Understanding individual differences in lifting mechanics: Do some people adopt motor control strategies that minimize biomechanical exposure

Quantifying how functional and structural personal factors influence biomechanical exposures in paramedic lifting tasks

It is unknown how structural (sex, stature, body mass) and functional (strength, flexibility) personal factors influence lifting strategy in paramedic work. We explored whether variance in peak low back forces and kinematic coordination patterns could be explained by structural and functional personal factors in paramedic lifting tasks. Seventy-two participants performed backboard and stretcher lifts. Peak low back forces normalised to body mass, as well as kinematic coordination patterns, were calculated as dependent variables. Being female, stronger, shorter, having higher body mass, and/or having greater lower body range of motion (ROM) were all independently associated with lower normalised low back forces across backboard and stretcher lifting. Females and stronger individuals seemed to define a movement objective to consistently minimise compressive forces, while individuals with greater hip ROM consistently minimised anteroposterior shear forces. The efficacy of improving strength and hip ROM to reduce low back forces in paramedic lifting should be investigated.Practitioner summary: Females, stronger individuals, and individuals with greater hip range of motion consistently exhibited lower normalised low back forces in paramedic lifting. Improving strength and hip range of motion via training is a potential proactive ergonomics approach to reduce peak low back forces in paramedic lifting tasks.

Sensitivity of principal component analysis outcomes to data pre-processing conditions when quantifying trial-to-trial variability in whole-body kinematics

This study investigated whether modes of variance in trial-to-trial whole-body kinematic variability identified by principal component analysis (PCA) were consistent across data pre-processing conditions generated from a common dataset. Comparisons made included 1) when trajectory data was expressed in a global vs. local reference frame; 2) when the number of landmarks used to represent whole-body motion differed, and; 3) whether input trajectory data were normalized to participant stature. Varying data pre-processing conditions prior to PCA does not bias the total variance identified. However, it can influence how modes of variance are dispersed across PCs, which in turn, can influence interpretation.

Differential effects of sex on upper body kinematics and kinetics during fatiguing, Asymmetric lifting

This study quantified sex-specific biomechanical adaptations to fatigue in asymmetric lifting. Twenty-one females and fifteen males performed a prolonged asymmetric lifting protocol while upper body, trunk and pelvis kinematics were collected. Features of movement identified with principal component analysis, and peak joint angular velocities and moments were calculated. Sex-specific kinematic adaptations to fatigue included females adopting a 'stoop-like' lifting strategy to a greater extent than males. Additionally, females exhibited higher vertical elbow positions during load rotation, moved their body toward the destination for load deposit, and did not reduce peak right shoulder flexion velocities, in contrast to male participants. Females also had greater low back and shoulder peak normalized joint moments. When fatigued, females adopted an asymmetric lifting strategy that minimized metabolic demand as supported by smaller decreases in maximum voluntary contractions. However, females' fatigue-related adaptations increased biomechanical exposures associated with injury risk.

The Influence of Contextual and Theoretical Expertise on Generic and Occupation-Specific Lifting Strategy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether (i) low back loads and/or (ii) kinematic coordination patterns differed across theoretical expert, contextual expert and novice groups when completing both generic and occupation-specific lifts.

BACKGROUND

Experience has been proposed as a factor that could reduce biomechanical exposures in lifting, but the literature reports mixed effects. The inconsistent relationship between experience and exposures may be partially attributable to the broad classification of experience and experimental lifting protocols not replicating the environment where experience was gained.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was used to recruit 72 participants including theoretical experts (formal training on lifting mechanics), contextual experts (paramedics), and novices. Participants performed 10 barbell and crate (generic) lifts, as well as backboard and stretcher (occupation-specific) lifts while whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Peak low back compression and anteroposterior shear loads normalized to body mass, as well as kinematic coordination patterns, were calculated as dependent variables.

RESULTS

No significant differences in low back loads were observed across expertise groups. However, significant differences were seen in kinematic coordination patterns across expertise groups in occupation-specific lifts, but not in generic lifts.

CONCLUSION

Increasing expertise is unlikely to minimize low back loads in lifting. However, contextual expertise did influence lifting kinematics, but only when performing occupationally specific lifts.

APPLICATION

Contextual expertise may help lifters adopt lifting kinematics that enhance the tolerance of their musculoskeletal system to withstand applied loads, but does not seem to reduce the applied low back loads relative to noncontextual expert groups.

Identification of movement phenotypes from occupational gesture kinematics: Advancing individual ergonomic exposure classification and personalized training

The identification of personalized preventive strategies plays a major role in contrasting the occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. This requires the identification of distinct movement patterns within large samples and the attribution of a proper risk level to each identified movement phenotype. We assessed the feasibility of this approach by exploiting wearable inertial measurement units to estimate the whole-body kinematics of 43 healthy participants performing 18 reach-to-manipulate movements, which differed based on the object's position in the space and the type of manipulation required. Through unsupervised clustering, we identified multiple movement phenotypes graded by ergonomic performance. Furthermore, we determined which joints mostly contributed to instantiating the ergonomic differences across clusters, emphasizing the importance of monitoring this aspect during occupational gestures. Overall, our analysis suggests that movement phenotypes can be identified within occupational motor repertoires. Assigning individual performance to specific phenotypes has the potential to inform the development of more effective and tailored interventions.

Influence of load knowledge on lifting biomechanics

Objectives. Findings from previous studies implied that appropriately controlling load knowledge might help improve the biomechanical performance during lifting tasks. However, only load weight knowledge was often discussed in previous studies. The current study aimed to complement the existing studies and provide improved knowledge about the influence of load knowledge on lifting biomechanics. Methods. Twenty-four healthy male participants were recruited and instructed to perform symmetric lifting tasks with different load weights under different load knowledge conditions. Load weights were set at three levels (40, 80 and 120%) of each participant's maximum acceptable lifting capacity. The examined load knowledge conditions included 'no knowledge' condition, 'weight known' condition, 'fragile material known' condition and 'weight and fragile material known' condition. Results. We found that when knowing fragility information about lifting materials, workers tended to be more cautious by adopting a less dynamic motion pattern during the landing phase, as evidenced by decreases of 6-8% in elbow joint acceleration. The 'cautious' lifting pattern when fragility load knowledge was presented could contribute to reduced risk of lower back disorder. Conclusion. This finding could help to develop lower back disorder prevention interventions to improve occupational safety and health.

The influence of sex and strength capacity on normalized low-back exposure during lifting: Insights from a joint power analysis

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the influence of sex, strength capacity, and relative load mass on low-back exposure and lower extremity joint power generation in backboard lifting.

BACKGROUND

Sex and strength have been shown to influence lifting strategy, but without load mass being scaled to strength it is unknown which factor influences low-back exposures, and whether there are interactions with load mass.

METHODS

Motion capture and force plate data from 28 participants were collected during backboard lifting at load masses scaled to strength capacity. Differences in normalized peak low-back moment, peak knee-to-hip power magnitude ratio and timing were tested as a function of sex, strength, and load mass.

RESULTS

Stronger participants had lower normalized peak low-back moments (average 32% change from low-capacity across all load masses), with no significant sex effect (p = 0.582). As load mass increased, normalized peak low-back moment, peak knee-to-hip power magnitude and synchronicity decreased.

CONCLUSION

Training to both increase strength capacity and hip-joint power generation may be a strategy to reduce low-back exposure in backboard lifting.