Clinical relevance of pretransplant human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies in renal patients waiting for a transplant: a risk factor

Association Between De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Clinical Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are recognized as an important factor of kidney allograft loss as a subsequent event of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The clinical relevance of de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) after kidney transplant, particularly in their ability to bind C1q, has been widely investigated to various extents among studies. A recent study was performed to examine the association between C1q-binding dnDSAs and succeeding clinical events after kidney transplant.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of studies published before April 2021 was conducted from PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases. Publications on dnDSA after kidney transplant focusing on differentiation between C1q-binding and non-C1q-binding were included. The outcomes analyzed were AMR rate and allograft loss. Studies using preformed DSA were excluded. The pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were analyzed using Mantzel-Haenzel method, and the I2 value was used to determine the heterogeneity of the studies. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 535 patients from 13 studies who developed dnDSA after kidney transplant were analyzed. Among these, 239 (44.7%) had C1q-binding and 296 (55.3%) had non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Acute AMR was found in 59.2% (97/164) of the C1q-binding group and in 28.8% (49/170) of the non-C1q-binding group (risk ratio [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.85], P = .006, I2 = 58%). Chronic AMR was found in 50% (19/38) of the C1q-binding group and in 16.9% (11/65) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.71], P = .002, I2 = 0%). Allograft loss was found in 62.2% (74/119) of the C1q-binding group and in 34.1% (60/176) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85], P = .006, I2 = 61%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who developed C1q-binding dnDSA display an increased risk of AMR and allograft loss compared with those with non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Therefore, C1q-binding dnDSAs are associated with inferior outcomes after kidney transplant.

Prospective multi-centric study to analyze pre-transplant compatibility algorithm for live-related donor kidney transplant in Indian setting: the "Delhi approach"!

BACKGROUND

Since no single test is always accurate and sensitive, two or more tests are used to increase the precision of evaluation. Different algorithms have been proposed by centers in Leiden, Basel, Vienna and Minnesota, etc. With an intention to develop an optimal algorithm for India, we evaluated pre-transplant compatibility tests for live-donor kidney transplants. Three tests complement dependent cyto-toxicity cross-match (CDCXM), flow-cytometry cross-match (FCXM) and anti-HLA antibody screening (HAS) were performed and confirmed by the anti-HLA antibody identification (HAI) assay in a multi-centric trial (three transplant centers) in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All prospective recipients (and their potential donors) underwent low-resolution HLA typing as well as CDCXM, FCXM and HAS assays. In addition, HAI {single antigen bead assay; (SAB)} was done for all recipients to identify possible anti-HLA antibodies. In a virtual cross-match (VXM), antibody specificity was mapped to donor HLA type to determine donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Only patients without DSA were cleared for the transplant. Alternatively, patients with DSA were offered an exchange in the kidney paired donation (KPD) program. The screening results (CDCXM, FCXM, and HAS) were analyzed, individually as well as in combination of screening assays (CDCXM+HAS, CDCXM+FCXM, and FCXM+HAS) and the results were compared with those from the HAI test.

RESULTS

Out of 100 patients, 69 were males and 31 were females; 85 recipients (85%) underwent a kidney transplant. The sensitivity of CDCXM was only 12.1% and the specificity of CDCXM was 100%; whereas the sensitivity of FCXM was 84.8% and the specificity of FCXM was 89.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of class I HAS was 88.2% and 84.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity class II HAS was 88.0% and 80.0%, respectively. However, when both class I/II HAS were tested together the sensitivity increased to 97.0% and the specificity to 82.1%. Similarly, the sensitivity of combined FCXM+HAS had the sensitivity of 100% and the specificity of 76.1%; CDCXM+FCXM had the sensitivity of 84.8% and the specificity of 89.6% and CDCXM+HAS assays reached 97% with the specificity of 82.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that the algorithm of FCXM with HAS produced the best sensitivity of 100%. The specificity of 76.1% indicate that the combined FCXM+HAS assays may detect up to 24.9% false positive results. We suggest that these false-positives may be easily resolved by performing the virtual crossmatch based on HAI (SAB) results. In our reflex testing algorithmic approach only 49% patients needed HAI (SAB). Finally, our results suggested that the CDCXM assay may be discontinued in pre-transplant workup owing to its very low sensitivity (12.1%).

Quantitative analysis of humoral immunity by flow-cytometric crossmatch using molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochromosome (FCXM-MESF)

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we examined the quantitative significance of humoral immunity by flow-cytometric crossmatch using molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochromosome (FCXM-MESF) in recipients of kidney transplantation. We stratified the recipients into four sensitization classes, from non-sensitized to strongly sensitized by the results of the FCXM-MESF assay, and compared the pathological results after transplantation by the sensitization status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We stratified 140 recipients into four groups according to their sensitization status, as follows; none/NDSA, defined by FCXM-MESF values of below the cut-off value (n = 79), mildly sensitized, defined by FCXM-MESF values of less than 3000 (N = 45); moderately sensitized, defined by FCXM-MESF values of between 3000 and 8000 (N = 12); strongly sensitized, defined by FCXM-MESF values exceeding 8000 (N = 4).

RESULTS

We employed tailor-made immunosuppressive regimens according to the FCXM-MESF values for the 140 recipients between 2009 and 2011. In regard to the pathological results, 4% (2/51), 3% (1/35), 20% (2/10) and 75% (3/4) of the none/Non Donor Specific Antibody (NDSA), mildly sensitized, moderately sensitized and strongly sensitized patients showed antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Thus, FCXM may be more useful for the detection of anti-non-HLA as well as for that of anti-HLA antibodies than the solid phase assay (SPA) or panel reactive antibody (PRA) assay.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative analysis using FCXM-MESF assay accurately reflected the clinical as well as pathological aspects, and may serve as a useful guide for the selection of appropriate anti-rejection therapy.

Clinical Relevance of Pretransplant Testing for Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies in Iraqi Renal Transplant Patients

OBJECTIVES

The use of highly sensitive Luminex technology to assess the immunologic risk of renal transplant candidates have greatly added to the ability of stratifying patients and have paved the way to avoid hyperacute antibody-mediated rejection. Our aim was to understand how much the testing for pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies affects the decision for transplant and survival at 1 year posttransplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2014 to June 2017, 336 transplant candidates were tested by complement-dependent cytotoxicity and by the Luminex platform for anti-HLA antibodies in our nephrology and renal transplant center (The Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq). All clinical and laboratory data were noted. Our program is a living-donor, blood group-compatible donor program. All transplant patients (sensitized or not) were followed for 1 year, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival rate.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study group was 34.07 ± 12.4 years. Of 336 transplant patients who were tested, there were 63 (18.75%) sensitized patients and 159 (47.35%) nonsensitized patients. Blood transfusion was the main cause of sensitization. Class I anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 54 of 63 sensitized patients (85.7%), and class II anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 39 of 63 sensitized patients (61.9%). Donor-specific antibodies were detected in 33/63 (52.3%). Thirteen sensitized patients (15.3%) underwent transplant. No incidences of hyperacute rejection were recorded. The 1-year survival of the nonsensitized patient group was 90%, whereas survival was 61.5% for the sensitized patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant testing for anti-HLA antibodies is undoubtedly useful for assessment of patient risk, to facilitate decisions regarding patient and donor selection, and to plan treatment strategies. The 1-year survival for sensitized patient was lower than for nonsensitized patients. More knowledge, experience, technology advancements, and support are needed to improve the Iraqi practice of transplanting sensitized patients.

Role of Pretransplant Complement-fixing Donor-specific Antibodies Identified by C1q Assay in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients who have pretransplant donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies have greater risk for developing allograft rejection and allograft loss. However, there is a varied effect of graft injury among patients with pretransplantation donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The difference of complement activating ability may be the reason why some DSA are detrimental to kidney allograft. This study aimed to investigate the association between pretransplantation C1q-binding DSA and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 48 pretransplant sera from kidney transplant recipients who had pretransplant DSA with negative complement-dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatches. The IgG DSA testing and C1q testing were performed on a Luminex platform with single antigen bead assay. The clinical outcomes between C1q-positive and C1q-negative groups were compared.

RESULTS

C1q-positive DSA were detected in 12 out of 48 patients (25%). The incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) were higher among patients with C1q-positive DSA than patients with C1q-negative DSA (66.7% vs 41.7%). Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant associations between C1q-DSA and AMR (odds ratio 2.8, 95% CI 0.68-11.6, P = .13) and between C1q-DSA and graft loss (odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.09-2.89, P = .44). The C1q-positive DSA group had significantly higher IgG DSA MFI than the C1q-negative DSA group (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

C1q-binding ability of DSA in pretransplant sera of kidney recipients was not associated with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss post-transplantation. In contrast with the clinical relevance of C1q testing in the post-transplantation setting, C1q testing in pretransplant sera has limited use for immunological risk assessment.

[Immunological monitoring in kidney transplantation: 13 years experience of a Moroccan histocompatibility laboratory]

PURPOSE OF STUDY

The quality of the immunological monitoring is crucial because it determines the success of the kidney transplantation. The scope of this work is to describe the experience of the department of immunological unity of the Ibn Sina university hospital in Rabat regarding the immunological monitoring of patients transplanted between 2001 and 2014.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient samples were collected from nephrology services of different public and private hospitals of Morocco. The tests conducted in the context of immunological monitoring are ABO typing, HLA-A, B, DR, DQ typing, anti-HLA antibodies detection and identification and cross-match.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen benefited from a pre- and post-transplant immunological monitoring in our laboratory. The percentage of recipients having between 2 and 5 stored sera is 60.5 before transplantation and 56.1 after transplantation. Immunized patients account for 22.8% before the transplant and 17.6% after transplantation. Ninety-seven patients still have a functional graft, while 4 of them had DSA of low intensity before transplantation. Five immunological rejections were reported while the cross-match were negative and no DSA was identified before transplantation. Patient survival and graft at 1 year was 98.2% and 92.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conducting regular immunological monitoring is sometimes difficult in our context, however, the results are satisfactory in terms of graft and patients survival.

Concordance and discordance in anti-HLA antibody testing

BACKGROUND

Correct identification of the specificity of antibodies directed against HLA using single antigen Luminex beads (SALB) is essential in current HLA laboratory practice for transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the magnitude of concordance and discordance among laboratories in testing for anti-HLA antibodies using SALB.

METHOD

35 sera were distributed by the ASHI Proficiency Testing Program to HLA laboratories worldwide. We analyzed 4335 test results submitted between April 2010 and April 2013 by participating laboratories.

RESULTS

SALB was used by approximately 94% of the participating laboratories, yet concordant assignment of antibody specificity was imperfect. For each serum, the assignment of an average of 10 antibody specificities was discordant. Disagreement was observed for antibodies directed against common as well as uncommon antigens. The assignment of an average of 15 antibody specificities in each "positive" serum appeared to be influenced by vendor-dependent causes. Inter-vendor concordance was lower than intra-vendor concordance, indicating that vendor dependent factors may be a central cause for disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrates the prevalence of concordance and discordance, also affected by unpremeditated causes, in reporting SALB antibody results. Insufficient concordance and standardization in antibody testing may have practical implications for organ allocation and organ sharing programs.

Impact of donor-specific antibodies on the outcomes of kidney graft: Pathophysiology, clinical, therapy

Allo-antibodies, particularly when donor specific, are one of the most important factors that cause both early and late graft dysfunction. The authors review the current state of the art concerning this important issue in renal transplantation. Many antibodies have been recognized as mediators of renal injury. In particular donor-specific-Human Leukocyte Antigens antibodies appear to play a major role. New techniques, such as solid phase techniques and Luminex, have revealed these antibodies from patient sera. Other new techniques have uncovered alloantibodies and signs of complement activation in renal biopsy specimens. It has been acknowledged that the old concept of chronic renal injury caused by calcineurine inhibitors toxicity should be replaced in many cases by alloantibodies acting against the graft. In addition, the number of patients on waiting lists with preformed anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies is increasing, primarily from patients with a history of renal transplant failure already been sensitized. We should distinguish early and late acute antibody-mediated rejection from chronic antibody-mediated rejection. The latter often manifets late during the course of the post-transplant period and may be difficult to recognize if specific techniques are not applied. Different therapeutic strategies are used to control antibody-induced damage. These strategies may be applied prior to transplantation or, in the case of acute antibody-mediated rejection, after transplantation. Many new drugs are appearing at the horizon; however, these drugs are far from the clinic because they are in phase I-II of clinical trials. Thus the pipeline for the near future appears almost empty.

Different impact of pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies detected by Luminex in highly sensitized renal transplanted patients

It is well know that anti-HLA antibodies are an important obstacle in kidney transplantation. Our aim was to study the clinical impact of pretransplant donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA), in highly sensitized (HS) patients. We analyzed retrospectively the day-of-transplant sera by Luminex Single Antigen Assay (LSA) in HS patients, and the results were correlated with episodes of humoral and cellular rejection as well as with graft and patient survival. All HS subjects received the same induction therapy and rejection episodes were biopsy proven. Thirteen patients (56.5%) preformed HLA-DSA, and we observed higher incidence of acute rejection in aforementioned patients than in the pre-transplant negatives DSA recipients (77% versus 30%, P = 0.03). The one-year graft survival was significantly reduced in positive pre-transplant HLA-DSA patients (60% versus 100%, P = 0.01 Breslow). The positive predicted value of HLA-DSA in relation to rejection reached 100% if patients lost their previous graft in the first year after transplant. Among anti-HLA antibodies present in patients before transplant, HLA-DSA were significantly associated with high risk of acute humoral and cellular rejection and reduced graft survival in posttransplant outcome. The negative impact of these antibodies was even higher when patients suffered an early loss of the previous transplant.

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results.

METHODS

With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report.

RESULTS

A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

Transnational validation of the Australian algorithm for virtual crossmatch allocation in kidney paired donation

An independent pool of 16 incompatible live donor-recipient pairs registered at the Vienna transplant unit was applied to test whether virtual crossmatch allocation used in the Australian kidney paired donation (KPD) program reliably predicts negative crossmatches. High resolution HLA data were entered into the computer-matching algorithm and allocation was performed excluding any DSA>2000MFI. CDC and flow crossmatch data of recipients against any of the donors were available for 112 crossmatch combinations. The computer program identified 19 possible pairings in 2-way or 3-way chains in multiple combinations. The top ranked combination included one 3-way and two 2-way ABO-compatible chains. Where crossmatches were available all recipients were CDC crossmatch negative with the computer-matched donor. Excluding allocation of KPD donors in the presence of DSA>2000MFI had a negative predictive of 99.9% for CDC and 96.4% for flow crossmatch. In the 12 pairings with ⩾1 DSA against crossmatched donors there was a negative CDC and flow crossmatch. These results show excellent correlation between matching using virtual crossmatch and actual crossmatch results. Using the 2000MFI cut-off the number of potentially unacceptable CDC and flow crossmatch positive pairings identified by virtual crossmatching is low, but some potential crossmatch negative pairings are missed.

Inter and intra laboratory concordance of HLA antibody results obtained by single antigen bead based assay

Single antigen bead based assays (SAB) to identify antibodies to HLA are marketed as a qualitative test, however often used as a quantitative test as the results provide mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) which is found to correlate with the strength/avidity of the antibody. We studied the between and within laboratory variability in performing the SAB from one manufacturer. Ten samples were tested at four laboratories according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol. Additionally same samples were tested on four consecutive days in one laboratory. All tests were performed using the same lot of beads and secondary antibody. Results were classified as positive at four different MFI cutoffs: 1000, 5000, 8000 and 10,000. MFI values across and within the laboratory were compared in a pair-wise fashion with Pearson's correlations. Overall concordance for Class-I was 97% between laboratories and 98% within laboratory at all cutoffs. Pair-wise Pearson correlation between laboratories was 0.989-0.99, while within laboratory it was 0.998-0.999. For Class-II, overall concordance between and within laboratory was 98%. Pair-wise Pearson correlation between laboratories was 0.991-0.997, while within laboratory it was 0.997-0.999. There is good correlation between laboratories and within laboratory using the same manufacturer, same lot and same protocol while performing SAB.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies and graft function in children after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of circulating donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-DSA) has been associated with chronic antibody-mediated rejection, leading to progressive graft dysfunction and poor graft survival.The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and significance of HLA-DSA in paediatric renal transplantation(RTx) patients.

METHODS

A total of 294 post-transplant serum samples from 123 RTx patients were retrospectively analysed for HLA antibodies. Positive samples were further tested for HLADSA by a Luminex Single Antigen bead assay. The antibody findings were correlated to measured glomerular filtration rate(GFR) and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

HLA antibodies were detected in half of the routine samples (140/294) taken 1 month to 10 years after RTx, and 40% (62/140) of these were HLA-DSA. Overall, one-third(42/123) of the patients had HLA-DSA, which mostly(65%) reacted against class II antigens. Detection of HLADSA was not associated with poor GFR at the time of sampling, and no exceptional deterioration of GFR after the HLA-DSA detection was noted in individual patients regardless of the antibody level. The presence of HLA-DSA in the first 2 years posttransplantation was not associated with poorer graft function later on.

CONCLUSION

Detection of HLA antibodies is common in children after RTx, and this finding, as such, does not predict any deterioration of graft function.

Luminex and antibody detection in kidney transplantation

Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies have a negative effect on kidney transplantation outcome with an increased rejection rate and reduction in survival. Posttransplantation production of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is indicative of an active immune response and risk of transplantation rejection. For many years the primary technique for anti-HLA antibody detection was complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which has been integrated by solid-phase assays as HLA antigen-coated bead methods (Luminex). This new technological approach has allowed identification of anti-HLA antibodies, not detectable using conventional CDC method, in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Moreover, use of Luminex technology has enabled better definition of acceptable or unacceptable antigens favoring transplantation in highly immunized patients. However, there are still many unresolved issues, including the clinical relevance of antibodies detected with this system.

HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 allelic and haplotypic diversity in a sample of bone marrow volunteer donors from Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil

The HLA A, B, and DRB1 allele, phenotype, and haplotype frequencies were studied in a sample of 5,000 volunteer bone marrow donors registered at the Brazilian Volunteer Bone Marrow Donor Registry. The participants live in the state of Rio Grande do Sul and were classified according to ethnic group (4,428 Caucasians, 324 mestizos [mixed race], and 248 blacks). Typing was performed using the polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific oligonucleotide method combined with Luminex technology. Twenty-one HLA-A, 33 HLA-B, and 13 HLA-DRB1 allele groups were identified. The most frequent allele groups for each locus were A*02, B*35, and DRB1*13. The most frequent haplotypes were A*01 B*08 DRB1*03 in Caucasians and mestizos and A*02 B*15 and DRB1*04 in blacks. The allele frequencies were compared with samples from different Brazilian regions. In most comparisons no significant differences were found. The most significant differences were observed in the comparison of the groups of our sample, indicating that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a good marker to distinguish among people from different ethnic groups. The data provide insight on the knowledge of HLA diversity in the population of Rio Grande do Sul and in the search for a better match for transplant.

Decreased expression of hepatic signaling phosphoproteins after laparoscopic and hand-assisted surgery in a porcine model

OBJECTIVE

Minimally-invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with a decreased activation of both systemic and peritoneal immunity compared with the open technique. However, hepatic response to laparoscopic (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) surgery has not been defined well. We postulated that both LAP and HAL approaches are associated with a diminished activation of hepatic inflammatory signaling pathways compared with the traditional open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen pigs underwent a transabdominal nephrectomy via Open, HAL, or LAP approach. Liver samples were obtained 24 h postoperatively and spot frozen. Frozen tissue samples were then homogenized and the nuclear pellets were separated and stored. Nuclear extracts were analyzed for activation of three nuclear signaling phosphoproteins: nuclear factor-kappaB (NFκB)-p65, heat-shock protein 27 (HSP27), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (p38MAPK) using a standard Bioplex technique. Statistical comparison was performed using ANOVA and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

The average expression of HSP27 was significantly higher in the Open versus either the LAP or the HAL groups (P = 0.028 and P = 0.039). The average expression of NFκB-p65 was significantly higher in the Open versus either the LAP or the HAL groups (P = 0.032 and P = 0.049). The average expression of p38MAPK was significantly higher in the Open versus either the LAP or the HAL groups (P = 0.007 and P = 0.036). There was no significant difference in the expressions of HSP27 and NFκB-p65 between LAP and HAL groups (P = 0.38 and P = 0.20), however, detection of p38MAPK generated statistical difference between these two groups (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been widely accepted as an effective alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures. We demonstrated that both laparoscopic and hand-assisted approaches resulted in blunted hepatic stress manifested by diminished expression of hepatic HSP27, NFκB, and p38-MAPK. In addition, the hand-assisted approach was equal to the laparoscopic approach in two of the three phosphoproteins studied. It appears that the use of hand-assisted techniques did not abrogate immunologic benefits of pure laparoscopy. Overall, in addition to the clinical benefits of minimal access, both hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques may also confer an immunologic advantage over laparotomy.

Algorithm to manage highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients in Poland

OBJECTIVE

Programs for immunized transplant recipients are essential to achieve graft survivals comparable to those of non-immunized recipients. The threshold in Poland is a PRA by the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) method greater than 50%, which includes approximately 3.8% of the patients. At the same time the United Network for Organ Sharing there recipients represent approximately 16% of the waiting list in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). The underestimation of the immunized group in Poland may be due to differences in laboratory techniques to assess alloantibodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study investigated 55 potential recipients with a PRA by CDC>50%. We used the following algorithm to assess their immunization: Luminex screening test for an HLA antibody; specificity assessed with Luminex Single Antigen, vPRA (evaluation of immunization of the patient); and analysis of acceptable HLA incompatibilities (HLAMatchmaker).

RESULTS

All recipients were positive class I anti-HLA antibodies and 94.5% were positive for class II. For the groups of subjects with PRA-CDC from 50% to 79% versus those greater than 80%, the average values of PRA-CDC were 62.2% and 89.5%, respectively. The virtual PRA results for these groups were 95.7% and 97.2%, respectively. In addition, anti-HLA-Cw, anti-DQ and anti-DP antibodies were detected in 77%, 84%, and 51% of recipients, respectively. Immunized recipients reported to the next transplant were characterized by the antibodies against mismatch only in 68%. For all potential recipients, additional acceptable non-compliance was determined with HLAMatchmaker: 152 specificity for locus A and 252 for locus B.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of immunization status of recipient candidates should be routinely performed using tests to assess class and specificity as well as level of alloantibodies to enable determination of a safe potential donor. As a routine test, PRA-CDC underestimates the number of highly immunized patients. Exclusion from the list of patients with repeated non-compliance is a simplification, which reduces their chance for transplantation.

Clinical relevance of HLA donor-specific antibodies detected by single antigen assay in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Clinical relevance of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by a single antigen Luminex virtual crossmatch in pre-transplant serum samples from patients with a negative cytotoxicity-dependent complement crossmatch is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of a pre-transplant positive virtual crossmatch in the outcome of kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 892 patients who received a graft from deceased donors after a negative cytotoxicity crossmatch were included. Presence of anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was investigated using a Luminex screening assay and anti-HLA specificities were assigned performing a Luminex single antigen assay.

RESULTS

Graft survival was significantly worse among patients with anti-HLA DSA compared to both patients with anti-HLA with no DSA (P = 0.001) and patients without HLA antibodies (P < 0.001) using a log-rank test. No graft survival differences between anti-HLA with no DSA and no HLA antibodies patient groups were observed (P = 0.595). Influence of both anti-Class I and anti-Class II DSA was detected (P < 0.0001 in both cases). When the fluorescence values were stratified in four groups, no significant differences in graft survival were observed among the groups with fluorescence levels >1500 (global P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of preformed HLA DSA in transplanted patients with a negative cytotoxicity crossmatch is associated with a lower allograft survival. The detection of anti-HLA with no DSA has no influence in the graft outcome. Finally, there were no demonstrable effects of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values >1500 on graft survival.

Pre- and posttransplantation allosensitization in heart allograft recipients: major impact of de novo alloantibody production on allograft survival

The involvement of humoral response in allograft rejection has been suggested by both immunologic and histochemistry studies. In the present study, we explored the role of alloantibodies in a large cohort of heart allograft recipients followed for 15 years. Sequential samples of sera were obtained from 950 recipients of heart allografts before and after transplantation at the time when protocol endomyocardial biopsies were performed. The presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was investigated using complement mediated cytotoxicity and solid phase assay (SPA). Our data reveal an inverse correlation between the development of alloantibodies after transplantation and heart allograft survival. The 15-year graft survival was highest in patients who never developed alloantibodies (70%) or who displayed them only before transplantation (71%); graft survival in recipients who showed antibodies both before and after transplantation (56%), or only after transplantation (47%), was lower. The deleterious effect of antibodies on graft survival started 8 years after transplantation, suggesting that the production of de novo antibodies may have been triggered by some later event. We found that patients with de novo antibodies appearing more than 1 year after transplantation had the poorest survival. Furthermore, the development of de novo antibodies was preceded in 76% of these patients by cellular rejection grade 3 or higher, according to the International Society for Heart Transplantation (ISHT) grading criteria. Development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) had a significant negative impact on graft survival (16% in AMR(+) vs 63% in AMR(-) patients, p = 0.0008). Of the 23 patients with AMR, 21 displayed cytotoxic donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at the time of diagnosis, and in 18 of these cases SPA showed that they were directed against the donors' HLA. The data demonstrate that the detection of alloantibodies permits a better definition of AMR in heart allograft recipients. Identification of patients at risk for developing AMR is of great importance for early treatment of rejection episodes.

Clinical relevance of circulating donor-specific HLA antibodies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For a long period of time complement-dependent cytotoxicity was the standard assay to demonstrate clinically relevant HLA antibodies in the serum of patients before transplantation. The introduction of more sensitive solid-phase assays to detect HLA antibodies had led to a lot of discussion on the clinical relevance of the presence of these antibodies before transplantation and the appearance of these antibodies after transplantation. This review discusses the current controversies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The old dogma that the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies before transplantation is a contra-indication for transplantation does not exist anymore. The correlation between the presence of HLA antibodies and clinical outcome is less strict although the presence of circulating donor-specific antibodies, both before and after transplantation, should be considered a risk factor. It is clear, however, that the opinion on the clinical relevance of donor-specific HLA antibodies is very different amongst the transplant centers.

SUMMARY

The clinical relevance of the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies before transplantation and the appearance of these antibodies after transplantation is a controversial issue. The lack of consensus between different centers is partly due to the heterogeneity of the HLA antibodies involved. Standardization is essential and future studies must focus on the further characterization of the antibody titers, the immunoglobulin (sub)classes of the antibodies and the epitopes recognized. It remains to be established in which cases the HLA antibodies are the direct cause of or just associated with (chronic) graft failure.