Adverse event rate during inpatient sotalol initiation for the management of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia in the pediatric and young adult population

Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children-Review of the Literature

Antiarrhythmic drugs represent a mainstay of pediatric arrhythmia treatment. However, official guidelines and consensus documents on this topic remain scarce. There are rather uniform recommendations for some medications (including adenosine, amiodarone, and esmolol), while there are only very broad dosage recommendations for others (such as sotalol or digoxin). To prevent potential uncertainties and even mistakes with regard to dosing, we summarized the published dosage recommendations for antiarrhythmic drugs in children. Because of the wide variations in availability, regulatory approval, and experience, we encourage centers to develop their own specific protocols for pediatric antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Atrial Flutter

In the present article, we will focus on the pharmacologic treatment of atrial flutter aimed either at restoring/maintaining sinus rhythm or controlling the ventricular response during tachyarrhythmia. To provide a comprehensive description we will start discussing the electroanatomic substrate underlying the development of atrial flutter and the complex relationship with atrial fibrillation. We will then describe the available drugs for the treatment of atrial flutter on the bases of their electrophysiological effects and data from available clinical studies. We will conclude by discussing the general principles of rhythm and rate control treatment during atrial flutter.

"Second line medications" for supraventricular arrhythmias in children: In-hospital efficacy and adverse events during treatment initiation of sotalol and flecainide

INTRODUCTION

Sotalol and flecainide are used as second line agents in children for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias (SA) refractory to anti-beta adrenergic antiarrhythmics or digoxin. Efficacy and adverse events in this cohort have not been well described. Here, we report our institutional experience of second line treatment initiation for SA in children.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Utilizing an institutional database, 247 patients initiated on sotalol and 81 patients initiated on flecainide were identified. Congenital heart disease (CHD) was present in 40% of patients. Arrhythmia-free discharge on single or dual agent therapy (in combination with other antiarrhythmics) was 87% for sotalol and 91% for flecainide. Neither age, sex, dosing, presence of CHD nor arrhythmia subtype were associated with alterations in in-hospital efficacy. Compared to baseline, QTc intervals in sotalol patients (436 [416-452 ms] vs. 415 [400-431 ms], p < .01) and QRS intervals in flecainide patients (75 [68-88 ms] vs. 62 [56-71 ms], p < .01) were prolonged. Dose reduction or discontinuation due to QRS prolongation occurred in 9% of patients on flecainide. QTc prolongation resulting in dose reduction/discontinuation of sotalol was encountered in 9 patients (4%) and death with documented torsade de pointes in 2 patients (1%), with 9 of 11 patients having underlying CHD.

CONCLUSION

In children requiring second line agents for treatment of SA, both sotalol and flecainide appear to be highly efficacious. Although predominantly safe in otherwise healthy patients, electrocardiogram changes can occur and children with underlying cardiac disease may have an increased risk of adverse events and rhythm-related side effects during initiation.