1
|
Gorbokon N, Timm P, Dum D, Menz A, Büscheck F, Völkel C, Hinsch A, Lennartz M, Luebke AM, Hube-Magg C, Fraune C, Krech T, Lebok P, Clauditz TS, Jacobsen F, Sauter G, Uhlig R, Steurer S, Minner S, Marx AH, Simon R, Burandt E, Bernreuther C, Höflmayer D. Mammaglobin-A Expression Is Highly Specific for Tumors Derived from the Breast, the Female Genital Tract, and the Salivary Gland. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13061202. [PMID: 36980510 PMCID: PMC10047670 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Human mammaglobin-A (SCGB2A2) is a secretory protein with an unknown function that is used as a diagnostic marker for breast cancer. However, other tumors can also express mammaglobin-A. To comprehensively study patterns of mammaglobin-A expression, a tissue microarray containing 16,328 samples from 128 different tumor types as well as 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. Mammaglobin-A positivity was found in only a few normal tissues, including luminal cells of the breast as well as endocervical and endometrial glands. In tumor tissues, 37 of 128 tumor categories showed mamma-globin-A staining, 32 of which were derived from one of four organs: breast (6 tumor categories), endometrium (5 tumor categories), ovary (5 tumor categories), and salivary glands (16 tumor categories). Only five additional tumor types showed occasional weak mammaglobin positivity, including medullary thyroid cancer, teratoma of the testis, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and pharynx, and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Among 1139 evaluable invasive breast carcinomas of no special type, low mammaglobin-A immunostaining was linked to high BRE grade (p = 0.0011), loss of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression (p < 0.0001 each), and triple-negative status (p < 0.0001) but not to patient survival. In endometrial cancer, mammaglobin-A loss was linked to an advanced tumor stage (p = 0.0198). Our data characterize mammaglobin-A as a highly specific marker for tumors derived from either the breast, female genitals, or salivary gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Gorbokon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Timm
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - David Dum
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Menz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Büscheck
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cosima Völkel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hinsch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas M Luebke
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Fraune
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Krech
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, D-49076 Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - Patrick Lebok
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till S Clauditz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jacobsen
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ria Uhlig
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas H Marx
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, D-90766 Fuerth, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eike Burandt
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Bernreuther
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Doris Höflmayer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Němejcová K, Šafanda A, Bártů MK, Michálková R, Drozenová J, Fabian P, Hausnerová J, Laco J, Matěj R, Méhes G, Škapa P, Stružinská I, Dundr P. A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of 26 markers in 250 cases of serous ovarian tumors. Diagn Pathol 2023; 18:32. [PMID: 36855066 PMCID: PMC9972686 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-023-01317-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined a large cohort of serous tubo-ovarian tumors with 26 immunohistochemical markers, with the aim to assess their value for differential diagnosis and prognosis. METHODS Immunohistochemical analyses with 26 immunomarkers were performed on 250 primary tubo-ovarian tumors including 114 high grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), 97 low grade serous carcinomas (LGSC), and 39 serous borderline tumors (micropapillary variant, mSBT). The associations of overall positivity with clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher's Exact test. RESULTS We found significantly different expression of p53, p16, ER, PR, PTEN, PAX2, Mammaglobin, RB1, Cyclin E1, stathmin, LMP2, L1CAM, CD44, and Ki67 in HGSCs compared to LGSCs. No significant differences were found between LGSC and mSBT. None of the other included markers (PAX8, ARID1A, HNF1B, Napsin A, CDX2, SATB2, MUC4, BRG1, AMACR, TTF1, BCOR, NTRK) showed any differences between the investigated serous tumors. Regarding the prognosis, only PR and stathmin showed a statistically significant prognostic meaning in LGSCs, with better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in cases positive for PR, and worse outcome (RFS) for stathmin. None of the study markers showed prognostic significance in HGSCs. CONCLUSION We provided an extensive immunohistochemical analysis of serous ovarian/tubo-ovarian tumors. Although we found some differences in the expression of some markers in HGSCs compared to LGSCs, only p53, p16, and Ki67 seem to be useful in real diagnostic practice. We also suggested the best discriminative cut-off for Ki67 (10% of positive tumor cells) for distinguishing HGSC from LGSC. We found prognostic significance of PR and stathmin in LGSCs. Moreover, the high expression of stathmin could also be of predictive value in ovarian carcinomas as target-specific anti-stathmin effectors are potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristýna Němejcová
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Adam Šafanda
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michaela Kendall Bártů
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Romana Michálková
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Drozenová
- grid.4491.80000 0004 1937 116XDepartment of Pathology, Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, 10034 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Fabian
- grid.419466.8Department of Oncological Pathology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Hausnerová
- grid.10267.320000 0001 2194 0956Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Laco
- grid.4491.80000 0004 1937 116XThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Radoslav Matěj
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic ,grid.4491.80000 0004 1937 116XDepartment of Pathology, Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, 10034 Prague, Czech Republic ,grid.4491.80000 0004 1937 116XDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gábor Méhes
- grid.7122.60000 0001 1088 8582Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Petr Škapa
- grid.412826.b0000 0004 0611 0905Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Stružinská
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Dundr
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Butler H, Saulat O, Guinn BA. Identification of biomarkers for the diagnosis and targets for therapy in patients with clear cell ovarian cancer: a systematic literature review. Carcinogenesis 2022; 43:183-189. [PMID: 35104328 PMCID: PMC9036986 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgac012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC) is a rare type of epithelial cancer often resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of CCOC, and targets for immunotherapy, both have the potential to improve outcomes for patients. Our review aims to determine whether any antigens already identified in the literature could fulfil this remit. PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched and included all reported studies up until August 2021. Primary research articles on human adult females including at least 10 CCOC patients were included. Quality assurance was carried out using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve were extracted from each included study by two independent reviewers. Twenty-three articles were included which identified 19 gene transcripts/proteins and one antibody, with reported sensitivities between 21% and 100% and specificities between 0% and 100% for expression in CCOC and differentiation from other epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes, benign gynaecological disease or normal tissue. Twelve studies identified biomarkers with a sensitivity and specificity above 80%. A panel of biomarkers consisting of IMP3, napsin A and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta achieved the highest area under the curve of 0.954. This review demonstrates that there are promising candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis of CCOC, some of which are highly specific, and have the potential to act as targets for therapy. However, larger cohort studies are needed to validate these biomarkers and their potential use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Butler
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Omar Saulat
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Barbara-ann Guinn
- To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel: +44 (0)1482 466543;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen C, Yang L, Rivandi M, Franken A, Fehm T, Neubauer H. Bioinformatic Identification of a Breast-Specific Transcript Profile. Proteomics Clin Appl 2020; 14:e2000007. [PMID: 32558282 DOI: 10.1002/prca.202000007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify a breast-specific transcript profile for the first time, and present an updated bioinformatics strategy for searching tissue-specific transcripts and predicting their significance in cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The RNA-seq data of 49 311 transcripts in 88 human tissues from the GTEx, the Illumina Body Map, and the RIKEN FANTOM5 project are integrated to screen breast-specific transcripts. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, TGCA, and Kaplan-Meier Plotter are used to examine their expression in cancer tissues and values for prognosis prediction. RESULTS Only 96 transcripts in human genome are breast-specific for women. Among them, ankyrin repeat domain 30A (ANKRD30A) and long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 993 (LINC00993) are further analyzed. The two transcripts are also breast-specific in 33 types of common female cancer and are often dysregulated in breast cancer tissues. Their expression is higher in the luminal breast cancer while significantly downregulated in triple-negative breast cancer. Moreover, the high expression levels of ANKRD30A and LINC0993 in breast cancer tissues indicate a better prognosis of patients with breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Breast-specific transcripts in human genome are rare and poorly understood currently. The data indicate that these breast-specific biomarkers are promising candidates for screening early cancer, assessing treatment response, monitoring recurrence, identifying metastatic tumor origin, and serving as potential targets for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.,Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Zunyi, 563000, China
| | - Liwen Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Mahdi Rivandi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - André Franken
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Hans Neubauer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Are the uterine serous carcinomas underdiagnosed? Histomorphologic and immunohistochemical correlates and clinical follow up in high-grade endometrial carcinomas initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:358-364. [PMID: 28984301 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Histologic subclassification of high-grade endometrial carcinomas can sometimes be a diagnostic challenge when based on histomorphology alone. Here we utilized immunohistochemical markers to determine the immunophenotype in histologically ambiguous high-grade endometrial carcinomas that were initially diagnosed as pure or mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, aiming to determine the utility of selected immunohistochemical panel in accurate classification of these distinct tumor types, while correlating these findings with the clinical outcome. A total of 43 high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially classified as pure high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (n=32), mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/serous carcinoma (n=9) and mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/clear cell carcinoma (n=2) were retrospectively stained with a panel of immunostains, including antibodies for p53, p16, estrogen receptor, and mammaglobin. Clinical follow-up data were obtained, and stage-to-stage disease outcomes were compared for different tumor types. Based on aberrant staining for p53 and p16, 17/43 (40%) of the high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma were re-classified as serous carcinoma. All 17 cases showed negative staining for mammaglobin, while estrogen receptor was positive in only 6 (35%) cases. The remaining 26 cases of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma showed wild-type staining for p53 in 25 (96%) cases, patchy staining for p16 in 20 (77%) cases, and were positive for mammaglobin and estrogen receptor in 8 (31%) and 19 (73%) cases, respectively, thus the initial diagnosis of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma was confirmed in these cases. In addition, the patients with re-classified serous carcinoma had advanced clinical stages at diagnosis and poorer overall survival on clinical follow-up compared to that of the remaining 26 high-grade endometrioid carcinoma cases. These results indicate that selected immunohistochemical panel, including p53, p16, and mammaglobin can be helpful in reaching accurate diagnosis in cases of histomorphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas, and can assist in providing guidance for appropriate therapeutic options for the patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Picot N, Guerrette R, Beauregard AP, Jean S, Michaud P, Harquail J, Benzina S, Robichaud GA. Mammaglobin 1 promotes breast cancer malignancy and confers sensitivity to anticancer drugs. Mol Carcinog 2015. [PMID: 26207726 DOI: 10.1002/mc.22358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Mammaglobin 1 (MGB1), a member of the secretoglobin family, is expressed in mammary epithelial tissues and is overexpressed in most mammary carcinomas. Despite the extensive research correlating MGB1 expression profiles to breast cancer pathogenesis and disease outcome, the biological significance of MGB1 in cancer processes is still unclear. We have thus set out to conduct a functional evaluation of the molecular and cellular roles of MGB1 in breast cancer processes leading to disease progression. Using a series of breast cancer cell models with conditional MGB1 expression, we demonstrate that MGB1 promotes cancer cell malignant features. More specifically, loss of MGB1 expression resulted in a decrease of cell proliferation, soft agar spheroid formation, migration, and invasion capacities of breast cancer cells. Concomitantly, we also observed that MGB1 expression activates signaling pathways mediated by MAPK members (p38, JNK, and ERK), the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and NFκB. Moreover, MGB1 regulates epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT) features and modulates Snail, Twist and ZEB1 expression levels. Interestingly, we also observed that expression of MGB1 confers breast cancer cell sensitivity to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. Together, our results support a role for MGB1 in tumor malignancy in exchange for chemosensitivity. These findings provide one of the first descriptive overview of the molecular and cellular roles of MGB1 in breast cancer processes and may offer new insight to the development of therapeutic and prognostic strategies in breast cancer patients. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Picot
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Roxann Guerrette
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Annie-Pier Beauregard
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Stéphanie Jean
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Pascale Michaud
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Jason Harquail
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Sami Benzina
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Gilles A Robichaud
- Département de Chimie et Biochimie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.,Atlantic Cancer Research Institute, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mammaglobin-A immunohistochemistry in primary central nervous system neoplasms and intracranial metastatic breast carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2015; 22:442-8. [PMID: 23958549 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0b013e318294ca46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Metastases represent the most common type of intracranial neoplasm. In women, 30% of such tumors derive from breast carcinoma. In neurosurgical cases with ambiguous cellular morphology and/or limited biopsy material, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is often performed to distinguish metastases from primary central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. IHC for mammaglobin-A (MGA), a protein expressed in a majority of breast carcinomas, is commonly applied in this setting, but its utility for distinguishing primary CNS neoplasms from metastatic breast carcinoma is unknown; the reactivity of MGA in primary and metastatic CNS neoplasms has never been described. Here, we describe the frequency and patterns of IHC reactivity for MGA in metastatic and primary CNS neoplasms from patients with well-documented histories of breast carcinoma. Following a published protocol previously applied to non-CNS neoplasms, MGA staining of moderate to strong intensity within 5% or more of a neoplasm was considered positive. On the basis of these criteria, 3 of 12 (25.0%) glioblastomas, 1 of 10 (10.0%) meningiomas, and 47 of 95 (49.5%) metastases were positive. Importantly, the cytoarchitectural staining characteristics among all 4 MGA-positive primary CNS neoplasms (cytoplasmic and nuclear) differed from those of the metastases (cytoplasmic and membranous). These findings suggest that MGA IHC staining intensity and distribution can distinguish metastases from primary CNS neoplasms (P=0.0086) in women with a history of breast carcinoma but also indicate that cytologic staining patterns must be interpreted for more accurate tumor classification.
Collapse
|
8
|
Euscher E, Malpica A. Use of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of miscellaneous and metastatic tumors of the uterine corpus and cervix. Semin Diagn Pathol 2014; 31:233-57. [PMID: 24863030 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2014.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Uncommon tumors in the uterus present diagnostic challenges. In some cases, the tumor subtype is usually seen outside the gynecologic tract and the possibility of a uterine primary is not considered. In other cases, histologic overlap with more common uterine tumors leads to potential misdiagnosis. Finally, metastatic carcinoma may involve the uterus and cervix. Rarely, symptoms related to the uterine metastasis may precede diagnosis of an extrauterine primary. Without the proper clinical context, the possibility of a missed diagnosis is increased. One must first be aware of these possibilities, but immunoperoxidase studies are often necessary to confirm the diagnosis. In this review, unusual and metastatic tumors involving the uterine corpus and cervix and immunoperoxidase studies used to diagnosis such tumors are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Euscher
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 85, Houston, Texas 77030.
| | - Anais Malpica
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 85, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu H, Shi J, Prichard JW, Gong Y, Lin F. Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA-3 expression in ER-negative breast carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 2014; 141:648-55. [PMID: 24713735 DOI: 10.1309/ajcp0q9uqteeslhn] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Estrogen receptor (ER), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), and mammaglobin (MGB) are commonly used breast-specific immunomarkers; however, about half of metastatic breast carcinomas are negative for all three. GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA-3) has emerged recently as a sensitive and relatively specific immunomarker for breast and urothelial carcinomas, but the data documenting its expression in ER-negative breast carcinomas are limited; this often poses a dilemma in the setting of metastases. The purpose of this study is to investigate expression of GATA-3 in ER-negative breast carcinomas. METHODS Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA-3, GCDFP-15, and MGB on 96 ER-negative breast carcinomas was performed. RESULTS Overall, 69% (66/96), 15% (14/96), and 35% (34/96) of ER-negative breast carcinomas expressed GATA-3, GCDFP-15, and MGB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that GATA-3 is, so far, the best breast-specific immunomarker, especially when encountering ER-negative metastatic breast carcinomas. GATA-3 should be included in the panel of immunomarkers in the workup of tumors of unknown primary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yun Gong
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Fan Lin
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Differential expression of secretoglobins in normal ovary and in ovarian carcinoma – Overexpression of mammaglobin-1 is linked to tumor progression. Arch Biochem Biophys 2014; 547:27-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2013] [Revised: 02/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
11
|
|