The utility of CDX2, GATA3, and DOG1 in the diagnosis of testicular neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 109 cases

Primitive Embryonic-Type Neuroectodermal/Glandular Complexes in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Mimic of Embryonic-Type Neuroectodermal Tumor

Embryonic-type neuroectodermal elements are often intimately mixed with primitive endodermal-type glands, like those of yolk sac tumors, in germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS)-derived germ cell tumors of the testis. Because the primitive glands mimic tubules or rosettes of embryonic-type neuroectodermal elements, these embryonic-type neuroectodermal/glandular complexes may be misinterpreted as pure lesions of embryonic-type neuroectodermal elements, which, if of sufficient size, may lead to a diagnosis of embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor, despite that the criteria of the World Health Organization for a "somatic-type malignancy" are not met. A diagnosis of embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor in the testis may lead to retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy even in clinical stage I patients, and in postchemotherapy resections indicates a poor prognosis. The distinction of the neuroectodermal and glandular elements is not always straightforward based on morphology alone. We, therefore, studied 34 testis-derived germ cell tumors with embryonic-type neuroectodermal/glandular complexes and 2 purely glandular yolk sac tumors to characterize the immunophenotypes and determine an efficient immunohistochemical panel to aid in this differential. We found that GFAP, synaptophysin, and paired-like homeobox 2B (PHOX2B) expression was specific to embryonic-type neuroectodermal elements, although PHOX2B had poor sensitivity. In contrast, positive reactions with antibodies directed against AFP, villin, and CDX2 were specific for the glandular elements, although CDX2 had poor sensitivity. Other markers, including AE1/AE3 cytokeratin, SALL4, glypican 3, SOX2, SOX11, CD56, INSM1, and neurofilament, proved less helpful because of their nonspecificity and/or poor sensitivity. We conclude that the optimal immunohistochemical panel for distinguishing the components of embryonic-type neuroectodermal/glandular complexes includes stains for synaptophysin, GFAP, villin, and AFP.

Pathogenesis and pathobiology of testicular germ cell tumours: a view from a developmental biological perspective with guidelines for pathological diagnostics

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCT) are divided into three different subtypes (types I-III) regarding to their developmental origin, histological differences and molecular features. Type I GCT develop from disturbed primordial germ cells and most commonly occur in children and young adolescents, which is why they are referred to as prepubertal GCT. Type II GCT develop from a non-invasive germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) and show an isochromosome 12p (i12p) or gain of 12p material as a common and characteristic molecular alteration. Type III GCT originate from distorted postpubertal germ cells (e.g. spermatogonia) in adult patients and have changes on chromosome 9 with amplification of the DMRT1 gene. Type I GCT encompass prepubertal-type teratomas and yolk-sac tumours (YST). Type II GCT include seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, postpubertal-type teratoma and postpubertal-type YST. Types I and II GCT both show similar morphology, but are separated from each other by the detection of a GCNIS and an i12p in type II GCT. For type II GCT it is especially important to detect non-seminomatous elements, as these tumours have a worse biological behaviour and need a different treatment to seminomas. In contrast to types I and II GCT, type III tumours are equivalent to spermatocytic tumours and usually occur in elderly men, with few exceptions in young adults. The development of types I and II GCT seems to depend not upon driver mutations, but rather on changes in the epigenetic landscape. Furthermore, different pluripotency associated factors (e.g. OCT3/4, SOX2, SOX17) play a crucial role in GCT development and can be used as immunohistochemical markers allowing to distinguish the different subtypes from each other in morphologically challenging tissue specimens. Especially in metastatic sites, a morphological and immunohistochemical diagnostic algorithm is important to detect small subpopulations of each non-seminomatous GCT subtype, which are associated with a poorer prognosis and need a different treatment. Furthermore, primary extragonadal GCT of the retroperitoneum or mediastinum develop from misguided germ cells during embryonic development, and might be challenging to detect in small tissue biopsies due to their rarity at corresponding sites. This review article summarises the pathobiological and developmental aspects of the three different types of testicular GCT that can be helpful in the histopathological examination of tumour specimens by pathologists.

Primary germ cell tumours of the mediastinum: A review with emphasis on diagnostic challenges

This article will review current aspects of the histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of primary mediastinal germ cell tumours (PMGCTs) as well as their aetiological, epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic features. PMGCTs represent an important differential diagnosis in the spectrum of mediastinal tumours, and their diagnosis is usually made on small tissue samples from core needle biopsies in combination with diagnostic imaging and serum tumour markers. As in lymphomas, a small biopsy is often the only viable tumour sample available from these patients, as they receive chemotherapy prior to eventual surgical resection. Pathologists therefore need to apply an efficient combination of immunohistochemical markers to confirm the diagnosis of a PMGCT and to exclude morphological mimics.

The Application and Pitfalls of Immunohistochemical Markers in Challenging Diagnosis of Genitourinary Pathology

CONTEXT.—

The morphologic features of different entities in genitourinary pathology overlap, presenting a diagnostic challenge, especially when diagnostic materials are limited. Immunohistochemical markers are valuable when morphologic features alone are insufficient for definitive diagnosis. The World Health Organization classification of urinary and male genital tumors has been updated for 2022. An updated review of immunohistochemical markers for newly classified genitourinary neoplasms and their differential diagnosis is needed.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of genitourinary lesions in the kidney, bladder, prostate, and testis. We particularly emphasized difficult differential diagnosis and pitfalls in immunohistochemistry application and interpretation. New markers and new entities in the 2022 World Health Organization classifications of genitourinary tumors are reviewed. Recommended staining panels for commonly encountered difficult differential diagnoses and potential pitfalls are discussed.

DATA SOURCES.—

Review of current literature and our own experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of problematic lesions of the genitourinary tract. However, the immunostains must be carefully interpreted in the context of morphologic findings with a thorough knowledge of pitfalls and limitations.

Gene of the month: GATA3

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) is a zinc-finger pioneer transcription factor involved in diverse processes. GATA3 regulates gene expression through binding nucleosomal DNA and facilitating chromatin remodelling. Post-translational modifications modulate its activity. During development, GATA3 plays a key role in cell differentiation. Mutations in GATA3 are linked to breast and bladder cancer. GATA3 expression is a feature of the luminal subtype of bladder cancer and has implications for immune status and therapeutic response. It also has clinical relevance in squamous cell carcinomas and soft tissue sarcomas. This paper reviews the structure and function of GATA3, its role in cancer and its use and pitfalls as an immunohistochemical marker.

[Fundamentals in the pathology of testicular germ cell tumours]

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCT) represent the most common malignant neoplasia in young male adults between the age of 15 and 44. Because of their different biological behaviour it is important to differentiate prepubertal GCTs from postpubertal GCTs. This distinction is made by presence or absence of a germ cell neoplasia in situ. Histopathological diagnostics can be challenging due to different tumour subtypes and their different growth patterns. Therefore, knowledge of morphologic variants and immunohistochemical markers is important.

FoxA2 is a reliable marker for the diagnosis of yolk sac tumour postpubertal-type

AIMS

Yolk sac tumour postpubertal-type (YSTpt) shows a wide range of histological patterns and is challenging to diagnose. Recently, forkhead box transcription factor A2 (FoxA2) emerged as a driver of YSTpt formation and a promising marker for diagnosing YSTpt. However, FoxA2 has not been tested in the different patterns of YSTpt. This study aimed to assess the staining pattern of FoxA2 in te different patterns of YSTpt and other germ cell tumours of the testis (GCTT), comparing it with glypican-3 (GPC3) and α-fetoprotein (AFP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

FOXA2, GPC3 and AFP immunohistochemistry was performed on 24 YSTpt (24 microcystic/reticular, 10 myxoid, two macrocystic, five glandular/alveolar, two endodermal sinus/perivascular, four solid, two polyembryoma/embryoid body and two polyvesicular vitelline) and 81 other GCTT. The percentage of positive cells (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) and the intensity (0, 1, 2, 3) were evaluated regardless of and within each YSTpt pattern. FoxA2 was positive in all YSTpt (24 of 24) and all but one (23 of 24) exhibited 2+/3+ stain, with higher intensity [median value (mv): 2.6] than AFP (1.8) and GPC3 (2.5). Both FoxA2 and GPC3 were positive in all microcystic/reticular (24 of 24), myxoid (10 of 10), macrocystic (two of two), endodermal sinus/perivascular (four of four) and polyembryoma/embryoid body (two of two) patterns. Nevertheless, only FoxA2 was positive in all glandular/alveolar (five of five), solid (four of four) and polyvesicular vitelline (two of two) patterns. The intensity of FoxA2 was higher than AFP and GPC3 in almost all YST patterns. In the other GCTT, FoxA2 was positive only in teratoma postpubertal-type (Tpt) [13 of 20 (65%)], with staining almost exclusively confined to the mature gastrointestinal/respiratory tract epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS

FoxA2 is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker that supports the diagnosis of YSTpt. FoxA2 is superior to GPC3 and AFP, especially in rare and difficult-to-diagnose histological patterns of YSTpt, but mature glands of Tpt could represent a potential diagnostic pitfall.

DOG1 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms: Potential applications and diagnostic pitfalls

Neuroendocrine neoplasms represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors, more frequently arising from gastroenteropancreatic tract and lungs. At the time of diagnosis, 20% of cases are metastatic, and 10% of cases are considered as cancer of unknown primary origin. Several immunohistochemical markers are routinely used to confirm the neuroendocrine differentiation, first among all Synaptophysin and Chromogranin-A; on the other hand, different immunohistochemical markers are used to establish primary anatomical site, as TTF1, CDX2, Islet-1 and Calcitonin, but no marker is available in order to distinguish among different sites of the digestive tract. DOG1 (discovered on GIST-1) is a gene normally expressed in interstitial cells of Cajal and, in routine practice, DOG1 immunostaining is used in diagnosis of GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor). DOG1 expression has been described in several neoplasms other than GIST, both in mesenchymal and epithelial neoplasms. In the present study, DOG1 immunostaining has been performed in a large cohort of neuroendocrine neoplasms, including neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas, in order to evaluate frequency, intensity and pattern of expression in different anatomical site and in different tumor grade. DOG1 expression was detected in a large percentage of neuroendocrine tumors, with statistically significant association between DOG1 expression and gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors. As a consequence, DOG1 could be included in marker panel for the identification of primary site in neuroendocrine metastases of unknown primary origin; moreover, these results recommend careful evaluation of DOG1 expression in gastrointestinal neoplasms, in particular in differential diagnosis between epithelioid GIST and neuroendocrine tumors.

Genome-scale CRISPR screen reveals neddylation to contribute to cisplatin resistance of testicular germ cell tumours

BACKGROUND

Type II testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) are the most prevalent tumours in young men. Patients suffering from cisplatin-resistant TGCTs are facing very poor prognosis demanding novel therapeutic options. Neddylation is a known posttranslational modification mediating many important biological processes, including tumorigenesis. Overactivation of the neddylation pathway promotes carcinogenesis and tumour progression in various entities by inducing proteasomal degradation of tumour suppressors (e.g., p21, p27).

METHODS

We used a genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 activation screen to identify cisplatin resistance factors. TGCT cell lines were treated with the neddylation inhibitor (MLN4924)/cisplatin/combination and investigated for changes in viability (XTT assay), apoptosis/cell cycle (flow cytometry) as well as in the transcriptome (3'mRNA sequencing).

RESULTS

NAE1 overexpression was detected in cisplatin-resistant colonies from the CRISPR screen. Inhibition of neddylation using MLN4924 increased cisplatin cytotoxicity in TGCT cell lines and sensitised cisplatin-resistant cells towards cisplatin. Apoptosis, G2/M-phase cell cycle arrest, γH2A.X/P27 accumulation and mesoderm/endoderm differentiation were observed in TGCT cells, while fibroblast cells were unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified overactivation of neddylation as a factor for cisplatin resistance in TGCTs and highlighted the additive effect of NAE1 inhibition by MLN4924 in combination with cisplatin as a novel treatment option for TGCTs.

An update on diagnostic tissue-based biomarkers in testicular tumors

Testicular cancer is rare overall but comprises the most common solid malignancy diagnosed in young men aged ∼20-40 years. Most testicular neoplasms generally fall into 2 broad categories: germ cell tumors (GCTs; ∼95%) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs ∼5%). Given the relative rarity of these tumors, diagnostic biomarkers are highly relevant for their diagnosis. Over the past several decades, diagnostic biomarkers have improved dramatically through targeted immunohistochemical and molecular characterization. Despite these recent advances, most markers are not perfectly sensitive or entirely specific. Therefore, they need to be used in combination and interpreted in context. In this review, we summarize tissue-based biomarkers relevant to the pathologist, with a focus on practical diagnostic issues that relate to testicular GCT and SCST.

Role of GATA3 as a potential adjunct marker in the differential diagnosis of Paget’s disease of the nipple

Aims

Paget’s disease of the nipple (PDN) is a rare type of cancer of the nipple-areola complex. We examined GATA3 protein expression in PDN to determine its potential value as an adjunct marker in the differential diagnosis with other nipple lesions.

Methods and results

Chart review documented clinicopathological data. H&E slides were re-evaluated and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GATA3 was performed. Amongst 3614 breast cancer patients, 74 had PDN and 41 cases were selected for our study (mean age, 55 years). Amid PDN cases, 4 (10%) patients showed PDN alone, 22 (65%) had an underlying ductal carcinoma in situ and 15 (37%) had invasive breast carcinomas (IBC), including 11 invasive carcinoma of no special type, 2 lobular, 1 mucinous and 1 micropapillary carcinoma. Additionally, 9 cancers were classified as luminal B, 4 as HER2 overexpression and 2 as luminal A. GATA3 expression was detected in all 41 PDN cases and in all underlying cancers. Furthermore, IHC for S-100, HMB45 and Melan-A was performed in PDN-only, ensuing negative results. Positivity for cytokeratin 7 or AE1/AE3 was demonstrated in all cases and HER2 overexpression was seen in 2/4 lesions. GATA3 expression was noted in all lesions, including one CK7-negative case.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that GATA3 is consistently expressed in PDN. Although not entirely specific, positivity for GATA3 reinforces the non-melanocytic nature of PDN and its mammary origin, thus representing a potential adjunct tool for the diagnosis of PDN in tricky situations, particularly PDN variants or unusual lesions.

Utility of TRPS-1 immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology specimens

INTRODUCTION

At present, GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3) is the most frequently used diagnostic immunohistochemical (IHC) marker for breast carcinoma (BC). However, it is not specific and has very low sensitivity for triple-negative BC (TNBC). SRY-box transcription factor 10 (SOX-10) and trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS-1) have been suggested for inclusion in the diagnostic workup of TNBC. TRPS-1 has not been established in cytology specimens as a diagnostic IHC marker for metastatic BC (MBC). Hence, in the present study we evaluated the utility of TRPS-1 in diagnosing MBC in cytology specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MBC cases diagnosed on cytology specimens from January to October 2020 were included in the present study. Only cases with hormonal status available and ≥20 tumor cells on cell blocks were included in the study. The cell blocks were assessed for TRPS-1, GATA-3, and SOX-10 IHC marker positivity (intensity and percentage of tumor cells). The results were correlated with the specimen type (fine needle aspiration [FNA] versus body fluid) and various BC prognostic subgroups.

RESULTS

We analyzed 61 cases, including 33 body fluid and 28 FNA (13 lymph node, 10 bone, 2 liver, 2 soft tissue, and 1 lung) specimens. TRPS-1 had 97.2% positivity in ER/PR+ (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive) MBC compared with GATA-3, which had 100% positivity in the same group. TRPS-1 showed high positivity in 35 of 37 cases (94.6%) and intermediate positivity in 1 (2.6%) and was negative/low positive in 1 case (2.7%). In contrast, GATA-3 showed high positivity for all 37 cases (100%). SOX-10 showed positivity in only 1 of 37 cases (2.7%), with intermediate positivity. In the HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive) group, TRPS-1 showed high positivity in 5 of 7 cases (71.4%), intermediate positivity in 1 case (14.3%), and negativity in 1 case (14.3%). However, GATA-3 showed high positivity in 6 of 7 cases (85.7%) and negative/low positivity in 1 case (14.3%). SOX-10 was negative in all 7 cases. In TNBC, TRPS-1 showed high positivity in 16 of 17 cases (94%) and intermediate positivity in 1 (5.9%), and GATA-3 showed high positivity in 9 (53%), intermediate positivity in 2 (11.8%), and low positive/negative in 6 of the 17 cases (35.3%). TRPS-1 expression was significantly higher than GATA-3 expression for the number of positive cases (P = 0.07), mean percentage of positive tumor cells (P = 0.005), and intensity of reactivity (P = 0.005). SOX-10 expression was present in only 5 of 17 cases (29%), with a mean percentage of positivity in the tumor cells of 26.5% and intensity of 0.8. No differences were found in the IHC results between the different specimen types (FNA versus fluid) in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

TRPS-1 is a highly sensitive new diagnostic IHC marker for breast carcinoma, with a similar positivity rate in ER/PR+ and HER2+ BC compared with GATA-3 and a higher positivity rate than GATA-3 and SOX-10 in TNBC in cytology specimens. In particular, when only a few clusters of tumor cells are present on the cell block, TRPS-1 can be highly useful, because its mean percentage of positive tumor cells and intensity are higher than those of other IHC markers.

Role of GATA3 in tumor diagnosis: A review

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) belongs to a family of transcription factors comprising six members. These proteins identify G-A-T-A containing sequences in the target gene and bind to DNA target via two zinc-finger domains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of GATA3 in the diagnosis of tumors and its value as a prognostic marker. To perform this review, a comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases from 1985 to 2020. Articles were considered thoroughly by independent reviewers and data were extracted in predefined forms. Final synthesis was conducted by using appropriate data from included articles in each topic. Studies have shown that GATA3 has a critical role in the development of epithelial structures in both embryonic and adult tissues. The majority of studies regarding GATA3 expression in tumor evaluation focused on breast and urothelial neoplasms, whether primary or metastatic. Its sensitivity in these neoplasms has been reported to be high and made this marker more valuable than other available immunohistochemistry markers. However, GATA3 expression was not restricted to these tumors. Studies have shown that GATA3 immunostaining could be a useful tool in various tumors in kidney, salivary gland, endocrine system, hematopoietic system, and skin. GATA3 can also be used as a useful prognostic tool. Although GATA3 is a multi-specific immunohistochemical stain, it is a valuable marker in the panel for confirming many epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms as both a diagnostic and prognostic tool.

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumours: an immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic approach

AIMS

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumours (PMGCTs) are rare mediastinal neoplasms and their diagnosis can be challenging due to small biopsy samples. The aim of this study was to elaborate a diagnostic algorithm using immunohistochemical stainings with focus on novel markers and molecular analysis of isochromosome 12p [i(12p)].

METHODS AND RESULTS

Paraffin-embedded tissues of 32 mediastinal tumours were analysed using immunohistochemical stainings for SALL4, LIN28, OCT3/4, D2-40, CD117, SOX17, SOX2, CD30, ß-hCG, GATA3, FOXA2, GPC3, AFP, TdT, NUT and pan-cytokeratin. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to investigate i(12p) status. Fifteen seminomas, seven teratomas, one yolk sac tumour, one choriocarcinoma and seven mixed PMGCT were diagnosed. Each entity had different immunohistochemical staining patterns which helped to distinguish them: seminoma (OCT3/4, D2-40, CD117, TdT), embryonal carcinoma (OCT3/4, SOX2), yolk sac tumour (FOXA2, GPC3, AFP) and choriocarcinoma (ß-hCG, GATA3). Mature teratomas stained positive for pan-cytokeratin in epithelial components and focally for SALL4, SOX2, GATA3, D2-40 and FOXA2. Furthermore, a NUT carcinoma mimicking a PMGCT was diagnosed showing a strong nuclear SOX2 and speckled nuclear NUT staining. i(12p) was detected in 24 out of 27 PMGCTs [89%].

CONCLUSION

A diagnostic algorithm is of great importance for a reliable diagnosis of PMGCTs in the usually small tissue biopsy samples. Therefore, a combination of three to four antibodies to identify the correct histological subtype is usually necessary in addition to morphological features. The i(12p) status serves as an additional option to underline germ cell origin in selected cases.

Practical Application of Lineage-Specific Immunohistochemistry Markers: Transcription Factors (Sometimes) Behaving Badly

CONTEXT.—

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that regulate gene expression and control RNA transcription from DNA. Lineage-specific TFs have increasingly been used by pathologists to determine tumor lineage, especially in the setting of metastatic tumors of unknown primary, among other uses. With experience gathered from its daily application and increasing pitfalls reported from immunohistochemical studies, these often-touted highly specific TFs are not as reliable as once thought.

OBJECTIVES.—

To summarize the established roles of many of the commonly used TFs in clinical practice and to discuss known and potential sources for error (eg, false-positivity from cross-reactivity, aberrant, and overlap "lineage-specific" expression) in their application and interpretation.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and the authors' personal practice experience were used. Several examples selected from the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) are illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The application of TF diagnostic immunohistochemistry has enabled pathologists to better assess the lineage/origin of primary and metastatic tumors. However, the awareness of potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis.

DOG1 immunohistochemical staining of testicular biopsies is a reliable tool for objective assessment of infertility

Testicular biopsy may be a component of the work-up of male infertility. However, no reliable diagnostic tools are available for objective quantitative assessment of spermatogenic cells. It is well known that MAGE-A4 is selectively expressed in spermatogonia and our group has previously demonstrated that DOG1 differentially stains germ cells. Therefore, we performed DOG1 and a double stain cocktail (DOG1 and 57b murine monoclonal anti-MAGE-A4) immunohistochemical stains on 40 testicular infertility biopsies (10 each with active spermatogenesis, Sertoli cell-only, hypospermatogenesis, and maturation arrest), 25 benign seminiferous tubules from radical orchiectomies, and 5 spermatocytic tumors (ST). In biopsies/resections with active spermatogenesis, DOG1 stained spermatocytes and spermatids and was absent in spermatogonia, while MAGE-A4 stained spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes (weak). In hypospermatogenesis, DOG1 highlighted decreased spermatocytes/spermatids and MAGE-A4 highlighted decreased spermatogonia. DOG1 staining confirmed decreased to absent spermatocytes in maturation arrest and MAGE-A4 staining established the presence of preserved spermatogonia in all cases. All STs were negative for DOG1 and positive for MAGE-A4, while all Sertoli cell-only cases were negative for DOG1 and the double stain cocktail. In conclusion, we confirmed that DOG1 is expressed in spermatocytes and spermatids and MAGE-A4 highlights primarily spermatogonia. Usage of these stains facilitates confirmation of maturation arrest, assessment of the percentage of testis involvement in hypospermatogenesis and identification of mixed patterns. Finally, this study supports that the differentiation of STs is more closely related to spermatogonia than the more mature spermatocytes.

CDX2 immunostaining in primary and metastatic germ cell tumours of the testis

Objective To evaluate the immunohistochemical staining pattern of caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) protein in germ cell tumours (GCTs) of the testis. Methods This study reassessed archival tissue samples collected from patients diagnosed with primary and metastatic testicular GCTs for CDX2 immunoreactivity using standard immunohistochemical techniques. Positive nuclear immunostaining was evaluated with regard to both the staining intensity and the extent of the staining. Results Tissue sections from primary and metastatic testicular GCTs ( n = 104), germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNis) ( n = 5) and benign testicles ( n = 15) were analysed. The GCNis and benign testicular tissues showed no immunoreactivity for CDX2. Strong and diffuse staining of CDX2 was demonstrated only in the mature colonic epithelium of teratomas in both primary and metastatic GCTs. CDX2 positivity in other tumours (one pure yolk sac tumour, one yolk sac component of a mixed GCT and one pure seminoma) was infrequent, and was only weak and focal. Conclusions CDX2 immunostaining should be interpreted based on both the staining intensity and the extent of staining so as not to cause misdiagnosis. Teratomas with colonic-type epithelium should be considered in the differential diagnosis if a metastatic tumour with an unknown primary shows prominent CDX2 immunostaining.