Immunohistochemical and molecular profiling of histologically defined apocrine carcinomas of the breast

Breast Cancer Histopathology in the Age of Molecular Oncology

For more than a century, microscopic histology has been the cornerstone for cancer diagnosis, and breast carcinoma is no exception. In recent years, clinical biomarkers, gene expression profiles, and other molecular tests have shown increasing utility for identifying the key biological features that guide prognosis and treatment of breast cancer. Indeed, the most common histologic pattern-invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type-provides relatively little guidance to management beyond triggering grading, biomarker testing, and clinical staging. However, many less common histologic patterns can be recognized by trained pathologists, which in many cases can be linked to characteristic biomarker and gene expression patterns, underlying mutations, prognosis, and therapy. Herein we describe more than a dozen such histomorphologic subtypes (including lobular, metaplastic, salivary analog, and several good prognosis special types of breast cancer) in the context of their molecular and clinical features.

TRPS1 and GATA3 Expression in Invasive Breast Carcinoma With Apocrine Differentiation

CONTEXT.—

The recently identified immunohistochemical marker TRPS1 is highly sensitive and specific for invasive breast carcinoma, especially triple-negative breast carcinoma. However, TRPS1 expression in special morphologic subtypes of breast cancer is unclear.

OBJECTIVE.—

To investigate the expression of TRPS1 in invasive breast cancer with apocrine differentiation, in comparison to the expression of GATA3.

DESIGN.—

A total of 52 invasive breast carcinomas with apocrine differentiation, comprising 41 triple-negative breast carcinomas and 11 estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cases, along with 11 triple-negative breast carcinomas without apocrine differentiation, were evaluated for TRPS1 and GATA3 expression by immunohistochemistry. All tumors were diffusely positive (>90%) for androgen receptor (AR).

RESULTS.—

Triple-negative breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation had positive TRPS1 expression in 12% of cases (5 of 41), whereas GATA3 was positive in all cases. Similarly, HER2+/ER- invasive breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation showed positive TRPS1 in 18% of cases (2 of 11), whereas GATA3 was positive in all cases. In contrast, triple-negative breast carcinoma with strong AR expression but without apocrine differentiation showed both TRPS1 and GATA3 expression in 100% (11 of 11) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Most ER-/PR-/AR+ invasive breast carcinomas with apocrine differentiation are TRPS1 negative and GATA3 positive, regardless of HER2 status. Therefore, TRPS1 negativity does not exclude breast origin in tumors with apocrine differentiation. A panel of TRPS1 and GATA3 immunostains can be helpful when the tissue origin of such tumors is clinically relevant.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study

Background

With a prevalence of only 1% among all breast cancers in Japan, apocrine carcinoma (AC) is a rare type of breast cancer, and its clinicopathological characteristics remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and prognosis of AC, in relation to the presence or absence of androgen receptor (AR).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective multi-center case-control study (Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG): YCOG1701 study) in Japan. A total of 53 patients were registered who were diagnosed with AC between 2000 and 2017 in YCOG-affiliated hospitals.

Results

The median age of the patients was 67 (43 - 94) years, and the median observation time was 6.1 years. Among the 53 cases, 24 had triple-negative pure AC (TN-PAC; AR-positive), whereas 29 had other types of AC (other-AC; estrogen receptor-positive and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive or AR-negative). Tumor size was smaller (1.4 vs. 2.1 cm, P = 0.024) and metastasis occurred in fewer nodes (12.5% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.036) in the TN-PAC group than in the other-AC group. The number of patients who were administered perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly differ between the two groups (TN-PAC/other-AC = 50.0%/55.2%, P = 0.525); however, there was no recurrence in the TN-PAC group, compared to five cases with relapse in the other-AC group.

Conclusions

AR-positive AC patients showed a favorable prognosis without adjuvant chemotherapy, even with the TN subtype. A clinical trial exploring the possibility of treatment de-escalation is anticipated.

Genomic characteristics of triple negative apocrine carcinoma: a comparison to triple negative breast cancer

Apocrine carcinoma is a rare breast cancer subtype. As such, the genomic characteristics of apocrine carcinoma with triple negative immunohistochemical results (TNAC), which has been treated as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), have not been revealed. In this study, we evaluated the genomic characteristics of TNAC compared to TNBC with low Ki-67 (LK-TNBC). In the genetic analysis of 73 TNACs and 32 LK-TNBCs, the most frequently mutated driver gene in TNAC was TP53 (16/56, 28.6%), followed by PIK3CA (9/56, 16.1%), ZNF717 (8/56, 14.3%), and PIK3R1 (6/56, 10.71%). Mutational signature analysis showed enrichment of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-related signatures (SBS6 and SBS21) and the SBS5 signature in TNAC, whereas an APOBEC activity-associated mutational signature (SBS13) was more prominent in LK-TNBC (Student's t test, p < 0.05). In intrinsic subtyping, 38.4% of TNACs were classified as luminal A, 27.4% as luminal B, 26.0% as HER2-enriched (HER2-E), 2.7% as basal, and 5.5% as normal-like. The basal subtype was the most dominant subtype (43.8%) in LK-TNBC (p < 0.001), followed by luminal B (21.9%), HER2-E (21.9%), and luminal A (12.5%). In the survival analysis, TNAC had a five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 92.2% compared to 59.1% for LK-TNBC (P = 0.001) and a five-year overall survival (OS) rate of 95.3% compared to 74.6% for LK-TNBC (P = 0.0099). TNAC has different genetic characteristics and better survival outcomes than LK-TNBC. In particular, normal-like and luminal A subtypes in TNAC have much better DFS and OS than other intrinsic subtypes. Our findings are expected to impact medical practice for patients diagnosed with TNAC.

Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinomas: Toward a Unified Group With Shared Molecular Features and Clinical Behavior

Triple-negative apocrine carcinomas (TNACs) are rare breast tumors with limited studies evaluating their molecular characteristics and clinical behavior. We performed a histologic, immunohistochemical, genetic, and clinicopathologic assessment of 42 invasive TNACs (1 with a focal spindle cell component) from 41 patients, 2 pure apocrine ductal carcinomas in situ (A-DCIS), and 1 A-DCIS associated with spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma (SCMBC). All TNACs had characteristic apocrine morphology and expressed androgen receptor (42/42), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (24/24), and CK5/6 (16/16). GATA3 was positive in most cases (16/18, 89%), and SOX10 was negative (0/22). TRPS1 was weakly expressed in a minority of tumors (3/14, 21%). Most TNACs had low Ki67 proliferation (≤10% in 67%, 26/39), with a median index of 10%. Levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were low (≤10% in 93%, 39/42, and 15% in 7%, 3/42). Eighteen percent of TNACs presented with axillary nodal metastasis (7/38). No patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved pathologic complete response (0%, 0/10). Nearly all patients with TNAC (97%, n = 32) were without evidence of disease at the time of study (mean follow-up of 62 months). Seventeen invasive TNACs and 10 A-DCIS (7 with paired invasive TNAC) were profiled by targeted capture-based next-generation DNA sequencing. Pathogenic mutations in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway genes PIK3CA (53%) and/or PIK3R1 (53%) were identified in all TNACs (100%), including 4 (24%) with comutated PTEN. Ras-MAPK pathway genes, including NF1 (24%), and TP53 were mutated in 6 tumors each (35%). All A-DCIS shared mutations, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase aberrations and copy number alterations with paired invasive TNACs or SCMBC, and a subset of invasive carcinomas showed additional mutations in tumor suppressors (NF1, TP53, ARID2, and CDKN2A). Divergent genetic profiles between A-DCIS and invasive carcinoma were identified in 1 case. In summary, our findings support TNAC as a morphologically, immunohistochemically, and genetically homogeneous subgroup of triple-negative breast carcinomas and suggest overall favorable clinical behavior.

[Triple-negative breast cancer : Classification, current concepts, and therapy-related factors]

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 10% of all breast cancer cases and is defined by the lack of expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and the lack of overexpression or amplification of HER2. It differs with regard to the younger age of the patients, an increased association with a mutation of BRCA1 and a mostly low differentiation from hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The spectrum of triple-negative breast cancer shows considerable heterogeneity both at the morphological and at the molecular level. It includes most commonly TNBC of no special type, with and without basal phenotype, triple-negative metaplastic breast carcinomas, triple-negative breast carcinomas with apocrine differentiation and rare triple-negative tumor types. At the gene-expression level, TNBC most commonly is associated with a basal phenotype, with rarer molecular variants of TNBC involving the Claudin-low, molecular apocrine types, and other rarer subtypes. Therefore, a critical use of the term TNBC, considering the histopathological tumor differentiation, is recommended.

Nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with triple-negative apocrine breast cancer: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based analysis

PURPOSE

Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) is a sort of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that is rare and prognosis of these patients is unclear. The present study constructed an effective nomogram to assist in predicting TNAC patients overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A total of 373 TNAC patients from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) got extracted from 2010 to 2016 and were divided into training (n = 261) and external validation (n = 112) groups (split ratio, 7:3) randomly. A Cox regression model was utilized to creating a nomogram according to the risk factors affecting prognosis. The predictive capability of the nomogram was estimated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed age, surgery, chemotherapy, stage, and first malignant primary as independent predictors of OS. A prediction model was constructed and virtualized using the nomogram. The time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) showed satisfactory discrimination of the nomogram. Good consistency was shown on the calibration curves in OS between actual observations and the nomogram prediction. What's more, DCA showed that the nomogram had incredible clinical utility. Through separating the patients into groups of low and high risk group that connects with the risk system that shows a huge difference between the low-risk and high risk OS (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

To predict the OS in TNAC patients, the nomogram utilizing the risk stratification system that is corresponding. These tools may help to evaluate patient prognosis and guide treatment decisions.

HER2-positive apocrine carcinoma of the breast: a population-based analysis of treatment and outcome

PURPOSE

Apocrine carcinoma of the breast (APO) expresses HER2 in 30-50% of cases. This study explored the clinicopathological features and outcome of HER2+/APO and matched HER2+/NST cohort.

METHODS

We used the SEER database to explore the cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the survival. Based on ER and PR [steroid receptors/SR/] and HER2 status, we divided the cohorts to match the intrinsic molecular subtypes for comparisons.

RESULTS

We retrieved 259 cases of HER2+/APO. Most HER2+/APO were SR negative (65%). HER2+/APO were more prevalent in the 80+ age group (24.7% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001). HER2+/SR-/APO had a significantly lower histological grade than the HER2+/SR-/NST (p < 0.001). Breast cancer-related deaths were more prevalent in HER2+/NST (7.8% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.019). This was particularly evident between SR- subgroups (10.4% in HER2+/SR-/NST vs. 4.2% in HER2+/SR-/APO, p = 0.008) and was reaffirmed in breast cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis (p = 0.03). Other than race and SR status, HER2+/APO subgroups did not differ in clinicopathological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the rarity of the APO and reveals that SR status in APO does not affect these patients' prognosis. HER2+/APO tumors tend to have a less aggressive phenotype and a more favorable outcome despite a markedly lower ER/PR positivity.

Sclerosing Polycystic Adenoma: Conclusive Clinical and Molecular Evidence of Its Neoplastic Nature

Sclerosing polycystic adenosis, initially considered a non-neoplastic salivary gland lesion and classified as such in the 2017 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors, has been the subject of controversy regarding its possible neoplastic nature. The reporting of recurrent PI3K pathway alteration represents evidence to support these lesions as being neoplastic and more appropriately referred to as sclerosing polycystic adenoma (SPA). Herein, we provide additional evidence that supports the classification of SPA as a true neoplasm. Eight cases of SPA were identified in our database and consultation files. All cases were subjected to PTEN immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In addition, one patient underwent genetic counseling and germline testing. The cases included 5 men and 3 women with a mean age of 41 years (range 11-78) and all tumors arose in the parotid gland. One patient had multiple recurrences over a period of 2 years. Morphologically the tumors were circumscribed and characterized by an admixture of acini, ducts and cysts embedded in a fibrotic/sclerotic stroma. The cells lining the ducts and cysts showed variable granular, vacuolated, foamy and apocrine cytoplasmic features, as well as acinar cells contained intracytoplasmic brightly eosinophilic granules. The apocrine intraductal proliferations showed mild to moderate atypia in 6 cases. One case showed overt malignant morphology that ranged from intraductal carcinoma to invasive salivary duct carcinoma. Seven cases tested for PTEN IHC showed loss of nuclear expression in the acinar and ductal cells with retained PTEN expression in the myoepithelial cell and stroma. NGS detected PIK3CA or PIK3R1 genetic alterations in 7 cases, including a novel TFG-PIK3CA fusion. Coexisting PTEN mutations were seen in 4 cases, including in a patient with clinical stigmata of Cowden syndrome and confirmed by germline genetic testing. Our findings herein documented including recurrence of tumor, malignant transformation, high prevalence of PI3K pathway oncogenic alterations and the possible heretofore undescribed association with Cowden syndrome add support to classifying SPA as true neoplasms justifying their designation as adenoma, rather than adenosis.

Triple-Negative Apocrine Breast Carcinoma Has Better Prognosis despite Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Apocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of invasive ductal breast cancer that shows apocrine differentiation and largely triple-negative immunohistology. Triple-negative breast cancers are known to have more aggressive clinical courses. However, unlike most other subtypes, it is reported that triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) has a better prognosis. Due to the scarcity of reported studies, our knowledge regarding its clinical behavior, prognosis and response to therapy is very limited. In this study, we retrospectively retrieved 41 triple-negative apocrine carcinoma cases from our breast cancer database, with an average follow-up of 32.8 months. It was found that TNAC had a poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy but a better prognosis than other nonapocrine types of triple-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, TNAC has a low proliferative nature, as indicated by its low Ki-67 index. An updated analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database showed that chemotherapy did not improve breast-cancer-specific survival in TNAC patients. Our results suggest that TNAC is a special subtype of triple-negative breast cancer with a better short-term prognosis despite poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The Research Progress in Physiological and Pathological Functions of TRAF4

Tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 4 (TRAF4) is a member of the TRAF protein family, a cytoplasmic bridging molecule closely associated with various immune functions. The physiological processes of TRAF4 are mainly involved in embryonic development, cell polarity, cell proliferation, apoptosis, regulation of reactive oxygen species production. TRAF4 is overexpressed in a variety of tumors and regulates the formation and development of a variety of tumors. In this review, we summarize the physiological and pathological regulatory functions of TRAF4 and focus on understanding the biological processes involved in this gene, to provide a reference for further studies on the role of this gene in tumorigenesis and development.

Low-risk triple-negative breast cancers: Clinico-pathological and molecular features

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) comprise biologically and clinically heterogeneous diseases characterized by the lack of hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 expression. This subset of tumors accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers and pursues an ominous clinical course. However, there is a spectrum of low-risk TNBCs with no/minimal metastatic potential, including the salivary gland-type tumors, those with extensive apocrine differentiation and/or high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and small-sized, early-stage (pT1a/bN0M0) TNBCs. De-escalating the treatment in low-risk TNBC, however, is not trivial because of the substantial lack of dedicated randomized clinical trials and cancer registries. The development of new diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers based on clinical and molecular aspects of low-risk TNBCs would lead to improved clinical treatment. Here, we sought to provide a portrait of the clinicopathological and molecular features of low-risk TNBC, with a focus on the diagnostic challenges along with the most important biological characteristics underpinning their favorable clinical course.

An Update on the Molecular and Clinical Characteristics of Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast

Apocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare malignancy. According to 2019 WHO classification, apocrine cellular features and a characteristic steroid receptor profile (Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and androgen receptor (AR)-positive) define apocrine carcinoma. Her-2/neu protein expression is reported in ∼30-50% of apocrine carcinomas, while NGS analysis showed frequent PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT and TP53 mutations Followed by deregulation in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway components (mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF). A recent miRNA study indicates various miRNAs (downregulated hsa-miR-145-5p and upregulated 14 miRNAs such as hsa-miR-182-5p, hsa-miR-3135b, and hsa-miR-4417) may target the commonly altered pathways in apocrine carcinomas such as ERBB2/HER2 and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Although AR expression is a hallmark of apocrine carcinoma, little is known regarding the efficacy/resistance to antiandrogens. Success of bicalutamide, a non-steroidal anti-androgen, was reported in a case of Her2-negative apocrine carcinoma. Two recent studies, however, described presence of anti-androgen resistance biomarkers (a splice variant ARv7 and AR/NCOA2 co-amplification) in a subset of AR+ apocrine carcinomas, cautioning the use of anti-androgens in AR+ triple-negative breast carcinomas. Apocrine carcinomas rarely show biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-L1 expression, MSI-H status, and TMB-high). Therefore, a comprehensive cancer profiling of apocrine carcinomas is necessary to identify potential therapeutic targets for a truly individualized treatment approach.

Apocrine lesions of the breast

Apocrine change is recognised in benign, atypical and malignant lesions of the breast. Apocrine metaplasia, a frequent finding in the breast of women over the age of 25 years, is most commonly seen in benign cysts with a simple or papillary configuration. Apocrine change is also recognised in other benign lesions including sclerosing adenosis, now known as apocrine adenosis. Apocrine atypia usually refers to cytological atypia in which there is at least threefold variation in nuclear size but architectural atypia may also occur. The distinction between atypical apocrine hyperplasia and non-high-grade apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ may be difficult due to the relative rarity of these entities and the lack of validated diagnostic criteria. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) with apocrine change is considered to be a variant of pleomorphic LCIS. An apocrine variant of encapsulated papillary carcinoma is also recognised. Apocrine change is described in invasive carcinoma, including no special type, lobular, micropapillary and mucinous variants. The recent WHO 2019 update recognises 'carcinoma with apocrine differentiation' as a special type breast carcinoma based on the presence of apocrine morphology in at least 90% of the tumour. Tumours with apocrine morphology are usually but not always hormone receptor negative. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status is variable. Molecular studies have identified breast tumours with apocrine features and high expression of androgen receptor mRNA including 'luminal androgen receptor tumours' and 'molecular apocrine tumours'. The term 'pure apocrine carcinoma' has been proposed to describe an invasive carcinoma with apocrine morphology that is oestrogen and progesterone receptor negative and androgen receptor positive. HER-2 status may be positive or negative. This article reviews the pathology of benign, atypical and malignant apocrine lesions of the breast, with emphasis on diagnostic criteria including an approach to evaluation of apocrine lesions on needle core biopsy, and recent advances in our understanding of invasive apocrine carcinoma.

Obesity and Androgen Receptor Signaling: Associations and Potential Crosstalk in Breast Cancer Cells

Obesity is an increasing health challenge and is recognized as a breast cancer risk factor. Although obesity-related breast cancer mechanisms are not fully understood, this association has been linked to impaired hormone secretion by the dysfunctional obese adipose tissue (hyperplasic and hypertrophic adipocytes). Among these hormones, altered production of androgens and adipokines is observed, and both, are independently associated with breast cancer development. In this review, we describe and comment on the relationships reported between these factors and breast cancer, focusing on the biological associations that have helped to unveil the mechanisms by which signaling from androgens and adipokines modifies the behavior of mammary epithelial cells. Furthermore, we discuss the potential crosstalk between the two most abundant adipokines produced by the adipose tissue (adiponectin and leptin) and the androgen receptor, an emerging marker in breast cancer. The identification and understanding of interactions among adipokines and the androgen receptor in cancer cells are necessary to guide the development of new therapeutic approaches in order to prevent and cure obesity and breast cancer.

The expression of calpain-1 and androgen receptor in breast cancer and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics: An immunohistochemical retrospective study

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different biological outcome and ability to acquire resistance to therapy. The calpain family of proteases and androgen receptor (AR) are implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis and progression and are potential targets for novel treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of calpain-1 and AR in breast cancer and to correlate their expression with clinicopathological variables and prognosis of patients. In this study we enrolled 219 breast cancer patients with long term follow-up information available. Immunohistochemical methods on a tissue microarray were used to investigate expression of calpain-1 and AR in tumor cells. The expression of calpain-1 and AR both differed significantly between the tumor subtypes of patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.042 respectively). High calpain-1 expression was associated with patient's age over 50 years (p = 0.005) and positive ER status (p = 0.009), but not with other clinicopathological variables. Women with AR negative breast cancers were more likely to be older (p = 0.016), to have bigger tumors (p = 0.032), higher stage of the disease (p = 0.026), presence of exulceration (p = 0.017), negative ER status (p = 0.007) and higher Ki-67 proliferative index (p = 0.027). Calpain-1 expression was not associated with breast cancer specific overall survival in the total cohort of patients, however low calpain-1 expression was associated with adverse survival (p = 0.018) in triple negative subgroup of patients. Low calpain-1 expression was also associated with significantly shorter 5-year disease-free survival in total cohort of patients (p = 0.03). AR status was not associated with overall and disease-free survival of patients. This study has demonstrated that the expression of calpain-1 and androgen receptors are associated with important clinicopathological variables. The expression of calpain-1 was associated with improved disease-free survival of all analyzed patients and with improved overall survival of triple negative breast cancer patients.

Histology of Luminal Breast Cancer

Background

Invasive breast cancer (IBC) can be categorized into prognostic and predictive molecular subtypes (including luminal breast cancer) using gene expression profiling. Luminal IBC comprises a variety of histological subtypes with varying clinical and pathological features.

Summary

IBC of no special subtype is the most common histological subtype in general and likewise within luminal IBC. Classical invasive lobular breast cancer, typically clustering into luminal subgroup, is characterized by discohesive growth and loss of E-cadherin expression. Infrequent, morphologically distinct luminal IBC subtypes are tubular, invasive cribriform, mucinous, and invasive micropapillary carcinomas. Breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation, with characteristic expression of androgen receptor (AR), often clusters into the luminal AR category. Rarely, neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast can be seen. IBC of the male breast usually matches with the luminal subtype.

Key Messages

Independently from histological subtypes, invasive breast cancer (IBC) can be divided into molecular subtypes based on mRNA gene expression levels. Using this molecular subtyping, risk scores based on gene expression profiling (established for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative IBC), grading, and Ki-67 index, prognosis of patients with luminal breast cancer and response to chemotherapy can be predicted. In routine diagnostics, the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 status, and the proliferation rate (Ki-67) are used to determine a surrogate (molecular-like) subtype. Within luminal(-like) IBC, no special subtype and invasive lobular breast carcinoma are the most common histological subtypes. Other rare histological subtypes (e.g., tubular carcinoma) should be recognized due to their distinct clinical and pathological features.

All Benign and Malignant Apocrine Breast Lesions Over-Express Claudin 1 and 3 and Are Negative for Claudin 4

Invasive apocrine carcinoma of the breast is an uncommon triple negative tumour that lacks a specific therapeutic target. Apocrine metaplasia of the breast shares common morphological features with apocrine carcinoma, and was previously found to consistently over-express claudin 1 and to lack claudin 4. This study was aimed at finding whether apocrine carcinoma, and other related apocrine breast lesions, have similar claudin profile. The immunohistochemical expression of claudin 1, 3 and 4 was studied in 11 cases of in situ and invasive apocrine breast carcinoma, 7 benign apocrine lesions and 45 consecutive morphologically non-apocrine triple negative breast carcinomas. All cases were also immunostained for Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein-15 (GCDFP-15), a marker for apocrine differentiation. Apocrine breast lesions maintained their expression pattern from benign through DCIS to invasive carcinoma; all showing strong expression of claudin 1 and 3 and absence of claudin 4. The same pattern of expression was seen in 2 out of the 45 morphologically non-apocrine tumours, but both showed strong positive staining for GCDFP-15. It is concluded that all benign and malignant apocrine lesions of the breast have a consistent pattern of claudin 1, 3 and 4 expression, suggesting the presence of a specific pathway for the development of invasive apocrine carcinoma. The over-expression of claudin 1 and 3 may have therapeutic implications as targets for managing apocrine cancers.

A novel in ovo model to study cancer metastasis using chicken embryos and GFP expressing cancer cells

Cancer metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. To date, several in vitro methodologies have been developed to understand the mechanisms of cancer metastasis and to screen various therapeutic agents against it. Nevertheless, mimicking an in vivo microenvironment in vitro is not possible; while in vivo experiments are complex, expensive and bound with several regulatory requirements. Herein, we report a novel in ovo model that relies on chicken embryo to investigate cancer cell invasion and metastasis to various organs of the body. In this model, we directly injected green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressing cancer cells to the heart of chicken embryo at 3 days of incubation, then monitored cell migration to various organs. To this end, we used a simple tissue processing technique to achieve rapid imaging and quantification of invasive cells. We were able to clearly observe the migration of GFP expressing cancer cells into various organs of chicken embryo. Organ specific variation in cell migration was also observed. Our new slide pressing based tissue processing technique improved the detectability of migrated cells. We herein demonstrate that the use of GFP expressing cancer cells allows easy detection and quantification of migrated cancer cells in the chicken embryo model, which minimizes the time and effort required in this types of studies compared to conventional histopathological analysis. In conclusion, our investigation provides a new cancer metastasis model that can be further improved to include more complex aspects, such as the use of multiple cell lines and anti-metastatic agents, thus opening new horizons in cancer biology and pharmaceutical research.

Caveolin-1: a multifaceted driver of breast cancer progression and its application in clinical treatment

Human breast cancer is one of the most frequent cancer diseases and causes of death among female population worldwide. It appears at a high incidence and has a high malignancy, mortality, recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Caveolin-1 (Cav1) is the main component of caveolae and participates in various biological events. More and more experimental studies have shown that Cav1 plays a critical role in the progression of breast cancer including cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, invasion, migration and breast cancer metastasis. Besides, Cav1 has been found to be involved in chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy resistance, which are still the principal problems encountered in clinical breast cancer treatment. In addition, stromal Cav1 may be a potential indicator for breast cancer patients' prognosis. In the current review, we cover the state-of-the-art study, development and progress on Cav1 and breast cancer, altogether describing the role of Cav1 in breast cancer progression and application in clinical treatment, in the hope of providing a basis for further research and promoting CAV1 gene as a potential target to diagnose and treat aggressive breast cancers.

Apocrine lesions of the breast: part 2 of a two-part review. Invasive apocrine carcinoma, the molecular apocrine signature and utility of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of apocrine lesions of the breast

Pure apocrine carcinoma of the breast is rare and has been defined by using a combination of morphologic (apocrine morphology in >90% of tumour cells) and immunohistochemical criteria (oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative and androgen receptor (AR) positive). Recent advances in the molecular classification of breast tumours have uncovered a subset of breast tumours associated with high expression of androgen receptor mRNA including the so-called 'luminal androgen receptor (LAR) tumours' and 'molecular apocrine tumours' (MATs). Recognition of these tumour subsets has opened potential avenues for therapies exploiting the AR pathway in triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC). In this second part of our two-part review, we focus on the definition of pure apocrine carcinoma, recent advances in understanding the molecular apocrine signature in breast carcinoma, its relationship to pure apocrine carcinoma defined at the level of light microscopy and immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the therapeutic implications of androgen expression in TNBC. We complete the article with a summary of the utility of IHC in stratifying apocrine lesions of the breast.

Dose invasive apocrine adenocarcinoma has worse prognosis than invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: evidence from SEER database

Background

Invasive apocrine adenocarcinoma (AAC) of breast is a rare histopathological subtype of breast carcinomas. We aim to investigate the different characteristics and prognostic outcomes between AAC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of breast cancer.

RESULTS

AAC patients presented with older ages, more aggressive behaviors, lower ER and PR proportions, higher HER2 amplification rates and less application of breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy compared to IDC patients. Long-term OS and DSS were both worse in ACC patients (p = 0.006, p = 0.012 respectively) than in IDC patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, no significant difference was detected in DSS (p = 0.181) and OS (p = 0.116) between the matched two histological subtypes. Further subgroup analysis indicated that AJCC stage, ER status, PR status and HER2 status may be principal confounders for AAC prognosis.

Materials and Methods

With accession to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database, a total of 260,596 patients met the eligibility criteria. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between groups using Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Subgroup analyses summarized the hazard ratio (HR) of AAC versus IDC using a forest plot.

Conclusions

AAC had unique clinicopathological characteristics and it tended to be a more aggressive type than IDC. However, the worse prognosis was diminished after matching for demographic and clinicopathological factors. Deeper insights into AAC are in need to contribute to individualized and tailored therapy, which thereby may improve clinical management and outcomes.

Translational Genomics: Practical Applications of the Genomic Revolution in Breast Cancer

The genomic revolution has fundamentally changed our perception of breast cancer. It is now apparent from DNA-based massively parallel sequencing data that at the genomic level, every breast cancer is unique and shaped by the mutational processes to which it was exposed during its lifetime. More than 90 breast cancer driver genes have been identified as recurrently mutated, and many occur at low frequency across the breast cancer population. Certain cancer genes are associated with traditionally defined histologic subtypes, but genomic intertumoral heterogeneity exists even between cancers that appear the same under the microscope. Most breast cancers contain subclonal populations, many of which harbor driver alterations, and subclonal structure is typically remodeled over time, across metastasis and as a consequence of treatment interventions. Genomics is deepening our understanding of breast cancer biology, contributing to an accelerated phase of targeted drug development and providing insights into resistance mechanisms. Genomics is also providing tools necessary to deliver personalized cancer medicine, but a number of challenges must still be addressed. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); 2630-9. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in this CCR Focus section, "Breast Cancer Research: From Base Pairs to Populations."

Evaluation of the expression and clinical value of lncRNA AC010761.9 in human gastric adenocarcinoma

Background

The current study determined the expression and clinical value of lncRNA AC010761.9 in human gastric adenocarcinoma (GA).

Methods

Real-time quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR was used to detect the level of lncRNA expression in 145 GA tissues and three GA cell lines, and the correlation between its level and clinicopathologic characteristics and potential corresponding mRNA of TNF receptor-associated factor 4 gene (TRAF4) was then evaluated.

Results

Elevated lncRNA AC010761.9 was detected in all 6 GA tissues by previous lncRNA expression profile microarray assay. LncRNA AC010761.9 was over-expressed in 99 of 145 GA tissues (68.3%) with an elevated fold change of up to 35.14 compared to matched paracancerous tissues (p < 0.05), and was also over-expressed in the 3 GA cell lines (MGC803, BGC823, and SGC7901) compared to the normal gastric mucosal epithelial cell line (GES-1 cells; p < 0.05) by qRT-PCR. The elevated expression of this lncRNA was related to tumor size (p = 0.028), degree of differentiation (p = 0.047), and serum carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentrations (p = 0.026 and p = 0.037, respectively). Multivariate analysis further confirmed that the expression of lncRNA AC010761.9 was related to the degree of tumor differentiation (p = 0.015). Additionally, the expression of lncRNA AC010761.9 had a positive correlation with the mRNA expression of the potentially associated gene (TRAF4) in GA tissues (r = 0.385, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

LncRNA AC010761.9 may be linked to GA progression and is a potential new biomarker for GA.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-017-1289-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Salivary Duct Carcinoma and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: A Comparative Immunohistochemical Study

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a high-grade salivary gland malignancy with great morphological resemblance to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. Rarely, female patients may have a past history of both SDC and IDC. When these patients present with distant metastasis, accurate identification of the primary tumor is particularly difficult. Additionally, rare metastasis of SDC to the breast and IDC to the salivary (parotid) gland can also present a diagnostic challenge. Our aim was to develop an immunohistochemical panel that reliably distinguishes SDC from IDC. We included all SDCs diagnosed from 1989 to 2016 (23 cases) and 29 treatment naïve and histologically similar IDCs. All cases were stained with androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α), progesterone receptor (PR), HER-2, CK5/6, p63, and beta-catenin. The great majority (> 90%) of both SDCs and IDCs reacted positively to AR. The main discrepancy in the immunohistochemical profiles was a distinctly different reactivity to ER-α, PR and HER-2. While 28 IDCs (96.6%) reacted positively to ER-α and/or PR, the majority expressing both (82.8%) with a moderate to strong staining intensity, only 2 SDCs expressed ER-α (8.7%) and 5 others expressed PR (21.7%) with only one case expressing both (P value < 0.05). On the other hand, 8 SDC (34.8%) were positive for HER-2 while none of the IDCs were positive (P value < 0.05). ER-α, PR, and HER-2 may be helpful to distinguish SDC from IDC. Positive reactivity to ER-α, PR or both and negative HER-2 favors a diagnosis of IDC while ER-α, PR negative, HER-2 positive tumors are more likely SDC.

Racial disparity in breast cancer: can it be mattered for prognosis and therapy

Breast cancer (BC) has emerged as a deadly disease that affects the lives of millions of women worldwide. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Advancements in BC screening, preventive measures and treatment have resulted in significant decline in BC related deaths. However, unacceptable levels of racial disparity have been consistently reported, especially in African-American (AA) women compared to European American (EA). AA women go through worse prognosis, shorter survival time and higher mortality rates, despite higher cancer incidence reported in EA. These disparities are independent of socioeconomic status, access to healthcare or age, or even the stage of BC. Recent race-specific genetic and epigenetic studies have reported biological causes, which form the crux of this review. However, the developments are just the tip of the iceberg. Prioritizing primary research towards studying race-specific tumor microenvironment and biological composition of the host system in delineating the cause of these disparities is utmost necessary to ameliorate the disparity and design appropriate diagnosis/treatment regimen for AA women suffering from BC. In this review article, we discuss emerging trends and exciting discoveries that reveal how genetic/epigenetic circuitry contributed to racial disparity and discussed the strategies that may help in future therapeutic development.

Pure Apocrine Carcinomas Represent a Clinicopathologically Distinct Androgen Receptor-Positive Subset of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers

Apocrine carcinomas comprise ∼1% of all breast cancers and are characterized by large cells bearing abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm, round nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. They are typically estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 negative, making them unresponsive to typical hormonal or HER2-based chemotherapy. However, this subtype of triple-negative breast cancers expresses androgen receptor (AR), a feature not shared by most nonapocrine triple-negative cancers (NA-TNCs). AR therefore represents a potential diagnostic tool and therapeutic target for apocrine breast carcinoma. All pure apocrine carcinomas diagnosed during a 10-year period were reviewed, and clinicopathologic characteristics were compared with a control group of 26 NA-TNC cases. Twenty apocrine carcinomas were identified (∼0.8% of all breast cancers). The mean age at diagnosis was 69.3 years for apocrine carcinomas and 56.7 years for NA-TNC. All apocrine carcinomas and no NA-TNC were AR positive. The proportions of apocrine carcinoma grades varied, with G1 being seen in 15% of patients, G2 in 55%, and G3 in 30%. In contrast, 100% of NA-TNC cases were G3. The majority of apocrine carcinomas presented at low T stage (T1: 70%; T2: 20%; T3: 10%; T4: 0%), whereas NA-TNC cases more often presented at T2 or higher (T1: 46.2%; T2: 30.8%; T3: 11.5%; T4: 11.5%). Thirty percent of apocrine carcinomas and 30.8% of NA-TNCs had nodal metastases at presentation. Apocrine carcinomas had a favorable clinical prognosis, with 80% of patients showing no evidence of disease-related morbidity or mortality (mean follow-up: 45.2 mo). Pure apocrine carcinomas represent a clinicopathologically distinct subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer characterized by AR positivity. When compared with NA-TNC, apocrine carcinomas more often present in older women with lower grade and T stage, a group in which a more conservative treatment regimen is often desired.

Drug-screening and genomic analyses of HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines reveal predictors for treatment response

Background

Approximately 15%–20% of all diagnosed breast cancers are characterized by amplified and overexpressed HER2 (= ErbB2). These breast cancers are aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Although improvements in treatment have been achieved after the introduction of trastuzumab and lapatinib, many patients do not benefit from these drugs. Therefore, in-depth understanding of the mechanisms behind the treatment responses is essential to find alternative therapeutic strategies.

Materials and methods

Thirteen HER2 positive breast cancer cell lines were screened with 22 commercially available compounds, mainly targeting proteins in the ErbB2-signaling pathway, and molecular mechanisms related to treatment sensitivity were sought. Cell viability was measured, and treatment responses between the cell lines were compared. To search for response predictors and genomic and transcriptomic profiling, PIK3CA mutations and PTEN status were explored and molecular features associated with drug sensitivity sought.

Results

The cell lines were divided into three groups according to the growth-retarding effect induced by trastuzumab and lapatinib. Interestingly, two cell lines insensitive to trastuzumab (KPL4 and SUM190PT) showed sensitivity to an Akt1/2 kinase inhibitor. These cell lines had mutation in PIK3CA and loss of PTEN, suggesting an activated and druggable Akt-signaling pathway. Expression levels of five genes (CDC42, MAPK8, PLCG1, PTK6, and PAK6) were suggested as predictors for the Akt1/2 kinase-inhibitor response.

Conclusion

Targeting the Akt-signaling pathway shows promise in cell lines that do not respond to trastuzumab. In addition, our results indicate that several molecular features determine the growth-retarding effects induced by the drugs, suggesting that parameters other than HER2 amplification/expression should be included as markers for therapy decisions.

Apocrine carcinoma of the breast: A brief update on the molecular features and targetable biomarkers

Apocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare, primary breast cancer characterized by the apocrine morphology, estrogen receptor-negative and androgen receptor-positive profile with a frequent overexpression of Her-2/neu protein (~30%). Apart from the Her-2/neu target, advanced and/or metastatic apocrine carcinomas have limited treatment options. In this review, we briefly describe and discuss the molecular features and new theranostic biomarkers for this rare mammary malignancy. The importance of comprehensive profiling is highlighted due to synergistic and potentially antagonistic molecular events in the individual patients.

Androgen and breast cancer: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review is targeted at describing the advances in our understanding of androgen actions in the breast over the last 18 months. Androgens are current 'hot topics' in breast cancer because of their potential as therapeutics in situations where we currently do not have good clinical options. This is true for both estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) negative and ERα positive cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review has focused on examining associations between androgen receptor and patient prognosis and outcomes in different breast cancer subtypes. A logical extension of this is covering the timely topic of the use of androgen-directed therapy in these patients. The principle settings in which this is being considered is in ERα positive cancer with therapeutic resistance to ER-directed therapies and in ERα negative breast cancer that lack current standard targeted therapies. Finally interactions between mutations, and the potential role of androgen in the normal hierarchy of mammary cell differentiation and the relationship of this to cancer, are considered.

SUMMARY

Androgens are firmly established as important factors across multiple breast cancer subtypes. The future challenge for basic researchers and important development for clinicians is going to be translating this understanding into effective therapeutics for the benefit of breast cancer patients.

Screening of differentially expressed genes after silencing MCM7 in liver cancer cell line SMMC-7721

AIM: To explore the mechanisms of mini-chromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7) for regulating the growth of liver cancer cells.

METHODS: The expression of MCM7 gene in SMMC-7721 cells was silenced with small interfering RNA (siRNA). Human genome-wide expression profile chip was then employed to screen the differentially expressed genes, and bioinformatics analysis of the differentially expressed genes was performed. Finally, part of these differentially expressed genes were confirmed by Western blot assay.

RESULTS: In total there were 1010 genes that were differentially expressed in SMMC-7721 cells after the expression of MCM7 was silenced, including 391 up-regulated and 619 down-regulated ones. Bioinformatics analysis showed that these differentially expressed genes are involved in many cellular biological processes such as macromolecular metabolism, cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation regulation, apoptosis, endocytosis, P53 and mTOR signaling pathways. The down-regulation of CCND1, SKP2 and JUP was confirmed by Western blot, which was consistent with the results of the genome-wide expression profile chip.

CONCLUSION: The differentially expressed genes after silencing the gene MCM7 in liver cancer cells SMMC-7721 might provide some clues for understanding the mechanism by which MCM7 affects the growth of liver cancer cells.

Androgen deprivation by adrenal suppression using low-dose hydrocortisone for the treatment of breast carcinoma with apocrine features: a case report illustrating this new paradigm

We report on a postmenopausal patient with a secondary metastatic apocrine breast cancer successfully treated with low-dose hydrocortisone only following several lines of chemotherapy. The tumor cells in the primary and metastatic lesion exhibited a 'triple-negative' status (estrogen receptor (ER)-, progesterone receptor (PR)-, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative); the androgen receptor (AR) was strongly expressed. Twenty milligrams of hydrocortisone, a low substitution dose known to suppress adrenal steroid production, twice daily led to a clinical benefit lasting for one year, with symptom control, radiologically stable disease, and steady decrease in CA15.3. Our observation demonstrates that an AR-expressing apocrine breast cancer may respond to androgen deprivation, as an ER-positive breast cancer may benefit from estrogen deprivation. It highlights the importance of further research targeting the AR pathway in apocrine carcinoma, for which androgens represent the sole (known) steroid hormone stimulating tumor growth. Future clinical trials should not only focus on AR inhibitors like enzalutamide, but also on ablative modalities like low-dose hydrocortisone aiming at medical adrenalectomy. This method of androgen deprivation is largely available, cheap, and nearly devoid of toxicity.