N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is a specific predictor of appropriate device therapies in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Role of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide as a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with HFrEF receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have demonstrated that combining left ventricular ejection fraction and New York Heart Association functional class is insufficient for predicting risk of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock in primary prevention candidates. Hence, our aim was to assess the relationship between N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) along with appropriate ICD shock and all-cause mortality in order to improve the stratification process of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) being considered for primary preventive ICD therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search from several databases was conducted up until 9 June 2022. Studies were eligible if they investigated the relationship of NT-pro BNP with all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shock.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis comprised nine studies with a total of 5117 participants. Our study revealed that high levels of NT-pro BNP were associated with all-cause mortality (HR=2.12 (95% CI=1.53 to 2.93); p<0.001, I²=78.1%, p<0.001 for heterogeneity) and appropriate ICD shock (HR=1.71 (95% CI=1.18 to 2.49); p<0.001, I²=43.4%, p=0.102 for heterogeneity). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shock increased by approximately 3% and 5%, respectively per 100 pg/mL increment pursuant to concentration-response model (P_{non-linearity} <0.001). The curves became steeper after NT-pro BNP reached its inflection point (3000 pg/mL).

CONCLUSION

A positive concentration-dependent association between elevated NT-pro BNP levels along with the risk of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shock was found in patients with HFrEF with ICD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022339285.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implanted for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. Results From a two-Year Prospective Follow-up Study

Aim      To compare variables of transthoracic EchoCG for determining echocardiographic predictors and their prognostic role in the development of persistent paroxysmal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) in patients with ischemic CHF who had been implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator (CD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Material and methods  This single-site prospective study included 176 patients with CHF of ischemic origin aged 58.7±7.4 years with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) of 30 % [25; 34] % who had been implanted with CD. The follow-up duration was 24 months. The primary endpoint was a newly developed persistent paroxysm of VT (duration ≥30 sec) detected in the “monitored” VT area or a VT paroxysm that required electric treatment. The echocardiographic picture was evaluated by 28 variables. Statistical analysis was performed with the c2, Fisher’s, and Mann—Whitney tests, and the one-factor logistic regression (LR). Prognostic models were developed with a multifactorial LR. The model accuracy was evaluated by 4 metrics: area under the ROC (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficacy.

Results The primary endpoint was observed in 60 (34 %) patients. Mean time to a persistent VT episode was 19.2±0.8 months (95 % confident interval (CI): 17.5–20.8). Superior-inferior dimensions of the right and left atria (RA and LA, respectively) and the left atrial volume (LAv) were independent predictors for VT. The odds of VT development in patients of the study cohort increased with RAl ≥4.5 cm (odds ratio (OR), 1.6; 95 % CI: 1.4–1.9; р=0.03), LAl ≥5.5 cm (OR, 2.5; 95 % CI: 1.01–6.1; р=0.04), LAv ≥95 ml (OR, 3.2; 95 % CI: 1.3–17.5; р=0.01). A comprehensive analysis of echocardiographic variables proved the prognostic potential of LAv that was linearly associated with the development of VT. The metrics of the best prognostic model were AUC 0.7±0.07 with 95 % CI: 0.54–0.83; specificity, 20.9 %; sensitivity, 95.7 %; and diagnostic efficacy, 47 %.

Conclusion      This study allowed evaluation of capabilities of transthoracic EchoCG for predicting the probability of VT in patients with CHF of ischemic origin and reduced LV EF. It was shown that linear and volumetric atrial dimensions could be used for stratification of risk of VT and for determining the tactics for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in this patient category.

N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Risk Stratification of Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Background

The prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in heart failure (HF) is well-established. However, whether it could facilitate the risk stratification of HF patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is still unclear.

Objective

To determine the associations between baseline NT-proBNP and outcomes of all-cause mortality and first appropriate shock due to sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in ICD recipients.

Methods and results

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was measured before ICD implant in 500 patients (mean age 60.2 ± 12.0 years; 415 (83.0%) men; 231 (46.2%) Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM); 136 (27.2%) primary prevention). The median NT-proBNP was 854.3 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 402.0 to 1,817.8 pg/ml). We categorized NT-proBNP levels into quartiles and used a restricted cubic spline to evaluate its nonlinear association with outcomes. The incidence rates of mortality and first appropriate shock were 5.6 and 9.1%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariable Cox regression showed a rise in NT-proBNP was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Compared with the lowest quartile, the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI across increasing quartiles were 1.77 (0.71, 4.43), 3.98 (1.71, 9.25), and 5.90 (2.43, 14.30) for NT-proBNP (p for trend &lt; 0.001). A restricted cubic spline demonstrated a similar pattern with an inflection point found at 3,231.4 pg/ml, beyond which the increase in NT-proBNP was not associated with increased mortality (p for nonlinearity &lt; 0.001). Fine-Gray regression was used to evaluate the association between NT-proBNP and first appropriate shock accounting for the competing risk of death. In the unadjusted, partial, and fully adjusted analysis, however, no significant association could be found regardless of NT-proBNP as a categorical variable or log-transformed continuous variable (all p &gt; 0.05). No nonlinearity was found, either (p = 0.666). Interactions between NT-proBNP and predefined factors were not found (all p &gt; 0.1).

Conclusion

In HF patients with ICD, the rise in NT-proBNP is independently associated with increased mortality until it reaches the inflection point. However, its association with the first appropriate shock was not found. Patients with higher NT-proBNP levels might derive less benefit from ICD implant.