Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated ICU patients in Saudi Arabia: Results of an ICU-wide national survey

Status quo and influencing factors of multiprofessional and multidisciplinary teamwork for early mobilization in mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs: A multi-centre survey study

AIM

To understand the status quo of multiprofessional and multidisciplinary collaboration for early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in Chinese ICUs and identify any factors that may influence this practice.

DESIGN

A multi-centre cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

From October to November 2022, the convenience sampling method was used to select ICU multiprofessional and multidisciplinary early mobility members (including physicians, nurses and physiotherapists) from 27 tertiary general hospitals in 14 provinces, cities and autonomous regions of China. They were asked to complete an author-developed questionnaire on the status of collaboration and the Assessment of Inter-professional Team Collaboration Scale. A multiple linear regression model was used to analyse the factors associated with the level of collaboration.

RESULTS

Physicians, nurses and physiotherapists mostly suffered from the lack of normative protocols, unclear division of responsibilities and unclear multiprofessional and multidisciplinary teams when using a collaborative approach to early activities. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the number of ICU patients managed, the existence of norms and processes, the attitude of colleagues around them, the establishment of a team, communication methods and activity leaders were significant influences on the level of collaboration among members of the multiprofessional and multidisciplinary early activities.

CONCLUSION

The collaboration of multiprofessional and multidisciplinary early activity members for mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU remains unclear, and the collaboration strategy needs to be constructed and improved, taking into account China's human resources and each region's economic development level.

IMPACT

This study investigates the collaboration status of multiprofessional and multidisciplinary activity members from the perspective of teamwork, analyses the reasons affecting the level of collaboration and helps to develop better teamwork strategies to facilitate the implementation of early activities.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The participants in this study were multiprofessional and multidisciplinary medical staff who performed early activities for ICU patients.

Robot-assisted early mobilization for intensive care unit patients: Feasibility and first-time clinical use

BACKGROUND

Early mobilization is only carried out to a limited extent in the intensive care unit. To address this issue, the robotic assistance system VEMOTION® was developed to facilitate (early) mobilization measures more easily. This paper describes the first integration of robotic assistance systems in acute clinical intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE

Feasibility test of robotic assistance in early mobilization of intensive care patients in routine clinical practice.

SETTING

Two intensive care units guided by anesthesiology at a German university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent elective surgery with postoperative treatment in the intensive care unit and had an estimated ventilation time over 48 h.

METHODS

Participants underwent robot-assisted mobilization, scheduled for twenty-minute sessions twice a day, ten times or one week, conducted by nursing staff under actual operational conditions on the units. No randomization or blinding took place. We assessed data regarding feasible cutoff points (in brackets): the possibility of enrollment (x ≥ 50 %), duration (pre- and post-setup (x ≤ 25 min), therapy duration (x = 20 min), and intervention-related parameters (number of mobilizing professionals (x ≤ 2), intensity of training, events that led to adverse events, errors or discontinuation). Mobilizing professionals rated each mobilization regarding their physical stress (x ≤ 3) and feasibility (x ≥ 4) on a 7 Point Likert Scale. An estimated sample size of at least twenty patients was calculated. We analyzed the data descriptively.

RESULTS

Within 6 months, we screened thirty-two patients for enrollment. 23 patients were included in the study and 16 underwent mobilization using robotic assistance, 7 dropped out (enrollment eligibility = 69 %). On average, 1.9 nurses were involved per therapy unit. Participants received 5.6 robot-assisted mobilizations in mean. Pre- and post-setup had a mean duration of 18 min, therapy a mean of 21 min. The robot-assisted mobilization was started after a median of 18 h after admission to the intensive care unit. We documented two adverse events (pain), twelve errors in handling, and seven unexpected events that led to interruptions or discontinuation. No serious adverse events occurred. The mobilizing nurses rated their physical stress as low (mean 2.0 ± 1.3) and the intervention as feasible (mean 5.3 ± 1.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted mobilization was feasible, but specific safety measures should be implemented to prevent errors. Robotic-assisted mobilization requires process adjustments and consideration of unit staffing levels, as the intervention does not save staff resources or time.

REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.org TRN: NCT05071248; Date: 2021/10/08; URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05071248.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Robot-assisted early mobilization in intensive care patients is feasible and no adverse event occurred.

Comparison of early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, pain, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Although coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery improves the life expectancy of patients with coronary artery disease, it is associated with various short and long-term complications. Early mobilization has been shown to reduce the risk of these complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), pain intensity, and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing CABG. This three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial included 120 patients undergoing CABG surgery who were randomly assigned to Intervention A, which received a four-phase early mobilization protocol; Intervention B, which received a three-phase early mobilization protocol; and the Control group, which received routine care. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and pain were assessed using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Groups were comparable in demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction at baseline. After the intervention, Group B had statistically significantly (p < 0.001) less cognitive dysfunction (25.8 ± 1.7) compared to Group A (24.1 ± 2.2) and the Control Group (23.4 ± 2.7). Likewise, hospital stay was statistically (p < 0.01) shorter for Group B (7.7 ± 1.5) than the Control group (8.9 ± 1.9). However, the experience of pain was statistically significantly lower over time in Group A than in the other groups (p < 0.001). This study concludes that an early mobilization protocol based on deep breathing exercises and chest physiotherapy may better improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and length of hospital stay than an early mobilization protocol based on passive and active range of motion activities or routine care.

The Intersection of Health Rehabilitation Services with Quality of Life in Saudi Arabia: Current Status and Future Needs

Quality of life (QoL) is essential for maintaining a healthy, balanced lifestyle, especially among individuals with chronic diseases. Saudi Arabia (SA) launched a health sector transformation program as part of the nationwide Vision 2030 initiative to ensure the sustainable development of efficient healthcare services, aiming to improve health by increasing well-being and QoL. More investigation into the current status of health rehabilitation services provided to individuals with chronic diseases and future needs to optimize services and improve QoL is needed. This was narratively discussed by experts from different health rehabilitation services in SA. Comprehensive health rehabilitation services including orthopedic, occupational, cardiac, pulmonary, critical care, perioperative, hearing and speech, substance use disorders, and vocational rehabilitation services were addressed. Health rehabilitation services in SA, as in other countries, are suboptimal for individuals in health rehabilitation programs. To optimize the QoL of individuals with chronic diseases, health rehabilitation services should be tailored based on the unique requirements of each service and its serving patients. The shared need to improve health rehabilitation services includes the adoption of home-based and telehealth services, the integration of multi-governmental sectors, the empowerment and allocation of health rehabilitation specialists, public awareness campaigns, policy legislation and guideline development, and the implementation of a long-term follow-up system. This review is one of the first to address the intersection of health rehabilitation services and QoL in SA; urgent and holistic actions are paramount to address the pressing need to optimize SA's health rehabilitation services. The experts' recommendations in this study may be applicable to other countries' health systems, as health rehabilitation services are not well optimized globally.