Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients Referred to Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation

World Heart Federation Roadmap for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: 2023 Update

Background

Secondary prevention lifestyle and pharmacological treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) reduce a high proportion of recurrent events and mortality. However, significant gaps exist between guideline recommendations and usual clinical practice.

Objectives

Describe the state of the art, the roadblocks, and successful strategies to overcome them in ASCVD secondary prevention management.

Methods

A writing group reviewed guidelines and research papers and received inputs from an international committee composed of cardiovascular prevention and health systems experts about the article's structure, content, and draft. Finally, an external expert group reviewed the paper.

Results

Smoking cessation, physical activity, diet and weight management, antiplatelets, statins, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and cardiac rehabilitation reduce events and mortality. Potential roadblocks may occur at the individual, healthcare provider, and health system levels and include lack of access to healthcare and medicines, clinical inertia, lack of primary care infrastructure or built environments that support preventive cardiovascular health behaviours. Possible solutions include improving health literacy, self-management strategies, national policies to improve lifestyle and access to secondary prevention medication (including fix-dose combination therapy), implementing rehabilitation programs, and incorporating digital health interventions. Digital tools are being examined in a range of settings from enhancing self-management, risk factor control, and cardiac rehab.

Conclusions

Effective strategies for secondary prevention management exist, but there are barriers to their implementation. WHF roadmaps can facilitate the development of a strategic plan to identify and implement local and national level approaches for improving secondary prevention.

Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation Among Patients With Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Heart Failure (HF) have significant morbidity and mortality. Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (HBCR) is a form of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) which has been proven beneficial for the patients with cardiovascular disease; However, cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF who was referred to HBCR is not known.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 188 patients with HF (HFrEF or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and HFpEF or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) referred to HBCR at Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) from November 2017 to March 2020. We used the outcomes of patients with HF who attended HBCR and compared with the outcomes of patients who did not attend HBCR (Non-HBCR) from 3 months after starting HBCR till 12 months. Primary outcome was composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalization, separately. We used cox proportional methods to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI. We adjusted for imbalanced characteristics at baseline: age, smoking, PCI and CABG status. In subgroup analysis, we compared HFrEF and HFpEF patients who have completed HBCR and compared differences of their outcomes (weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, HbA1C, 6 Minutes walking test, duke score and PHQ-9) pre- and post-HBCR.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 72 year and 98% were male. Out of 188 patients total, 11 patients were excluded for the main analysis as their outcomes occurred within first 90 days of HBCR enrollment, 105/177 (59%) patients attended HBCR while 72/177 (41%) patients did not attend HBCR and 93/105 (89%) patients have completed HBCR. The primary outcome occurred in 14 patients (13.3%) in the HBCR group and 19 patients (26.4%) in the Non-HBCR group (adjusted HR=0.32, CI 0.15-0.68). There was no difference in cardiovascular hospitalization among two groups, however patients in HBCR group have lower all-cause hospitalizations and all-cause death, separately. After HBCR completion, all outcomes (weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, HbA1C, 6 Minutes walking test, duke score and PHQ-9) have improved in both HFrEF and HFpEF group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HF who have completed HBCR have a lower risk of all-cause mortality, all cause hospitalization separately and lower risk of combined all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization. Patients with HFrEF and HFpEF have equal degree of improvement after completing HBCR when compared with each other. HBCR is an ideal opportunity for patients with HF who cannot attend center-based CR and also for patients with HFpEF since CR is not approved for those patients.

Identifying Factors for Low-Risk Participation in Alternative Cardiac Rehabilitation Models for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Using MI'S SCOREPAD

Introduction

Although a recent joint society scientific statement (the American Association of Cardiovascular Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology) suggests home-based cardiac rehab (CR) is appropriate for low- and moderate-risk patients, there are no paradigms to define such individuals with coronary heart disease.

Methods

We reviewed a decade of data from all patients with coronary heart disease enrolled in a single CR center (University of Michigan) to identify the prevalence of low-risk factors, which may inform on consideration for participation in alternative models of CR. Low-risk factors included not having any of the following: metabolic syndrome, presence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator or permanent pacemaker, active smoking, prior stroke, congestive heart failure, obesity, advanced renal disease, poor exercise capacity, peripheral arterial disease, angina, or clinical depression (MI'S SCOREPAD). We report on the proportion of participants with these risk factors and the proportion with all of these low-risk factors.

Results

The mean age of CR participants (n = 1984) was 63 years; 25% were women, and 82% were non-Hispanic White. The mean number of low-risk factors was 8.5, which was similar in the 2011-2012 and 2018-2019 cohorts (8.5 vs. 8.3, respectively, P = 0.08). Additionally, 9.3% of the 2011-2012 cohort and 7.6% of the 2018-2019 cohort had all 11 of the low-risk factors.

Conclusion

In this observational study, we provide a first paradigm of identifying factors among coronary heart disease patients that may be considered low-risk and likely high-gain for participation in alternative models of CR. Further work is needed to track clinical outcomes in patients with these factors to determine thresholds for enrolling participants in alternative forms of CR.

Role of wearable devices in cardiac telerehabilitation: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based comprehensive program that includes exercise training, health education, physical activity promotion, and extensive counseling for the management of cardiovascular risk factors. Wearable devices monitor certain physiological functions, providing biometric data such as heart rate, movement, sleep, ECG analysis, blood pressure, energy expenditure, and numerous other parameters. Recent evidence supports wearable devices as a likely relevant component in cardiovascular risk assessment and disease prevention. The purpose of this scoping review is to better understand the role of wearable devices in home-based CR (HBCR) and to characterize the evidence regarding the incorporation of wearable devices in HBCR programs and cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS & FINDINGS

We created a search strategy for multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebsco), Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley), and Scopus (Elsevier). Studies were included if the patients were eligible for CR per Medicare guidelines and >18 years of age and if some type of wearable device was utilized during HBCR. Our search yielded 57 studies meeting all criteria. The studies were classified into 4 groups: patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) without heart failure (HF); patients with HF; patients with heart valve repair or replacement; and patients with exposure to center-based CR. In three groups, there was an upward trend toward improvement in quality of life (QOL) and peak VO2, less sedentary time, and an increase in daily step count in the intervention groups compared to control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HBCR using wearable devices can be a comparable alternative or adjunct to center-based CR for patients with CHD and HF. More studies are needed to draw conclusions about the comparability of HBCR to center-based CR in patients with heart valve repair or replacement.

Remotely Delivered Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise for Coronary Heart Disease: Nonrandomized Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, poor uptake of and poor adherence to CR exercise programs have been reported globally. Delivering CR exercise classes remotely may remove some of the barriers associated with traditional hospital- or center-based CR.

OBJECTIVE

We have developed a bespoke platform, Eastern Corridor Medical Engineering Centre-Cardiac Rehabilitation (ECME-CR), to support remotely delivered CR exercise. This pilot trial sought to test the ECME-CR platform and examine the efficacy and feasibility of a remote CR exercise program compared to a traditional center-based program.

METHODS

In all, 21 participants with CHD were recruited and assigned to either the intervention or control group. Both groups performed the same 8-week exercise program. Participants in the intervention group took part in web-based exercise classes and used the ECME-CR platform during the intervention period, whereas participants in the control group attended in-person classes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and following the 8-week intervention period. The primary outcome measure was exercise capacity, assessed using a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes included measurement of grip strength, self-reported quality of life, heart rate, blood pressure, and body composition. A series of mixed between-within subjects ANOVA were conducted to examine the mean differences in study outcomes between and within groups. Participant adherence to the exercise program was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In all, 8 participants (male: n=5; age: mean 69.7, SD 7.2 years; height: mean 163.9, SD 5.4 cm; weight: mean 81.6, SD 14.1 kg) in the intervention group and 9 participants (male: n=9; age: mean 69.8, SD 8.2 years; height: mean 173.8, SD 5.2 cm; weight: mean 94.4, SD 18.0 kg) in the control group completed the exercise program. Although improvements in 6MWT distance were observed from baseline to follow-up in both the intervention (mean 490.1, SD 80.2 m to mean 504.5, SD 93.7 m) and control (mean 510.2, SD 48.3 m to mean 520.6, SD 49.4 m) group, no significant interaction effect (F_1,14=.026; P=.87) nor effect for time (F_1,14=2.51; P=.14) were observed. No significant effects emerged for any of the other secondary end points (all P>.0275). Adherence to the exercise program was high in both the intervention (14.25/16, 89.1%) and control (14.33/16, 89.6%) group. No adverse events or safety issues were reported in either group during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot trial did not show evidence of significant positive effect for either the remotely delivered or center-based program. The 6MWT may not have been sufficiently sensitive to identify a change in this cohort of participants with stable CHD. This trial does provide evidence that remote CR exercise, supported with digital self-monitoring, is feasible and may be considered for individuals less likely to participate in traditional center-based programs.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/31855.

Physical and Psychological Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation and Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Both traditional cardiac rehabilitation (TCR) and intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) have proven benefits for patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to compare ICR versus TCR on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of 970 patients (n = 251, ICR; n = 719, TCR) who were referred for CR between January 2018 and December 2019, 693 (71.4%) patients completed it. The TCR sessions were 90 min (60-min exercise) three times/wk for 12 wk, while ICR sessions were 4 hr (60-min exercise) two times/wk for 9 wk. Primary endpoints were change in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (by difference in exercise prescription metabolic equivalents [METs] between the last session and the average of the second and third sessions), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) scores, percent depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) scores, and health status (36-item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental composite scores). Linear regression adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics (age, race, and diagnosis of angina).

RESULTS

Of the 693 patients who completed CR (ICR = 204/251 [81%] vs TCR = 489/719 [68%], P < .01), mean age was 66 yr and 31% were female. Patients in TCR had a higher improvement in CRF (CR session METs: ICR +1.5 ± 1.2 vs TCR +1.9 ± 1.5, P < .01) but no difference in health status scores. Conversely, patients in ICR had more reduction in anxiety scores (-2 ± 4 vs -1 ± 3, P < .01) and percent reduction in depression scores (-8.3 ± 13.7% vs -5.0 ± 11.7%, P < .01) than patients in TCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in TCR had higher improvement in CRF while patients in ICR had higher improvement in anxiety and depression scores.

Kinesiophobia in patients with angina pectoris of coronary artery disease: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

In the field of chronic pain research, kinesiophobia is defined as avoidance behavior due to fear of pain, but this perspective seems to be neglected in the field of coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the status quo of angina pectoris (AP) and kinesiophobia and factors associated with kinesiophobia in patients with AP of CAD.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling, and patients with AP of CAD in four wards of the Cardiology Department of a hospital were enrolled in this study. Participants completed questionnaires and scales face-to-face with researchers.

RESULTS

Most patients with AP of CAD suffered from at least moderate pain episodes (60.2%) of at least 5 minutes per episode (53.8%), but less than 1/3 of patients reached 5 instances of pain per week (29.1%). The total score of kinesiophobia in patients was 40.80±6.65, and the vast majority of patients had moderate to high levels of kinesiophobia (75.7%). The results of multiple linear stepwise regression analysis showed that personal monthly income, New York Heart Function Assessment (NYHA) classification, pain intensity, and pain resilience were independent factors associated with kinesiophobia, and these factors explained 30.2% of the variation in total scores of kinesiophobia.

CONCLUSION

The symptoms of AP were prominent in terms of pain intensity and duration of pain. The level of kinesiophobia was moderate, and this was affected by multiple factors. Health care providers and researchers seldom pay attention to the kinesiophobia of patients with AP of CAD. This study refocused on the effect of "fear of pain" in kinesiophobia in patients with CAD. It opens up new horizons for the application of fear-avoidance models in CAD patients and helps to raise awareness of kinesiophobia in AP patients with CAD and provides guidance for reducing the level of kinesiophobia in the future.

Safety of home-based cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation is an evidence-based intervention that aims to improve health outcomes in cardiovascular disease patients, but it is largely underutilized. One strategy for improving utilization is home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR). Previous research has shown that HBCR programs are feasible and effective. However, there is a lack of evidence on safety issues in different cardiac populations. This systematic review aimed to provide an evidence-based overview of the safety of HBCR.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the incidence and severity of adverse events of HBCR.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Global Health, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database for randomized controlled trials. The included trials were written in English and analyzed the incidence of adverse events (AEs) as a primary or secondary intervention outcome.

RESULTS

Five studies showed AEs incidence, of which only one study reported severe AE associated with HBCR exercise. The incidence rate of severe AEs from the sample (n = 808) was estimated as 1 per 23,823 patient-hour of HBCR exercise. More than half patients included were stratified into a high-risk group. In the studies were found no deaths or hospitalizations related to HBCR exercise.

CONCLUSION

The risk of AEs during HBCR seems very low. Our results concerning the safety of HBCR should induce cardiac patients to be more active in their environment and practice physical exercise regularly.