Serial changes in exercise capacity, quality of life and cardiopulmonary responses after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Melatonin supplementation enhances pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in COPD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Melatonin (MLT), the main product of the pineal gland, is involved in muscle tissue repair and regeneration, besides several other important physiologic functions. In COPD, MLT administration can improve lung oxidative stress and sleep quality, but its potential effects on the outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) have not been previously investigated. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken to test the hypothesis that a combined approach of rehabilitative exercise training and MLT supplementation could maximize functional performance, health status and quality of life in patients with COPD. Thirty-nine individuals with COPD referred to a supervised PR program at the Federal University of Ceara, Brazil, were randomized to receive MLT (3 mg/day; n = 18) or placebo (n = 21). Exercise capacity (6-min walk test - 6MWT), health status (COPD assessment test), and quality of life (airways questionnaire 20) were investigated as primary outcomes. No differences were observed at baseline in demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics between MLT and placebo groups. At the end of PR, superiority of the MLT group was demonstrated in improvement in the distance covered in the 6MWT (71 ± 26 vs. 25 ± 36 m; p < 0.01), health status (-11 ± 6 vs. -3 ± 5; p < 0.01), and quality of life (-6.9 ± 3.0 vs. -1.9 ± 2.4; p < 0.01), compared to the placebo group. In conclusion, MLT supplementation during the course of 12 weeks of PR can improve functional capacity, health status and quality of life in patients with COPD. These findings may have significant implications for the management of this condition.

Establishing Quality of Life in Southern Taiwan COPD Patients Using Long-Acting Bronchodilator

BACKGROUND

To assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Taiwan patients with different stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and using different combination therapies and to explore the factors affecting HRQoL in these patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included outpatient participants aged 35 years old and older who were receiving long-acting bronchodilator treatment in one of two hospitals in Southern Taiwan. Participants were categorized according to their Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification as either their COPD group, based on symptoms and exacerbation risk, or their COPD stage, based on spirometry results. Patients' HRQoL was assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (SGRQ), World Health Organization Quality of Life Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), and EQ-5D-5L. The total scores of the SGRQ, WHOQOL-BREF, EQ-5D utility index, and EQ-VAS were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) among different combination treatments. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of patients' baseline characteristics and environmental factors with HRQoL.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients were enrolled in the study. The distribution of patients using GOLD group classification were as follows: 73.39% in group A, 20.19% group B, 1.83% group C and 4.59% group D. Triple therapy patients mostly showed a lower quality of life than other combination therapies, regardless of the GOLD classification system. However, only the SGRQ scores of GOLD groups A and B were significantly different when using different drug combinations (p-value = 0.0072 and 0.0430, respectively). The COPD assessment test (CAT) score, a questionnaire to assess impact of COPD on health status, was found to be associated with all the questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

The HRQoL is impaired in patients with COPD, and it deteriorates with an increase of severity. The CAT was the strongest predictor of HRQoL.

Acupuncture Point Stimulation Treatments Combined With Conventional Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is a disease characterized by dyspnea, cough, and respiratory symptoms, leading to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL) and exercise capacity, is highly prevalent worldwide. Some studies demonstrated that acupuncture point stimulation treatments (APSTs) are effective and safe in treating patients with COPD. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to analyze the effects on HRQL and FEV1% predicted of diverse APSTs in treating patients with COPD.

Materials and Methods: We searched seven electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with stable COPD patients comparing APSTs and conventional treatment (Tx) were included. The primary outcome was HRQL measured by COPD Assessment Test or St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. The secondary outcome was FEV1% predicted. We performed random effect network meta-analysis using a consistency model.

Results: This network meta-analysis analyzed 21 RCTs with 1,577 stable COPD participants. In comparison with Tx, acupressure massage (AM) + Tx [−5.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), −6.65 to −3.57] was the most effective intervention in improving HRQL, followed by moxibustion (Mx) + Tx (−2.86; 95% CI, −3.86 to −1.86). Moreover, in comparison with Tx, Mx + Tx (7.79; 95% CI, 2.16 to 13.42) was the most effective intervention in improving FEV1% predicted, followed by acupuncture (A) + Tx (5.79; 95% CI, 2.90 to 8.68).

Conclusions: Combined interventions (APSTs + Tx) are more effective than single intervention in improving both HRQL and FEV1% predicted. AM, Mx, and A can be considered effective non-pharmacological complementary interventions in treating patients with COPD under Tx.

The Effects of the Respiratory Rehabilitation Program on Perceived Self-Efficacy and Dyspnea in Patients with Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aims to examine the effects of the respiratory rehabilitation program on perceived self-efficacy and dyspnea in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

This is a quasi-experimental research study with a two-group repeated measures design with the pretest and post-test at Week 4 and Week 8. The theory of self-efficacy by Bandura was used as the conceptual framework. The sample consisted of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer Stage 4 who visited the oncology clinic in a university hospital. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and equally allocated to the control group and experimental group. The control group received routine nursing care only, whereas the experimental group received the respiratory rehabilitation program. The program comprised dyspnea educating, breathing exercise, using handheld fans, effective coughing, respiratory strengthening training, and follow-up by phone in the third and sixth week. Data for perceived self-efficacy and dyspnea were collected before the program start and reassessment in the fourth and eighth week. Instrumentation was composed of the respiratory rehabilitation program, demographic data, perceived self-efficacy assessment for respiratory rehabilitation, and the Cancer Dyspnea Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-factor repeated measures analysis of variance and by comparing means between groups.

RESULTS

The result revealed that almost all of the patients in the sample were men, and the mean age of the experimental group and control group was 65.80 years (standard deviation = 8.80) and 73.00 years (standard deviation = 7.60), respectively. There was significant different in the mean score of perceived self-efficacy and dyspnea between the experimental group and the control group (p < .050).

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the study, the respiratory rehabilitation program should be used to promote self-efficacy and relieve dyspnea in patients with lung cancer.

Exercise training increases respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory muscle weakness

BACKGROUND

How respiratory muscle strength influences the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the benefits of PR in subjects with COPD according to respiratory muscle strength.

METHODS

Ninety-seven subjects with COPD were evaluated using maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), pulmonary function tests, the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Subjects were divided into four groups: 1 (normal MIP and MEP); 2 (low MIP); 3 (low MEP); and 4 (low MIP and MEP). Subjects underwent PR for 3 months; MIP, MEP, SGRQ, and CPET were evaluated post-PR.

RESULTS

Subjects with both poor MIP and MEP had the highest dyspnea score, lowest exercise capacity, and poorest health-related quality of life (HRQoL). PR improved exercise capacity and HRQoL in all groups, with more improvement in MIP, MEP, tidal volume (on exercise), and dyspnea (at rest) in subjects with both low MIP and MEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with respiratory muscle weakness had worse dyspnea, lower exercise capacity, and poorer HRQoL at baseline. Exercise training improved respiratory muscle strength with concurrent improvement of exercise capacity, HRQoL, and dyspnea score. Subjects with both poor baseline MIP and MEP showed greater benefits of PR.

Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Are Cardiovascular Comorbidities and Outcomes Taken into Account?-A Systematic Review

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) frequently suffer from cardiovascular comorbidities (CVC). Exercise training is a cornerstone intervention for the management of these conditions, however recommendations on tailoring programmes to patients suffering from respiratory diseases and CVC are scarce. This systematic review aimed to identify the eligibility criteria used to select patients with COPD, asthma or ILD and CVC to exercise programmes; assess the impact of exercise on cardiovascular outcomes; and identify how exercise programmes were tailored to CVC. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched. Three reviewers extracted the data and two reviewers independently assessed the quality of studies with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. MetaXL 5.3 was used to calculate the individual and pooled effect sizes (ES). Most studies (58.9%) excluded patients with both stable and unstable CVC. In total, 26/42 studies reported cardiovascular outcomes. Resting heart rate was the most reported outcome measure (n = 13) and a small statistically significant effect (ES = -0.23) of exercise training on resting heart rate of patients with COPD was found. No specific adjustments to exercise prescription were described. Few studies have included patients with CVC. There was a lack of tailoring of exercise programmes and limited effects were found. Future studies should explore the effect of tailored exercise programmes on relevant outcome measures in respiratory patients with CVC.