers between August 2022 and February 2024 based on the calculation with 80% power, considering the assumption that 65% and 75% of the PVI and PVI + LAPWI group patients will be free from atrial arrhythmia recurrence 18-months postprocedure (10% of dropout). The primary endpoint is freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias 18 months postsingle procedures. Clinical follow-up will include 7-day ambulatory electrocardiograms and routine outpatient consultations by electrophysiologists at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

As of August 2023, a total of 331 patients (68 ± 9 years, 270 men, 43 longstanding persistent AF) have been enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

The CORNERSTONE AF study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an adjunctive empirical LAPWI following standard AF ablation in persistent AF patients.

Catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation with versus without left atrial posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the results are suboptimal for persistent AF. The left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is thought to be a major additional area in initiation and perpetuation of persistent AF. Therefore, adjunctive ablation of the posterior wall may reduce AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF using PVI alone versus a combination of PVI and LAPW isolation.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Embase since inception to February 2023. Screening of studies was done via Covidence software. Risk of bias assessment was done using appropriate tools. Data extraction and a narrative synthesis were carried out accordingly.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, of which five were randomized controlled trials. PVI with LAPW ablation group had significantly lower recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR 0.47, CI 0.32-0.70) and AF (OR 0.39, CI 0.23-0.69). In sensitivity analysis, freedom from atrial arrhythmias was noted to be significantly higher in the PVI with LAPW ablation group (OR 2.22, CI 1.36-3.64). However, there was no significant difference in occurrence of atrial flutter (OR 1.36, CI 0.86-2.14) or with periprocedural adverse events (OR 1.10, CI 0.60-1.99).

CONCLUSION

LAPW ablation, in addition to PVI, significantly improves the rates of arrhythmia freedom and reduces the recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia. There was no significant difference in atrial flutter or periprocedural adverse events.

Outcomes of adjunct posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), several studies have illustrated clinical benefits associated with PVI with posterior wall isolation (PWI).

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of PVI alone versus PVI+PWI performed using the cryoballoon in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF).

RESULTS

Acute PVI was achieved in all patients using cryoballoon ablation. Compared to PVI alone, PVI+PWI was associated with longer cryoablation, fluoroscopy, and total procedure times. Adjunct radiofrequency was required to complete PWI in 29/77 patients (37.7%). Adverse events were similar with PVI alone versus PVI+PWI. But at 24 ± 7 months of follow-up, not only cryoballoon PVI+PWI was associated with improved freedom from recurrent AF (74.3% vs. 46.0%, P = .007) and all atrial tachyarrhythmias (71.4% vs. 38.1%, P = .001) in patients with PersAF, cryoballoon PVI+PWI also yielded greater freedom from AF (88.1% vs. 63.7%, P = .003) and all atrial tachyarrhythmias (83.3% vs. 60.8%, P = .008) in those with PAF. Additionally, PVI+PWI was associated with higher reductions in atrial tachyarrhythmia burden (97.9% vs. 91.6%, P < .001), need for cardioversion (5.2% vs. 23.6%, P < .001) and repeat catheter ablation (10.4% vs. 26.1%, P = .005), and a longer time-to-arrhythmia recurrence (16 ± 6 months vs. 8 ± 5 months, P < .001) in both PersAF and PAF patients.

CONCLUSION

In CIED patients with PersAF or PAF, cryoballoon PVI+PWI is associated with a greater freedom from recurrent AF and atrial tachyarrhythmias, as compared to PVI alone during long-term follow-up.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation With and Without Posterior Wall Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: IMPPROVE-PAF Trial

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have demonstrated clinical benefits associated with cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and concomitant posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the role for this approach in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the acute and long-term outcomes of PVI vs PVI+PWI using cryoballoon in patients with symptomatic PAF.

METHODS

This retrospective study (NCT05296824) examined the outcomes of cryoballoon PVI (n = 1,342) vs cryoballoon PVI+PWI (n = 442) in patients with symptomatic PAF during long-term follow-up. Using the nearest-neighbor method, a 1:1 matched sample of patients receiving PVI alone and PVI+PWI was created.

RESULTS

The matched cohort consisted of 320 patients (PVI: n = 160; PVI+PWI: n = 160). PVI+PWI was associated with longer cryoablation (23 ± 10 minutes vs 42 ± 11 minutes; P < 0.001) and procedure times (103 ± 24 minutes vs 127 ± 14 minutes; P < 0.001). In 39 (24.4%) of 160 patients, adjunct radiofrequency ablation was required for PVI+PWI. Adverse event rates were similar (PVI 3.8% vs PVI+PWI 1.9%; P = 0.31). Though there were no differences at 12 months, freedom from all atrial arrhythmias (67.5% vs 45.0%; P < 0.001) and AF (75.6% vs 55.0%; P < 0.001) were significantly greater with PVI+PWI vs PVI alone at 39 ± 9 months of follow-up. PVI+PWI was also associated with reduced long-term need for cardioversion (16.9% vs 27.5%; P = 0.02) and repeat catheter ablation (11.9% vs 26.3%; P = 0.001), and emerged as the only significant predictor of freedom from recurrent AF (HR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.64-4.74; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cryoballoon PVI, cryoballoon PVI+PWI appears to be associated with greater freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias and AF in patients with PAF during long-term follow-up >3 years.

Clinical Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation in Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of pulmonary venous isolation alone for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) remain unclear. Adjuvant posterior wall isolation (PWI) has become a potential supplementary strategy for improving the outcome of PerAF ablation. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of PWI added to catheter ablation for PerAF.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing the outcomes of PerAF ablation with and without PWI. The efficacy outcomes were recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (AA), atrial fibrillation (AF), and atrial tachycardia (AT), and the safety outcome was adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 8 studies with 1428 patients were included in the pooled analyses. The results showed that PWI significantly reduced the recurrence of AA (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55-0.87, p = 0.002, I² = 63%) and AF (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40 - 0.80, p = 0.001, I² = 70%). AT recurrence (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.67 - 1.27, p = 0.63, I² = 42%) and adverse events (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.67-1.84, p = 0.70, I² = 0%) were comparable between the two groups. In the sub-analyses, the efficacy of PWI in reducing AA recurrence was consistent in patients who underwent cryoablation or debulking ablation.

CONCLUSION

PWI effectively decreased AA recurrence after PerAF ablation without increasing the risk of AT or procedure-related complications. However, more randomized studies are needed to confirm these results. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cryoballoon Ablation of the Pulmonary Veins, the Posterior Wall, the Left Atrial Appendage, and the Mitral Isthmus Guided by Intracardiac Echocardiography-integrated and Three-dimensional Mapping

Here, we describe the first reported case of pulmonary vein, posterior wall, and left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation with concomitant ablation of a mitral isthmus flutter using the cryoballoon, guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-integrated 3-dimensional mapping in a patient with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and intolerance to long-term oral anticoagulation, followed by ICE-guided LAA closure using an endocardial occlusion device. This report illustrates the safety and feasibility of this combined approach. Additionally, it advocates for empiric LAA isolation prior to LAA occlusion, as LAA ablation/isolation can prove challenging in those with existing endocardial LAA occlusion devices should they require subsequent ablations to target arrhythmias or triggers arising from this structure.

Contact-Force Guided Posterior Wall Isolation as an Adjunctive Ablation Strategy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) on top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still controversial and little is known about the impact of contact-force (CF) technology.

Objective

In this retrospective study, we present our experience with PWI using CF sensing catheters and its efficacy and safety as an adjunctive ablation strategy on top of PVI for management of patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF.

Methods

A total of 73 consecutive patients (20.5% female) affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (10.9% long-standing) underwent PWI as an adjunctive therapy to PVI using CF sensing catheters. Outcomes were reported as incidence of atrial arrhythmic recurrences (ARs) lasting >30 seconds at follow up and in addition, in patients provided with insertable cardiac monitors (ICM), as burden of AF or atrial tachycardias (AT) at relevant time points.

Results

PWI was successfully achieved in 65 (89.0%) patients. Two (2.7%) minor vascular procedural complications were observed. At 1 and 2-year follow-up, ARs free survival was observed in 80.5% and 64.1% of patients, respectively with 75.3% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs at the last follow-up. Ten patients underwent repeat ablations during the follow-up. At multivariate analysis, early ARs within 3 months after procedure, were associated with a two-fold increased risk of late ARs at follow-up. Among patients provided with ICM, PWI on top of PVI was able to reduce the mean AT/AF burden of more than 50% compared with pre-ablation time, reporting very low levels (≤ 5%) over 2 years.

Conclusions

In persistent atrial fibrillation, PWI on top of PVI using CF sensing catheters is safe and effective, providing great reduction of burden of ARs. Early ARs are associated with a greater risk of late recurrences.

Living Anatomy of the Pericardial Space: A Guide for Imaging and Interventions

The pericardium of the human heart has received increased attention in recent times due to interest in the epicardial approach for cardiac interventions to treat cardiac arrhythmias refractory to conventional endocardial approaches. To support further clinical application of this technique, it is fundamental to appreciate the living anatomy of the pericardial space, as well as its relationships to the surrounding structures. The anatomy of the pericardial space, however, is extremely difficult regions to visualize. This is due to its complex 3-dimensionality, and the "potential" nature of the space, which becomes obvious only when there is collection of pericardial fluid. This potential space, which is bounded by the epicardium and pericardium, can now be visualized by special techniques as we now report, permitting appreciation of its living morphology. Current sources of knowledge are limited to the dissection images, surgical images, and/or illustrations, which are not necessarily precise or sufficient to provide relevant comprehensive anatomical knowledge to those undertaking the epicardial approach. The authors demonstrate, for the first time to their knowledge, the 3-dimensional living anatomy of the pericardial space relative to its surrounding structures. They also provide correlative anatomy of the left sternocostal triangle as a common site for subxiphoid access. The authors anticipate their report serving as a tool for education of imaging and interventional specialists.

Size matters in atrial fibrillation: the underestimated importance of reduction of contiguous electrical mass underlying the effectiveness of catheter ablation

Evidence has accumulated over the last century of the importance of a critical electrical mass in sustaining atrial fibrillation (AF). AF ablation certainly reduces electrically contiguous atrial mass, but this is not widely accepted to be an important part of its mechanism of action. In this article, we review data showing that atrial size is correlated in many settings with AF propensity. Larger mammals are more likely to exhibit AF. This is seen both in the natural world and in animal models, where it is much easier to create a goat model than a mouse model of AF, for example. This also extends to humans-athletes, taller people, and obese individuals all have large atria and are more likely to exhibit AF. Within an individual, risk factors such as hypertension, valvular disease and ischaemia can enlarge the atrium and increase the risk of AF. With respect to AF ablation, we explore how variations in ablation strategy and the relative effectiveness of these strategies may suggest that a reduction in electrical atrial mass is an important mechanism of action. We counter this with examples in which there is no doubt that mass reduction is less important than competing theories such as ganglionated plexus ablation. We conclude that, when considering future strategies for the ablative therapy of AF, it is important not to discount the possibility that contiguous electrical mass reduction is the most important mechanism despite the disappointing consequence being that enhancing success rates in AF ablation may involve greater tissue destruction.

Rationale and Outcomes of Cryoballoon Ablation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall in Conjunction with Pulmonary Vein Isolation

There is strong evidence in support of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with concomitant left atrial (LA) posterior wall (PW) isolation (PWI) for the treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). While this may be achieved using surgical and catheter-based strategies, there is growing interest in performing this approach using the cryoballoon. There are several potential advantages to this strategy. First, lesions created using the current-generation cryoballoons are typically large and durable. Second, cryoballoon ablation offers a simple technique to directly ablate and debulk the LAPW. Moreover, some consider cryoenergy a safer modality specifically with regard to collateral structures (ie, the esophagus). Based on the available data, cryoballoon PVI + PWI is associated with greater intraprocedural AF terminations and reductions in long-term AF recurrence (typically by ~20%), as compared to PVI alone in patients with persAF, but with similar rates of adverse events. As such, PVI + PWI has emerged as a significant predictor of freedom from recurrent AF (odds ratio: 3.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.44-9.34; p = 0.006) as well as all atrial arrhythmias (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-3.61; p = 0.015). Adjunct radiofrequency ablation to complete PWI is required in at least one-third of the patients, and this need is highly predicted by the LA size (significantly increased with an LA diameter > 48 mm). LAPW reconnection also seems to be associated with LA dimension, particularly an LA diameter greater than 48 mm (negative predictive value: 89.7%). Nevertheless, based on the analysis of patients who underwent repeat electrophysiology study for arrhythmia recurrences, cryoballoon PVI + PWI yields acceptable long-term durability (> 80%).

Segmental nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins and extrapulmonary vein structures: Best practices III

Although cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) traditionally has been guided by pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion, there is evidence and growing interest in performing segmental, nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation to target not only large/common PVs but extra-PV structures such as the left atrial (LA) roof and posterior wall in conjunction with PV isolation. A number of studies have demonstrated improved clinical efficacy associated with nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation of the LA roof and posterior wall in addition to PV isolation, particularly in patients with persistent AF. Not only can the cryoballoon be used for targeting extra-PV structures through segmental, nonocclusive ablation, but the large size and durability of cryolesions coupled with the enhanced stability afforded through cryoadhesion render the cryoballoon an effective tool for such an approach. This article reviews the rationale and practical approach to segmental, nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation of large/common PV antra and the LA roof and posterior wall.

New method and electrophysiological characteristics of LA posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) is commonly used with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, potentials are often still recorded in the posterior wall after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), roof linear ablation, and bottom linear ablation in clinical practice. We aimed to explore the methodological approach and electrophysiological characteristics of PWI.

METHODS

A total of 36 patients who attended our center with long-standing persistent AF were retrospectively analyzed. After routine PVI and roof and bottom linear ablation, complete PWI was confirmed in sinus rhythm by voltage mapping and high-output pacing. Otherwise, activation mapping and voltage mapping were used to guide ablation on the line or inside the posterior wall until bidirectional block was achieved.

RESULTS

The first-pass success rate of PWI was 39%. In the remaining 61% of patients with posterior wall electrograms, activation mapping in sinus rhythm showed that the earliest activation point was not on the ablation line but in a relatively dispersed focal area, possibly related to epicardial muscular sleeve insertion. Voltage mapping revealed a focal high-voltage area in the posterior wall matching the relatively dispersed earliest activation site, in which an average of five points of ablation achieved complete PWI without serious esophageal injury. The middle zone contained 80% of the additional posterior wall ablation points.

CONCLUSIONS

PWI was performed safely and effectively with an average of five additional ablation points in the posterior wall in 61% of patients under the guidance of voltage mapping.

General anesthesia is not superior to sedation in clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

The strategy of anesthesia used during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare sedation with general anesthesia (GA) for catheter ablation of AF.

Hypothesis

The presence of AF is associated with an increased risk of stroke and heart failure and decreased quality of life and survival.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective single‐centered study with 351 patients undergoing the first ablation procedure for AF under sedation or GA. The main outcome was freedom from recurrence of AF at 1 year. The total time of staying at the ablation laboratory and procedure cost were also calculated.

Results

Freedom from atrial arrhythmia and ablation time did not differ between AF patients under sedation and GA (77.9% vs 79.9% and 42.27 ± 9.84 minutes vs 41.51 ± 9.27 minutes, respectively), while the total procedure time and cost were lower in patients who underwent sedation than GA (171.39 ± 45.09 minutes vs 202.92 ± 43.85 and 8.00 ± 7.02 CNY vs 8.79 ± 11.63 CNY, respectively).

Conclusion

GA is not superior to sedation, in terms of ablation time and freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year, whereas patients with GA had more anesthesia time and procedure cost than sedation.

Epicardial course of the septopulmonary bundle: Anatomical considerations and clinical implications for roof line completion

BACKGROUND

Gaps in the roof line have been ascribed to epicardial conduction using the septopulmonary bundle.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the frequency of septopulmonary bundle bypass during roof line ablation, to describe anatomical conditions favoring this epicardial gap, and to propose an alternative strategy when present.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. A de novo roof line was created between the superior pulmonary veins. In cases of residual gaps, a floor line was created between the inferior pulmonary veins. Microtomography imaging and histological analyses of 5 human donor hearts were performed: a specific focus was made on the dome and the posterior wall.

RESULTS

Residual gaps were more frequent in roof lines than floor lines (33% vs 15%; P = .049). Electrogram morphologies, activation sequences, and pacing maneuvers indicated an epicardial bypass of the roof line in all cases. Conduction block was obtained in 67 roof lines and 28 floor lines, resulting in a 95% success rate of linear block, without "box" isolation. Between the superior pulmonary veins, the atrial myocardium was thicker and consistently displayed adipose tissue separating the septopulmonary bundle from the septoatrial bundle.

CONCLUSION

Epicardial conduction across the roof line is common and requires careful electrogram analysis to detect. In such cases, a floor line can be an effective alternative strategy, with clear validation criteria. Myocardial thickness and fat interposition may explain difficulties in achieving lesion transmurality during roof line ablation.

Concomitant Pulmonary Vein and Posterior Wall Isolation Using Cryoballoon With Adjunct Radiofrequency in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this multicenter, randomized, single-blind study was to prospectively evaluate the short-and long-term outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus PVI with concomitant left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) using the cryoballoon in patients with symptomatic persistent/long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (P/LSP-AF).

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested a clinical benefit associated with PVI+PWI in patients with P/LSP-AF. However, there are limited safety and efficacy data on this approach using cryoballoon ablation.

METHODS

The immediate and long-term outcomes in patients with P/LSP-AF randomized to PVI (n = 55) versus PVI+PWI (n = 55) using the cryoballoon were prospectively examined.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar. PVI was achieved in all patients (21 ± 11 min). PWI was attained using 23 ± 8 min of cryoablation. Adjunct radiofrequency ablation was required in 4 of 110 patients (7.3%) to complete PVI (3 ± 2 min) and in 25 of 55 patients (45.5%) to complete PWI (4 ± 6 min). Although left atrial dwell time (113 ± 31 min vs. 75 ± 32 min; p < 0.001) and total procedure time (168 ± 34 min vs. 127 ± 40 min; p < 0.001) were longer with PVI+PWI, this cohort required fewer intraprocedural cardioversions (89.1% vs. 96.4%; p = 0.04). Adverse events occurred in 5.5% in each group (p = 1.00). However, the incidence of recurrent atrial fibrillation at 12 months was significantly lower with PVI+PWI (25.5% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.028). Additionally, in a multivariate analysis, PVI+PWI emerged as a significant predictor of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 9.34; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with P/LSP-AF, PVI+PWI using the cryoballoon is associated with a significant reduction in atrial fibrillation recurrence, but similar safety, as compared with PVI alone.

Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation for atrial fibrillation: Best practices and guide to hybrid convergent procedures

The absence of strategies to consistently and effectively address nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation by nonpharmacological interventions has represented a long-standing treatment gap. A combined epicardial/endocardial ablation strategy, the hybrid Convergent procedure, was developed in response to this clinical need. A subxiphoid incision is used to access the pericardial space facilitating an epicardial ablation directed at isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium. This is followed by an endocardial ablation to complete isolation of the pulmonary veins and for additional ablation as needed. Experience gained with the hybrid Convergent procedure during the last decade has led to the development and adoption of strategies to optimize the technique and mitigate risks. Additionally, a surgical and electrophysiology "team" approach including comprehensive training is believed critical to successfully develop the hybrid Convergent program. A recently completed randomized clinical trial indicated that this ablation strategy is superior to an endocardial-only approach for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. In this review, we propose and describe best practice guidelines for hybrid Convergent ablation on the basis of a combination of published data, author consensus, and expert opinion. A summary of clinical outcomes, emerging evidence, and future perspectives is also given.

Left atrial posterior wall isolation in conjunction with pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (PIVoTAL): study rationale and design

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence in support of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with concomitant posterior wall isolation (PWI) for the treatment of patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). However, there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of this approach using the cryoballoon.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicenter, investigational device exemption trial (G190171) is to prospectively evaluate the acute and long-term outcomes of PVI versus PVI+PWI using the cryoballoon in patients with symptomatic persAF.

METHODS

The PIVoTAL is a prospective, randomized controlled study ( ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04505163) in which patients with symptomatic persAF refractory/intolerant to ≥ 1 class I-IV antiarrhythmic drug, undergoing first-time catheter ablation, will be randomized to PVI (n = 183) versus PVI+PWI (n = 183) using the cryoballoon in a 1:1 fashion. The design will be double-blind until randomization immediately after PVI, beyond which the design will transform into a single-blind. PVI using cryoballoon will be standardized using a pre-specified dosing algorithm. Other empiric ablations aside from documented arrhythmias/arrhythmias spontaneously induced during the procedure will not be permitted. The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as AF recurrence at 12 months, after a single procedure and a 90-day blanking period. Arrhythmia outcomes will be assessed by routine electrocardiograms and 7-14 day ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months post-ablation.

CONCLUSION

The PIVoTAL is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the outcomes of PVI alone versus PVI+PWI using the cryoballoon, in patients with symptomatic persAF. We hypothesize that PVI+PWI will prove to be superior to PVI alone for prevention of AF recurrence.

Long-term durability of posterior wall isolation using the cryoballoon in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicenter analysis of repeat catheter ablations

PURPOSE

There is a growing interest in performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with concomitant posterior wall isolation (PWI) using the cryoballoon for the treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is little known about the long-term durability of PWI using this approach.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, we retrospectively examined the durability of PVI + PWI using the 28-mm cryoballoon by investigating the outcomes from consecutive patients referred for repeat catheter ablation.

RESULTS

Altogether, 81/519 patients (15.6%) were referred for repeat catheter ablation. Repeat ablation was associated with a longer AF duration, hypertension, heart failure, multiple cardioversions, and antiarrhythmic therapy as well as larger left atrial (LA) diameters (49 ± 4 mm versus 43 ± 5 mm; P < 0.001) and greater need for "touch-up" (adjunct) radiofrequency ablation (44.4% versus 18.3%; P < 0.001). LA diameter also emerged as a significant predictor for adjunct radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.001). Durable PVI was observed in 66/81 patients (81.5%) and PWI in 67/81 patients (82.7%). Those with incomplete PWI exhibited larger LA diameters, particularly > 48 mm (negative predictive value = 89.7%). Lastly, an atypical LA posterior wall/roof flutter represented the third most common cause of arrhythmia recurrence and essentially every patient with incomplete PWI exhibited such an arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

PWI performed using a 28-mm cryoballoon in conjunction with PVI exhibits long-term durability in the vast majority of patients with persistent AF. While LA diameter (particularly > 48 mm) is a significant predictor for the need for adjunct radiofrequency ablation when performing this technique, those with incomplete PWI invariably present with an atypical flutter using this substrate.

Isolating the entire pulmonary venous component versus isolating the pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: A propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are suboptimal. The entire pulmonary venous component (PV-Comp), consisting of the pulmonary veins, their antra, and the area between the antra, provides triggers and substrate for AF. PV-Comp isolation is an alternative strategy for persistent AF ablation.

METHODS

Among 328 patients with persistent AF who underwent a first radiofrequency ablation procedure, 200 patients (PVI, n = 100; PV-Comp isolation, n = 100) were selected by propensity score matching. Both groups were followed up for 1 year.

RESULTS

At 6- and 12-month follow-up, atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF/atrial tachycardia) recurred in 41 and 61 patients in PVI group and 22 (P = .006) and 33 patients (P < .001) in PV-Comp isolation group, respectively. PV-Comp isolation was associated with longer mean time to recurrence (PVI: 8 months, PV-Comp isolation: 10 months, log-rank P < .001) and a lower probability of recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32; 95% confidence of interval [CI] = 0.18-0.56, P < .001), with no increase in procedural complications (PVI: 5 of 100, PV-Comp isolation: 6 of 100, P = .76). Procedure duration was longer in PV-Comp isolation group (PVI: 186 ± 42 min, PV-Comp isolation: 238 ± 44 min, P < .001), as well as fluoroscopy time (PVI: 22 ± 16 min, PV-Comp isolation: 31 ± 21 min, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

PV-Comp isolation for persistent AF reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence up to 1 year compared with PVI alone. While procedure and fluoroscopy time increased, there was no difference in procedural complications.