MICA is associated with type 1 diabetes in the Belgian population, independent of HLA-DQ

MICA Polymorphism and Genetic Predisposition to T1D in Jordanian Patients: A Case-Control Study

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder whose etiology includes genetic and environmental factors. The non-classical Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I chain-related gene A (MICA) gene has been associated with increased susceptibility to T1D as the interaction of MICA to the Natural Killer Group 2D (NK2GD) receptors found on the cell surface of natural killer (NK) cells and T cells is responsible for inducing immune responses. MICA polymorphisms were reported in association with T1D among different ethnic groups. However, data from different populations revealed conflicting results, so the association of MICA polymorphisms with predisposition to T1D remains uncertain. The aim of this sequencing-based study was to identify, for the first time, the possible MICA alleles and/or genotypes that could be associated with T1D susceptibility in the Jordanian population. Polymorphisms in exons 2–4 and the short tandem repeats (STR) in exon 5 of the highly polymorphic MICA gene were analyzed. No evidence for association between T1D and MICA alleles/genotypes was found in this study, except for the MICA*011 allele which was found to be negatively associated with T1D (p = 0.023, OR = 0.125). In conclusion, MICA polymorphisms seem not to be associated with increasing T1D susceptibility in Jordanian patients.

Diseases association with the polymorphic major histocompatibility complex class I related chain a: MICA gene

The Major Histocompatibility Complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) genes encode a highly polymorphic glycoprotein among the cell surface antigens that trigger an immune response after allograft transplantation. It is encoded by the MICA gene, a member of the glycosylated MIC genes. Discovered in 1994, the MICA gene is located within the MHC class I region. Moreover, its biological function is achieved through the interaction with the NKG2D receptor. Unlike the classical HLA molecules, MICA protein is not associated with β2- microglobulin nor binds peptides. MICA gene expression may result in a cytotoxic response and IFN-γ secretion through the up-regulation by heat shock proteins in response to infection (Human Cytomegalovirus HCMV), mediated by NKG2D-expressing cells. Anti-MICA antibodies were identified as significant risk factors for antibody mediated rejection after being detected in sera of patients with graft rejection. In addition, soluble MICA proteins (sMICA) has been detected in the serum of transplant recipients with cancers. Furthermore, the association of MICA polymorphisms with infectious diseases, various autoimmune diseases, cancer, and allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has been studied. Moreover, numerous advanced disease studies centered on MICA polymorphism are independent of HLA association. In this review, we discussed the up-to-date data about MICA and the association of MICA polymorphism with infections, autoimmune diseases, graft-versus-host disease, and cancer.

Genetics, genomics, and evolutionary biology of NKG2D ligands

Human and mouse NKG2D ligands (NKG2DLs) are absent or only poorly expressed by most normal cells but are upregulated by cell stress, hence, alerting the immune system in case of malignancy or infection. Although these ligands are numerous and highly variable (at genetic, genomic, structural, and biochemical levels), they all belong to the major histocompatibility complex class I gene superfamily and bind to a single, invariant, receptor: NKG2D. NKG2D (CD314) is an activating receptor expressed on NK cells and subsets of T cells that have a key role in the recognition and lysis of infected and tumor cells. Here, we review the molecular diversity of NKG2DLs, discuss the increasing appreciation of their roles in a variety of medical conditions, and propose several explanations for the evolutionary force(s) that seem to drive the multiplicity and diversity of NKG2DLs while maintaining their interaction with a single invariant receptor.

Type 1 diabetes and polyglandular autoimmune syndrome: A review

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder caused by inflammatory destruction of the pancreatic tissue. The etiopathogenesis and characteristics of the pathologic process of pancreatic destruction are well described. In addition, the putative susceptibility genes for T1D as a monoglandular disease and the relation to polyglandular autoimmune syndrome (PAS) have also been well explored. The incidence of T1D has steadily increased in most parts of the world, especially in industrialized nations. T1D is frequently associated with autoimmune endocrine and non-endocrine diseases and patients with T1D are at a higher risk for developing several glandular autoimmune diseases. Familial clustering is observed, which suggests that there is a genetic predisposition. Various hypotheses pertaining to viral- and bacterial-induced pancreatic autoimmunity have been proposed, however a definitive delineation of the autoimmune pathomechanism is still lacking. In patients with PAS, pancreatic and endocrine autoantigens either colocalize on one antigen-presenting cell or are expressed on two/various target cells sharing a common amino acid, which facilitates binding to and activation of T cells. The most prevalent PAS phenotype is the adult type 3 variant or PAS type III, which encompasses T1D and autoimmune thyroid disease. This review discusses the findings of recent studies showing noticeable differences in the genetic background and clinical phenotype of T1D either as an isolated autoimmune endocrinopathy or within the scope of polyglandular autoimmune syndrome.

Association of major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related gene a dimorphism with type 1 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults in the Algerian population

Major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA-129) dimorphism was investigated in 73 autoimmune diabetes patients (type 1 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) and 75 controls from Algeria. Only MICA-129 Val allele and MICA-129 Val/Val genotype frequencies were higher among patients than in the control group. Statistical analysis of the estimated extended HLA-DR-DQ-MICA haplotypes shown that individual effects of MICA alleles on HLA-DQ2-DR3-MICA-129 Val/Val and HLA-DQ8-DR4-MICA-129 Val/Val haplotypes were significantly higher in patients than in the control groups. These preliminary data might suggest a relevant role of MICA-129 Val/Val single nucleotide polymorphism (weak/weak binders of NKG2D receptor) in the pathogenesis of T1D and LADA.

Diabetes classification: grey zones, sound and smoke: Action LADA 1

Diseases gain identity from clinical phenotype as well as genetic and environmental aetiology. The definition of type 1 diabetes is clinically exclusive, comprising patients who are considered insulin dependent at diagnosis, whilst the definition of type 2 diabetes is inclusive, only excluding those who are initially insulin dependent. Ketosis-prone diabetes (KPD) and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) are each exclusive forms of diabetes which are, at least initially, clinically distinct from type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes, and each have a different natural history from these major types of diabetes.KPD can be diagnosed unequivocally as diabetes presenting with the categorical clinical feature, ketoacidosis. In contrast, LADA can be diagnosed by the co-occurrence of three traits, not one of which is categorical or exclusive to the condition: adult-onset non-insulin-requiring diabetes, an islet autoantibody such as glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) or cytoplasmic islet cell autoantibodies (ICA), and no need for insulin treatment for several months post-diagnosis. But while some would split diabetes into distinct subtypes, there is a strong case that these subtypes form a continuum of varying severity of immune and metabolic dysfunction modified by genetic and non-genetic factors. This article discusses the nature of disease classification in general, and KPD and LADA in particular, emphasizing the potential value and pitfalls in classifying diabetes and suggesting a need for more research in this area.

Sequencing-based genotyping and association analysis of the MICA and MICB genes in type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The nonclassical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related molecules (MICs), encoded within the MHC, function in immunity. The transmembrane polymorphism in MICA (MICA-STR) has been reported to be associated with type 1 diabetes. In this study, we directly sequenced both of the highly polymorphic MIC genes (MICA and MICB) in order to establish whether they are associated with type 1 diabetes independently of the known type 1 diabetes MHC class II genes HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed a sequencing-based typing method and genotyped MICA and MICB in 818 families (2,944 individuals) with type 1 diabetes from the U.K. and U.S. (constructing the genotype from single nucleotide polymorphisms in exons 2-4 of MICA and 2-5 of MICB) and additionally genotyped the MICA-STR in 2,023 type 1 diabetic case subjects and 1,748 control subjects from the U.K. We analyzed the association of the MICA and MICB alleles and genotypes with type 1 diabetes using regression methods.

RESULTS

We identified known MICA and MICB alleles and discovered four new MICB alleles. Based on this large-scale and detailed genotype data, we found no evidence for association of MICA and MICB with type 1 diabetes independently of the MHC class II genes (MICA P = 0.08, MICA-STR P = 0.76, MICB P = 0.03, after conditioning on HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1).

CONCLUSIONS

Common MICA and MICB genetic variations including the MICA-STR are not associated, in a primary way, with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.

MICA gene polymorphism in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a typical autoimmune disease and results from the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells of the pancreas. It develops in the presence of genetic susceptibility, even though more than 85% of patients with T1DM do not have a close relative with the disorder. The etiology of T1DM is complex, and both genetic and environmental factors play important roles. A permissive genetic background is required for the development of the islet autoimmune process. The strongest genetic association idengified is that with HLA class II genes located on the short arm of chromosome 6. It is well known that both HLA DRB1*04-DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302 (DR4-DQ8) and DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 (DR3-DQ2) are positively, and DRB1*15-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 is negatively, associated with T1DM. However, only a minority of the subjects carrying the high-risk haplotypes/genotypes develops the disease, which suggests that additional genes play a crucial role in conferring either protection or susceptibility to T1DM. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related A (MICA) is located in a candidate susceptibility region and activates natural killer (NK) cells, T cells and gammadelta CD8 T cells by its receptor NKG2D. The polymorphism of the MICA gene is associated with T1DM in different populations as demonstrated in several papers published in the last 7 years.

TNFa microsatellite polymorphism modulates the risk of type 1 diabetes in the Belgian population, independent of HLA-DQ

To determine the contribution of the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene (TNFA) to the immunogenetic risk prediction of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the Belgian population, well-characterized antibody-positive patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), nondiabetic control subjects, and nuclear families were analyzed for HLA-DQA1-DQB1, TNFA -308 G/A promoter single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and TNFa microsatellite markers in both case-control and transmission studies. A total of 1,029 patients (mean age at onset, 18 years; male/female ratio, 1.2), 575 control subjects and 179 nuclear families were analyzed for the -308 SNP and 1,082 patients (mean age at onset, 17 years; and male/female ratio, 1.3), 606 control subjects, and 261 nuclear families were analyzed for the TNFa microsatellite marker. All subjects were typed initially for HLA-DQ. No primary association was detected with the -308 G/A promoter SNP. In contrast, we found evidence of a contribution of TNFa1 allele to susceptibility for T1D independently of HLA-DQ. We observed that the conserved HLA-DQ-TNFa extended haplotype, HLA-DQA1 0501-DQB1 0201-TNFa1 is a diabetogenic haplotype in the Belgian population and is independent of age at onset and gender and confers an estimated relative risk of 4.55 and an absolute risk of 1.7%. In conclusion, our observations suggest that the-308 G/A promoter SNP is not a genetic marker for T1D, but that the TNFa microsatellite may have an added value to further refine the immunogenetic risk conferred by the HLA-DQ region in the Belgian population.

MICA marks additional risk factors for Type 1 diabetes on extended HLA haplotypes: an association and meta-analysis

The association of the HLA complex on chromosome 6 does not explain total linkage of the HLA region to Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), leading to the hypothesis that there may be additional causal genes in the HLA region for immune-related disorders. Reports on the MHC Class I chain-related A (MICA) gene as candidate for association with T1D are contradicting. We investigated whether variation in MICA is associated to T1D in a cohort of 350 unrelated individuals with juvenile-onset T1D and 540 control subjects, followed by a meta-analysis of 14 studies. We also investigated an HLA-independent association for MICA with T1D. In our case-control study, we found that the MICA*A5 variant was significantly associated with an increased risk for T1D, while MICA*A6 was significantly associated with a decreased risk that was confirmed by our meta-analysis. However, the meta-analysis did not show an association of MICA*A5 T1D. Analysis of MICA alleles conditional on T1D-associated high-risk MHC class II haplotypes revealed that MICA*A6 was associated with an increased risk for T1D when this marker co-occurred with HLA DQ2DR17 T1D-risk-haplotypes. In contrast, MICA*A6 reduced the risk from the HLA DQ8DR4 T1D-risk haplotype. Moreover, MICA*A9 showed a significant association to increased risk for T1D on DQ8DR4 haplotypes. Co-inheritance of MICA*A6 with the HLA DQ2DR17 haplotype in T1D indicates this haplotype may carry the additional genetic factors for T1D, but our study does not support an independent association between MICA variants and T1D.