1
|
Nabulsi S, Otunla AA, Salciccioli J, Marshall DC, Villani V, Shanmugarajah K, Shalhoub J. HLA matching between donors and recipients improves clinical liver transplant graft survival. Liver Int 2024; 44:411-421. [PMID: 38010995 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The importance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching between liver transplant donors and recipients on graft survival remains unclear and is not a clinical consideration in liver transplantation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HLA matching and liver graft survival using a large-scale multi-centre database (UNOS/OPTN) and multivariate logistic analysis. The secondary aim was to determine whether this relationship was influenced by transplant indication and donor status. METHODS This retrospective observational analysis was performed using 22 702 liver transplant recipients from the UNOS/OPTN database. Patients were divided into two groups based on number of HLA mismatches (0-3 mismatches vs. 4-6 mismatches) and then subcategorized by indication and donor status. Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics and visualized using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS Allograft survival and risk of acute rejection were associated with degree of HLA mismatch. This association between HLA mismatch and graft survival persisted in individuals who underwent transplant for hepatitis, metabolic, drug toxicity, and congenital indications. Donor status also influenced the relationship between HLA mismatch and graft survival. Graft survival in DBD recipients was longer than in DCD in the 4-6 HLA mismatch group, whereas no significant difference was found in the 0-3 HLA mismatch group. CONCLUSION HLA mismatch significantly reduced graft survival and increased risk of acute rejection. This association was noted only in specific indications. These findings are of potential clinical relevance to organ allocation, allograft matching algorithms, immunosuppression protocols, and transplant surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Nabulsi
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Justin Salciccioli
- Department of Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Vincenzo Villani
- Department of Transplantation, Memorial Hermann Health System, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Joseph Shalhoub
- Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kok G, Ilcken EF, Houwen RH, Lindemans CA, Nieuwenhuis EE, Spierings E, Fuchs SA. The Effect of Genetic HLA Matching on Liver Transplantation Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e334. [PMID: 37746594 PMCID: PMC10513352 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We aim to investigate the effects of genetically based HLA matching on patient and graft survival, and acute and chronic rejection after liver transplantation. Background Liver transplantation is a common treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. In contrast to most other solid organ transplantations, there is no conclusive evidence supporting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching for liver transplantations. With emerging alternatives such as transplantation of bankable (stem) cells, HLA matching becomes feasible, which may decrease the need for immunosuppressive therapy and improve transplantation outcomes. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of genetic HLA matching on liver transplantation outcomes (acute/chronic rejection, graft failure, and mortality). Results We included 14 studies with 2682 patients. HLA-C mismatching significantly increased the risk of acute rejection (full mismatching: risk ratio = 1.90, 95% confidence interval = 1.08 to 3.33, P = 0.03; partial mismatching: risk ratio = 1.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 1.66, P = 0.01). We did not discern any significant effect of HLA mismatching per locus on acute rejection for HLA-A, -B, -DR, and -DQ, nor on chronic rejection, graft failure, or mortality for HLA-DR, and -DQ. Conclusions We found evidence that genetic HLA-C matching reduces the risk of acute rejection after liver transplantation while matching for other loci does not reduce the risk of acute rejection, chronic rejection, graft failure, or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautam Kok
- From the Department of Metabolic Diseases, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline F. Ilcken
- From the Department of Metabolic Diseases, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roderick H.J. Houwen
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline A. Lindemans
- Department of Immunology, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Edward E.S. Nieuwenhuis
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center of Translational Immunology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine A. Fuchs
- From the Department of Metabolic Diseases, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bricogne C, Halliday N, Fernando R, Tsochatzis EA, Davidson BR, Harber M, Westbrook RH. Donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen A mismatching is associated with hepatic artery thrombosis, sepsis, graft loss, and reduced survival after liver transplant. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1306-1320. [PMID: 35313059 PMCID: PMC9541857 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is not routinely performed for liver transplantation as there is no consistent evidence of benefit; however, the impact of HLA mismatching remains uncertain. We explored the effect of class I and II HLA mismatching on graft failure and mortality. A total of 1042 liver transplants performed at a single center between 1999 and 2016 with available HLA typing data were included. The median follow-up period was 9.38 years (interquartile range 4.9-14) and 350/1042 (33.6%) transplants resulted in graft loss and 280/1042 (26.9%) in death. Graft loss and mortality were not associated with the overall number of mismatches at HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ loci. However, graft failure and mortality were both increased in HLA mismatching on graft failure and mortality the presence of one (p = 0.004 and p = 0.01, respectively) and two (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively) HLA-A mismatches. Elevated hazard ratios for graft failure and death were observed with HLA-A mismatches in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Excess graft loss with HLA-A mismatch (138/940 [14.7%] mismatched compared with 6/102 [5.9%] matched transplants) occurred within the first year following transplantation (odds ratio 2.75; p = 0.02). Strikingly, transplants performed at a single all grafts lost due to hepatic artery thrombosis were in HLA-A-mismatched transplants (31/940 vs. 0/102), as were those lost due to sepsis (35/940 vs. 0/102). In conclusion, HLA-A mismatching was associated with increased graft loss and mortality. The poorer outcome for the HLA-mismatched group was due to hepatic artery thrombosis and sepsis, and these complications occurred exclusively with HLA-A-mismatched transplants. These data suggest that HLA-A mismatching is important for outcomes following liver transplant. Therefore, knowledge of HLA-A matching status may potentially allow for enhanced surveillance, clinical interventions in high-risk transplants or stratified HLA-A matching in high-risk recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Bricogne
- Sheila Sherlock Liver UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Liver and Digestive HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Neil Halliday
- Sheila Sherlock Liver UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Liver and Digestive HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Raymond Fernando
- The Anthony Nolan Research InstituteRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Emmanuel A. Tsochatzis
- Sheila Sherlock Liver UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Liver and Digestive HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Brian R. Davidson
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional SciencesRoyal Free HospitalLondonUK
| | - Mark Harber
- Kidney UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Rachel H. Westbrook
- Sheila Sherlock Liver UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Liver and Digestive HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Urinary CXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol 2021; 70:101494. [PMID: 34774739 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary CXCL10 (uCXCL10) is associated with graft inflammation and graft survival, but the factors related to its excretion are not well known. HLA molecular matching at epitope level allow estimating the "dissimilarity" between donor and recipient HLA more precisely, being better related to further transplant outcomes. The relationship between uCXCL10 and HLA molecular mismatch has not been previously explored. METHODS HLA class I and class II typing of some 65 recipients and their donors was retrospectively performed by high resolution sequence-specific-primer (Life Technologies, Brown Deer, WI). The HLA-Matchmaker 3.1 software was used to assess eplet matching. Urine samples collected on the day of the 1-year surveillance biopsy were available of these 65 patients. uCXCL10 was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunoassay kit. RESULTS 1-year uCXCL10 was independently associated with HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load (β 0.300, 95%CI 0.010-0.058, p = 0.006). Kidney transplant recipients with a HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load >3 showed higher values of uCXCL10 at 1-year (p = 0.018) than those with ≤3. Patients with a HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load >3 with subclinical AbMR had significantly higher levels of the logarithm of 1-year uCXCL10 (No AbMR 0.88, IQR 0.37; AbMR 1.38, IQR 0.34, p = 0.002) than those without AbMR. CONCLUSIONS uCXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load. This relationship can partly explain the previously reported association between uCXCL10 excretion and graft inflammation. An adequate evaluation of any potential non-invasive biomarker, such as uCXCL10, must take into account the HLA molecular mismatch.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee BT, Fiel MI, Schiano TD. Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective. J Hepatol 2021; 75:1203-1216. [PMID: 34343613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Transplant Institute, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
| | - M Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas D Schiano
- Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Epitope-Level Matching—A Review of the Novel Concept of Eplets in Transplant Histocompatibility. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2030033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of de novo donor-specific antibodies is related to the poor matching of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) between donor and recipient, which leads to dismal clinical outcomes and graft loss. However, new approaches that stratify the risks of long-term graft failure in solid organ transplantation have emerged, changing the paradigm of HLA compatibility. In addition, advances in software development have given rise to a new structurally based algorithm known as HLA Matchmaker, which determines compatibility at the epitope rather than the antigen level. Although this technique still has limitations, plenty of research maintains that this assessment represents a more complete and detailed definition of HLA compatibility. This review summarizes recent aspects of eplet mismatches, highlighting the most recent advances and future research directions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Eplet mismatch scores and de novo donor-specific antibody development in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Hum Immunol 2020; 82:139-146. [PMID: 33390268 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection is the principal cause of allotransplant graft failure. Available studies differ on the impact of de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA) in pancreas transplants but are limited by patient sample size and sera sample collection. High-resolution HLA incompatibility scoring algorithms are able to more accurately predict dnDSA development. We hypothesized that HLA incompatibility scores as determined by the HLA-Matchmaker, HLA-EMMA, and PIRCHE-II algorithms would serve as a predictor of de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA) development and clarify the role dnDSA as detrimental to simultaneous pancreas-kidney graft survival. Our results show that female sex and race were significantly associated with dnDSA development and dnDSA development resulted in worse kidney and pancreas graft survival. The majority of individuals who developed dnDSA (88%), developed anti-HLA-DQ antibody in some combination with anti-HLA class I or -DR. A multivariate analysis of the incompatibility scores showed that both HLA-Matchmaker and PIRCHE-II scores predicted anti-DQ dnDSA development. An optimal cutoff threshold for incompatibility matching was obtained for these scores and demonstrated statistical significance when predicting freedom from anti-DQ DSA development. In conclusion, increased scores from high-resolution HLA matching predict dnDSA development, and dnDSA is associated with antibody-mediated rejection and worse pancreas and kidney graft outcomes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Thomson AW, Vionnet J, Sanchez-Fueyo A. Understanding, predicting and achieving liver transplant tolerance: from bench to bedside. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:719-739. [PMID: 32759983 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0334-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In the past 40 years, liver transplantation has evolved from a high-risk procedure to one that offers high success rates for reversal of liver dysfunction and excellent patient and graft survival. The liver is the most tolerogenic of transplanted organs; indeed, immunosuppressive therapy can be completely withdrawn without rejection of the graft in carefully selected, stable long-term liver recipients. However, in other recipients, chronic allograft injury, late graft failure and the adverse effects of anti-rejection therapy remain important obstacles to improved success. The liver has a unique composition of parenchymal and immune cells that regulate innate and adaptive immunity and that can promote antigen-specific tolerance. Although the mechanisms underlying liver transplant tolerance are not well understood, important insights have been gained into how the local microenvironment, hepatic immune cells and specific molecular pathways can promote donor-specific tolerance. These insights provide a basis for the identification of potential clinical biomarkers that might correlate with tolerance or rejection and for the development of novel therapeutic targets. Innovative approaches aimed at promoting immunosuppressive drug minimization or withdrawal include the adoptive transfer of donor-derived or recipient-derived regulatory immune cells to promote liver transplant tolerance. In this Review, we summarize and discuss these developments and their implications for liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angus W Thomson
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Institute of Liver Studies, Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, School of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, King's College London University, King's College Hospital, London, UK.,Transplantation Center, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Service of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo
- Institute of Liver Studies, Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, School of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, King's College London University, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030708. [PMID: 32151032 PMCID: PMC7141359 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of DSAs in a large cohort of 810 liver recipients undergoing liver transplant to determine the influence on acute (AR) or chronic liver rejection (CR), graft loss and allograft survival. DSAs were identified using complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) and multiplexed solid-phase-based flow cytometry assay (Luminex). CDC-CM showed that a 3.2% of liver transplants were positive (+CDC-CM) with an AR frequency of 19.2% which was not different from that observed in negative patients (-CDC-CM, 22.3%). Only two patients transplanted with +CDC-CM (7.6%) developed CR and suffered re-transplant. +CDC-CM patients showed a significantly lower survival rate compared to -CDC-CM patients (23.1% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.0003), developing allograft failure within the first three months (p < 0.00001). In conclusion, we have demonstrated a relationship between the presence of preformed DSAs and the low graft liver survival, indicating the important role and the potential interest of performing this analysis before liver transplantation. Our results could help to detect patients with an increased risk of graft loss, a better choice of liver receptors as well as the establishment of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.
Collapse
|
10
|
Number of Antibody-verified Eplet in HLA-C Locus as an Independent Factor of T-cell–Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2020; 104:562-567. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
11
|
Philogene MC, Amin A, Zhou S, Charnaya O, Vega R, Desai N, Neu AM, Pruette CS. Eplet mismatch analysis and allograft outcome across racially diverse groups in a pediatric transplant cohort: a single-center analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2020; 35:83-94. [PMID: 31599339 PMCID: PMC6901410 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-019-04344-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
HLA eplet mismatch load has been suggested as an improvement to HLA antigen mismatch determination for organ selection. Given that eplet mismatches are determined based on amino acid sequence difference among HLA alleles, and that the frequency of HLA alleles varies between racial groups, we investigated the correlation between eplet mismatch load and allograft outcomes in 110 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who received their first organ from a donor of the same race (SRT) versus a donor of a different race (DRT). Adjusted modified Poisson regression was used to assess the interaction between eplet mismatch load and race mismatch and its effect on outcome. Caucasians and living donor recipients had lower eplet mismatched loads against their donors compared with non-Caucasian and deceased donor recipients. Overall, for the entire population, the risk of de novo HLA-DSA development was significantly increased with higher eplet loads (p < 0.001). Compared with the SRT group, the DRT group had higher eplet loads when compared with their donor, for HLA class I but not HLA class II molecules; however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of de novo HLA-DSA between the 2 groups. The risk of rejection increased significantly for DRT compared with SRT, only when class I eplet load was ≥ 70 (p = 0.04). Together this data show that eplet mismatch load analysis is an effective tool for alloimmune risk assessment. If considered for donor selection, acceptable eplet mismatch loads determined from studies in homogenous populations may restrict transplantation across racially diverse donor and patient groups with no evidence of poor outcome. Therefore, an acceptable eplet mismatch load threshold must consider the heterogeneity of the transplant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Carmelle Philogene
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2041 E. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, 2041 E. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Anita Amin
- Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 115 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Sheng Zhou
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave Turner 34, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Olga Charnaya
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Rubenstein Child Health Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 200 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Renato Vega
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2041 E. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Niraj Desai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave Turner 34, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Alicia M Neu
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Rubenstein Child Health Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 200 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Cozumel S Pruette
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Rubenstein Child Health Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 200 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu Q, Shrum B, Leckie S, Skaro A, McAlister VC. The impact of alloantibodies directed against the second donor on long-term outcomes of repeat liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:246-252. [PMID: 31245404 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.01.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite reports that associate donor specific antibody (DSA) with rejection after liver transplantation, grafts are still allocated according to blood group (ABO) but not human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility, possibly due to the absence of an easily discernible clinical association between adverse recipient outcome and DSA. Re-transplantation provides a test environment where the presence of preformed DSA is prevalent and its effect on outcome should be apparent. Methods All patients undergoing a second liver transplantation with available pre-operative serum were included with the exception of ABO incompatible or multiple organ transplants. Banked sera were tested for anti-HLA antibodies with Luminex-based solid phase assays. Anti-HLA antibodies to the second donor (D2SA) were determined using antibodies specificity and HLA typing of 2nd liver donor. Results Preformed HLA antibodies directed to second liver transplantation (D2SA) were found in 31 (39%) of the 79 patients that were included in the study. Primary and re-transplantation characteristics were similar in both subgroups except first graft survival which was significantly shorter in recipients who are negative for D2SA. Mean survival of the second graft was similar in D2SA+ and D2SA- cohorts [8.55 (range, 0.01-24.74) vs. 7.56 (range, 0-23.53) years respectively, P=0.574]. Mean patient survival after 2nd liver transplantation was similar in D2SA+ and D2SA- cohorts [9.11 (range, 0.01-24.74) vs. 8.10 (range, 0-23.53) years respectively, P=0.504]. Subgroup univariate analysis demonstrated no detrimental effect of class, locus, or strength of D2SA on survival of the second liver transplant. In multivariate cox regression model, neither class I D2DSA (HR =1.101, P=0.92) nor class II D2SA (HR =1.74, P=0.359) were significant risks of graft failure. Conclusions Presence of D2SA was not found to be associated with inferior outcomes in this retrospective cohort study of liver re-transplantation suggesting that changes to the allocation system are not required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyong Xu
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Brad Shrum
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Steve Leckie
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anton Skaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Vivian C McAlister
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Epitope-based human leukocyte antigen matching for transplantation: a personal perspective of its future. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 23:486-492. [PMID: 29995674 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study reflects my personal experience with the characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes and their significance in HLA matching for transplantation. It offers a subjective assessment what further studies are needed to have this concept be applied in the clinical setting. RECENT FINDINGS This study addresses the structural characteristics of antibody-reactive HLA epitopes determined by different methods, eplet-associated antibody analysis and acceptable mismatching for sensitized patients and eplet immunogenicity and determination of mismatch permissibility. BASIC IMPLICATIONS: for clinical practice and research consider the need for further studies of the structural basis of antibody-verified HLA epitopes determined in different techniques and their clinical relevance, the biological basis of epitope immunogenicity and determinations of permissible mismatches and a computerized clinical transplant database with an Artificial Intelligence component that can generate evidence-based information for the practical application of epitope-based HLA matching.
Collapse
|