Epicardial course of the musculature related to the great cardiac vein: Anatomical considerations and clinical implications for mitral isthmus block after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion

Detection of Epicardial Connection Through Intercaval Bundle Involving Right Pulmonary Veins After Ipsilateral Circumferential Ablation by Intra-Atrial Activation Sequence Pacing From the Right Pulmonary Vein

BACKGROUND

An epicardial connection (EC) through the intercaval bundle (EC-ICB) between the right pulmonary vein (RPV) and right atrium (RA) is one of the reasons for the need for carina ablation for PV isolation and may reduce the acute and chronic success of PV isolation. We evaluated the intra-atrial activation sequence during RPV pacing after failure of ipsilateral RPV isolation and sought to identify specific conduction patterns in the presence of EC-ICB.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 223 consecutive patients who underwent initial catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. If the RPV was not isolated using circumferential ablation or reconnected during the waiting period, an exit map was created during mid-RPV carina pacing. If the earliest site on the exit map was the RA, the patient was classified into the EC-ICB group. The exit map, intra-atrial activation sequence, and RPV-high RA time were evaluated. First-pass isolation of the RPV was not achieved in 36 patients (16.1%), and 22 patients (9.9%) showed reconnection. Twelve and 28 patients were classified into the EC-ICB and non-EC-ICB groups, respectively, after excluding those with multiple ablation lesion sets or incomplete mapping. The intra-atrial activation sequence showed different patterns between the 2 groups. The RPV-high RA time was significantly shorter in the EC-ICB than in the non-EC-ICB group (69.2±15.2 versus 148.6±51.2 ms; P<0.001), and RPV-high RA time<89.0 ms was highly predictive of the existence of an EC-ICB (sensitivity, 91.7%; specificity, 89.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

An EC-ICB can be effectively detected by intra-atrial sequencing during RPV pacing, and an RPV-high RA time of <89.0 ms was highly predictive.

Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for AF Ablation; A Review

The outcomes of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are modest with various adjunctive strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) yielding largely disappointing results in randomised controlled trials. Linear ablation is a commonly employed adjunct strategy but is limited by difficulty in achieving durable bidirectional block, particularly at the mitral isthmus. Epicardial connections play a role in AF initiation and perpetuation. The ligament of Marshall has been implicated as a source of AF triggers and is known to harbour sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibres that contribute to AF perpetuation. Ethanol infusion into the Vein of Marshall, a remnant of the superior vena cava and key component of the ligament of Marshall, may eliminate these AF triggers and can facilitate the ease of obtaining durable mitral isthmus block. While early trials have demonstrated the potential of Vein of Marshall 'ethanolisation' to reduce arrhythmia recurrence after persistent AF ablation, further randomised trials are needed to fully determine the potential long-term outcome benefits afforded by this technique.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Efficiency and Durability of EIVOM on Acute Reconnection After Mitral Isthmus Bidirectional Block

BACKGROUND

Reconnection after mitral isthmus (MI) block with radiofrequency ablation is common.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) on acute reconnection after MI bidirectional block.

METHODS

Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who were scheduled to receive radiofrequency ablation for the first time were randomly assigned to the radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) group (n = 44) or the EIVOM group (n = 45). The RFCA group's strategy was bilateral pulmonary vein ablation and linear ablation; in the EIVOM group, EIVOM was performed first. The primary endpoint was acute reconnection 30 minutes after MI bidirectional block.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients (average age 62.9 years; 57.3% male) were enrolled. The average duration for persistent atrial fibrillation was 2.3 years. Before observation, all patients in the EIVOM group achieved MI bidirectional block (45 of 45 [100%]), compared with 84.1% (37 of 44) in the RFCA group. After the observation, 3 cases of MI reconnection occurred in the EIVOM group and 13 cases in the RFCA group (6.7% vs 35.1%; P < 0.05). After additional ablation, the final MI block rates in the EIVOM and RFCA groups were 97.8% (44 of 45) and 72.7% (32 of 44), respectively. During a 1-year follow-up, 8 of 45 patients who underwent EIVOM had recurrent atrial fibrillation, compared with 14 of 44 in the RFCA group (17.8% vs 31.8%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

EIVOM can reduce acute reconnection after MI bidirectional block and significantly increase first-pass MI block.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

A proposed index of myocardial staining for vein of Marshall ethanol infusion: an Italian single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Mitral isthmus (MI) conduction block is a fundamental step in anatomical approach treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, MI block is hardly achievable with endocardial ablation only. Retrograde ethanol infusion (EI) into the vein of Marshall (VOM) facilitates MI block. Fluorographic myocardial staining (MS) during VOM-EI could be helpful in predicting procedural alcoholization outcome even if its role is qualitatively assessed in the routine. The aim was to quantitatively assess MS during VOM-EI and to evaluate its association with MI block achievement.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for PeAF at Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio (Pisa, Italy) from February 2022 to May 2023 were considered. Patients with identifiable VOM were included. A proposed index of MS (MSI) was retrospectively calculated in each included patient. Correlation of MSI with low-voltage zones (LVZ) extension after VOM-EI and its association with MI block achievement were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 42 patients out of 49 (85.8%) had an identifiable VOM. MI block was successfully achieved in 35 patients out of 42 (83.3%). MSI was significantly associated with the occurrence of MI block (OR 1.24 (1.03-1.48); p = 0.022). A higher MSI resulted in reduced ablation time (p = 0.014) and reduced radiofrequency applications (p = 0.002) to obtain MI block. MSI was also associated with MI block obtained by endocardial ablation only (OR 1.07 (1.02-1.13); p = 0.002). MSI was highly correlated with newly formed LVZ extension (r = 0.776; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, optimal MSI predicts MI block and facilitates its achievement with endocardial ablation only.

The impact of empirical Marshall vein ethanol infusion as a first-choice intraoperative strategy on the long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing mitral isthmus ablation

Background

Marshall vein ethanol infusion (MVEI) as an additional therapy to conventional catheter ablation (CA) has been proved to be efficacious in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, whether empirical MVEI could be the first-line strategy in mitral isthmus (MI) ablation has seldom been investigated. Here, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes between provisional and empirical MVEI in PeAF patients undergoing the index MI ablation procedure.

Methods

We enrolled 133 patients with PeAF either in the provisional group (n = 38, MVEI was performed when conventional endocardial and/or epicardial ablation procedures were inadequate to achieve bidirectional MI block) or in the empirical group (n = 95, MVEI was performed empirically before MI CA).

Results

All of the baseline characteristics were comparable. Less spontaneous or inducible atrial tachycardias (ATs) were encountered in the empirical group of patients (P < 0.001). More epicardial ablations were applied (26.3% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.016) and a higher incidence of CA-facilitated restoration of sinus rhythm was recorded (86.8% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) in the provisional group of patients. Although more fluoroscopy time (6.4[4.2, 9.3] vs. 9.5[5.9, 11.6] min, P = 0.019) and radiation exposure (69.0[25.3, 160.2] vs. 122.0[62.5, 234.1] mGy, P = 0.010) were documented in the empirical group with comparable procedure time, less time (455.9 ± 192.2 vs. 366.5 ± 161.3 s, P = 0.038) was consumed to achieve bidirectional MI block during endocardial ablation in the provisional group. Incidences of procedure-related complications were similar between the two groups. During a 16.5 ± 4.4-month follow-up, the empirical group of patients showed a significantly higher rate of freedom from AT recurrence (95.8% vs. 81.6%, log-rank P = 0.003), while the rate of freedom from AF or atrial tachyarrhythmias (combining AF and AT) was similar. Both univariate (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.64, P = 0.008) and multivariate (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.92, P = 0.037) Cox regression analyses indicated that empirical MVEI was independently associated with lower long-term AT recurrence.

Conclusion

Among patients with PeAF who underwent the index MI ablation procedure, empirical MVEI could reduce endocardial MI ablation time and provide greater long-term freedom from AT recurrence.

Epicardial connections and bi-atrial tachycardias: From anatomy to clinical practice

Bi-atrial tachycardia (BiAT) is not rare after extensive atrial ablation or cardiac surgery. The complexity of bi-atrial reentrant circuits poses a great challenge for clinical practice. With recent advances in mapping technologies, we are now able to characterize atrial activation in detail. However, given the involvement of both atria and multiple epicardial conductions, endocardial mapping for BiATs is not easy to understand. Knowledge of the atrial myocardial architecture is the foundation for the clinical management of BiATs; as it is required to understand the possible mechanism of the tachycardia and identify the optimal target of ablation. In this review we summarize current knowledge about the anatomy of interatrial connections as well as other epicardial fibers and discuss the interpretation of electrophysiological findings and ablation strategies for BiATs.

A novel catheter ablation strategy for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation combining cryoballoon, radiofrequency, and Marshall-vein ethanol ablations

BACKGROUNDS

Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) remains challenging and more effective strategy has been required to reduce postoperative arrhythmia recurrences. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of a novel extensive ablation strategy for non-PAF, that is based on a combination of cryoballoon (CBA), radiofrequency (RFA), and Marshall-vein ethanol ablations (EA-VOM).

METHODS

The study was a single-center, retrospective observational study. We enrolled 171 consecutive patients who underwent de-novo catheter ablation for non-PAF under conscious sedation with a novel extensive ablation strategy that included CBA for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and left atrial roof ablation (LARA), RFA for mitral isthmus (MI) ablation, superior vena cava isolation, and other linear ablations and EA-VOM. Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias over 1 year, procedure outcomes, and procedure-related complications were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 139 (81.3%) patients remained in sinus rhythm during 1-year follow-up. Of the 139 patients, 51 patients (29.8%) received antiarrhythmic drugs. The mean procedure time was 204 ± 45 min. PVI and LARA ablation by CBA and MI block by RFA and EA-VOM were completed in 171 (100%) and 166 (97.1%) patients, respectively. No serious procedure-related complications were observed except for one case of delayed pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 80% of the study patients were AF-free during 1-year follow-up period after a single procedure based on the novel extensive ablation strategy combining CBA, RFA, and EA-VOM. This strategy for non-PAF may be preferred in terms of maintenance of sinus rhythm, safety even in high-risk patients, and relatively short procedure time.

The pitfalls of automatic point acquisition with high-resolution mapping

An 81-year-old man with a typical atrial flutter underwent cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. After the creation of wide planar lesion at the CTI, a high-resolution activation map with Rhythmia™ (Boston Scientific, Cambridge, MA, USA) was acquired during lateral right atrium pacing, which demonstrated a centrifugal activation at the septal side of ablation line. A review of points acquired at the earliest activation site demonstrated that perivalvular premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at tricuspid annulus had been inappropriately acquired as atrial electrograms. This mis-acquisition was explained by the following: (i) no change in the beat acceptance criteria of the propagation reference in the coronary sinus due to the absence of ventriculoatrial conduction of mechanical PVCs, and (ii) failure to reject beats overlapping the PVCs because those voltages did not reach the threshold of 0.64 mV. When the mapping system shows centrifugal activation over the linear lesion, passive activation from the epicardial structures or the other chamber is an important differential diagnosis; however, mis-annotation due to automated acquisition must be also ruled out. It is important to understand the automated point-acquisition criteria in each mapping system and to be familiar with the pitfalls of the criteria.

Learning objective

The evolution of ultra-high-resolution mapping technology enables us to understand the details of tachycardia circuit with much fewer manual reannotations. The criteria for automatic point acquisition installed in the mapping system usually works effectively, resulting in a demonstration of a precise tachycardia circuit. However, the present case logically showed how we noticed the mis-annotation of the high-resolution activation map and explained the pitfall of the function of automatic beat acquisition.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone or in combination with substrate modulation after electrical cardioversion failure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: The PACIFIC trial: Study design

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective at treating 50% of unselected patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Alternatively, PVI combined with a new ablation strategy entitled the Marshall-PLAN ensures a 78% 1-year sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rate in the same population. However, a substantial subset of patients could undergo the Marshall-PLAN unnecessarily. It is therefore essential to identify those patients who can be treated with PVI alone versus those who may truly benefit from the Marshall-PLAN before ablation is performed. In this context, we hypothesized that electrical cardioversion (EC) could help to select the most appropriate strategy for each patient.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized study, patients with AF recurrence within 4 weeks after EC will be randomized 1:1 to PVI alone or the Marshall-PLAN. Conversely, patients in whom SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC will be treated with PVI only and included in a prospective registry. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year SR maintenance rate after a single ablation procedure.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The Marshall-PLAN might be necessary in patients with an advanced degree of persistent AF (i.e., where SR is not maintained for ≥4 uninterrupted weeks after EC). Conversely, in patients with mild or moderate persistent AF (i.e., where SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC), PVI alone might be a sufficient ablation strategy. The PACIFIC trial is the first study designed to assess whether rhythm monitoring after EC could help to identify patients who should undergo adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI.

Efficacy and Safety Ablation Index-Guided High-Energy Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: PVI Plus Linear Ablation of Mitral Isthmus and Posterior Box Isolation

BACKGROUND

For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), whether linear ablation should be performed remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety for ablation index (AI)-guided high-energy linear ablation of mitral isthmus (MI) and left atrial (LA) posterior box isolation is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and clinical success rate of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) combined with linear ablation of LA roof and posterior inferior (posterior wall isolation) and MI compare with the PVI-alone method in patients of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

362 consecutive persistent AF patients were enrolled from two electrophysiology centers. A total of 200 cases were in PVI-plus group and 162 cases were in PVI-alone group. The PVI-alone group received wide circumferential isolation of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins. PVI combined with linear ablation of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI)and MI were performed in the PVI-plus group. The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia. After 24 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was achieved in 73.5% of the patients in the PVI-plus group and 62.5% in the PVI-alone group (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91, log rank p = 0.012). The procedure-related complication rates were 2.5% in PVI-plus group and 1.9% in PVI-alone group (p = 0.808).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the ablation strategy of ablation (PVI plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation) was feasible and safe for persistent AF patients. Compared with the PVI-alone method, it improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF.

A specific notation for contrast medium and dehydrated ethanol injection into the vein of Marshall during mitral isthmus ablation-A case report

BACKGROUND

Ablation of the vein of Marshall (VOM) by dehydrated ethanol (DE) is an important method for completely blocking the mitral isthmus (MI). Before DE ablation of the VOM, Marshall angiography should be performed so that the contrast medium is inevitably exposed to DE.

METHOD

We present a case of DE ablation of the VOM. When iodixanol was exposed to DE, some floccule embolized the lumen of the over-the-wire (OTW) balloon dilatation catheter and led to the impossibility of DE ablation. Then, we performed in vitro experiments: iodixanol, not iomeprol, produced many stable white floccules when it encountered DE.

CONCLUSION

Iodixanol is not an appropriate contrast for DE ablation of the VOM. However, if there is no other alternative contrast, the following methods might be used to address the problem: ⑴ diluted iodixanol (iodixanol:normal saline 1:1) could be used for VOM ablation; or ⑵ the lumen of the OTW could be flushed by NS after VOM angiography, and then DE injection could be performed.

Revisiting the characteristics and ablation strategy of biatrial tachycardias: a case series and systematic review

AIMS

To describe the role of left atrial (LA) epicardial conduction and targets of ablation in biatrial tachycardias (BiATs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with BiAT diagnosed by high-density mapping and appropriate entrainment were enrolled. A systematic review of case reports or series was then performed. Biatrial tachycardia was identified in 20 patients aged 63.5 ± 11.1 years. Among them, eight had LA epicardial conduction, including four via the ligament of Marshall, two via myocardial fibres between the great cardiac vein (GCV) and LA, one via septopulmonary bundle, and one via myocardial fibres between the posterior wall and coronary sinus. Ablation was targeted at the anatomical isthmus in 14, including 5 undergoing vein of Marshall ethanol infusion and 2 undergoing ablation in the GCV. Another six underwent ablation at interatrial connections, including one with septopulmonary bundle at the fossa ovalis and five at the atrial insertions of Bachmann's bundle. After a mean follow-up of 8.7 ± 3.8 months, five patients had recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter. Systematic review enrolled 87 patients in previous and the present reports, showing a higher risk of impairment in atrial physiology in those targeting interatrial connections (30.4 vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001) but no significant difference in short- and long-term effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Left atrial epicardial conduction is common in BiATs and affects the ablation strategy. Atrial physiology is a major concern in selecting the target of intervention.

Atrial tachycardia occurring after a prior atrial fibrillation ablation procedure: Does non-inducibility matter?

Recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) is a common phenomenon after catheter ablation for AF, particularly in the setting of additional substrate ablation, with many studies demonstrating gap-related macro re-entrant AT (predominantly mitral and roof dependent) to be the dominant mechanism. Although multiple inducible ATs after ablation of the clinical AT are commonly described at repeat procedures, the optimal ablation strategy, and procedural endpoints are unclear in this setting. A recent randomized study addressing the question of non-inducibility as a procedural endpoint demonstrated no additional benefits to the ablation of all induced, non-clinical ATs, but it was limited by small numbers and high rates of non-inducibility. Nevertheless, once ablation of the clinical AT has been successfully performed, ensuring durable linear block and PV isolation may be sufficient for the prevention of further AT. Durable linear block, particularly at the mitral isthmus, is difficult to achieve but may be facilitated by the real-time evaluation of lesion quality and contiguity and the novel technique of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion. Large-scale, randomized trials are needed, nonetheless, to fully assess the optimal ablation strategy in the setting of recurrent AT post-AF ablation.

Ethanol Infusion of Vein of Marshall for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Basics and Clinical Practice

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is particularly challenging, as the clinical outcomes are modest. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus linear ablation is one of the main strategies for PeAF ablation. Completely durable transmural lesions are difficult to achieve by catheter ablation during mitral isthmus ablation. The ligament of Marshall contains the vein of Marshall (VOM), myocardial tracts and innervation, and serves as arrhythmogenic foci that make it an attractive target in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Additionally, it co-localizes with the mitral isthmus, and may serve as a part of the perimitral isthmus reentrant circuit. Ethanol infusion into the VOM results in rapid ablation of the neighboring myocardium and its innervation. Its incorporation into PVI significantly increases the success rate of mitral isthmus block and the clinical outcome of PeAF ablation.

Distribution of atrial low voltage induced by vein of Marshall ethanol infusion

INTRODUCTION

Systematic and quantitative descriptions of vein of Marshall (VOM)-induced tissue ablation are lacking. We sought to characterize the distribution of low voltage observed in the left atrium (LA) after VOM ethanol infusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The distribution of ethanol-induced low voltage was evaluated by comparing high-density maps performed before and after VOM ethanol infusion in 114 patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation. The two most frequently impacted segments were the inferior portion of the ridge (82.5%) and the first half of the mitral isthmus (pulmonary vein side) (92.1%). Low-voltage absence in these typical areas resulted from inadvertent ethanol infusion in the left atrial appendage vein (n = 3), initial VOM dissection (n = 3), or a "no branches" VOM morphology (n = 1). Visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins more frequently resulted in low-voltage extension beyond typical areas, toward the entire left antrum (19.0% vs. 1.9%, p = .0045) or the posterior LA (39.7% vs. 3.8%, p < .001) but with a limited positive predictive value ranging from 29.4% to 43.5%. Ethanol-induced low voltage covered a median LA surface of 3.6% (1.9%-5.0%) and did not exceed 8% of the LA surface in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSION

VOM ethanol infusion typically locates at the inferior ridge and the adjacent half of the mitral isthmus. Low-voltage extensions can be anticipated but not guaranteed by the presence of visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins.

Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion as First Step for Mitral Isthmus Linear Ablation

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to investigate the added value of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOMEt) as first step in facilitating radiofrequency (RF)-guided mitral isthmus (MI) block.

BACKGROUND

Achieving MI block with the use of RF ablation is challenging.

METHODS

Seventy patients planned for MI ablation were randomized 1:1 to VOMEt as a first step preceding RF (endocardial and epicardial, VOM_FIRST group) vs RF ablation as a first step preceding VOMEt (RF_FIRST group). The study end point was incidence of MI block after RF ablation and after the 2 steps.

RESULTS

In VOM_FIRST, VOMEt was successful in 30/35 patients (86%) resulting in a low-voltage area of 12 ± 7.4 cm² and MI block in 2/35 patients (6%). VOM_FIRST, compared with RF_FIRST, was associated with higher incidence of MI block after endocardial (46% vs 11%; P < 0.001) and epicardial ablation (94% vs 43%; P < 0.001), with fewer endocardial applications (4 vs 11 vs 4; P < 0.001) and similar epicardial applications (7 vs 8; P = 0.68). Incidence of MI block after the 2 steps was 94% vs 63% (P = 0.001) in VOM_FIRST vs RF_FIRST, respectively. Additional touch-up RF ablation in both groups resulted in final MI block in all but 1 patient (99%).

CONCLUSIONS

VOMEt as a first step in RF-guided MI line ablation significantly reduced the number of RF applications needed to achieve MI block, even if the sequence of the ablation steps did not affect the final incidence of block. (Evaluation of Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion During Left Atrial Linear Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation [MARSHALINE]; NCT04124328).

Catheter Ablation in Persistent AF, the Evolution towards a More Pragmatic Strategy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and represents a heterogeneous disorder with a complex pathological basis. While significant technological advances have taken place over the last decade in the field of catheter ablation of AF, response to ablation varies and long-term success rates in those with persistent AF remain modest. Mechanistic studies have highlighted potentially different sustaining factors for AF in the persistent AF population with substrate-driven focal and re-entrant sources in the body of the atria identified on invasive and non-invasive mapping studies. Translation to clinical practice, however, remains challenging and the application of such mapping techniques to clinical ablation has yet to demonstrate a significant benefit beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone in the persistent AF cohort. Recent advances in catheter and ablation technology have centered on improving the durability of ablation lesions at index procedure and although encouraging results have been demonstrated with early studies, large-scale trials are awaited. Further meaningful improvement in clinical outcomes in the persistent AF population requires ongoing advancement in the understanding of AF mechanisms, coupled with continuing progress in catheter technology capable of delivering durable transmural lesions.

Characteristics of macroreentrant atrial tachycardias using an anatomical bypass: Pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia case series

INTRODUCTION

Human atria comprise distinct layers. One layer can bypass another, and lead to a downstream centrifugal propagation at their interface. We sought to characterize anatomical substrates, electrophysiological properties, and ablation outcomes of "pseudo-focal" atrial tachycardias (ATs), defined as macroreentrant ATs mimicking focal ATs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed left atrial ATs showing centrifugal propagation with postpacing intervals (PPIs) after entrainment pacing suggestive of a macroreentrant mechanism. A total of 22 patients had pseudo-focal ATs consisting of 15 perimitral and 7 roof-dependent flutters. A low-voltage area was consistently found at the collision site and colocalized with distinct anatomical structures like the: (1) coronary sinus-great cardiac vein bundle (27%), (2) vein of Marshall bundle (18%), (3) Bachmann bundle (27%), (4) septopulmonary bundle (18%), and (5) fossa ovalis (9%). The mean missing tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 65 ± 31 ms (22%) on the endocardial activation map. PPI was 0 [0-15] ms and 0 [0-21] ms longer than TCL at the breakthrough site and the opposite site, respectively. While feasible in 21 pseudo-focal ATs (95%), termination was better achieved by blocking the anatomical isthmus than ablating the breakthrough site [20/21 (95%) vs. 1/5 (20%); p < .001].

CONCLUSION

Perimitral and roof-dependent flutters with centrifugal propagation are favored by a low-voltage area located at well-identified anatomical structures. Comprehensive entrainment pacing maneuvers are crucial to distinguish pseudo-focal ATs from true focal ATs. Blocking the anatomical isthmus is a better therapeutic option than ablating the breakthrough site.