Degree of HLA class II eplet mismatch load improves prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in living donor kidney transplantation

Repeated human leukocyte antigens eplets, importance of typing the partner

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the most common cause of immune-mediated allograft failure after kidney transplant and impacts allograft survival. Previous sensitization is a major risk factor for development of donor specific antibodies (DSA). AMR can have a wide range of clinical features such as impaired kidney function, proteinuria/hypertension or can be subclinical. HLA molecules have specific regions of antigens binding antibodies called epitopes and eplets are considered essential components responsible for immune recognition. We present a patient with subclinical AMR 1 week post transplantation.

CASE REPORT

A 48-year-old, caucasian woman with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) on peritoneal dialysis was registered in deceased donor waitlist. She was a hypersensitized patient from 3 prior pregnancies with a calculated panel reactive antibody of 93,48%. She was transplanted through kidney paired exchange donation with no evidence of DSA pre transplantation. Surgery and post-op were unremarkable with excellent and immediate graft function. Per protocol DSA levels on the 5th day was DR1 of 3300 MFI, with an increase in MFI by day 13 with 7820 MFI and a new B41 1979MFI. Allograft kidney biopsy findings were diagnostic of AMR and she was treated with immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis. As early onset AMR post transplantation was observed an anamnestic response was hypothesized from a previous exposure to allo-HLA. We decided to type her husband, her son's father, which was presented with DSA. Mismatch eplet analysis revealed a shared 41 T and 67LQ eplets between the donor and husband, responsible for the reactivity and new HLA class I B41 and HLA class II DR1 DSA, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Shared eplets between the patient husband and donor was responsible for the alloimmune response and early development of DSAs. This case highlights the importance of early monitoring DSA levels in highly sensitized patients after transplant in order to promptly address and lower inflammatory damage. Mismatch eplet analysis can provide a thorough and precise evaluation of immune compatibility providing a useful technique to immune risk stratification, donor selection and post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy and monitoring.

HLA B eplet mismatches in the context of delayed graft function and low tacrolimus trough levels are risk factors influencing the generation of de novo donor-specific antibodies and acute rejection in the early stage after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) generation and acute rejection (AR) are the main factors affecting long-term graft survival. This study aims to investigate human leukocyte antigen (HLA) eplet mismatching (MM), delayed graft function (DGF), and tacrolimus (TAC) trough levels on the occurrence of dnDSA and AR in the early stages after kidney transplantation (KT).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 526 cases of deceased donation KT. The effects of DGF, HLA eplet MM, and TAC trough levels on dnDSA and AR occurrence were analyzed with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the independent risk factor of dnDSA generation was HLA B eplet MM (OR: 1.201, 95% CI: 1.007-1.431, P = 0.041). The independent risk factors of AR occurrence include DGF (OR: 4.045, 95% CI: 1.047-15.626, P = 0.043), HLA B eplet MM (OR: 1.090, 95% CI: 1.000-1.187, P = 0.050), and TAC trough levels at 12 months (OR: 0.750, 95% CI: 565-0.997, P = 0.048). HLA B eplet MM combined with DGF and TAC trough levels at 12 months increased the predictive value of dnDSA (AUC 0.735) and AR (AUC 0.730) occurrence. HLA B eplet MM > 9 and TAC trough levels below 5.95 ng/mL at 12 months could increase the risk of early AR occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA B eplet MM, DGF, and TAC trough levels at 12 months after KT could affect the occurrence of dnDSA and AR in the early stage of KT.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA at 1 Month after Kidney Transplantation Relates to HLA Class II Eplet Mismatch Load

Kidney transplantation is the preferred therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease; however, the alloimmune response is still the leading cause of renal allograft failure. To better identify immunologic disparities in order to evaluate HLA compatibility between the donor and the recipient, the concept of eplet load has arisen. Regular kidney function monitoring is essential for the accurate and timely diagnosis of allograft rejection and the appropriate treatment. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been proposed as a potential biomarker of acute rejection and graft failure in kidney transplantation. The proportion of plasma dd-cfDNA was determined in forty-two kidney patients at 1 month after transplantation. A total of eleven (26.2%) patients had a dd-cfDNA proportion of ≥1.0%. The only pretransplant variable related to dd-cfDNA > 1.0% was the HLA class II eplet mismatch load, mainly the HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load. Furthermore, dd-cfDNA was able to discriminate the patients with antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) (AUC 87.3%), acute rejection (AUC 78.2%), and troubled graft (AUC 81.4%). Increased dd-cfDNA levels were associated with kidney allograft deterioration, particularly rejection, as well as a greater HLA class II eplet mismatch load. Consequently, combining dd-cfDNA determination and HLA eplet mismatch load calculation should improve the assessment of the risk of short- and long-term allograft damage.

Extended genomic HLA typing identifies previously unrecognized mismatches in living kidney transplantation

Introduction

Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) is the most common cause of long-term allograft loss in kidney transplantation (KT). Therefore, a low human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (MM) load is favorable for KT outcomes. Hitherto, serological or low-resolution molecular HLA typing have been adapted in parallel. Here, we aimed to identify previously missed HLA mismatches and corresponding antibodies by high resolution HLA genotyping in a living-donor KT cohort.

Methods

103 donor/recipient pairs transplanted at the University of Leipzig Medical Center between 1998 and 2018 were re-typed using next generation sequencing (NGS) of the HLA loci -A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB345, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1. Based on these data, we compiled HLA MM counts for each pair and comparatively evaluated genomic HLA-typing with pre-transplant obtained serological/low-resolution HLA (=one-field) typing results. NGS HLA typing (=two-field) data was further used for reclassification of de novo HLA antibodies as "donor-specific".

Results

By two-field HLA re-typing, we were able to identify additional MM in 64.1% (n=66) of cases for HLA loci -A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 that were not observed by one-field HLA typing. In patients with biopsy proven ABMR, two-field calculated MM count was significantly higher than by one-field HLA typing. For additional typed HLA loci -DRB345, -DQA1, -DPA1, and -DPB1 we observed 2, 26, 3, and 23 MM, respectively. In total, 37.3% (69/185) of de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) formation was directed against these loci (DRB345 ➔ n=33, DQA1 ➔ n=33, DPA1 ➔ n=1, DPB1 ➔ n=10).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that two-field HLA typing is feasible and provides significantly more sensitive HLA MM recognition in living-donor KT. Furthermore, accurate HLA typing plays an important role in graft management as it can improve discrimination between donor and non-donor HLA directed cellular and humoral alloreactivity in the long range. The inclusion of additional HLA loci against which antibodies can be readily detected, HLA-DRB345, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1, will allow a more precise virtual crossmatch and better prediction of potential DSA. Furthermore, in living KT, two-field HLA typing could contribute to the selection of the immunologically most suitable donors.

On the clinical relevance of using complete high-resolution HLA typing for an accurate interpretation of posttransplant immune-mediated graft outcomes

Complete and high-resolution (HR) HLA typing improves the accurate assessment of donor–recipient compatibility and pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA). However, the value of this information to identify de novo immune-mediated graft events and its impact on outcomes has not been assessed. In 241 donor/recipient kidney transplant pairs, DNA samples were re-evaluated for six-locus (A/B/C/DRB1/DQB1+A1/DPB1) HR HLA typing. De novo anti-HLA antibodies were assessed using solid-phase assays, and dnDSA were classified either (1) as per current clinical practice according to three-locus (A/B/DRB1) low-resolution (LR) typing, estimating donor HLA-C/DQ typing with frequency tables, or (2) according to complete six-locus HR typing. The impact on graft outcomes was compared between groups. According to LR HLA typing, 36 (15%) patients developed dnDSA (LR_dnDSA+). Twenty-nine out of 36 (80%) were confirmed to have dnDSA by HR typing (LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA+), whereas 7 (20%) did not (LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA−). Out of 49 LR_dnDSA specificities, 34 (69%) were confirmed by HR typing whereas 15 (31%) LR specificities were not confirmed. LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA+ patients were at higher risk of ABMR as compared to dnDSA− and LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA− (logRank < 0.001), and higher risk of death-censored graft loss (logRank = 0.001). Both LR_dnDSA+ (HR: 3.51, 95% CI = 1.25–9.85) and LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA+ (HR: 4.09, 95% CI = 1.45–11.54), but not LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA− independently predicted graft loss. The implementation of HR HLA typing improves the characterization of biologically relevant de novo anti-HLA DSA and discriminates patients with poorer graft outcomes.

Pediatric Kidney Transplantation-Can We Do Better? The Promise and Limitations of Epitope/Eplet Matching

Kidney transplant is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease as it offers significant survival and quality of life advantages over dialysis. While recent advances have significantly improved early graft outcomes, long-term overall graft survival has remained largely unchanged for the last 20 years. Due to the young age at which children receive their first transplant, most children will require multiple transplants during their lifetime. Each subsequent transplant becomes more difficult because of the development of de novo donor specific HLA antibodies (dnDSA), thereby limiting the donor pool and increasing mortality and morbidity due to longer time on dialysis awaiting re-transplantation. Secondary prevention of dnDSA through increased post-transplant immunosuppression in children is constrained by a significant risk for viral and oncologic complications. There are currently no FDA-approved therapies that can meaningfully reduce dnDSA burden or improve long-term allograft outcomes. Therefore, primary prevention strategies aimed at reducing the risk of dnDSA formation would allow for the best possible long-term allograft outcomes without the adverse complications associated with over-immunosuppression. Epitope matching, which provides a more nuanced assessment of immunological compatibility between donor and recipient, offers the potential for improved donor selection. Although epitope matching is promising, it has not yet been readily applied in the clinical setting. Our review will describe current strengths and limitations of epitope matching software, the evidence for and against improved outcomes with epitope matching, discussion of eplet load vs. variable immunogenicity, and conclude with a discussion of the delicate balance of improving matching without disadvantaging certain populations.

hlaR: A rapid and reproducible tool to identify eplet mismatches between transplant donors and recipients

Eplet mismatch load, both overall and at the single molecule level, correlates with transplant recipient outcomes. However, precise eplet assessment requires high-resolution HLA typing of both the donor and recipient. Anything less than high-resolution typing requires imputation of HLA types. The currently available methods to identify eplet mismatch are both tedious and demanding. Therefore, we developed a software package and user-friendly web application (hlaR), that simplifies the workflow of eplet analysis, provides functions to impute high-resolution from low-resolution data and calculates both overall and single molecule eplet mismatch for single or multiple donor recipient pairs. Compared to manual assessments using currently available tools (namely, HLAMatchMaker), hlaR resulted in only minimal discrepancy in eplet mismatches (mean absolute difference of 0.56 for class I and 0.86 for class II for unique sum across loci). Additionally, output of the single molecule eplet function compared well to manual calculation, with an average single antigen count increase of 0.19. Importantly, the hlaR tool permits rapid and reproducible imputation and eplet mismatch including comparison between eplet reference tables (e.g. HLAMatchMaker version 2 or 3). Users can import data from a spreadsheet rather than relying on keystroke entry of individual donor and recipient data, thus reducing the risk of data entry errors. The resulting improved scalability of the hlaR tool is highlighted by plotting analysis time against the size of the input dataset. The new hlaR tool can provide eplet mismatch data with a streamlined workflow. With decreased effort from the end user, eplet matching and mismatch load data can be further incorporated into both research and clinical use.

The utility of imputation for molecular mismatch analysis in solid organ transplantation

HLA genotyping has undergone a rapid progression in resolution since the development of DNA-based typing methods. Despite the advent of high-resolution next-generation sequencing, the bulk of solid organ genotyping is performed at intermediate resolution, which provides multiple possible two-field results for each classical HLA loci. As a result, several methodologies have been developed to impute the most likely allele-level (two-field) HLA genotype for the purposes of donor-recipient compatibility analysis. The advent of molecular mismatch analysis, however, has placed a new emphasis on the accuracy of imputation. While seminal molecular mismatch studies have relied on the imputation of intermediate resolution genotyping, several recent studies have performed analysis showing that imputation generates inaccuracies in epitope identification. While the clinical impact of these errors is not clear, it is important that these concerns do not preclude future progress in understanding the utility of molecular mismatch analysis in transplantation. In the future, advances in genotyping methods will result in routine two-field resolution that will abrogate these concerns. In the meantime, however, studies are needed in order to address the role of molecular mismatch in diverse patient populations and to carefully address the potential of molecular mismatch analysis in the context of imputation.

Role of HLA molecular mismatch in clinical practice

To date, traditional pre-transplant risk factors have failed to provide accurate risk stratification in transplantation. As a result, the practice of precision medicine remains elusive, resulting in a one-size-fits-all therapeutic approach for most patients. However, recent advancements in the understanding of HLA molecules at the molecular level have revitalized interest in HLA mismatch assessment. This review discusses HLA molecular mismatch as a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker available at the time of transplantation and answers some of the common questions and critiques of this approach. We highlight the retrospective data that supports single molecule risk categorization and explore the next steps required to evaluate its potential in clinical practice.

Molecular Mismatch Predicts T Cell-Mediated Rejection and De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Formation After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch (MM) analysis improves the prediction of clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation compared with prediction via traditional antigen MM. However, it remains unclear whether the level of MM can be used for risk stratification among liver transplantation (LT) recipients. A retrospective observational study of 45 living donor LTs was performed to evaluate eplet MM as a risk factor for both T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in the first month and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) formation. A total of 9 (20%) patients displayed TCMR. HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 eplet MM numbers were not associated with TCMR. By contrast, HLA-DQB1 eplet MM (DQB1-EpMM) number was significantly high in patients with TCMR. The predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE-II) score for the HLA-DQB1 locus (DQB1-PIRCHE-II) was also significantly higher in the TCMR group than in the no-TCMR group. There was a high probability for TCMR to occur with either a DQB1-EpMM ≥7 or a DQB1-PIRCHE-II ≥13. Pretransplant mixed lymphocyte response analyses indicated that there were no significant differences between the antidonor T cell proliferation activities of patients with low-number (<7) and high-number (≥7) DQB1-EpMMs. However, the proportion of CD25 expression on proliferating antidonor CD8⁺ T cells, used as a cytotoxic activity marker, was high in DQB1-EpMMs ≥7. Moreover, both DQB1-EpMMs ≥9 and DQB1-PIRCHE-II ≥3 were predictors of dnDSA formation. Thus, MM analysis may be applied toward tailored immunosuppression based on individual risks.

Donor-specific antibodies, glomerulitis, and human leukocyte antigen B eplet mismatch are risk factors for peritubular capillary C4d deposition in renal allografts

BACKGROUND

The complement system plays an important role in the immune response to transplantation, and the diagnostic significance of peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition (C4d+) in grafts is controversial. The study aimed to fully investigate the risk factors for PTC C4d+ and analyze its significance in biopsy pathology of kidney transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 124 cases of kidney transplant with graft biopsy and donor-specific antibody (DSA) testing from January 2017 to December 2019 in a single center. The effects of recipient pathological indicators, eplet mismatch (MM), and DSAs on PTC C4d+ were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 35/124 (28%) were PTC C4d+, including 21 with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), eight with renal tubular injury, three with T cell-mediated rejection, one with glomerular disease, and two others. Univariate analysis revealed that DSAs (P < 0.001), glomerulitis (P < 0.001), peritubular capillaritis (P < 0.001), and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B eplet MM (P = 0.010) were the influencing factors of PTC C4d+. According to multivariate analysis, DSAs (odds ratio [OR]: 9.608, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.742-33.668, P < 0.001), glomerulitis (OR: 3.581, 95%CI: 1.246-10.289, P = 0.018), and HLA B eplet MM (OR: 1.166, 95%CI: 1.005-1.353, P = 0.042) were the independent risk factors for PTC C4d+. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was increased to 0.831 for predicting PTC C4d+ when considering glomerulitis, DSAs, and HLA B eplet MM. The proportions of HLA I DSAs and PTC C4d+ in active antibody-mediated rejection were 12/17 and 15/17, respectively; the proportions of HLA class II DSAs and PTC C4d+ in chronic AMR were 8/12 and 7/12, respectively. Furthermore, the higher the PTC C4d+ score was, the more serious the urinary occult blood and proteinuria of recipients at the time of biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

PTC C4d+ was mainly observed in AMR cases. DSAs, glomerulitis, and HLA B eplet MM are the independent risk factors for PTC C4d+.

Emerging monitoring technologies in kidney transplantation

Non-invasive technologies to monitor kidney allograft health utilizing high-throughput assays of blood and urine specimens are emerging out of the research realm and slowly becoming part of everyday clinical practice. HLA epitope analysis and eplet mismatch score determination promise a more refined approach to the pre-transplant recipient-donor HLA matching that may lead to reduced rejection risk. High-resolution HLA typing and multiplex single antigen bead assays are identifying potential new offending HLA antibody subtypes. There is increasing recognition of the deleterious role non-HLA antibodies play in post-transplant outcomes. Donor-derived cell-free DNA detected by next-generation sequencing is a promising biomarker for kidney transplant rejection. Multi-omics techniques are shedding light on discrete genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic signatures that correlate with and predict allograft outcomes. Over the next decade, a comprehensive approach to optimize kidney matching and monitor transplant recipients for acute and chronic graft dysfunction will likely involve a combination of those emerging technologies summarized in this review.

Epitope-Level Matching—A Review of the Novel Concept of Eplets in Transplant Histocompatibility

The development of de novo donor-specific antibodies is related to the poor matching of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) between donor and recipient, which leads to dismal clinical outcomes and graft loss. However, new approaches that stratify the risks of long-term graft failure in solid organ transplantation have emerged, changing the paradigm of HLA compatibility. In addition, advances in software development have given rise to a new structurally based algorithm known as HLA Matchmaker, which determines compatibility at the epitope rather than the antigen level. Although this technique still has limitations, plenty of research maintains that this assessment represents a more complete and detailed definition of HLA compatibility. This review summarizes recent aspects of eplet mismatches, highlighting the most recent advances and future research directions.

Non-HLA Antibodies and Epitope Mismatches in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Histological Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Background

Correlation between antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and circulating HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA) is strong but imperfect in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, raising the possibility of undetected HLA-DSA or non-HLA antibodies contributing to ABMR. Detailed evaluation of the degree of HLA matching together with the identification of non-HLA antibodies in KT may help to decipher the antibody involved.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed patients with transplant biopsies scored following Banff'15 classification. Pre- and post-transplant serum samples were checked for HLA and non-HLA antibodies [MICA-Ab, angiotensin-II type-1-receptor (AT1R)-Ab, endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR)-Ab and crossmatches with primary aortic endothelial cells (EC-XM)]. We also analyzed HLA epitope mismatches (HLA-EM) between donors and recipients to explore their role in ABMR histology (ABMRh) with and without HLA-DSA.

Results

One-hundred eighteen patients with normal histology (n = 19), ABMRh (n = 52) or IFTA (n = 47) were studied. ABMRh patients were HLA-DSApos (n = 38, 73%) or HLA-DSAneg (n = 14, 27%). Pre-transplant HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab were more frequent in ABMRh compared with IFTA and normal histology cases (p = 0.006 and 0.003), without differences in other non-HLA antibodies. Only three ABMRhDSAneg cases showed non-HLA antibodies. ABMRhDSAneg and ABMRhDSApos cases showed similar biopsy changes and graft-survival. Both total class II and DRB1 HLA-EM were associated with ABMRhDSApos but not with ABMRhDSAneg. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant HLA-DSA (OR: 3.69 [1.31-10.37], p = 0.013) and AT1R-Ab (OR: 5.47 [1.78-16.76], p = 0.003) were independent predictors of ABMRhDSApos.

Conclusions

In conclusion, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab is frequently found in ABMRhDSApos patients. However, AT1R-Ab, MICA-Ab, ETAR-Ab or EC-XM+ are rarely found among ABMRhDSAneg patients. Pre-transplant AT1R-Ab may act synergistically with preformed or de novo HLA-DSA to produce ABMRhDSApos but not ABMRhDSAneg. HLA epitope mismatch associates with ABMRhDSApos compared with ABMRhDSAneg, suggesting factors other than HLA are responsible for the damage.

Is the level of HLA eplet mismatch a risk factor for graft loss among kidney transplant recipients who have already formed de novo donor specific antibody?

Eplet mismatches are associated with de novo DSA (dnDSA) and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) among the general kidney transplant population. However, it is unclear whether the level of eplet mismatch can be used for risk stratification among patients with dnDSA. We performed a retrospective observational study of kidney transplant recipients with dnDSA (n = 44) transplanted between 10/2007 and 5/2014 to evaluate eplet mismatch as a risk factor for ABMR and allograft loss among dnDSA patients. High resolution typing was inferred from by imputation based on ethnicity and NMDP haplotypes, and the eplet mismatch was calculated using the Epvix algorithm. Biopsies (N = 151) from 95.3%(42/44) of patients were reviewed. The mean (SD) eplet mismatch was 69.8(22.8). The ABMR incidence was 71.4% (30/42) and 5 year death censored allograft survival was 67.4% during the mean (SD) follow-up of 5.3 (3.1) years. ABMR and death-censored allograft survival were not correlated with eplet mismatch among dnDSA patients. However, medication adherence and dnDSA MFI < 3000 were associated with reduced ABMR incidence. Among patients with both of these favorable characteristics, only 35.7% (15/42) developed ABMR. In conclusion, the level of eplet mismatch does not correlate with ABMR or allograft loss among high risk kidney transplant patients with dnDSA.

Substituting imputation of HLA antigens for high-resolution HLA typing: Evaluation of a multiethnic population and implications for clinical decision making in transplantation

Molecular mismatch analysis for assessment of histocompatibility in transplantation requires high-resolution HLA typing. Algorithms to "guesstimate" high-resolution from low-resolution typing exist, but their accuracy remains unknown. We converted high-resolution, sequence-based, HLA typing of 310 subjects from an ethnically heterogeneous population to low-resolution equivalents and tested the ability of the NMDP HaploStats and HLA Matchmaker programs to impute/reproduce the measured high-resolution HLA type, using the more common "winner-takes-all" approach. Only 35.6% of the HaploStats imputed HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 haplotypes had no mistakes, and the accuracy was significantly lower for non-Caucasians (29.1%) compared to Caucasians (45.2%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.8; P = .004). HLA Matchmaker was not able to provide high-resolution haplotypes for 45.2% of Caucasian subjects and 63.5% of non-Caucasian subjects (P = .002). Of those with an imputed result, only 10.3% of Caucasians and 4.8% of non-Caucasians had accurate 10-allele high-resolution output. Eplet analysis revealed additional, inaccurate eplets in 37% of individuals, with 22.5% showing at least 2 additional, inaccurate eplets; incorrect eplets were more common among non-Caucasians (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = .018). Given this high error rate, caution should be taken before using imputation tools for clinical or research purposes, especially for non-Caucasian individuals.

HLA class II eplet mismatch load improves prediction of dnDSA development after living donor kidney transplantation

HLA donor-specific antibodies developed de novo after transplant remain a major cause of chronic allograft dysfunction. Our study main purpose was to determine whether HLA MM, assessed traditionally and by HLA total and AbVer eplet mismatch load (EptMM and EpvMM) assessed with HLAMatchMaker, had impact on dnDSA development after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 96 LDKT between 2008 and 2017 performed in Hospital Santo António. Seven patients developed dnDSA-II and EpvMM and EptMM were greater in dnDSA-II group compared to the no dnDSA-II (18.0 ± 8.7 versus 9.9 ± 7.9, p = .041 and 41.3 ± 18.9 versus 23.1 ± 16.7, p = .018), which is not observed for AgMM (2.29 versus 1.56; p = .09). In a multivariate analysis, we found that preformed DSA (HR = 7.983; p = .023), living unrelated donors (HR = 8.052; p = .024) and retransplantation (HR = 14.393; p = .009) were predictors for dnDSA-II (AUC = 0.801; 0.622-0.981). HLA-II EpvMM (HR = 1.105; p = .028; AUC = 0.856) showed to be a superior predictor of dnDSA-II, when compared to AgMM (HR = 1.740; p = .113; AUC = 0.783), when adjusted for these clinical variables. Graft survival was significantly lower within dnDSA-II patient group (36% versus 88%, p < .001). HLA molecular mismatch analysis is extremely important to minimize risk for HLA-II dnDSA development improving outcome and increasing chance of retransplant lowering allosensitization.

Not all HLA epitope mismatches are equal

The future of HLA matching in solid organ transplantation lies in epitope matching. The article by Sapir-Pichhadze et al. provides indirect evidence that there is a difference in immunogenicity between antibody-verified versus non-verified eplets. However, this difference was less clear for HLA class II, showing the need for additional efforts to identify truly immunogenic HLA class II epitope mismatches.

Analysis of T and B Cell Epitopes to Predict the Risk of de novo Donor-Specific Antibody (DSA) Production After Kidney Transplantation: A Two-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Risk prediction of de novo donor specific antibody (DSA) would be very important for long term graft outcome after organ transplantation. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the association of eplet mismatches and predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE) scores with de novo DSA production. Our retrospective cohort study enrolled 691 living donor kidney transplantations. HLA-A, B, DRB and DQB eplet mismatches and PIRCHE scores (4 digit of HLA-A, B, DR, and DQ) were determined by HLA matchmaker (ver 2.1) and PIRCHE-II Matching Service, respectively. Weak correlation between eplet mismatches and PIRCHE scores was identified, although both measurements were associated with classical HLA mismatches. Class II (DRB+DQB) eplet mismatches were significantly correlated with the incidence of de novo class II (DR/DQ) DSA production [8/235 (3.4%) in eplet mismatch ≤ 13 vs. 92/456 (20.2%) in eplet mismatch ≥ 14, p < 0.001]. PIRCHE scores were also significantly correlated with de novo class II DSA production [26/318 (8.2%) in PIRCHE ≤ 175 vs. 74/373 (19.8%) in PIRCHE ≥ 176, p < 0.001]. Patients with low levels of both class II eplet mismatches and PIRCHE scores developed de novo class II DSA only in 4/179 (2.2%). Analysis of T cell and B cell epitopes can provide a beneficial information on the design of individualized immunosuppression regimens for prevention of de novo DSA production after kidney transplantation.

Improving HLA matching in living donor kidney transplantation using kidney paired exchange program

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of compatible pairs within kidney paired exchange programs has been described as a way to enhance these programs. Improved immunological matching for the recipient in compatible pair has been described to be a possible benefit.

METHODS

The main purpose of our study was to determine if the introduction of compatible pairs in the Portuguese kidney paired exchange program would result in a better match for these patients, but also to assess if this strategy would increase the number of incompatible pairs with a possible match. We included 17 compatible pairs in kidney paired exchange pool of 35 pairs and performed an in-silico simulation determining HLA eplet mismatch load between the co-registered and matched pairs using HLA MatchMaker, version 3.0.

RESULTS

Our study showed that the inclusion of fully HLA-A, -B, -DR mismatched compatible pairs within the national Portuguese KEP increased matched rate within ICP (0.71%) and improved HLA eplet matching within compatible pairs. 16 of 17 (94.12%) of the CP obtained one or more transplants possibilities and 13 (81.25%) would have been transplanted with significantly lower HLA class I and class II total and antibody-verified eplet mismatch load (83.9 ± 16.9 vs. 59.8 ± 12.2, P = .002 and 30.1 ± 5.5 vs. 21.2 ± 3.0, P = .003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This strategy is a viable alternative for compatible pairs seeking a better matched kidney and Portuguese KEP program should allow them this possibility.