Prospects and limitations of post-transplantation alloantibody detection in renal transplantation

The Maintenance Immunosuppression Scheme Influences Early C4d Urinary Excretion in Kidney Graft Recipients but Does Not Affect the Long-term Graft Survival

C4d urinary excretion varies according to the risk of graft rejection or progression of chronic allograft nephropathy. The most common maintenance immunosuppression (IS) schemes include cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC) with azathiopryne (AZA) or mycophenolate mophetil (MMF). The chosen IS may influence kidney transplant outcomes and possibly modify urinary C4d. The aim of the study was to determine whether early C4d urinary excretion varies in patients after kidney allograft transplantation (KTx) regarding administered IS and if these factors may help to predict long-term KTx outcomes. The study involved 185 patients who underwent KTx. The urinary specimens were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for C4d excretion. To increase the objectivity, C4d excretion was divided by urinary creatinine excretion (ng/mgCr). The study population was grouped according to the IS scheme, that is, CSA + AZA, CSA + MMF, and TAC + MMF. At baseline, the greatest C4d urinary excretion was noticed in patients treated with CSA + AZA, 199.5 ± 175.9 ng/mL (5.3 ± 7.1 ng/mgCr) and the lowest in those in whom tacrolimus and mycophenolate mophetil was administered, 166.6 ± 186.3 ng/mL (3.9 ± 6.2 ng/mgCr). In the CSA + MMF group, C4d excretion was 195.6 ± 200.3 ng/mL (5.0 ± 6.6 ng/mgCr). Statistically significant differences were seen only between the CSA + AZA and TAC + MMF groups, analysis of variance P < 0.05 (P < 0.01 for C4d/urinary creatinine ratio). No statistically significant differences were found in graft survival rates between different immunosuppressive regimens. Although early C4d measurements vary in patients after kidney allograft transplantation regarding administered IS, this IS dependant variation does not seem to affect the long-term graft survival.

Absence of C4d urinary excretion in the early post-transplant period is associated with improved long-term kidney graft survival

INTRODUCTION

C4d urinary excretion varies according to the risk of graft rejection or progression of chronic allograft nephropathy, but its influence on long-term kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine whether the initial (1-3 months post KTx) level of C4d urinary excretion may help to predict long-term kidney allograft transplantation outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 185 patients who had undergone KTx. The urinary specimens taken from the morning urine portion were assessed by ELISA test for C4d excretion. To increase the objectivity of the assessment, all measurements were divided by urinary creatinine excretion (ng/mgCr). The study population was grouped according to the C4d excretion cut-off value into low (LC4d, 109 participants) and high (HC4d, 76 participants) C4d excretion groups. Additionally a subgroup with absence of C4d in the urine (ZC4d, 26 patients) was formed.

RESULTS

The calculated Roc curve indicated the cut off value of the urinary C4d excretion as 12.4ng/mgCr (AUC 0.77; 95%CI 0.73-0.95). The mean C4d urinary excretions in LC4d and HC4d were 1.9±3.27 and 20.6±4.6ng/mgCr, respectively, whereas after exclusion of ZC4d subgroup, the mean C4d was 14.9±6.3ng/mgCr in the remainder. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a slightly higher graft survival rate (GSR) in LC4d than in HC4d group (p=0.04 by log-rank). The subsequent analysis showed the highest GSR in ZC4d subgroup (p=0.0006 by log-rank).

CONCLUSION

Although lower C4d urinary excretion in the early post-transplant period seems to be associated with better long-term kidney allograft transplantation outcomes, only its absence in the urine appears to be a solid predictor of improved graft survival.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies and graft function in children after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of circulating donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-DSA) has been associated with chronic antibody-mediated rejection, leading to progressive graft dysfunction and poor graft survival.The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and significance of HLA-DSA in paediatric renal transplantation(RTx) patients.

METHODS

A total of 294 post-transplant serum samples from 123 RTx patients were retrospectively analysed for HLA antibodies. Positive samples were further tested for HLADSA by a Luminex Single Antigen bead assay. The antibody findings were correlated to measured glomerular filtration rate(GFR) and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

HLA antibodies were detected in half of the routine samples (140/294) taken 1 month to 10 years after RTx, and 40% (62/140) of these were HLA-DSA. Overall, one-third(42/123) of the patients had HLA-DSA, which mostly(65%) reacted against class II antigens. Detection of HLADSA was not associated with poor GFR at the time of sampling, and no exceptional deterioration of GFR after the HLA-DSA detection was noted in individual patients regardless of the antibody level. The presence of HLA-DSA in the first 2 years posttransplantation was not associated with poorer graft function later on.

CONCLUSION

Detection of HLA antibodies is common in children after RTx, and this finding, as such, does not predict any deterioration of graft function.

Predicting renal graft failure by sCD30 levels and de novo HLA antibodies at 1year post-transplantation

HLA antibodies and sCD30 levels were detected in the serum sampled from 620 renal graft recipients at 1 year post-transplantation, which were followed up for 5 years. Six-year graft and patient survivals were 81.6% and 91.0%. HLA antibodies were detected in 45 recipients (7.3%), of whom there were 14 cases with class I antibodies, 26 cases with class II, and 5 cases with both class I and II. Much more graft loss was record in recipients with HLA antibodies than those without antibodies (60% vs. 15.1%, p<0.001). Significantly higher sCD30 levels were recorded in recipients suffering graft loss than the others (73.9±48.8 U/mL vs. 37.3±14.6 U/mL, p<0.001). Compared with those with high sCD30 levels, recipients with low sCD30 levels (<50 U/mL) had much better 6-year graft survival (92.4% vs. 46.6%, p<0.001). Further statistical analysis showed that detrimental effect of de novo HLA antibodies and high sCD30 on graft survival was not only independent but also additive. Therefore, post-transplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies and sCD30 levels is necessary and recipients with elevated sCD30 level and/or de novo HLA antibody should be paid more attention in order to achieve better graft survival.

Prevention and treatment of alloantibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is commonly caused by preformed and/or de novo HLA alloantibodies, has evolved as a leading cause of early and late kidney allograft injury. In recent years, effective treatment strategies have been established to counteract the deleterious effects of humoral alloreactivity. One major therapeutic challenge is the barrier of a positive pretransplant lymphocytotoxic crossmatch. Several apheresis- and/or IVIG-based protocols have been shown to enable successful crossmatch conversion, including a strategy of peritransplant immunoadsorption for rapid crossmatch conversion immediately before deceased donor transplantation. While such protocols may increase transplant rates and allow for acceptable graft survival, at least in the short-term, it has become evident that, despite intense treatment, many patients still experience clinical or subclinical AMR. This reinforces the need for innovative strategies, such as complementary allocation programs to improve transplant outcomes. For acute AMR, various studies have suggested efficiency of plasmapheresis- or immunoadsorption-based protocols. There is, however, no established treatment for chronic AMR and the development of strategies to reverse or at least halt chronic active rejection remains a big challenge. Major improvements can be expected from studies evaluating innovative therapeutic concepts, such as proteasome inhibition or complement blocking agents.

Pre- and posttransplantation allosensitization in heart allograft recipients: major impact of de novo alloantibody production on allograft survival

The involvement of humoral response in allograft rejection has been suggested by both immunologic and histochemistry studies. In the present study, we explored the role of alloantibodies in a large cohort of heart allograft recipients followed for 15 years. Sequential samples of sera were obtained from 950 recipients of heart allografts before and after transplantation at the time when protocol endomyocardial biopsies were performed. The presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was investigated using complement mediated cytotoxicity and solid phase assay (SPA). Our data reveal an inverse correlation between the development of alloantibodies after transplantation and heart allograft survival. The 15-year graft survival was highest in patients who never developed alloantibodies (70%) or who displayed them only before transplantation (71%); graft survival in recipients who showed antibodies both before and after transplantation (56%), or only after transplantation (47%), was lower. The deleterious effect of antibodies on graft survival started 8 years after transplantation, suggesting that the production of de novo antibodies may have been triggered by some later event. We found that patients with de novo antibodies appearing more than 1 year after transplantation had the poorest survival. Furthermore, the development of de novo antibodies was preceded in 76% of these patients by cellular rejection grade 3 or higher, according to the International Society for Heart Transplantation (ISHT) grading criteria. Development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) had a significant negative impact on graft survival (16% in AMR(+) vs 63% in AMR(-) patients, p = 0.0008). Of the 23 patients with AMR, 21 displayed cytotoxic donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at the time of diagnosis, and in 18 of these cases SPA showed that they were directed against the donors' HLA. The data demonstrate that the detection of alloantibodies permits a better definition of AMR in heart allograft recipients. Identification of patients at risk for developing AMR is of great importance for early treatment of rejection episodes.

Clinical relevance of circulating donor-specific HLA antibodies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For a long period of time complement-dependent cytotoxicity was the standard assay to demonstrate clinically relevant HLA antibodies in the serum of patients before transplantation. The introduction of more sensitive solid-phase assays to detect HLA antibodies had led to a lot of discussion on the clinical relevance of the presence of these antibodies before transplantation and the appearance of these antibodies after transplantation. This review discusses the current controversies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The old dogma that the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies before transplantation is a contra-indication for transplantation does not exist anymore. The correlation between the presence of HLA antibodies and clinical outcome is less strict although the presence of circulating donor-specific antibodies, both before and after transplantation, should be considered a risk factor. It is clear, however, that the opinion on the clinical relevance of donor-specific HLA antibodies is very different amongst the transplant centers.

SUMMARY

The clinical relevance of the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies before transplantation and the appearance of these antibodies after transplantation is a controversial issue. The lack of consensus between different centers is partly due to the heterogeneity of the HLA antibodies involved. Standardization is essential and future studies must focus on the further characterization of the antibody titers, the immunoglobulin (sub)classes of the antibodies and the epitopes recognized. It remains to be established in which cases the HLA antibodies are the direct cause of or just associated with (chronic) graft failure.

Complement in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to bring to attention the most recent advances made in understanding the role of complement components in both innate and adaptive immune responses in solid organ transplantation with emphasis on the kidney.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alongside recent findings related to the role of anaphylatoxins in modulating adaptive immune responses, there has been a genomic study to assess the expression of inflammatory markers in kidney transplantation, showing significant involvement of some complement molecules in predicting graft function. Modulators of complement pathway activity such as decay accelerating factor (CD55) and CD59 have also been shown to have a role in graft rejection. Potential new therapeutic targets related to complement proteins are being investigated.

SUMMARY

The mechanism of rejection in solid organ transplantation is influenced by the initial inflammatory response and subsequent adaptive allo-immune response, both of which have been shown to be affected by various complement components. Due to limitations of existing treatments, new approaches are needed to better control these responses to improve graft survival. Built on an expanding knowledge of complement involvement, targeted blocking of the effector complement molecules and modulating the expression of complement inhibitors has suggested potentially useful approaches for reducing the effect of inflammatory damage from cold ischaemia as well as reducing the activation of the adaptive immune system related to complement.

Detecting adaptive immunity: applications in transplantation monitoring

In recent decades, continuous improvements in immunosuppressive therapy have led to a significant increase in kidney allograft survival. Despite innovative developments and improvements in immunosuppression, chronic allograft injury and late graft loss still remain major causes of morbidity and mortality. In clinical practice, long-term immunosuppression is adapted and fine-tuned according to drug levels, kidney function, and biopsy results. As an invasive procedure, indication biopsy still represents an indispensible diagnostic gold standard. However, in an effort to further improve outcomes on the basis of individualized treatment, there is an urgent need for noninvasive assays, as well as biomarkers, to more accurately monitor allogeneic responses and predict the risk of acute and chronic allograft rejection. This article discusses strategies for immune monitoring of T-cell responsiveness and humoral alloreactivity. Furthermore, new microarray and gene profiling data are highlighted, which may identify hyporesponsive transplant recipients who could benefit from a reduction or even withdrawal of immunosuppression. Finally, supplementary transplant risk assessment markers, such as soluble CD30 and urinary effector molecule analysis, are discussed as promising new tools. Recent developments and improvements in test principles to monitor and predict allograft immunity are encouraging and may herald the transition of present empiric immunosuppression to individualized immunosuppressive treatment. Nonetheless, before implementation of immune monitoring in routine clinical practice, there is still a need for prospective trials designed to clarify the actual diagnostic potential of individual test systems in a therapeutic context.