1
|
Devriese M, Da Silva S, Le Mene M, Rouquie J, Allain V, Kolesar L, Rigo K, Creary LE, Lauterbach N, Usureau C, Dewez M, Caillat-Zucman S, Werner G, Taupin JL. Two-field resolution on-call HLA typing for deceased donors using nanopore sequencing. HLA 2024; 103:e15441. [PMID: 38507216 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
The current practice of HLA genotyping in deceased donors poses challenges due to limited resolution within time constraints. Nevertheless, the assessment of compatibility between anti-HLA sensitized recipients and mismatched donors remains a critical medical need, particularly when dealing with allele-specific (second field genotyping level) donor-specific antibodies. In this study, we present a customized protocol based on the NanoTYPE® HLA typing kit, employing the MinION® sequencer, which enables rapid HLA typing of deceased donors within a short timeframe of 3.75 h on average at a three-field resolution with almost no residual ambiguities. Through a prospective real-time analysis of HLA typing in 18 donors, we demonstrated the efficacy and precision of our nanopore-based method in comparison to the conventional approach and without delaying organ allocation. Indeed, this duration was consistent with the deceased donor organ donation procedure leading to organ allocation via the French Biomedicine Agency. The improved resolution achieved with our protocol enhances the security of organ allocation, particularly benefiting highly sensitized recipients who often present intricate HLA antibody profiles. By overcoming technical challenges and providing comprehensive genotyping data, this approach holds the potential to significantly impact deceased donor HLA genotyping, thereby facilitating optimal organ allocation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magali Devriese
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR976, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sephora Da Silva
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Melchior Le Mene
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Julien Rouquie
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Allain
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Cedric Usureau
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR976, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Sophie Caillat-Zucman
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR976, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR976, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Greenspan NS. Epitopes, paratopes, and other topes 30 years on: Understanding what we are talking about. Hum Immunol 2023; 84:429-438. [PMID: 37407356 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The question of which protein antigens, such as HLA class I or class II molecules, will bind, and how well, to a given antibody is often assumed to depend exclusively on the details of protein surface structure. These structures are usually based on static models resulting from X-ray crystallography. While these notions are useful, the ultimate causal factors determining how well a given antigen binds a given antibody are based in thermodynamics and can include atomic mobility and the time-varying conformations of proteins. In this article, fundamental biophysical principles of antibody-antigen interaction are discussed, concepts critical for a deeper understanding of the pertinent molecular phenomena are highlighted, and common misunderstandings are identified and debunked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil S Greenspan
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lemieux W, Fleischer D, Yang AY, Niemann M, Oualkacha K, Klement W, Richard L, Polychronakos C, Liwski R, Claas F, Gebel HM, Keown PA, Lewin A, Sapir-Pichhadze R. Dissecting the impact of molecular T-cell HLA mismatches in kidney transplant failure: A retrospective cohort study. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1067075. [PMID: 36505483 PMCID: PMC9730505 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1067075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment in end-stage kidney disease, but de-novo donor specific antibody development continues to negatively impact patients undergoing kidney transplantation. One of the recent advances in solid organ transplantation has been the definition of molecular mismatching between donors and recipients' Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA). While not fully integrated in standard clinical care, cumulative molecular mismatch at the level of eplets (EMM) as well as the PIRCHE-II score have shown promise in predicting transplant outcomes. In this manuscript, we sought to study whether certain T-cell molecular mismatches (TcEMM) were highly predictive of death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Methods We studied a retrospective cohort of kidney donor:recipient pairs from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2000-2015). Allele level HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1 types were imputed from serologic types using the NMDP algorithm. TcEMMs were then estimated using the PIRCHE-II algorithm. Multivariable Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) models assessed the association between each TcEMM and DCGF. To discriminate between TcEMMs most predictive of DCGF, we fit multivariable Lasso penalized regression models. We identified co-expressed TcEMMs using weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA). Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to address PIRCHE and IMGT/HLA version updates. Results A total of 118,309 donor:recipient pairs meeting the eligibility criteria were studied. When applying the PIRCHE-II algorithm, we identified 1,935 distinct TcEMMs at the population level. A total of 218 of the observed TcEMM were independently associated with DCGF by AFT models. The Lasso penalized regression model with post selection inference identified a smaller subset of 86 TcEMMs (56 and 30 TcEMM derived from HLA Class I and II, respectively) to be highly predictive of DCGF. Of the observed TcEMM, 38.14% appeared as profiles of highly co-expressed TcEMMs. In addition, sensitivity analyses identified that the selected TcEMM were congruent across IMGT/HLA versions. Conclusion In this study, we identified subsets of TcEMMs highly predictive of DCGF and profiles of co-expressed mismatches. Experimental verification of these TcEMMs determining immune responses and how they may interact with EMM as predictors of transplant outcomes would justify their consideration in organ allocation schemes and for modifying immunosuppression regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Lemieux
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada,Medical Affairs & Innovation, Héma-Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - David Fleischer
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Archer Yi Yang
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Karim Oualkacha
- Department of Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William Klement
- Division of Organ Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Lucie Richard
- Transfusion medicine/Reference Laboratory, Héma-Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Constantin Polychronakos
- Department of Pediatrics, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre and the Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Robert Liwski
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Howard M. Gebel
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Paul A. Keown
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Antoine Lewin
- Medical Affairs & Innovation, Héma-Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada,Division of Nephrology and the Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada,*Correspondence: Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze,
| |
Collapse
|