Prognostic value of mucins in the classification of ampullary carcinomas

The Forms of the Lectin Tff2 Differ in the Murine Stomach and Pancreas: Indications for Different Molecular Functions

The lectin TFF2 belongs to the trefoil factor family (TFF). This polypeptide is typically co-secreted with the mucin MUC6 from gastric mucous neck cells, antral gland cells, and duodenal Brunner glands. Here, TFF2 fulfills a protective function by forming a high-molecular-mass complex with the MUC6, physically stabilizing the mucus barrier. In pigs and mice, and slightly in humans, TFF2 is also synthesized in the pancreas. Here, we investigated the murine stomach, pancreas, and duodenum by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) and proteomics and identified different forms of Tff2. In both the stomach and duodenum, the predominant form is a high-molecular-mass complex with Muc6, whereas, in the pancreas, only low-molecular-mass monomeric Tff2 was detectable. We also investigated the expression of Tff2 and other selected genes in the stomach, pancreas, and the proximal, medial, and distal duodenum (RT-PCR analysis). The absence of the Tff2/Muc6 complex in the pancreas is due to a lack of Muc6. Based on its known motogenic, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory effects, we propose a protective receptor-mediated function of monomeric Tff2 for the pancreatic ductal epithelium. This view is supported by a report that a loss of Tff2 promotes the formation of pancreatic intraductal mucinous neoplasms.

Depletion of MUC5B mucin in gastrointestinal cancer cells alters their tumorigenic properties: implication of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Secreted mucins are large O-glycosylated proteins that participate in the protection/defence of underlying mucosae in normal adults. Alteration of their expression is a hallmark of numerous epithelial cancers and has often been correlated to bad prognosis of the tumour. The secreted mucin MUC5B is overexpressed in certain subtypes of gastric and intestinal cancers, but the consequences of this altered expression on the cancer cell behaviour are not known. To investigate the role of MUC5B in carcinogenesis, its expression was knocked-down in the human gastric cancer cell line KATO-III and in the colonic cancer cell line LS174T by using transient and stable approaches. Consequences of MUC5B knocking-down on cancer cells were studied with respect to in vitro proliferation, migration and invasion, and in vivo on tumour growth using a mouse subcutaneous xenograft model. Western blotting, luciferase assay and qRT-PCR were used to identify proteins and signalling pathways involved. In vitro MUC5B down-regulation leads to a decrease in proliferation, migration and invasion properties in both cell lines. Molecular mechanisms involved the alteration of β-catenin expression, localization and activity and decreased expression of several of its target genes. In vivo xenografts of MUC5B-deficient cells induced a decrease in tumour growth when compared with MUC5B-expressing Mock cells. Altogether, the present study shows that down-regulation of MUC5B profoundly alters proliferation, migration and invasion of human gastrointestinal cancer cells and that these alterations may be, in part, mediated by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway emphasizing the potential of MUC5B as an actor of gastrointestinal carcinogenesis.

Intestinal and pancreatobiliary differentiation in periampullary carcinoma: the role of immunohistochemistry

Periampullary carcinoma (PC) is classified into intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes using morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Different combinations of markers have been used in the literature. One hundred eight PCs were classified using morphology and IHC (CDX2, mucin [MUC] 2, cytokeratin [CK] 20, CK7, CK17, and MUC1). The expression of these markers was compared with different histologic subtypes, histopathologic prognostic parameters, and patients' survival. There were 38 intestinal and 53 pancreatobiliary subtypes classified on morphology alone. CDX2 showed high sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (100%) for intestinal type. CK20 and MUC2 showed low sensitivity (50% and 39.5%) but high specificity (86.8% and 96.2%) for intestinal type. CK7 and CK17 showed a sensitivity of 90.5% and 32% and a specificity of 21% and 89.4%, respectively, for pancreatobiliary subtype. MUC1 was 100% sensitive but 0% specific in pancreatobiliary subtype. The overall median survival in morphologic and IHC intestinal type was 45 months versus 20 months in pancreatobiliary type (P = 0.01). Intestinal and pancreatobiliary types of PC were differentiated in 84.2% of cases by morphology alone and in 87.9% cases with IHC. CDX2-positive tumors had a median survival of 44 months versus 22 months in CDX2-negative tumors (P = .03). IHC helped in reclassifying an additional 4 cases of mixed and other types. Among the panel used, CDX2 showed a high sensitivity and specificity for intestinal subtype and was an independent prognostic marker for longer survival. Thus, CDX2 may be used routinely with morphology in subtyping of PC, and a panel of markers may be used in morphologically difficult cases.

The membrane-bound mucins: From cell signalling to transcriptional regulation and expression in epithelial cancers

The membrane-bound mucins belong to an ever-increasing family of O-glycoproteins. Based on their structure and localization at the cell surface they are thought to play important biological roles in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, in cell signalling and in modulating biological properties of cancer cells. Among them, MUC1 and MUC4 mucins are best characterized. Their altered expression in cancer (overexpression in the respiratory, gastro-intestinal, urogenital and hepato-biliary tracts) indicates an important role for these membrane-bound mucins in tumour progression, metastasis, cancer cell resistance to chemotherapeutics drugs and as specific markers of epithelial cancer cells. Some mechanisms responsible for MUC1 and MUC4 role in tumour cell properties have been deciphered recently. However, much remains to be done in order to understand the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways that control the expression of membrane-bound mucins during the different steps of tumour progression toward adenocarcinoma and evaluate their potential as prognostic/diagnostic markers and as therapeutic tools. In this review we focus on the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways known to control the expression of membrane-bound mucins in cancer. We will discuss the mechanisms of regulation at the promoter level (including genetic and epigenetic modifications) that may be responsible for the mucin altered pattern of expression in epithelial cancers.

Immunohistochemical study of mucin expression in periampullary adenomyoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Benign tumors and tumor-like conditions in the ampullary area are uncommon, and there are extremely rare cases of adenomyoma (AM) and adenomyomatous hyperplasia (AMH). Surgical treatment is necessary if these lesions cause biliary obstruction. In addition, the differential diagnosis of AM and AMH from carcinoma is often difficult by standard endoscopic biopsy and cytopathological analysis that may show differential findings, resulting in unnecessary surgeries sometimes being performed.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of periampullary AM and AMH was performed.

RESULTS

For both types of lesions, epithelial glandular cells (EGCs) showed diffuse expression of MUC6 and focal expression of HIK1083, mainly in the inner region, and focal expression of MUC5AC, mainly at the surface. The EGCs showed no expression of MUC1 or MUC4, both of which were identified as malignant tumor markers in our previous series of mucin expression studies in pancreatobiliary tumors. The expression of CK7, which was diffusely positive in normal periampullary mucosa, was decreased in the EGCs of AM and AMH.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined evaluation of IHC findings may be effective in the detection of AM and AMH, and also in distinguishing benign periampullary lesions, such as AM and AMH, from ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma, thus avoiding excessive surgery.

Differentiation markers in pancreatic head adenocarcinomas: MUC1 and MUC4 expression indicates poor prognosis in pancreatobiliary differentiated tumours

Aims:

To examine how accurately immunohistochemical markers discriminate between pancreatobiliary and intestinal-type adenocarcinomas in the pancreatic head and to explore the prognostic importance of these markers among each of these histological types.

Methods and results:

Histopathological features of 114 consecutively resected adenocarcinomas of pancreatobiliary (n = 67) and intestinal (n = 47) type of differentiation were recorded according to a standardized protocol. Immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, MUC1, MUC2, MUC4 and CDX2 was performed on tissue microarrays. Classification of the adenocarcinomas based on immunohistochemistry was compared with the morphological evaluation of histological type. Presence of CK7 and MUC4, and absence of CDX2, were independent predictors of pancreatobiliary versus intestinal type. Using these markers to optimize immunohistochemical classification, agreement between immunohistochemical and morphological classification was only moderate (κ = 0.53). In pancreatobiliary differentiated tumours, MUC1 and/or MUC4 expression was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 3.98) when adjusting for nodal involvement, vessel involvement and tumour size. In intestinally differentiated tumours, none of the markers was significantly associated with prognosis.

Conclusions:

Agreement between immunohistochemical and morphological classification of pancreatic head adenocarcinomas is moderate. In pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas, MUC1 and/or MUC4 expression indicates a particularly poor prognosis.

Application of immunohistochemistry to liver and gastrointestinal neoplasms: liver, stomach, colon, and pancreas

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry has become an integral component of the practice of pathology. Newer antibodies allow for increasingly precise diagnoses for tumors that previously could not be easily identified. Recently, immunohistochemical evaluations have begun to allow pathologists to actively assist in determining prognosis and even in selecting therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the usefulness of currently available immunostains for the study of liver and gastrointestinal system neoplasms and to make recommendations for panels of immunostains that can be particularly helpful.

DATA SOURCES

Information has been collected from recent literature as well as from personal experience and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Many immunostains are now available for the practicing pathologist that allow for increasing accuracy in diagnosis of liver and gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Panels of immunostains can be used to differentiate between various tumors and also to identify site of origin in the case of a metastatic neoplasm. Immunostains that allow for prognostic determinations and for guidance in the selection of chemotherapeutic agents can also be used by pathologists to assist in the management of patients with malignant tumors affecting the liver and gastrointestinal tract.

Prognostic factors for ampullary adenocarcinomas: tumor stage, tumor histology, tumor location, immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability

Prognostic factors for ampullary carcinomas (ACs) are poorly defined. Fifty three resected ACs were analyzed for CDX2, MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC6, MUC2, and for mismatch repair proteins (hMLH1, hMSH2, PMS2, hMSH6) using immunohistochemistry. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was evaluated by fluorescently labeled PCR using an automated sequencer. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed for clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular parameters. CDX2 was found in 32 out of 53 (60%) ACs with a significantly higher frequency among intestinal ACs compared with biliopancreatic (BP) ACs. The MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC6, MUC2 apomucins were expressed in 75, 43, 39, and 28% of ACs, respectively, with a significantly higher coexpression of MUC1/MUC5AC in BP ACs. MSI and loss of expression of hMLH1/PMS2 or hMSH2/hMSH6 proteins were observed only in intestinal ACs. Factors significantly correlated with improved survival in the univariate analysis were: low stage, absence of lymph nodes metastases, negative surgical margins (R0 status), and presence of MSI. In the multivariate analysis, stage was the only independent prognostic factor of survival. We conclude that stage is the only independent prognostic factor of survival in the multivariate analysis, whereas histological criteria and the immunohistochemical expression of apomucins and CDX2 are helpful in the classification and understanding of the histogenesis of ACs.

Expression profiles of MUC mucins and trefoil factor family (TFF) peptides in the intrahepatic biliary system: physiological distribution and pathological significance

Mucin secreted by mucosal epithelial cells plays a role in the protection of the mucosal surface and also is involved in pathological processes. So far, MUC1-4, 5AC, 5B, 6-8, 11-13 and 15-17 genes coding the backbone mucin core protein have been identified in humans. Their diverse physiological distribution and pathological alterations have been reported. Trefoil factor family (TFF) peptides are mucin-associated molecules co-expressed with MUC mucins and involved in the maintenance of mucosal barrier and the biological behavior of epithelial and carcinoma cells. Intrahepatic biliary system is a route linking the bile canaliculi and the extrahepatic bile duct for the excretion of bile synthesized by hepatocytes. Biliary epithelial cells line in the intrahepatic biliary system, secreting mucin and other molecules involved in the maintenance and regulation of the system. In this review, the latest information regarding properties, expression profiles and regulation of MUC mucins and TFF peptides in the intrahepatic biliary system is summarized. In particular, we focus on the expression profiles and their significance of MUC mucins in developmental and normal livers, various hepatobiliary diseases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.