Device-related infection in de novo transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Medicare patients

Incidence and outcomes of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in patients with end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are prone to bloodstream infections that may result in a higher risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, risk predictors, management strategies, and long-term outcomes of CIED infections in ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using the United States Renal Data System. ESKD patients with de novo CIED implantation between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2014, were included. Patients were observed until death, kidney transplantation, end of Medicare coverage, or September 30, 2015, to assess incidence of CIED infection. Management approach was determined from procedure codes for lead extraction within 60 days of CIED infection diagnosis. Patients with CIED infection were observed until December 31, 2019, to assess long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 15,515 ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation, incidence of CIED infection was 4.8% during a median follow-up of 1.3 years. The presence of a defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.48), higher body mass index (aHR, 1.01), and younger age (aHR, 0.96) were independent risk factors for CIED infection. Lead extraction occurred in only 50.71% of patients by 60 days. After propensity score matching, the 3-year mortality was higher in those who did not undergo lead extraction compared with those who did (80.3% vs 72.3%) and time to mortality was shorter (0.3 vs 0.6 year). Only 13.8% of patients underwent reimplantation with a new CIED after lead extraction.

CONCLUSION

CIED infections occur frequently in ESKD patients and are associated with a high mortality. Early lead extraction is not performed routinely but is associated with improved survival.

Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project

AIMS

Women have been historically underrepresented in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials. No data on sex differences regarding subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) carriers have been described. Aim of our study was to investigate sex-related differences among unselected S-ICD recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicentre, international i-SUSI registry were analysed. Comparisons between sexes were performed using a 1:1 propensity matching adjusted analysis for age, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular function, and substrate. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks and other device-related complications were deemed secondary outcomes. A total of 1698 patients were extracted from the i-SUSI registry; 399 (23.5%) were females. After propensity matching, two cohorts of 374 patients presenting similar baseline characteristics were analysed. Despite similar periprocedural characteristics and a matched BMI, women resulted at lower risk of conversion failure as per PRAETORIAN score (73.4% vs. 81.3%, P = 0.049). Over a median follow-up time of 26.5 [12.7-42.5] months, appropriate shocks were more common in the male cohort (rate/year 3.4% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P = 0.049), while no significant differences in device-related complications (rate/year: 6.3% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P = 0.595) and inappropriate shocks (rate/year: 4.3% vs. 3.1%; log-rank P = 0.375) were observed. After controlling for confounders, sex remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (aHR 1.648; CI 0.999-2.655, P = 0.048), while not resulting predictor of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

In a propensity-matched cohort of S-ICD recipients, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy, while not showing higher risk of device-related complications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0473876.

Association of a Medicare Mandate for Shared Decision-Making With Cardiac Device Utilization

This cohort study evaluates the association between a Medicare shared decision-making mandate for use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators with the rate of use for this device.

Do Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis?

Chronic kidney disease patients appear to be predisposed to heart rhythm disorders, including atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter, ventricular arrhythmias, and supraventricular tachycardias, which increase the risk of sudden cardiac death. The pathophysiological factors underlying arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death in patients with end-stage renal disease are unique and include timing and frequency of dialysis and dialysate composition, vulnerable myocardium, and acute proarrhythmic factors triggering asystole. The high incidence of sudden cardiac deaths suggests that this population could benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. The introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators significantly decreased the rate of all-cause mortality; however, the benefits of this therapy among patients with chronic kidney disease remain controversial since the studies provide conflicting results. Electrolyte imbalances in haemodialysis patients may result in ineffective shock therapy or the appearance of non-shockable underlying arrhythmic sudden cardiac death. Moreover, the implantation of such devices is associated with a risk of infections and central venous stenosis. Therefore, in the population of patients with heart failure and severe renal impairment, periprocedural risk and life expectancy must be considered when deciding on potential device implantation. Harmonised management of rhythm disorders and renal disease can potentially minimise risks and improve patients' outcomes and prognosis.

Validation of the Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death in Chinese Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Accurate identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) event is challenging. The objective of this study was to validate the three SCD risk stratifications recommended by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline, the 2020 American Heart Association /American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guideline, and the 2022 ESC guideline in Chinese patients with HCM. Our study population are made up of a cohort of 856 HCM patients without prior SCD events. The endpoint was defined as SCD or equivalent events (successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest or appropriate ICD shock for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation). During a median follow-up of 43 months, SCD endpoints occurred in 44 (5.1%) patients. A total of 34 (77.3%) patients suffering from SCD events were classified correctly into high-risk groups by the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline, 27(61.4%) by the 2022 ESC guideline, and 13 (29.6%) by the 2014 ESC guideline. The C-statistic of the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60-0.76), which performed better than the 2022 ESC guideline (0.65: 95% CI, 0.56-0.73), and the 2014 ESC guideline (0.58: 95% CI, 0.48-0.67). The 2020 AHA/ACC guideline displayed better discrimination for SCD risk stratification in Chinese HCM patients than the other two guidelines, with a higher sensitivity but lower specificity.

Infection in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Results of the S-ICD Post Approval Study

BACKGROUND

Early subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) studies included atypical cohorts of patients who were younger with fewer comorbidities. Recent S-ICD studies included patient populations with more comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to determine the incidence and predictors of S-ICD-related infection over a 3-year follow-up period and to use these results to develop an infection risk score.

METHODS

The S-ICD Post Approval Study is a US prospective registry of 1637 patients. Baseline demographic characteristics and outcomes with 3-year postimplantation follow-up were compared between patients with and without device-related infection. A risk score was derived from multivariable proportional hazards analysis of 22 variables.

RESULTS

Infection was observed in 55 patients (3.3%), with 69% of infections occurring within 90 days and a vast majority (92.7%) within 1 year of implantation. Late infections more likely involved device erosion; no infections occurred after year 2. The annual mortality rate postinfection was 0.6%/y. No lead extraction complications or bacteremia related to infection were observed. An infection risk score was created with diabetes, age, prior transvenous ICD implant, and ejection fraction as predictors. Patients with a risk score of ≥3 had an 8.8 hazard ratio (95% confidence interval 2.8-16.3) of infection compared with a 0 risk score.

CONCLUSION

Infection rates in the S-ICD Post Approval Study were similar to other S-ICD populations and not associated with systemic blood-borne infections. Late infection (>1 year) is uncommon and associated with system erosion. A high-risk infection cohort can be identified that may facilitate preventive measures.

The need for a subsequent transvenous system in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

BACKGROUND

The absence of pacing capabilities may reduce the appeal of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) devices for patients at risk for conduction disorders or with antitachycardia pacing (ATP)/cardiac resynchronization (CRT) requirements. Reports of rates of S-ICD to transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) system switch in real-world scenarios are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the need for a subsequent transvenous (TV) device in patients implanted with an S-ICD and its predictors.

METHODS

All patients implanted with an S-ICD were enrolled from the multicenter, real-world iSUSI (International SUbcutaneouS Implantable cardioverter defibrillator) Registry. The need for a TV device and its clinical reason, and appropriate and inappropriate device therapies were assessed. Logistic regression with Firth penalization was used to assess the association between baseline and procedural characteristics and the overall need for a subsequent TV device.

RESULTS

A total of 1509 patients were enrolled (age 50.8 ± 15.8 years; 76.9% male; 32.0% ischemic; left ventricular ejection fraction 38% [30%-60%]). Over 26.5 [13.4-42.9] months, 155 (10.3%) and 144 (9.3%) patients experienced appropriate and inappropriate device therapies, respectively. Forty-one patients (2.7%) required a TV device (13 bradycardia; 10 need for CRT; 10 inappropriate shocks). Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were associated with need for a TV device (odds ratio [OR] 2.57 [1.37-4.81], P = .003; and OR 2.67 [1.29-5.54], P = .008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A low rate (2.7%) of conversion from S-ICD to a TV device was observed at follow-up, with need for antibradycardia pacing, ATP, or CRT being the main reasons. BMI >30 kg/m2 and CKD predicted all-cause need for a TV device.

Process Mapping Strategies to Prevent Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Infections

BACKGROUND

Infection remains a major complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Implantable devices that avoid transvenous leads, such as the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD), can reduce the risk of serious infection-related complications, such as bloodstream infection and infective endocarditis. While the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines include recommendations for S-ICD use for patients at high risk of infection, currently, there are no clinical trial data that address best practices for the prevention of S-ICD infections. Therefore, an expert panel was convened to develop consensus on these topics.

METHODS

An expert process mapping methodology was used to achieve consensus on the appropriate steps to minimize or prevent S-ICD infections. Two face-to-face meetings of high-volume S-ICD implanters and an infectious diseases specialist, with expertise on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections, were conducted to develop consensus on useful strategies pre-, peri-, and post-implant to reduce S-ICD infection risk.

RESULTS

Expert panel consensus of recommended steps for patient preparation, S-ICD implantation, and post-operative management were developed to provide guidance in individual patient management.

CONCLUSION

Achieving expert panel consensus by process mapping methodology for S-ICD infection prevention was attainable, and the results should be helpful to clinicians in adopting interventions to minimize risks of S-ICD infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Infections following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation can require surgical device removal and often results in significant cost, morbidity, and potentially mortality. We aimed to systemically review the literature and identify risk factors associated with mortality following CIED infection. Methods: Electronic searches (up to June 2021) were performed on PubMed and Scopus. Twelve studies (10 retrospective, 2 prospective cohort studies) were included for analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted with the restricted maximum likelihood method, with mortality as the outcome. The overall mortality was 13.7% (438/1398) following CIED infection. Results: On meta-analysis, the male sex (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.57–1.01, I² = 2.2%) appeared to have lower odds for mortality, while diabetes mellitus appeared to be associated with higher mortality (OR 1.47, 95%CI 0.67–3.26, I² = 81.4%), although these trends did not reach statistical significance. Staphylococcus aureus as the causative organism (OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.76–4.19, I² = 0.0%), presence of heart failure (OR 1.92, 95%CI 1.42–4.19, I² = 0.0%) and embolic phenomena (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.67–9.56, I² = 69.8%) were associated with higher mortality. Surgical removal of CIED was associated with lower mortality compared with conservative management with antibiotics alone (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.09–0.50, I² = 62.8%). Conclusion: We identified important risk factors associated with mortality in CIED infections, including Staphyloccocus aureus as the causative organism, and the presence of complications, such as heart failure and embolic phenomena. Surgery, where possible, was associated with better outcomes.

Temporal Trends of Device-Related Infection in De Novo Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Medicare Patients with Underlying Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease is a risk factor for device infection in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) implants, with mechanisms that include immunodeficiency and a portal of entry for bacteria that can seed indwelling devices.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of both kidney disease and dialysis-dependence on the incidence of device-related infection after de novo TV-ICD implantation and how the incidence changes over time in.

METHODS

Medicare 100% administrative and claims data were used to identify patients who underwent de novo TV-ICD implantation between 7/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. Baseline characteristics included underlying kidney disease (none; non-dialysis; and dialysis), plus device infection during follow-up. Patients were followed for TV-ICD infection up to 78 weeks after implantation. Piecewise Poisson regression was used to predict the incidence of and hazard ratios for infection over time.

RESULTS

Overall, 809/42,200 (1.9%) patients had at least one device infection during a mean follow-up of 66 weeks: 484/31,217 (1.6%) none; 202/9,151 (2.2%) non-dialysis; and 123/1,832 (6.7%) dialysis (p<0.001 via log-rank test). The incidence of infection increased during the first 8-12 weeks and declined thereafter. Hazard ratios increased over time (dialysis week 12=4.9/1,000 PYs and week 52=9.8; non-dialysis week 12=1.4 and week 52=2.5; all p<0.05), as did the difference in the cumulative incidence compared with none (dialysis week 12=Δ11.8 and week 78=Δ53.5; non-dialysis week 12= Δ1.4 and week 78=Δ7.0.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of infection after de novo TV-ICD implantation is higher when patients have kidney disease and is substantially higher when patients are dialysis-dependent.

Burden of disease and costs of infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices

INTRODUCTION

Infections are complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) procedures, associated with high mortality (20-25% at 1 year), long hospitalizations (23-30 days), and high costs for health-care systems (often higher than 30.000 €). The incidence rates are around 1-4%. Prevention strategies appear to be the best approach for minimizing the occurrence of CIED infections, but in real-world, the recommendations for the best practices are not always followed. Among the recommended preventive measures, the antibacterial envelope has proven to be effective in reducing CIED-related infections.

AREAS COVERED

Published studies investigate the role of antibacterial envelopes in infection prevention and the use of infection risk scores to select high-risk patients undergoing CIED implantation/replacement who can benefit from additional preventive measures.

EXPERT OPINION

A proficient selection of the best candidates for the antibacterial envelope can be the basis for reducing the healthcare system's costs, in line with the principles of cost-effectiveness. Risk scores have been developed to select patients at high risk of CIED infections and their use appears simple and more complete than individual factors alone. Among them, the PADIT score seems to be effective in selecting patients eligible for antibacterial envelope insertion, with a good cost-effectiveness profile.