Examination of reactive motor responses to Achilles tendon vibrations during an inhibitory stepping reaction time task

The effect of mechanical vibration-based stimulation on dynamic balance control and gait characteristics in healthy young and older adults: A systematic review of cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

A good dynamic balance control and stable gait played an important role in the daily ambulation, especially for older adults with sensorimotor degeneration. This study aimed to systematically review the effects and potential mechanisms of mechanical vibration-based stimulation (MVBS) on dynamic balance control and gait characteristics in healthy young and older adults.

METHOD

Five bioscience and engineering databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase, were searched until September 4th, 2022. Studies published between 2000 and 2022 in English and Chinese involving mechanical vibration related to gait and dynamic balance were included. The procedure was followed via the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis method. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the NIH study quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

A total of 41 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Eight studies were good-quality while 26 were moderate-quality and 7 were poor-quality. There were six categories of MVBS at various frequencies and amplitudes utilized in included studies, including plantar vibration, focal muscle vibration, Achilles tendon vibration, vestibular vibration, cervical vibration, and vibration on nail of hallux.

SIGNIFICANCE

Different types of MVBS targeting different sensory systems affected the dynamic balance control and gait characteristics differently. MVBS could be used to provide improvement or perturbation to specific sensory systems, to induce different sensory reweight strategies during gait.

Perceptual Inhibition Is Not a Specific Component of the Sensory Integration Process Necessary for a Rapid Voluntary Step Initiation in Healthy Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether performing step initiation during a proprioceptive perturbation would require greater perceptual or motor inhibitory control in older adults.

METHOD

Fifty-two healthy adults (young: n = 26, mean age 22.5 years vs. older: n = 26, mean age 70.1 years) performed a stepping reaction time task, with different inhibition requirements (i.e., perceptual vs. motor inhibitory conflict), with two proprioceptive configurations: with and without application of Achilles tendon vibrations.

RESULTS

Beyond a systematically greater stepping reaction time in older adults (p < .01), no difference was found between the perceptual versus motor inhibitory conflict resolution, regardless of age and proprioceptive configuration. Furthermore, slower reaction time was observed for young participants in the presence of Achilles tendon vibrations unlike older adults, who showed the same reactive stepping performance with or without vibrations (p < .05).

DISCUSSION

These findings show that perceptual inhibition cannot be considered as specifically involved in the central processing of proprioceptive signals, at least not in active older adults. Rather than motor system malfunctioning or a reduced amount of proprioceptive afference, we propose that cortical-proprioceptive processing in older adults remains as effective as in young adults, regardless of the high attentional requirements for step responses.