Clinician needs and perceptions about cardioneuroablation for recurrent vasovagal syncope: An international clinician survey

Cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope: insights on patients' selection, centre settings, procedural workflow and endpoints-results from an European Heart Rhythm Association survey

AIMS

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a catheter-based intervention for recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS) that consists in the modulation of the parasympathetic cardiac autonomic nervous system. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current CNA utilization in Europe.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 202 participants from 40 different countries replied to the survey. Half of the respondents have performed a CNA during the last 12 months, reflecting that it is considered a treatment option of a subset of patients. Seventy-one per cent of respondents adopt an approach targeting ganglionated plexuses (GPs) systematically in both the right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA). The second most common strategy (16%) involves LA GP ablation only after no response following RA ablation. The procedural endpoint is frequently an increase in heart rate. Ganglionated plexus localization predominantly relies on an anatomical approach (90%) and electrogram analysis (59%). Less utilized methods include pre-procedural imaging (20%), high-frequency stimulation (17%), and spectral analysis (10%). Post-CNA, anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy is prescribed, with only 11% of the respondents discharging patients without such medication. Cardioneuroablation is perceived as effective (80% of respondents) and safe (71% estimated <1% rate of procedure-related complications). Half view CNA emerging as a first-line therapy in the near future.

CONCLUSION

This survey offers a snapshot of the current implementation of CNA in Europe. The results show high expectations for the future of CNA, but important heterogeneity exists regarding indications, procedural workflow, and endpoints of CNA. Ongoing efforts are essential to standardize procedural protocols and peri-procedural patient management.

Potential consequences of cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope: A call for appropriately designed, sham-controlled clinical trials

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is being increasingly used to treat patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Bradycardia, in the cardioinhibitory subtype of VVS, results from transient parasympathetic overactivity leading to sinus bradycardia and/or atrioventricular block. By mitigating parasympathetic overactivity, CNA has been shown to improve VVS symptoms in clinical studies with relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up periods (<5 years) at selected centers. However, CNA may potentially tip the autonomic balance to a state of sympathovagal imbalance with attenuation of cardiac parasympathetic activity. A higher heart rate is associated with adverse cardiovascular events and increased mortality in healthy populations without cardiovascular diseases. Chronic sympathovagal imbalance may also affect the pathophysiology of spectra of cardiovascular disorders including atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. This review addresses potential long-term pathophysiological consequences of CNA for VVS.

Shared Decision Making and Cardioneuroablation Allow Discontinuation of Permanent Pacing in Patients with Vagally Mediated Bradycardia

BACKGROUND

Safe discontinuation of pacemaker therapy for vagally mediated bradycardia is a dilemma. The aim of the study was to present the outcomes of a proposed diagnostic and therapeutic process aimed at discontinuing or not restoring pacemaker therapy (PPM) in patients with vagally mediated bradycardia.

METHODS

The study group consisted of two subgroups of patients with suspected vagally mediated bradycardia who were considered to have PPM discontinued or not to restore their PPM if cardioneuroablation (CNA) would successfully treat their bradycardia. A group of 3 patients had just their pacemaker explanted but reimplantation was suggested, and 17 patients had preexisting pacemakers implanted. An invasive electrophysiology study was performed. If EPS was negative, extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECVS) was performed. Then, patients with positive ECVS received CNA. Patients with an implanted pacemaker had it programmed to pace at the lowest possible rate. After the observational period and control EPS including ECVS, redo-CNA was performed if pauses were induced. The decision to explant the pacemaker was obtained based on shared decision making (SDM).

RESULTS

After initial clinical and electrophysiological evaluation, 17 patients were deemed eligible for CNA (which was then performed). During the observational period after the initial CNA, all 17 patients were clinically asymptomatic. The subsequent invasive evaluation with ECVS resulted in pause induction in seven (41%) patients, and these patients underwent redo-CNA. Then, SDM resulted in the discontinuation of pacemaker therapy or a decision to not perform pacemaker reimplantation in all the patients after CAN. The pacemaker was explanted in 12 patients post-CNA, while in 2 patients explantation was postponed. During a median follow-up of 18 (IQR: 8-22) months, recurrent syncope did not occur in the CNA recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacemaker therapy in patients with vagally mediated bradycardia could be discontinued safely after CNA.

Current approach to the treatment of vasovagal syncope in adults

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness. Although not associated with mortality, it causes injuries, reduces quality of life, and is associated with anxiety and depression. The European and North American cardiac societies recently published syncope clinical practice guidelines. Most patients with VVS do well after specialist evaluation, reassurance and education. Adequate hydration, increased salt intake when not contraindicated, and careful withdrawal of diuretics and specific hypotension-inducing drugs are a reasonable initial strategy. Physical counterpressure maneuvers might be helpful but can be of limited efficacy in older patients and those with short or no prodromes. Orthostatic training lacks long term efficacy and is troubled by non-compliance. Yoga might be helpful, although the biomedical mechanism is unknown. Almost a third of VVS patients continue to faint despite these conservative measures. Metoprolol was not helpful in a pivotal randomized clinical trial. Fludrocortisone and midodrine significantly reduce syncope recurrences with tolerable side effects, when titrated to target doses. Pacing therapy with specialized sensors appears promising in carefully selected population who have not responded conservative measures. Cardioneuroablation may be helpful but has not been studied in a formal clinical trial.

Cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as promising therapy for patients with refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide a freedom from syncope estimate for CNA, including subgroup analysis by method and target of ablation.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE according to the PRISMA guidelines until February 14, 2022. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting freedom from syncope were included. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 465 patients were included across 14 studies (mean age 39.8 ± 4.0 year; 53.5% female). Different techniques were used to guide CNA: 50 patients (10.8%) by mapping fractionated electrograms, 73 (15.7%) with the spectral method, 210 (45.2%) with high-frequency stimulation, 73 (15.7%) with a purely anatomically guided method, and 59 (12.6%) with a combination. The target was biatrial in 168 patients (36.1%), left atrium only in 259 (55.7%), and right atrium only in 38 (8.2%). The freedom from syncope was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1%-94.6%; I2 = 6.9%; P = .376). CNA limited to right atrial ablation was associated with a significant lower freedom from syncope (81.5%; 95% CI 51.9%-94.7%; P <.0001) vs left atrial ablation only (94.0%; 95% CI 88.6%--6.9%) and biatrial ablation (92.7%; 95% CI 86.8%-96.1%). Subgroup analysis according to the technique used to identify ganglionated plexi did not show any significant difference in freedom from syncope (P = .206).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests a high freedom from syncope after CNA in VVS. Well-designed, double-blind, multicenter, sham-controlled randomized clinical trials are needed to provide evidence for future guidelines.

The future of cardioneuroablation in cardiovascular medicine

INTRODUCTION

Cardioneuroablation is increasingly being utilized to improve outcomes in patients with vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias. However, there are still controversial issues in the field including patient selection, safety and efficacy, and procedural end-points.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the current role of cardioneuroablation is summarized, and controversial issues related to the modality are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

According to small open-label cohort studies, overall freedom from syncope recurrence was higher than 90% after cardioneuroablation in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Use of the electrogram-based strategy or high-frequency stimulation demonstrate similar success rate except in procedures limited to the right atrium. Based on a recently published randomized controlled trial and metanalysis, it may be possible now to make a strong recommendation for cardioneuroablation in patients <40 years of age, and those with the cardioinhibitory or mixed type of VVS who continue to experience frequent and/or burdensome syncope recurrences. Considering patients with VVS are prone to significant placebo/expectation effect, sham-controlled trials may help to quantify the placebo effect. In well-selected patients with functional atrioventricular block and sinus bradycardia, may result in encouraging medium-term outcomes. However, functional bradycardia is identified in a minority of patients presenting with high-grade atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction.