Immune "tolerance profiles" in donor bone marrow infused kidney transplant patients using multiple ex vivo functional assays

Outstanding questions in transplantation: Tolerance

In 2017, the American Society of Transplantation (AST) launched the Outstanding Questions in Transplantation Research forum to stimulate a community-wide discussion of how the field is evolving and to help identify areas where a better dialogue between clinicians and researchers could result in great advancements. Tolerance emerged as a topic of great interest to the AST community. This minireview provides an overview of clinical transplantation tolerance. Historical background followed by a review of the current status of attempts to establish tolerance in the clinic, highlighting the dynamic online discussion surrounding this important topic from the AST Transplantation Research forum, is provided.

Cellular and functional biomarkers of clinical transplant tolerance

Development of tolerance protocols requires assays or biomarkers that distinguish tolerant recipients from non-tolerant ones to be established. In addition, a thorough understanding of the plausible mechanisms associated with clinical transplant tolerance is necessary to take the field forward. Unlike the majority of molecular signature analyses utilized by others, the emphasis of this article is on the cellular and functional biomarkers of induced transplant tolerance. Immunity to an organ transplant is very complex, comprised of two broad categories - innate and acquired or adaptive immune responses. Innate immunity can be avoided by eliminating or preventing ischemic injuries to the donor organ and tolerance at the level of adaptive immunity can be induced by infusions of a number of cellular products. Since adaptive immune response consists of inflammatory hypersensitivity, cellular (cytotoxic and helper) and humoral aspects, all these need to be measured, and the recipients who demonstrate donor-specific unresponsiveness in all can be considered tolerant or candidates for immunosuppression minimization and/or withdrawal. The mechanisms by which these agents bring about transplant tolerance include regulation, anergy, exhaustion, senescence and deletion of the recipient immune cells. Another proven mechanism of tolerance is full or mixed donor chimerism. However, it should be cautioned that non-deletional tolerance can be reversed.

Current status of tolerance in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The attainment of tolerance remains a highly desirable goal in recipients of kidney transplants. Achievement of this goal would extend graft survival and eradicate toxicities related to long-term immunosuppression. Understanding mechanisms of tolerance and strategies to induce tolerance - their risk/benefit profiles - is essential for future success.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mechanistic studies of spontaneously tolerant kidney transplant recipients have uncovered potential roles for B or regulatory T cells, or both, in the maintenance of tolerance. Mixed hematopoietic chimerism has been the most commonly used approach to induce tolerance. Distinct protocols at three major transplant centers have led to successful withdrawal of immunosuppression in a subset of living donor kidney transplant recipients at the expense of complications such as infections and graft versus host disease. The addition of regulatory cell therapies to tolerance induction protocols could enhance success while minimizing complications.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the features of spontaneous tolerance in kidney transplant recipients, the results of clinical trials of tolerance induction in the context of living donor kidney transplant, and potential measures to improve the safety and efficacy of tolerance induction strategies.

Nonchimeric HLA-Identical Renal Transplant Tolerance: Regulatory Immunophenotypic/Genomic Biomarkers

We previously described early results of a nonchimeric operational tolerance protocol in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical living donor renal transplants and now update these results. Recipients given alemtuzumab, tacrolimus/MPA with early sirolimus conversion were multiply infused with donor hematopoietic CD34(+) stem cells. Immunosuppression was withdrawn by 24 months. Twelve months later, operational tolerance was confirmed by rejection-free transplant biopsies. Five of the first eight enrollees were initially tolerant 1 year off immunosuppression. Biopsies of three others after total withdrawal showed Banff 1A acute cellular rejection without renal dysfunction. With longer follow-up including 5-year posttransplant biopsies, four of the five tolerant recipients remain without rejection while one developed Banff 1A without renal dysfunction. We now add seven new subjects (two operationally tolerant), and demonstrate time-dependent increases of circulating CD4(+) CD25(+++) CD127(-) FOXP3(+) Tregs versus losses of Tregs in nontolerant subjects (p < 0.001). Gene expression signatures, developed using global RNA expression profiling of sequential whole blood and protocol biopsy samples, were highly associative with operational tolerance as early as 1 year posttransplant. The blood signature was validated by an external Immune Tolerance Network data set. Our approach to nonchimeric operational HLA-identical tolerance reveals association with Treg immunophenotypes and serial gene expression profiles.

Antithymocyte globulin facilitates alloreactive T-cell apoptosis by means of caspase-3: potential implications for monitoring rejection-free outcomes

BACKGROUND

Alloreactive T-cell apoptosis may explain reduced immunosuppression requirements with proapoptotic immunosuppression and among rejection-free recipients. This possibility remains unproven.

METHODS

Apoptotic (caspase-3+, cathepsin B+) and inflammatory (CD154+) T-cell subsets were evaluated before and after adding rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) to mixed lymphocyte co-cultures between human leukocyte antigen-mismatched peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy adults. In random samples from children with liver (LTx-20) and intestine (ITx-13) transplantation, apoptotic T cells were evaluated for association with rejection-free outcomes using the caspase-3 substrate, phiphilux.

RESULTS

In mixed lymphocyte co-cultures between normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes, (1) frequencies of memory (M) and naive (N) Th and Tc, which expressed activated caspase-3, were enhanced most by the combination of allostimulation and rATG, than either stimulus alone. These findings were confirmed with antibody to activated caspase-3, phiphilux, and terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay; (2) frequencies of Th subsets, which expressed activated cathepsin B, were similarly increased with combined stimulation. Tc seemed resistant to cathepsin B activation; (3) with increasing rATG concentrations, proportionately more allospecific CD154+T-cytotoxic memory cells (TcM) survived than TcM, resulting in relative enrichment of allospecific CD154+TcM. In random blood samples, phiphilux+T-cell subset frequencies were higher among 14 rejection-free LTx and ITx recipients and demonstrated a greater increase with ex vivo rATG pretreatment than 19 rejectors. In logistic regression analysis, phiphilux+TcM associated best with rejection-free outcomes with a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 89%.

CONCLUSION

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin facilitates apoptosis of alloreactive T cells by means of caspase-3 activation, which may explain its steroid-sparing effect in pediatric liver and intestine recipients. Apoptotic susceptibility of T-cytotoxic memory cells, which resist cathepsin B activation, may distinguish rejection-free and rejection-prone liver recipients.

A randomized pilot study of donor stem cell infusion in living-related kidney transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab

BACKGROUND

Transplant tolerance would remove the need for maintenance immunosuppression while improving survival and quality of life.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized pilot study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of donor stem cell infusion (DSCI) in living-related kidney transplant recipients treated with alemtuzumab (C1H) induction and tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance with switch to sirolimus and weaning over 2 years.

RESULTS

Four patients received DSCI; five patients were controls. Graft failure occurred in two patients in the DSCI arm. Recurrence of glomerular disease occurred in two DSCI recipients, leading to graft loss in one. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes occurred in three patients (two in the DSCI vs. one in the control). One DSCI patient, with recurrence, subsequently developed antibody-mediated rejection leading to graft failure. In the remaining two DSCI patients, weaning was attempted but was not successful. All (4 of 4) DSCI patients had biopsy-proven chronic allograft injury and/or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

DSCI with C1H induction and a steroid-free maintenance regimen in a small group of patients failed to induce tolerance, with suboptimal patient and graft survival. The results do not justify extension of this particular trial and underscore the importance of patient selection, specifically avoidance of patients with glomerulopathies whose recurrence may obscure potential benefit.

Role of ELISPOT Assays in Risk Assessment Pre- and Post-Kidney Transplantation

Immunologic risk in kidney transplantation is typically minimized by avoiding, or at least limiting, the potential of donor specific humoral responses by testing for the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Additionally, selecting donor and recipient pairs with the least number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches has been shown to play a role in transplant outcome. However, numerous other factors may play a role in the success of transplant outcome and patient health. Specifically, the use of T-cell allospecific ELISPOT assays have helped elucidate the role of pre-formed cellular responses as additional factors in post-transplant outcome. In this review, we will evaluate numerous uses of ELISPOT assays to assess the pre- and post-transplant immunologic risk of rejection episodes, graft survival and even viral susceptibility as well as the utility of ELISPOT assays in monitoring tolerance and withdrawal of immunosuppressive medications following kidney transplantation.

Pretransplant immune regulation predicts allograft outcome: bidirectional regulation correlates with excellent renal transplant function in living-related donor-recipient pairs

BACKGROUND

Tolerance to noninherited maternal antigens has provided clinical advantage when kidney transplants are exchanged between siblings but not when mother herself is the donor. This paradox prompted us to revisit the "two-way" hypothesis of transplant tolerance--that the immune status of both the organ recipient and the organ donor critically influences allograft outcome.

METHODS

We obtained peripheral blood monocyte cells from 29 living donor-recipient pairs before transplant and used the trans-vivo-delayed type hypersensitivity assay to measure immune regulation in both the recipient antidonor and donor antirecipient directions.

RESULTS

We found preexisting bidirectional regulation in all human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling pairs tested (7/7), and one half (9/18) of the HLA haploidentical pairs. No significant regulation was found in four control living unrelated and two HLA haploidentical living-related donor recipient pairs, whereas unidirectional regulation was found in the remaining seven haploidentical pairs. Of the nine HLA haploidentical transplants with unidirectional or no pretransplant regulation, seven had an acute rejection episode and four of these experienced graft loss. In contrast, of the nine HLA haploidentical transplants with bidirectional regulation, only one had rejection. Renal function for the latter group was similar to HLA-identical kidney recipients at 3 years posttransplant. Significantly (P<0.05) lower mean serum creatinine values in bidirectional regulators were noted as early as 4 months and this difference became more pronounced at 12 (P<0.005) and 36 months (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to the belief that only the recipient's immune status matters, the data indicate that pretransplant immune status of both donor and recipient influence posttransplant outcome.

Microchimerism in promoting graft acceptance in clinical transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infusions of bone marrow-derived cells together with 'space making' continue to be tested in clinical organ transplant tolerance protocols. These trials are based on the hypothesis that this might produce initial multilineage chimerism. There is some evidence that this in turn induces regulatory cells that control alloimmunity. Although a wealth of knowledge is available from animal models, this review deals with what we know or can speculate about donor bone marrow cells and chimerism in human organ transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Calcineurin inhibitors are employed in most of these protocols to blunt the initial immune response. One protocol also has a stepwise regulatory cell generating treatment with sirolimus before total withdrawal. A number of donor chimeric lineages including stem cells, dendritic cells, myeloid precursors, and various lymphoid subpopulations have been described. Currently, it is recognized that the nature of cells that make up the chimerism could influence graft rejection versus acceptance. Tolerogenic donor chimeric cells may also generate regulatory subsets, thus controlling alloimmunity on two fronts.

SUMMARY

It might be speculated that prolonged and sustained regulation or possible anergy induced by chimerism may eventually lead to clonal deletion, thereby bringing about classical immunologic tolerance.

Monitoring tolerance and rejection in organ transplant recipients

To avoid toxic side effects caused by permanent immunosuppressive treatment, research in transplantation focuses on new treatment strategies inducing tolerance or allowing drug weaning. Implementing drug minimization into clinical routine can be only safely achieved when guided by biomarkers reflecting the individual immune reactivity. We review recently described biomarkers and assays allowing identification of patients suitable for drug weaning or at risk of rejection. However, the majority of described biomarkers and assays have not been validated in prospective clinical trials. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed to design and perform prospective multicenter trials to validate the identified biomarkers across different laboratories.

Requirement of cognate CD4+ T-cell recognition for the regulation of allospecific CTL by human CD4+ CD127- CD25+ FOXP3+ cells generated in MLR

Although immunoregulation of alloreactive human CTLs has been described, the direct influence of CD4⁺ Tregs on CD8⁺ cytotoxicity and the interactive mechanisms have not been well clarified. Therefore, human CD4⁺CD127⁻CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ Tregs were generated in MLR, immunoselected and their allospecific regulatory functions and associated mechanisms were then tested using modified ⁵¹Chromium release assays (Micro-CML), MLRs and CFSE-based multi-fluorochrome flow cytometry proliferation assays. It was observed that increased numbers of CD4⁺CD127⁻CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ cells were generated after a 7 day MLR. After immunoselection for CD4⁺CD127⁻CD25⁺ cells, they were designated as MLR-Tregs. When added as third component modulators, MLR-Tregs inhibited the alloreactive proliferation of autologous PBMC in a concentration dependent manner. The inhibition was quasi-antigen specific, in that the inhibition was non-specific at higher MLR-Treg modulator doses, but non-specificity disappeared with lower numbers at which specific inhibition was still significant. When tested in micro-CML assays CTL inhibition occurred with PBMC and purified CD8⁺ responders. However, antigen specificity of CTL inhibition was observed only with unpurified PBMC responders and not with purified CD8⁺ responders or even with CD8⁺ responders plus Non-T “APC”. However, allospecificity of CTL regulation was restored when autologous purified CD4⁺ T cells were added to the CD8⁺ responders. Proliferation of CD8⁺ cells was suppressed by MLR-Tregs in the presence or absence of IL-2. Inhibition by MLR-Tregs was mediated through down-regulation of intracellular perforin, granzyme B and membrane-bound CD25 molecules on the responding CD8⁺ cells. Therefore, it was concluded that human CD4⁺CD127⁻CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ MLR-Tregs down-regulate alloreactive cytotoxic responses. Regulatory allospecificity, however, requires the presence of cognate responding CD4⁺ T cells. CD8⁺ CTL regulatory mechanisms include impaired proliferation, reduced expression of cytolytic molecules and CD25⁺ activation epitopes.