Can molecular markers stratify the diagnostic value of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia?

In Search for risk predictors at the microscopic scenario of a negative biopsy. A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In cases of persistent suspicion of prostate cancer (PC), repeat prostate biopsies (PB) are frequently performed in spite of their low yield. In the context of a negative PB, there is a microscopic scenario (MS), which we define as the group of recognizable non-neoplastic lesions. While some of these lesions seem to have a protective effect, the existence of others increases the risk of PC detection in posterior PB. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the lesions that may belong to the MS of a negative PB and analyse the current evidence of their association with the risk of detecting PC in subsequent PBs.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search on Medline, Embase and Central Cochrane with the following search terms: small acinar proliferation, ASAP, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, HGPIN, adjacent small atypical glands, pinatyp, atrophy, proliferative inflammatory atrophy, pia, prostatic inflammation, prostatitis and prostate cancer. 1,015 references were first identified, and 57 original articles were included in the study, following the PRISMA declaration and the PICO selection principles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Atypical small acinar proliferation is associated with PC detection in repeat PB with rates ranging between 32 and 48%. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is related to PC in 13 to 42% of cases. Studies show that HGPIN, when multifocal, is a significant independent risk factor for PC. Prostatic atrophy, inflammatory proliferative atrophy and prostatic inflammation seem to act as protective factors on the detection of PC in repeat PB. On the other hand, the risk of PC detection reduces significantly in male patients with multifocal HGPIN and coexistent PIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The MS of a negative PB may include atypical small acinar proliferation, HGPIN, prostatic atrophy, inflammatory proliferative atrophy and prostatic inflammation lesions, since they all seem to be associated with the risk of PC detection in repeat PB. This review has led us to create the hypothesis that the MS of a negative PB might be a valuable and useful tool when considering repeat PB.

Proteins from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostate cancer sections that predict the risk of metastatic disease

Background

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men and the third leading cause of cancer related deaths among men living in developed countries. Biomarkers that predict disease outcome at the time of initial diagnosis would substantially aid disease management.

Results

Proteins extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue were identified using nanoflow liquid chromatography-MALDI MS/MS or after separation by one- or two-dimensional electrophoresis. The proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000963. A list of potential biomarker candidates, based on proposed associations with prostate cancer, was derived from the 320 identified proteins. Candidate biomarkers were then examined by multiplexed Western blotting of archival specimens from men with premetastatic disease and subsequent disease outcome data. Annexin A2 provided the best prediction of risk of metastatic disease (log-rank Chi squared p = 0. 025). A tumor/control tissue >2-fold relative abundance increase predicted early biochemical failure, while <2-fold change predicted late or no biochemical failure.

Conclusions

This study confirms the potential for use of archival FFPE specimens in the search for prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer and suggests that annexin A2 abundance in diagnostic biopsies is predictive for metastatic potential. Protein profiling each cancer may lead to an overall reduction in mortality from metastatic prostate cancer as well as reduced treatment associated morbidity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12014-015-9096-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Heterogeneity of ERG expression in core needle biopsies of patients with early prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous, frequently multifocal disease with a broad spectrum of clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement is highly specific for prostate cancer. We used immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion to study the heterogeneity of ERG expression in 280 prostate core needle biopsy series from 256 patients with early prostate cancer defined as 3 or less positive cores with no more than 50% of cancer per biopsy and a Gleason score of 7 or lower (3 + 4). Among the 163 patients with 2 or 3 cancer-positive biopsies, we found a subset of 19 patients (11.7%) with heterogeneous ERG expression. Thirteen (68.4%) of these patients showed biopsies with distinct positive and negative ERG staining in separate cores. The remaining 6 patients showed a mixture of both positive and negative staining within 1 biopsy core. This was either caused by different cancer foci (n = 3) or by one single, ERG-heterogeneous cancer focus (n = 3) in 1 core. Furthermore, we observed a heterogeneous ERG staining pattern over time in 6 (2.3%) of the 256 patients, in biopsies taken at various time points. An interobserver study of 21 cases with 2 separate cancer foci revealed that heterogeneity of ERG status in different cancer foci can be suspected based on morphologic differences (κ = 0.44). We conclude that heterogeneity of ERG expression is detectable in 10% to 15% of core biopsies of early prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to explore the clinical impact of heterogeneous ERG status in this patient group.